The Tender For Law

Volume 6

Jun 28, 2014 1:57 AM

Read Comments

Howard Posehn

I gave him some bait for you Pete: 2 seconds ago+Troll for Truth Freedumber extraordinary with an illiterate Wettstein side kick monkey. You two imbeciles have something in common with Menard. The only thing that surpasses the ignorance of you three is your expansive stupidity.

Ceit Butler

Oh yeah, and Menard has a "mole", but shhhhhhh... Apparently it's a really big secret. As if none of us have considered that out of the 563 members, perhaps some of the 540-ish that don't ever speak are spying for one purpose or another. That's just crazy talk!

Howard Posehn

"Pete Daoust: What the fuck do they want ?" Knowledge. They been regurgitating the same bullshit over the past 7 years. If they could just come up with a "real money" script of some new material, this time the truth, well, what would that be worth too Menard. He could get off the peanut butter and back to steak.

Will Lawful Man

Pete Daoust and Ceit Butler, sooner or later, 'lurkers' will learn the nature of what Scott Duncan teaches. I would think that is a more important focus than a temporary frustration due to the ignorance of a man and/or woman.

Scott Duncan

Lawful Man remains anonymous without hostile intent, just like MOST of the lurkers here.

Those with idiotic numbers of subscribed groups probably only read a fraction of what is here. (seriously, If you subscribe to 300 groups, you are NOT reading ANY of them, really.)

Anonymous communication is actually RARELY hostile, which is why you REALLY notice it when they are.

The thing you have to know about those trolls is that it is THEY that have the "psychological disorder" they keep labeling others with. If you are telling the truth, you don't need to hide. People like "Troll for Truth" are schizophrenic inasmuch as they tend to brag about their "multiple personalities" that they create for...

...well they don't have a REASON. They seek attention, and look for coattails to ride, because they have no real purpose or identity. They don't make/do anything with the little knowledge and/or skill they have.

Do you REALLY think "troll for truth" actually gives a shit about TRUTH? Robert Menard? Or ME for that matter?

Anonymous accusations are ALWAYS an attempt to social-engineer others to hostile action, so they can get others to do what they want done, and then run away with the "they did it, not me" attitude. This gives them the illusion of "control".

People like myself, who DON'T hide, and actually teach others (at no cost) are who, people like "troll for truth" kind, hate the most. They hate that I'm not manipulating and/or brainwashing anyone.

So they accuse me of it.

It's all they know, so in their head, it MUST just be an act, on my part. ANY other possibility eludes them.

They hate that I actually DID something with my life, and they didn't. It's impossible, in their minds, that I could POSSIBLY be what I say, so they accuse me of lying.

I've run into this shit since the days of the dial-up BBS. The things I get accused of "lying" about are, at first, the real things (Navy, Corporations, etc), until reality proves them wrong... then they just make shit up.

Tara Duncan has actually read postings that said she doesn't exist and is a figment of my imagination... usually because the author of such idiocy, can't believe such an incredible woman exists. Even the sack of shit, Menard is forced to acknowledge what an extraordinary woman she is.

For SIX MONTHS I let that accusation go unanswered. I let people who actually knew us, provide the refutation... Those people were accused of being "fake accounts" and "blind followers" (Sound Familiar?), but eventually reality catches up on its own. No effort is required.

Then they get confused as to why she spends her life with ME, in MY little empire... because they have constructed so many lies about me, they can't see anything else. Their construct is REAL to them, and they never notice that their construct is made up by their own trolling.

REALITY DOESN'T CARE. Neither should you.

Here in REALITY, Menard's revenue stream is threatened, so the half-truths, and lies of ommission, that they usually post, are mutating into outright lies. The desperation is almost palpable! :D

I don't promote this group (or the several others that you probably don't know about), nor do I "invite" people here. EVERY ONE OF YOU came of your own volition with NO prompting from me. I'm not making bullshit videos about people, and everything I DO write is first-hand knowledge/testimony.

I do not hide the fact that this group serves my agenda. The trolls say that's a bad thing (like hiding it is FAR more ethical), and squawk about it constantly. I don't really hide WHAT that agenda is... and people are building their own banks here! (Notice they NEVER mention that?) If you get freedom through knowledge and understanding, does it really matter what my agenda is? REALLY?

...yet they will squawk words like "cult member" and "blind follower" when you try to defend your position. Don't bother. Reality doesn't care, and neither should you. Those of you who haven't rocketed ahead, like Pete Daoust should learn from him...just like I intended. That's the ONLY price I ask; SHOW OTHERS, using KNOWLEDGE and UNDERSTANDING.

THAT IS my agenda. SERVE IT! DON'T LEAVE PEOPLE BEHIND.

If you get a HUGE reward from what I teach, TEACH OTHERS, like a good little simu-drone. ;)

http://youtu.be/6TAWFML2544

Scott Duncan

True. Just remember, there are a lot of "good" christians and islamists who think you should be killed, just because you tell the truth. These "good" people won't even consider they are lied to, and will defend that lie to the death.

That is what the MAJORITY thinks...and they ALL lie about it.

Chip Douglas

"These "good" people won't even consider they are lied to, and will defend that lie to the death.

That is what the MAJORITY thinks...and they ALL lie about it."

...think i just figured out what "The MAJORITY is ALWAYS WRONG," really means here

CJ ML

hanged vs. hung Actually, contrary to what people might think, �hanged� is perfectly acceptable as a proper past-tense form of �hang� � when referring to deaths, that is. Merriam-Webster says: For both transitive and intransitive senses 1b the past and past participle hung, as well as hanged, is standard. Hanged is most appropriate for official executions <he was to be hanged, cut down whilst still alive�and his bowels torn out � Louis Allen> but hung is also used <gave orders that she should be hung � Peter Quennell>. Hung is more appropriate for less formal hangings <by morning I�ll be hung in effigy � Ronald Reagan>.