The Tender For Law

Volume 6

Jun 27, 2014 2:32 AM

Scott Duncan

Javier Alfredo Villela submitted the following, VERBATIM. Since I don't want this post Lammi-fied (because there is GOING to be ridicule), I am posting this as Copypasta.

****begin copypasta*****

STATE OF IN THE DISTRICT COURT FOR COUNTY STATE OF Nevada V. YOU Case No. ___________________ LETTER ROGATORY FOR RELIEF Under the Hague Convention Title 18 �1781 I, John Doe, Executor for the JOHN DOE cestui que trust, to notice the Court of my Letter Rogatory to the YOUR COUNTY DISTRICT COURT, and demand my name be cleared of this alleged criminal case for the reasons set forth below: 1) I, John Doe, have learned that this alleged Court that has scheduled a case/cause/claim against me is not really a court as per the Constitution of the United States, but rather a tribunal operated as a private corporation. 2) I have learned of the fraud that goes on behind the scenes of these alleged criminal case , which are really civil claims in equity, and the steps taken to securitize these civil claims, without giving full disclosure to the people. I am hereby letting the court know that I am opting out of any contract and do not allow any documents regarding me or my cestui que trust to be securitized and sold to any investors etc. 3) The fraudulent process is as follows: All cases are civil, though often fraudulently called criminal. The courts are operating under trust law, assuming the Defendant is a decedent. After finding the alleged Defendant guilty, the court clerks sell the judgments to the Federal Courts. Since the Defendant is a decedent, the court officials consider themselves as a beneficiary. 4) When a judge asks if a person understands, he/she is asking if the person is liable for the bond. I am not responsible for the bond of this/these cases, but I will appoint the Judge as Trustee/Fiduciary and be the beneficiary of all proceeds. 5) The judgments are stamped with something to the effect of Pay To The Order Of__on the back and taken to the federal discount window. The judgment now becomes a note. 6) The notes are then pooled together and then become securities, which are yet pooled together and sold as bonds. 7) Said bonds are liens against me. 8) The United States Attorney�s Office has a put code number, NAICS (North American Identification Security Classification. Said NAICS number enables the United States Attorney�s Office to trade globally all securities. 9) All US federal courts are registered with the DOD (Department of Defense), where they are registered with CCR (Contractor�s Central Registration), under the DOD, which another department called DLIS (Defense Logistics Information Service), which issues a cage code, which means a commercial and government entity, which everything corresponds with their bank account. 10) Said United States Attorney�s Office and Courts have a Dunn�s number (Dunn & Bradstreet). 11) Everything filed into court is securitized without the knowledge or consent of the people or of all parties. 12) All criminal cases not heard in an Article 3 court (District Court of the United States) are really civil, however, the courts again commit fraud by labeling the case as criminal. All cases which are plead out or have a guilty conviction label the civil defendant (through unlawful conversion) as felons, when they are not. This is fraud upon the people at large, and certainly fraud upon the alleged Defendants. 13) The Bank Account is at Federal Reserve Bank of New York, in New York City. The Depository Agreement is signed by the Clerk of Court. 14) All securities are then deposited with the DTC in New York. 15) An Escrow Agent is used as a go-between - between the Clerk�s Office and the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. 16) The securities end up being listed through the Seventh Circuit (Chicago, IL), then sent to the DTCC, the clearinghouse whom lists the securities for trading. 17) All of the lawyers involved are acting a private debt collectors according to the FDCPA (Title 15�1692). The BAR Association exempts them from having to be registered as such; however, they operate through call warrants, which are like a put, or a call. Doing margin calls is where they convert a case through (similar to a Writ of Execution) use the case number to buy equity securities. 18) Everything filed into court is securitized and turned into negotiable instruments, and then turning them into securities. These items are sold commercial items, calling them distress debts (Unifund). The items are then pooled together in what is now called a hedge fund, where they are sold globally. 