Scott Duncan

Jul 01, 2014 12:25 AM
This isn't an attack. His reasoning is sound. He just forgets that they are ignoring their own clubhouse rules. In the 80's and 90's I tried my cases PRO SE because EVERYONE STUCK TO THE RULES (With notable exceptions). The courts had VALUE for your PERSON, as it did for MONEY. It doesn't now. Mistake and Fraud can't enter the record unresolved. PERIOD. NOTICE OF MISTAKE is designed to GET YOU OUT OF SURETY, not "seek justice". The goal is to detach and damage. Not "win". He's thinking he can win a rigged game. He's presuming the Administrators are impartial. They aren't. That not an attack, that's a guy with sound reasoning... and a BELIEF that there are "magic good courts" that will rule honestly (there aren't). LIEN THEM PERSONALLY? That'd work How does he plan to get their FULL NAME ADDRESS AND DATE OF BIRTH? You think they just hand that shit out? There's a MISTAKE all right. He's making it. :P


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Jul 01, 2014 12:25 AM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


CJ ML

Jul 01, 2014 12:32 AM
So, you are saying that going after the individuals like a DA in personal capacity, is a mistake?


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Jul 01, 2014 12:32 AM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Scott Duncan

Jul 01, 2014 12:33 AM
Not if you can get that information. You CAN'T


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Jul 01, 2014 12:33 AM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


CJ ML

Jul 01, 2014 12:33 AM
Property records. Local property tax accessors.


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Jul 01, 2014 12:33 AM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Stuart Stone

Jul 01, 2014 12:48 AM
But there IS a mistake...by my own ignorance (ignorance of the law is no excuse), that I believed I was the name. It is a mistake that was made by ME, and it needs to be corrected...once corrected, then any further interaction from 'THEM' would most likely fall under the category of 'Demands with menaces' which is found in Section 138 of the Criminal Code Act 1995 Australia Administrative zone clubhouse rulebook: 138.1 Unwarranted demand with menaces (1) For the purposes of this Part, a person (the first person) makes an unwarranted demand with menaces of another person if, and only if: (a) the first person makes a demand with menaces of the other person; and (b) the first person does not believe that he or she has reasonable grounds for making the demand; and (c) the first person does not reasonably believe that the use of the menaces is a proper means of reinforcing the demand. (2) This Part applies to a demand whether or not it is for property. (3) This Part applies to a demand with menaces, whether or not the menaces relate to conduct to be engaged in by the person making the demand. 138.2 Menaces (1) For the purposes of this Part, menaces includes: (a) a threat (whether express or implied) of conduct that is detrimental or unpleasant to another person; or (b) a general threat of detrimental or unpleasant conduct that is implied because of the status, office or position of the maker of the threat. Threat against an individual (2) For the purposes of this Part, a threat against an individual is taken not to be menaces unless: (a) both: (i) the threat would be likely to cause the individual to act unwillingly; and (ii) the maker of the threat is aware of the vulnerability of the individual to the threat; or (b) the threat would be likely to cause a person of normal stability and courage to act unwillingly. 'Ignorance of the law is no excuse' then becomes a double edged sword :D


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Jul 01, 2014 12:48 AM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Isaiah Whitney

Jul 01, 2014 12:54 AM
Different approach then? Seems the way we're taught here is the simplest most effective. I just don't understand these guys with the Karl Lentz approach.


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Jul 01, 2014 12:54 AM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Scott Duncan

Jul 01, 2014 1:06 AM
You look at the "exhaust" of the Free-dumb Guru "Industry". Karl Lentz doesn't give a shit if everyone gets it or not. He got paid. Even if he gives away 90% of his "sales" there is enough to sustain him, or he wouldn't be asking for money. The fact that he "succeeded" on his own, in the PAST, does not mean the courts conduct themselves the same way NOW. For me it ended when I saw my transcript edited to say "I understood". As far as AQUILAE is concerned, EVERYBODY who signed a document in that case (except the "respondents") has forfeited ALL rights! ...and I will NEVER accept that they are a court of competent jurisdiction, EVER again. ...Carl Lentz doesn't care. He will still think what he sells is true. Reality has no bearing. Those that PAY him, make an investment. That's why they do it. Reality will show different. The sad reality is that the time to pick up a gun and organize, is NOW, and most still think Jesus will fix it.


