As the Law Times reported, Superior Court Justice Ian Nordheimer said Ritchie�s actions would leave an observer �with the distinct impression that that trial judge had predetermined the result of the � application, if not the likely outcome of the proceeding as a whole.� Remember that it is very important that no observer be given this impression, even though this is the REALITY, since it undermines the entire ACT, credibility of the system, and all the ACTors playing in it.
Justice Ian Nordheimer is actually the last of the Old School Justice reformers.
Look at his rulings. He WILL NOT cage someone for a commercial "offense". He's almost one of the "good guys".
He's also a secret fan of Your's Truly. ;)
[Clarification: The guy who said Richie was per-determining the outcome.]
Toronto constitutional lawyer Rocco Galati is out of date there are no Judges there are only Justices or else I've read the Admiral wrong and if so please forgive me.
Why do you say "Toronto constitutional lawyer Rocco Galati is out of date" Gerry? The term "judge" appears to be used very loosely, maybe deliberately so but this from the Ontario Courts website (even the URL includes the term "judges") http://www.ontariocourts.ca/scj/judges/current/judges/
"Toronto constitutional lawyer Rocco Galati" in my opinion is out of date when he refers to justices as judges as according to the Admiral (I feel a peeper peeping and I hope he doesn't come out and cause a shit stain) there are no judges only justices; forgive me if I'm wrong folks. but why would a lawyer call a justice a judge?
And like he says (the Admiral) lawyers are agents OF The law Society, so they would be all for keeping up appearances. I'm going to be keel hauled now. I just know it.
"Out of date" seems to be a poor choice of words to me. The provincial courts website I included only lists judges. We know better but does this mean the province is "out of date" too? Or do they know the difference and just fail/do not care about making the distinction?
I would say that seeing it is only the like of you and me they are preaching to (all of them being in the know) they couldn't give a fiddlers. i agree though my choice of words is poor, it comes with the territory, I'm only about a degree of longitude from where the queen resides and I still haven't grasped the tongue.
I have a book here called "the Canadian Legal System" written by a sack of shit liar, Gerald L. Gall, third edition, (you think that after the first 2 he would get it right) and in the foreword, written by another sack of shit "Justice of the Supreme Court of Canada, Charles D Gonthier, he uses the word "JUDGE" and "JUDGES" exclusively when referring to the cross dresser on the bench and then quotes Justice when referring to a specific sack of shit. This trend is carried on through out this club house doctrine.
Chapter nine: The Role of Judges and Lawyers.
JUDGES: 1 The appointment of Judges
2 The removal of Judges.
Linguistically Deceptive, indeed.
These fucking Liars should have a facebook page dedicated to them and how to fuck them up! The reason we need an international kick a lawyer in the groin and then stomp their fucking heads till they stop moving. Or something similar.