19) Anytime when there is risk management involved, it is for the securities. This is an underwriting company. When the hedge funds are going into the global market, they go through LuerHermes, a bond holder and underwriting company and subdivision of Alliance SE, of Munich ,Germany (Pimco Bonds). 20) After 9 months, all paper is converted to a securities status. This is defined in Title 15�77(a)(b)(1) and an now considered to be an investment contract. The paper is endorsed to become a security, and the trust is then collapsed. 21) The courts have an account with the IMF (International Monetary Fund) under Interpol. The Judges involved and the US Attorneys involved do not have an accessible Oath of Office , because they cover up the fact that the oath of office is between them and the IMF. 22) The US Judges and US Attorneys are actually employees of the IMF and have expatriated out of the United States. They are now unregistered foreign agents under Title 22, which states all foreign agents must be registered. 23) The court judgments are deposited with the IMF. Since this case obviously involves me, I have a drawing right to all proceeds. See UCC �3-305 and �3-306. The court judgments are monopolized according to Title 16, which is a violation of anti-trust laws, and also unfair trade practices. 24) Indictments are True Bills, meaning they are negotiable instruments. The District Attorney failed to give me a 1099 OID showing me as the recipient of the funds, which is a fraud upon me. In my case, I have not been indicted, but still request a 1099 OID, unless the court wishes to close this account. 25) The unlawful funds, through fraud and deception, are deposited in the Federal Reserve Bank of New York and they have not paid the tax on this income. According to the IRC, this is a �7201 of Title 26 violation (willful failure to file with the intent to evade the tax). 26) A copy of the Depository Resolution Agreement was not made available to me from the Clerk of Court. The Clerk of Court makes deposits into the Federal Reserve Bank of New York via electronic funds transfers (EFT�s). 27) The Clerk has a PMIA (Private Money Investment Account) is, which also has a government code. According to Clerks Praxis, the Clerk of the US District Court is the Registrar in Admiralty. 28) According to the IRS �6209 Decoding Manual and the ADP (Automated Data Processing Manual), all 1099�s are Class 5 gift and estate taxes. I am asking for a 1099 OID in this case, as I am not willing to gift you the proceeds. I am hereby asking for the proceeds in their entirety, including interest. 29) I have never pledged my rights or my body to any gifting program, including any court or court process. 30) I am not a charitable organization. I demand all funds from the cases (current and past cases) be sent to me within 30 days or I will file complaints to the IRS and SEC explaining the fraud and theft committed upon me, and issue a 1099 OID. 31) I demand my name and my cestui que trust name, John Doe/John S. Doe/John Smart Doe/ JOHNDOE/JOHN S. DOE/JOHN SMART DOE be removed from any and all government databases indicating bad credit, commercial liens and/or the titles of criminal, felon and/or convicted felon be removed immediately and permanently nunc pro tunc. 32) I hereby request a copy of the Depository Resolution Agreement from the Clerk of Court. And a W-9 from the Judge and the US Attorney involved, if you wish to proceed with this case. 33) I hereby notice the Court that I am the executor of the cestui que trust of JOHN DOE/JOHNSMART DOE. According to Title 26 �303 & �7701, companies, corporations, and associations and trusts are all decedents. This means my all capital letter name is a legal estate. My all capital letter name falls into this class. I direct all of the affairs and financial affairs of JOHNDOE/ JOHN S. DOE /JOHN SMART DOE. 34) I demand this case/account be closed and no further steps taken to securitize it. 35) I hereby ask the Court to notify local agents and agencies to put me on a do not disturb list so we do not have to go through this again. 36) I am confident that the Court and its officers want to follow the law, and perhaps were unaware of the processes of civil and criminal cases. 37) I expect no further harassment from rogue unregistered foreign agents. LETTER ROGATORY FOR RELIEF presented this the ____ day of ________, 2014. (_____Signature________________________) Authorized Representative : John Smart Doe Mail checks and correspondence to: PO Box Las vegas, Nevada 12345

*****end copypasta****

****BEGIN WITTY INSIGHTFUL CRITIQUE*****

Read Comments

Anibal Jose Baez

My tenth insightful critique: if you choose to administrate this matter at court (and do not have a private trust), your capacity must be of SOLE AUTHORIZED ADMINISTRATOR for the LEGAL NAME. Anything other than that CAPACITY, may put you in a vulnerable position, like presumed surety.

