Blocked from what? Just tell me "where" on FB, and I can get access to whatever it is (most of the time).

Blocked from his Facebook account. All I did was ask him two questions once, first interaction ever, and he immediately blocked me. :D

This one? https://www.facebook.com/robert.menard.52?fref=ts

Yep.

What type of attachment (description of any sort)?

Something about Legal Tender, so probably a recent post of his.

This one? : Robert Menard 3 hours ago � Edited "peanut butter' is not the same as 'peanut' + 'butter'. There is NO BUTTER in peanut butter. "Peanut butter" is ONE concept. 'Legal Tender' is not the same as 'legal' + 'tender'. 'Legal tender' is ONE concept. Some may find that hard to grasp. 1 ShareLikeLike � � Share 21 people like this. Peter William Lount Distinctions are important, some much more than others. Peanut butter is butter only in the sense of both it and butter being creamy. Oh, there is that milk again. Darn. English, damn you. 3 hours ago � Edited � Like � 2 Diane Kitchell I do grasp but do not put a choke hold on it 2 hours ago � Like John Bergman It makes perfectly good sense when you de-construct the two words. However,together on a slice of toast--yummy yummy for the tummy!! The analogy is well-put. Keep it up. 2 hours ago � Like � 2 Sovereign Psam I don't wish to barter over the meanings of these words. 30 minutes ago � Like Albert Porter So, there's no legal in legal tender? 3 minutes ago � Like

Possibly, but you'd have to ask Bruno Hiller to be sure, as he was the one trying to post it. Being blocked and all, I'm not sure what else is there. :p

But you have to admit, it's a compelling argument! "Legal Tender" is NOT a "Tender For Law" cuz...Peanut Butter. :/

Oh. If he is attempting to post something on Robert's wall, oh well. I thought maybe there was something on Robert's wall that you (or Bruno) may have wanted to share HERE.

Why would he block anybody? Let's "suppose" for a moment he is correct about everything he speaks about and shares, like peanut butter being different from peanut - butter, why would he deny people the truth? I don't block anyone unless they are completely useless government shill agents of fraud.

For a variety of reasons (too many to list). < not that any of these would satisfy your question. I got blocked by LB Bork; all I did was incorporate some harmless humor in one of his threads, and maybe show non-judgement toward those who disagreed with his "national status" theory.

And Bork is all about his "book", selling it etc. - I had the resources to give away free copies of his book, so after he blocked and removed me, I assumed he didn't want my "business" anymore. So, ironically, his actions cost him. I don't expend any energy figuring out "people" and their subjective agendas. If I see quality information (not misinformation), that's all I am interested in. If the "person" exhibits "odd" behavior or habits of some sort, I really can care less... whatever floats your boat. All I want is the truth. If I develop meaning relationships (in private) with others, awesome; bonus.

Yes, it was something from Rob's wall. Since I am blocked, the post showed up as "Attachment Unavailable", so I'm unaware of what said-post contained. Also, since I am blocked, I'm not sure what the available options are from Rob's wall and cannot verify if that was indeed the post in question. :p

Ha! It appears my head is back on "The Ban Block", only this time it's on Youtube, for...wait for it...being a "Grammar Nazi" :D Rob Menard: "Hey Jezabelle, I see what you are doing, trying to shift the topic away from the actual topic, and trying to focus on someone's fucking grammar. Thus in your mind, you may discount or dismiss them, for their failings in that small regard. Yet you still have not answered the question, you are trying so hard to avoid. Anecdotes aside, what steps did you take to verify the claim that the words 'legal tender'o a note indicate not a payment but an offer to contract? DID YOU TAKE ANY STEPS AT ALL? Be warned, your derisiveness and grammar nazi tactics will not be tolerated much more. You will be banned,and then you will strut around like you won, when all you will have done was prove yourself incapable of rational discourse. What steps? Can I see proof? Or do we just accept it as true because Scooty said so and you have an anecdote about some other time where he may or may not have been the agent of the courts actions." Me: "My "grammar nazi tactics will not be tolerated much longer"? Is it really so fucking unreasonable to expect someone to communicate in an articulate and concise manner? Hell, I'd settle for merely intelligible at this point! If you feel that is a ban-worthy quality, then by all means, drop the hammer, big guy. It's bad enough that everything this buffoon writes is virtually unrecognizable as being written in the English language, then he has the nerve to insinuate that the mental deficit is a failing on my part. That sort of stupidity is ONLY worthy of ridicule and contempt. You want to learn about the "Tender for Law" that is money? Learn WHAT money is. I've spent the last year and a half on this, I'm certainly not about to do YOUR work for you." And the cause of all this silliness: The often illegible, ALWAYS unintelligible stylings of butt-hurt, former TTFL member: Jason Wettstein: "you are a cunt statement and fact the end. Einstein and Hemingway both with at least as bad grammar, punctuation and spelling as me. Hemingway's writing at least I can confirm I know his family personally. What is amusing to me is someone that as smart as you is spending so much time arguing and communicating with...as you said... "types like an autistic 4 year old who is banging his face on the keyboard whilst in the throes of an epileptic seizure, commenting on MY intelligence." Spelling, Grammar and Literacy have nothing to do with intelligence. The fact that an illiterate like me that is also a grad 8 dropout has 3 million hits a week on his pages for his thoughts and ideas as poorly written as they may be says something. Just like you professing I am an illiterate autistic child and then spewing all this gibberish that has no consequence on my ability to communicate. Just like Scott and his laws he is a slave to you are a slave to yours if you are so hung up on the spelling and structure that the message is lost on your anal mind no concern of mine. I only post for other illiterates afraid to speak because grammar nazzis and indoctrinated fools like you should be outed Its actually a common trait amongst people of high IQ that act of monotony and redundancy makes us cringe whereas the act of monotony is where you excel the box folding mind often excels in school and institutional environments most often only good a criticising grammar and repetitive jobs like banking, waitressing and the likes.... Job like you have.. Your mind is the perfect slave mind you hate the animals on the other side of the fence and bark at the one that want to leave the farm you are dogs STUPID beaten dogs"