The fact that they don't starve (because they are paid with money taken by force, from others) deludes them into thinking "governing" is their "RIGHT".
...this sanctimonious cunt is the result. She is just more public about it.
Throughout the proceeding, Schulte, dressed in a T-shirt and jeans, repeatedly leaned back in his chair and stroked his goatee contemplatively.
POUHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!! :D
So....what exactly does one do when the ENTIRE state is seemingly opposing him? What does one do when everyone around is too fucking scared (even though they know something is wrong) to even 'like' a facebook comment?
This is what that article did....OSTRACIZED ME. It scared the living fuck out of anyone whose awareness was raised....now what?
In Ireland they would normally knock the less "troublesome" offences off the list and just stick the one on. Once they get some money out of you. Happened my mate. 7 charges, all dropped but one once he agreed to be surety...
hahah...in jail, they have a habeus corpus form. IT MEANS BRING ME TO A COURT I DEFAULTED ON THAT YOU DON'T KNOW ABOUT. People here are fucking dumb. They don't even know what a Habeus Corpus is!
They have a "Habeus Corpus" form in jails here. It does not mean what you think it does. To them, it means "I want to go cede jurisdiction to this court ASAP".
And of course there is this hypocrisy....
http://mycredit.dnb.com/search/?busName=Commonwealth+of+Massachusetts&address=&city=&state=MA&zip=&country=US&searchType=heroSearch&dunsLookup=1
17 entities called the Commonwealth of Massachusetts (on the conservative side). These people will not tell me which is bringing the charges.
Scott, this is one of the major issues, is it not?
Address hate mail to
Courts reporter Julie Manganis can be reached at 978-338-2521, via email at jmanganis@salemnews.com or on Twitter @SNJulieManganis.
I say BILL THEM send them a damn INVOICE fuck them. Lien the fucking court file. Hit them where it hurts their pockets. Commercial liens are effective really quickly. Do you know this process Chris. Maybe go the court house and ask for the judges service bond information. And a copy of his oath. Fuck them. AFFIRM that they are causing you HARM! AFFIRM that the NAME is property of a TRUST. Affirm anything and everything you KNOW is TRUE. Commercial lien affects credit scores immediately no more credit fuckos. And fuck them so push that shit , lien ALL thier PROPERTY you can take everything except pictures and dishes I think. And oh yea FUCK THOSE hired thugs and fuck men that "dress up" in black dresses and fuck them. Did I mention FUCK THEM!!!!!
well, when you started court that day did you reserve all rights? did you state you were there by special appearance, for the question of jurisdictional proof verification? did you OBJECT to anything they said?
did you bring a LIST of rebuttals to everything they could say?
my gut feeling is that althou you know quite a lot you were not well enough prepared.
You can clearly see an organized movement from all judiciary, law enforcement, and media to squash anyone not going along with the "making the lines for the trains" thing.
chris, did you by chance quote any pre 1933 cases that declare a man has the right to travel. and sinse you know of what for no other reason, that at the time of said alleged offence occuring any licencing would not have been applicable?
Just like that hot-chick in the bikini sunbathing while wearing her colostomy-bag went viral and had other people sharing the same secret, we need to get a hot-chick wearing a t-shirt that reads - "My parents sold me into slavery when they registered me for a Birth Certificate - and so did YOURS"....Kawni?
Hey Scott... There are some magicians in Australia that discharged a $134'407.40 bill of exchange for that Santos astrotheology bloke :/
I'm wondering if its black magic :D ...thoughts please ;)
The man acts as accommodation party, supra protest the bill using with lawful money, but in LEGAL world, that debt is still pending. There is some unbalanced ledger, somewhere.
"Jeremy Richard" has the secrets behind Bonacci's success. He does not want to share it, yet. He drops in "clues." He is waiting to rub it on Scott's face.
Is your intention sharing about Law and Money, or you are looking to try to "humiliate" Scott with Bonacci's "success"? :/ Why don't you say what you know?
I can pictire Adam, addressing the court,
COURT, are you telling me that, as a MAN, I can't supra protest a debt sent to my person and PAY that debt with LAWFUL money ? :-D
Scott is probably rushing to give you his "thoughts on why this thing works so well." Just stand-by here waiting.
You say to KNOW Adam, so much that you saw him a few days ago, he cannot explain to you the "final pieces of the jigsaw puzzle," so you write to Scott (You NEVER participate here) to have his thoughts on this "thing", that you do not understand, but seems to "work so well." ?
Seems legit.
"Scott, you were talking shit about Bonacci, and the buck-o-crack. Guess what? He "won"! What you have to say about that, pal ;) ?" That is how I read Jeremy Richard's comments. He is not here sharing anything. He is here to provoke, not to learn, or share anything.
Well if that is the truth Maxi then I'll be in the ocean shortly.
I'm not joking when I say I'm a Aussie dumbfuck.
Forgive my shitstains and the inability to share what I'm still myself trying to piece together.
Thanks for all that the man & woman has shared in this group... Gratitude :D
Wait, don't go! Scott is probably typing "his thoughts," as we speak ! He will probably be devastated if you are not around by the time he finishes.
:D
Wow! You guys have been busy. No worries mate, no hug required Jeremy Richard. Seeing as you didn't find my play on the word oxyMORON funny proves the point he he he. :D Just some CANADIAN humour which we have plenty to spare. Remember we have Russel Peters ;) I must admit AussieMORON was good too Mackximus Minimus lol!
I mean, let's think about this. Who is this Jeremy Richard? He has been a member of this group for OVER A YEAR! And he has rarely appeared here.
All of the sudden, he appears from exile, asking Scott his thoughts about Santos Bonacci's "win." He is friends with Adam Thomas, praises the buck-o-five welfare method, yet does not have all the "pieces to the puzzle" (Whatever that is), and says NOTHING about what happened, and how it happened. Then leaves again.
So I am not arbitrarily bashing Jeremy, I have reason to think he just showed-up to provoke Scott. Like that is going to work.
No, I want you to stay waiting for Scott's "thoughts." He probably will not forgive himself if he misses the opportunity of sharing his "thoughts" with a complete stranger, that has never participated in the group.