Mike Lamb

Another thread I will probably copy and save into a file. I appreciate it. Before coming here, I was aware of "some" stuff (anytime I see or hear any reference to the "constitution", the hair on my neck stood up - to me, a red flag), but as I gradually get through the info here, I am realizing that some of my previous communication(s) may have to be re-done/re-written. Not the first time I've done stuff incorrectly. Just as long as I don't make the same freakin' mistakes, it's all good.

Anibal Jose Baez

Michael Lamb II, and all the newbies, if not acting completely under a private trust, the SOLE AUTHORIZED ADMINISTRATOR is the other most reasonable position to assume. Do not label yourself anything else. OK?

If all it's surety, and accounting, as the SOLE AUTHORIZED ADMINISTRATOR: we can't be surety, we have PROOF of who is surety, we know were the surety is, we know what to give in consideration to settle the accounting, we know how to give instructions via notices to administrate all this.

Got it?

Mike Lamb

Got it. Some of us are "not quite there" yet. I've always had the proper mindset (all of it makes sense to me), but that is useless if you can't APPLY it into your public and private affairs. That trust thing is critical, but my studies and knowledge on TRUSTS is zip. Hopefully, I can catch up with you'all... after a couple years (preferably sooner).

Will Bed

Read AND - unlike that "I, ignorant Registered Agent of Her Majesty" - ASK QUESTIONS ! ALWAYS negate UNDERSTANDING ESPECIALLY if you believe you UNDERSTAND AND until you can PROVE what you say because you speak FACTS ! You'll learn much faster that way !

Believing you know something may be comfortable but SURE IS DANGEROUS. (See Original Post - this kind of freedumb bullshit is a ticket to benchwarming a seat in a cage)

David Johansen

there is very little we have that is original thought, if any. YOU blended eloquently aswell as drew out just enough that some of the 'new' attendees might start to crack out of a shell layer of brainwashing freemannery.

except Javier Alfredo Villela. he will still fight the argument. he wasted too much effort writing. he BELIEVES too much hogwash truth.

Scott Duncan

You will also piss me off.

People who attribute documents where they changed the words to sound "cooler/smarter" than me, deserve to rot in a cage.

I choose the words I do for a REASON, and NONE of you are qualified to write a shopping list, muchess a Legal Document.

David Johansen

i think that's why i couldn't get past 4), because i said (to myself as it caught up with me) that there were atleast 2 if not more un-relative things being overlapped within the composition. (is it a notice AND a dorogatory, plus whatelse?) and then i had convulsions.

Mike Lamb

Kent, in response to your comment (8 hrs ago), I have no intention of "changing" anything that is shared here by Scott. You are correct, I should have looked up that particular word. Why I am so cautious now and researching everything is because I have discovered that I have been using certain words incorrectly. So, since I am aware of those errors, I will now choose to correct my mistakes. I may be ignorant and my lawful use of words/terms sucks, but I am very receptive to constructive feedback and acting upon it. Probably why I have not been put in a "cage".

J.P. Alexander

There is a formula to writing a legal document. I don't just mean STYLE but content as well. Scott is a computer scientists. He's showing you the rules at play. What you do with them is on you. THAT'S WHY!

Michael Atkins

Free dumber proves he doesn't know shit and shit and makes a fool of himself on the public record and further causes detriment to anyone trying to remove joinder from themselves and no longer live under threat of violence

Scott Duncan

LETTER ROGATORY are for COURTS of different jurisdiction.

Pro Se Defendants may OFFER FOR APPEAL any EVIDENCE they choose. This REQUIRES the court to INCLUDE a LETTER ROGATORY, to have the APPEALS court ACCEPT it from their jurisdiction.

This creates JOINDER between SURETIES. It has NOTHING to do with you, and unless you find yourself ACTING as a JUDGE in a COURT, a 'LETTER ROGATORY' should never enter into your life.