The Tender For Law

Volume 6

Jun 26, 2014 8:52 PM

Read Comments

Pete Daoust

I have these....

Accepted by: (in black) Bank of Canada (in black) See back for endorsement (in red) Bill of Exchange Act (in black) Account number 26X-XXX-XXX (in black) Inscription number 1196604XXXXXX (in black) Date: ________ (in black) VOID (in red)

:P

David-Paul Sip

Sorry Capitain I didn't know you had been blocked by that IDIOT. People like that deserve to remain CHILDREN of the state.

Pete Daoust said I can't comment in the other thread, this idiot blocked me

But yes, these are the rubber stamps I have...

Here are the stamps that you suggested in another thread: Accepted by: (in black) Bank of Canada (in black) See back for endorsement (in red) Bill of Exchange Act (in black) Account number 26X-XXX-XXX (in black) Inscription number 1196604XXXXXX (in black) Date: ________ (in black) VOID (in red)

David-Paul Sip

Pete Daoust said:

I can't comment on that thread, Jason Moreland.....here in Quebec, the person has an INSCRIPTION number.....you guys I think it's a REGISTRATION number....

Every corporation also has an INSCRIPTION number, here in Quebec, instead of starting with 119, it starts with 116....

Janick Paquette

The Inscription number here in Quebec startes with 119 unless you were born in the years 2000. Then it would be 120.

ex: Inscription # 11975045214

1 = one person 1975 = year of birth 04 = Qu�bec 5214 = number on the Live Birth Record

Lee Edgely

I used VOID on the TV Licence NOTICE once, I think it confused the feck out of them. It took them two months to get back to me, when they did I asked for the BILL, I have never heard from them again. That was about four months ago.

David-Paul Sip

At least it's summer Capitaine Pete :) Btw I have been curious so may as well just come out and ask. I get that you're taken name is Pierre or Pete. But when you were in court why would the QRA want PiERRE DAOUST and not JOSEPH PIERRE GILLES DAOUST. I have missed something. :/

Pete Daoust

There is the name DAOUST.

There is the person's name, which is PIERRE DAOUST.

There is the beneficiary's name, which can be Pierre, Joseph and Gilles ( I took Pierre)

There is the male declarant's name, which is FATHER DAOUST.

There is the female declarant's name, which is MOTHER DAOUST

There is the SURETY signatory's name, which is BRUNO BERNIER.

Pete Daoust

So David-Paul Sip....

The DRAWER of that BILL is: MOTHER AND FATHER DAOUST (persons)

The DRAWEE of that BILL is: BRUNO BERNIER (The State)

The BENEFICIARY of the BILL is: Joseph Pierre Gilles (The human)

:D HAHAHAHAHA!!!!

David-Paul Sip

I had asked this in the Jason Lerato stamps thread and did not repeat the question here. I was thinking of combining a few of these stamps into one. Is there a specific reason why you have kept them separate Pete?