Eamonn O Brien

Jul 14, 2014 1:25 PM
You can do whatever you want as long as the receiving party doesn't rebut :p


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Jul 14, 2014 1:25 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Anibal Jose Baez

Jul 14, 2014 1:29 PM
Admiral Scott, I wish to have an answer. I have some thoughts on this myself.


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Jul 14, 2014 1:29 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Anibal Jose Baez

Jul 14, 2014 1:32 PM
Or, if this is a stupid question, please let me know.


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Jul 14, 2014 1:32 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Pete Daoust

Jul 14, 2014 1:44 PM
I really think, a Sole Authorized Administrator gives INSTRUCTIONS, and as long as these instructions are LEGAL, the trustee who receives these instructions has no other choice to make sure these instructions are fulfilled. That's how I see it, but ya know me ? :D


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Jul 14, 2014 1:44 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Anibal Jose Baez

Jul 14, 2014 1:48 PM
That is how I see it too. I can only instruct TRUSTEES. Express my wishes by giving INSTRUCTIONS. But I want to hear the Admiral's response.


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Jul 14, 2014 1:48 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Pete Daoust

Jul 14, 2014 1:49 PM
Ok, so lets wait for Scott's answer :)


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Jul 14, 2014 1:49 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Anibal Jose Baez

Jul 14, 2014 1:53 PM
Evidently, TRUSTEES SUCK at following INSTRUCTIONS nowadays.


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Jul 14, 2014 1:53 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Pete Daoust

Jul 14, 2014 2:07 PM
:D


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Jul 14, 2014 2:07 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Ceit Butler

Jul 14, 2014 2:27 PM
It will be sometime after lunch.


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Jul 14, 2014 2:27 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Scott Duncan

Jul 14, 2014 4:10 PM
ADMINISTRATOR=AGENT in that capacity. Yes, Max.


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Jul 14, 2014 4:10 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Anibal Jose Baez

Jul 14, 2014 4:29 PM
Thank you for answering my question, Admiral Scott. So to be clear, if the Administrator has the TRUTH, and has acted in honour, and has PROOF to support this, he can VOID and/or NOT ACCEPT an ILLEGAL order and/or sentence from an unauthorized administrator, and proceed to make a new order and/or sentence, and attach an affirmation attesting to the TRUTH?


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Jul 14, 2014 4:29 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Jo Xappie

Jul 14, 2014 6:14 PM
Demand to see the ORIGINAL INSTRUMENT and then endorse it to settle the matter.


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Jul 14, 2014 6:14 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Jo Xappie

Jul 14, 2014 6:14 PM
a la Pete Daoust


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Jul 14, 2014 6:14 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


David Johansen

Jul 14, 2014 7:33 PM
i think thats what chris did at one point...


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Jul 14, 2014 7:33 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Chris Evan

Jul 14, 2014 7:34 PM
I did that! I was told "we don't accept BCs here for payment"


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Jul 14, 2014 7:34 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


David Johansen

Jul 14, 2014 7:36 PM
yes, i know, i think this is why we need to possey up and find a few more men to join the ranks, and create a corporation, for the endowment of the 'fuck you, your a you society'...


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Jul 14, 2014 7:36 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


David Johansen

Jul 14, 2014 7:39 PM
dismiss the presumption some of us ever agreed to be GOVERNED (consent) and charge the U.S. with theft of property, lien that company for all its worth... i know i'm just ranting....


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Jul 14, 2014 7:39 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Pete Daoust

Jul 14, 2014 7:49 PM
Of course they don't accept Birth Certificates for PAYMENT, there is NO fucking PAYMENT, the Birth Certificates is PROOF of the surety's existence, so they can access CREDIT for these fucking charges, and/or public debts.... :/


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Jul 14, 2014 7:49 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Chris Evan

Jul 14, 2014 7:52 PM
Ha...I was standing in a box with handcuffs on. Apparently the Kourt didn't think it was proof of who the surety was either


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Jul 14, 2014 7:52 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Pete Daoust

Jul 14, 2014 7:52 PM
When you SHOW, and/or GIVE them that fucking Birth Certificate, you are telling them: HEY, trustee, here is the PROOF of the FUCKING surety, now, tell me WHERE the fuck I have to SIGN, for YOU to access this CREDIT, and discharge these stupid shit public debts, and/or CHARGES......fuck.... ?


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Jul 14, 2014 7:52 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Chris Evan

Jul 14, 2014 7:53 PM
FFS....I have done that a bunch of fucking times!!!!


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Jul 14, 2014 7:53 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Pete Daoust

Jul 14, 2014 7:53 PM
I know, you're a SLAVE, that was said publicly :P


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Jul 14, 2014 7:53 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Chris Evan

Jul 14, 2014 7:53 PM
Actually, I am preparing MORE of those now!


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Jul 14, 2014 7:53 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Pete Daoust

Jul 14, 2014 7:55 PM
Ouuffff....sorry, I just had a tantrum... :(


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Jul 14, 2014 7:55 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


David Johansen

Jul 15, 2014 8:25 PM
Ohh pierrre, i like that. HEY TRUSTEE... Hey that's a double sided Tshirt, the front says: YOUR the TRUSTEE, and the back says: NO. FUCK YOU! YOU'RE THE TRUSTEE... Thanks Pete (constructive criticizm accepted and syntax corrected)


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Jul 15, 2014 8:25 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Pete Daoust

Jul 15, 2014 8:27 PM
*You're :P


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Jul 15, 2014 8:27 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Ceit Butler

Jul 15, 2014 8:36 PM
You missed one. :p


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Jul 15, 2014 8:36 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Pete Daoust

Jul 15, 2014 8:37 PM
LOL :D


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Jul 15, 2014 8:37 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


David Johansen

Jul 15, 2014 11:18 PM
i left the front that way intentionally, it serves a dual purpose.


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Jul 15, 2014 11:18 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Ceit Butler

Jul 15, 2014 11:27 PM
The "dual purpose", being?


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Jul 15, 2014 11:27 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Pete Daoust

Jul 15, 2014 11:29 PM
Please no !! :-D


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Jul 15, 2014 11:29 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Ceit Butler

Jul 15, 2014 11:30 PM
So, the front states that YOU are the trustee belonging to the reader( "your" being possessive, and the reader of the shirt being the subject), and the back then argues that no, the reader is the trustee? I'm confused. :p


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Jul 15, 2014 11:30 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post: