Will participation in the mega-person require the death of the person I happen to have. I do not see Administration working for many of the peeps who see the logical process and adopt the position of Sole Authorized Administrator and Beneficiary. The removal/resignation of the person via a lien would seem to be the only true way to interact with the mega-person.
Yep, I have ALWAYS paid for PIERRE DAOUST, because I "believed" it was an OBLIGATION to do so.... :D
I had no idea I had a CHOICE :D ....well, sort of :/
Some corpses are worth more than others. While the accidental killing of a spouse, child, or other party who has enabled/benefited the corpse in question would be fucking hysterical, alas, we can only accept such corpses as a gratuity.
Great work as always Scott Duncan. The only question that arises after reading this is the last line, where you say" A Bank note does not tender surety". Forgive me, but wasn't this the basis of the argument between you and the "freeman on the land guy" who's name escapes me at the moment? Not Dean, the other guy. My understanding after reading all of that was by using money/ bank notes that we are accepting a binding tender for law? Please clarify any misunderstanding if you will.
Hey Pete Daoust, I did not say it does not work, it would seem for some administration returns only vitriol and a criminal breach of the trust, which as we all know is ignored and has zero remedy/accountability. other than to kill the person with a massive lien and use that instrument to issue credit via the Holding Company to the trust so the beneficiary can operate at full and proper capacity with the mega- person?