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Jul 01, 2014 1:06 AM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


CJ ML

Jul 01, 2014 1:10 AM
I'm game!!! I enjoy tracking things down and killing them. But, after some entertaining scientific experimentation.


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Jul 01, 2014 1:10 AM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


CJ ML

Jul 01, 2014 1:12 AM
This looks like a very entertaining experiment for elected officials: http://www.abc.net.au/science/articles/2010/04/07/2866275.htm


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Jul 01, 2014 1:12 AM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Isaiah Whitney

Jul 01, 2014 1:22 AM
I used to itch for the the fight in my early 20's but I now know that war isn't glorious and I don't want it. That said it seems inevitable. I look forward to this new way you've spoken about should I survive!


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Jul 01, 2014 1:22 AM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


David-Paul Sip

Jul 01, 2014 2:24 AM
What I learned from Karl Lentz is the meaning of the words they use in court. Karl Lentz likes to say that what he teaches is "so fucking simple it's scary". Of all the research I have done (before TTFL of course) his information is the most practical and yes even simple to a degree. For example he talks about FLIPPING the court, moving to COMMON LAW jurisdiction and PROSECUTING the PROSECUTER. You must really know what you are doing and how to counter their trickery. There is not much room for error in my view. You must also be willing to play their game and dance with them in court. Why? I have zero interest in getting that close to anyone that means me harm.


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Jul 01, 2014 2:24 AM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


CJ ML

Jul 01, 2014 2:51 AM
The becoming of a "super plaintiff"?


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Jul 01, 2014 2:51 AM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Chris Evan

Jul 01, 2014 4:30 PM
"Mistake and Fraud can't enter the record unresolved." In Essex County, it seems as though it can. Both have been brought into Kourt and both are left unresolved....


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Jul 01, 2014 4:30 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Maximus Legis

Jul 01, 2014 5:14 PM
It seems in the past where one was educated in Law and able to stand on that knowledge the courts would beat a hasty retreat. Now it seems they are willing to commit fraud on fraud because there are more with the knowledge standing fast and they simply can't/wont have that lest it spread like wildfire.


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Jul 01, 2014 5:14 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Maximus Legis

Jul 01, 2014 5:16 PM
You can almost hear them whisper "Get the bigger stick, this fucker is on to us and his buddies are watching!"


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Jul 01, 2014 5:16 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Chris Evan

Jul 01, 2014 5:18 PM
Actually Jason, I am pretty sure that Breach of the Public Trust is still punishable by a hanging in a Public Square. I have seen no evidence to the contrary. :-D


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Jul 01, 2014 5:18 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


CJ ML

Jul 01, 2014 5:20 PM
I really LOVE the idea of the guillotine... It's so French Revolution!!!!! The Irony....


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Jul 01, 2014 5:20 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Chris Evan

Jul 01, 2014 5:20 PM
Scott mentioned to me once, I think on the phone, that the Notice of Mistake hasn't worked in the past in Slaveachusetts. He didn't state why ....


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Jul 01, 2014 5:20 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


CJ ML

Jul 01, 2014 5:21 PM
Commonwealth?


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Jul 01, 2014 5:21 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Chris Evan

Jul 01, 2014 5:22 PM
Also, I saw some mention of the War of 1812 when I was gone...what did the British attack??? The HOLDER of the LEGAL TITLES. They also needed to remove the original 13th amendment to gain access to the rights to the LEGAL TITLES. It was a DEFAULT!!


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Jul 01, 2014 5:22 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Chris Evan

Jul 01, 2014 5:23 PM
What exactly does COMMONWEALTH have to do with LAW? Mackximus, you are in a COMMONWEALTH territory, correct?


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Jul 01, 2014 5:23 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


CJ ML

Jul 01, 2014 5:24 PM
This is always interesting: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KwciUVLdSPk


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Jul 01, 2014 5:24 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Chris Evan

Jul 01, 2014 5:34 PM
That was about Chapter 2 in the Fraud that has been perpetrated on us


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Jul 01, 2014 5:34 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Maximus Legis

Jul 01, 2014 5:35 PM
^^^Commonwealth= All the countries Queen Elizabeth owns :-(


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Jul 01, 2014 5:35 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Chris Evan

Jul 01, 2014 5:36 PM
So the Queen owns Slaveachusetts? :-/


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Jul 01, 2014 5:36 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Chris Evan

Jul 01, 2014 5:37 PM
and Virgina, Puerto Rico, and a couple others that no one cares about. :-P


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Jul 01, 2014 5:37 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Maximus Legis

Jul 01, 2014 5:38 PM
I don't know all of the Commonwealth constituents but it's another name for British Empire..


