I am new so thanks for the patience, please correct me if I am mistaken...
Refused for cause and consideration is a conditional acceptance requiring cause for receiving the presentment. Is that correct, maybe close?
If someone requires "money" or "obligation" from you, where is the valuable consideration? There must be consideration. Herein you are refusing (dishonour) to pay but it must be done within 72 hrs. Get the post office to stamp the ticket and send registered mail back.
My dad was really surprised when I got two tickets dismissed a couple years ago. I explained to him that their office is inundated with so much paperwork, that can be to one's advantage, and they will dismiss just so they don't have to deal with it; not worth the hassle etc.
Especially since most just consent and bend over for their courts and judges.
I dunno, realistically you are sending it back requiring proof of cause (same thing). Instead of going down there and arguing... I couldn't be bothered.
in THEIR CODE, it says bla, bla, bla.... So you must be PRESUMED working for "them = those fucking guys and their fucking codes" unless you rebut that.
Of course, but the employees (at least the ones I have dealt with) do not even comprehend that truth. They just see that you are required a piece of plastic with a picture on it (permission) to go from point A to point B.
Basically, I do not do "anything" to attract attention - not out of fear, but because I really just don't want to be bothered. I have too much stuff to do; it is an inconvenience.
Beverly, I am still learning this stuff. I have not even gotten half way through the information here. Before I was introduced to this "gathering", I had already found (on my own) that some stuff I had learned was either incorrect or half-correct, which is just as bad.
As I get through one document or thread, a new thread is posted and I get off course, even though the information in that thread is useful and relevant. Just trying to get through this as quickly as possible, but I wish to be thorough.
its all SURETY AND ACCOUNTING... "not for hire" will do nothing for you if you don't understand what The Tender for Law (Legal Tender) actually is.
THIS IS THE BOTTOM LINE.
That is a strength of mine. I am in no rush, as much as I do NOT like "where I am" at the moment. Fortunately, I was never someone to do "stupid shit" and "get in trouble", but I want to get all of this figured out, so that I am PREPARED, just in case some folks wish to contract with "me" (well, mostly the PERSON).
Did you catch the reference on Hitler BONDING his soldiers, and as they were killed, it would pay out... So then he BONDED the prisoners so when they were killed, it would pay out?
This is where BONDING people started. Now look at your birth certificate and check the stats on the men/women in jail in the U.S. per capita...
Let that sink in...
That �right there is why Scott is "such an asshole". This all goes on, and continues and NOBODY EVEN SEES IT?
And when things get hard, everyone "prays to gawd" so things will get better?
We've all been fucking LAZY is all that is... And now, when we FINALLY DECIDED TO CARE... there's so much to learn and we're so programmed to not think...
Shameful really.
I would like to access the article and documents about Hitler bonding the prisoners etc. - have to research that.
I've been sharing with folks that the Military Industrial Complex has "insurance" on all soldiers, so when they die, the corporation gets the "money" not the families of the deceased. Of course, I only heard it as hearsay, and did not actually view an authentic document confirming this, but it did not surprise me. And now that you have shared some stuff Beverly, my gut was probably correct.
Hell! There was a documentary about Wal-Mart insuring their employees and collected on them. Some mother of 3 died before she was 30 of an asthma attack and her hublet found out they collected HUGE on that...
Crap, I did not become aware of this "stuff" until just three years ago. I've been trying to share the truth with students, who will be most impacted, but so many are distracted and/or living "paycheck to paycheck".
Fortunately, friends and family do not see me as "too crazy". Note, I was already odd, so that is to my advantage. Some are "watching", observing me to see if I will be able to avoid being thrown in a cage for my "theories" or whatever derogatory term they like to label me with.
Heck, I filed my own divorce papers. I just wanted to get rid of that contract, especially after I figured out what it really was. Everyone else seems to think they had to pay an attorney to do such stuff. Ouch.
Oh yeah Beverly, that would go over real well. Most of them really don't care. Even my dad admits that he is comfortable "where he is at". As most here know, you can not make someone do the correct thing.
Scott, I think H Julian Spyer went to bed. Great Beverly, now you got me thinking (not good) about those policies; I don't think a company would allow that, would they?
I had considered selling my own life insurance policy a couple years ago, but changed my mind; my gut was telling me that that may not be the most smartest thing to do.
Nah, I was pulling Sue here just to bug her about the HEN shit... You see there's a Hen (laying eggs) a Rooster (cock) and then what the fuck is a chicken? A dead not-hen? So what came first? Chicken or the egg? Well the Hen laid an egg, which became a chicken? Might have become a hen...
That story does NOT HAVE a bottom line.
Scott's articles actually do.
Haha! We settle this....here ya go:
In the UK and Ireland adult male chickens over the age of 12 months are primarily known as cocks, whereas in America, Australia and Canada they are more commonly called roosters. Males less than 1 year old are cockerels.[7] Castrated roosters are called capons (surgical and chemical castration are now illegal in some parts of the world). Females over a year old are known as hens and younger females as pullets[8] although in the egg-laying industry, a pullet becomes a hen when she begins to lay eggs at 16 to 20 weeks of age. In Australia and New Zealand (also sometimes in Britain), there is a generic term chook /?t??k/ to describe all ages and both sexes.[9] The young are called chicks and the meat is called chicken.
"Chicken" originally referred to chicks, not the species itself. The species as a whole was then called domestic fowl, or just fowl. This use of "chicken" survives in the phrase "Hen and Chickens", sometimes used as a British public house or theatre name, and to name groups of one large and many small rocks or islands in the sea (see for example Hen and Chicken Islands).
In the Deep South of the United States chickens are also referred to by the slang term yardbird.[10]