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Jul 01, 2014 5:38 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Maximus Legis

Jul 01, 2014 5:39 PM
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commonwealth_of_Nations


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Jul 01, 2014 5:39 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Chris Evan

Jul 01, 2014 5:41 PM
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts is a TRUST HOLDING CORPORATION....but there are 22 REGISTERED entities using that name on Dunn and Bradstreet. I have no idea which one is bringing the charges....


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Jul 01, 2014 5:41 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


CJ ML

Jul 01, 2014 5:42 PM
Ask them for their EIN.


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Jul 01, 2014 5:42 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Chris Evan

Jul 01, 2014 5:43 PM
Oh....I have. On one of these cases (after they denied my rights earlier), I sent an 8 page Affidavit in Negative Averment form looking for clarification on the accuser. No response....


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Jul 01, 2014 5:43 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Chris Evan

Jul 01, 2014 5:44 PM
Tax purposes.....this is a good idea. So....they are trying to steal the rights to the Security of my Person with the idea that they will create some new debts. What are the Tax Forms they are required to fill out for such purposes?


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Jul 01, 2014 5:44 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Maximus Legis

Jul 01, 2014 5:45 PM
Ask them which one they are if they wish to do business with you the are obliged to identify themselves. Maxim: Know with whom it is you are dealing. (paraphrased)


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Jul 01, 2014 5:45 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Chris Evan

Jul 01, 2014 5:46 PM
I did! I have asked every question you can think of more than once ON THE RECORD to establish some facts....They don't think that they are required to answer me


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Jul 01, 2014 5:46 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Chris Evan

Jul 01, 2014 5:46 PM
I think it is a 705 or 707 form....But a 1099-MISC for income for sure


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Jul 01, 2014 5:46 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Chris Evan

Jul 01, 2014 5:46 PM
I heard Winston discuss it once


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Jul 01, 2014 5:46 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Chris Evan

Jul 01, 2014 5:47 PM
All are equal under the law!


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Jul 01, 2014 5:47 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Maximus Legis

Jul 01, 2014 5:49 PM
^ They are basically ignoring you with severe contempt, surprise surprise. No due process of Law, only Force !


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Jul 01, 2014 5:49 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Scott Duncan

Apr 29, 2015 10:43 PM
I remember this shit. :D "Make a CLAIM" to the MAGIC GOOD COURTS! :D


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Apr 29, 2015 10:43 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Pete Daoust

Apr 30, 2015 2:09 AM
Missed that one too, fuck, July 2014 was a busy month for the Administrator :D


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Apr 30, 2015 2:09 AM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Chris Evan

Apr 30, 2015 2:10 AM
I was treated like a slave that month. They actually decalred this


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Apr 30, 2015 2:10 AM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Pete Daoust

Apr 30, 2015 2:16 AM
Fuck, I just had this pink chair crossing my mind, for no reasons :/ Ceit, could you post that pink chair please :(


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Apr 30, 2015 2:16 AM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Ceit Butler

Apr 30, 2015 2:44 AM


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Apr 30, 2015 2:44 AM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Pete Daoust

Apr 30, 2015 2:45 AM
Hhaaaa !!!! :D


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Apr 30, 2015 2:45 AM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Ceit Butler

Apr 30, 2015 2:46 AM


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Apr 30, 2015 2:46 AM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Chris Evan

Apr 30, 2015 2:47 AM
Revenue Canada runs your Customs up there?


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Apr 30, 2015 2:47 AM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Chris Evan

Apr 30, 2015 2:48 AM
My brain is smoking with this information.


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Apr 30, 2015 2:48 AM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Scott Duncan

Apr 30, 2015 2:48 AM
IRS runs yours! They use "Homeland Security" to do it! :D


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Apr 30, 2015 2:48 AM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Chris Evan

Apr 30, 2015 2:49 AM
Yes. I just got that


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Apr 30, 2015 2:49 AM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Chris Evan

Apr 30, 2015 2:49 AM
All they have to offer is accounting. I missed this point


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Apr 30, 2015 2:49 AM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Pete Daoust

Apr 30, 2015 2:50 AM
Your brain is smoked since I know you, no surprise here :P


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Apr 30, 2015 2:50 AM
Type of Post:
Place of Post: