I have these....
Accepted by: (in black)
Bank of Canada (in black)
See back for endorsement (in red)
Bill of Exchange Act (in black)
Account number 26X-XXX-XXX (in black)
Inscription number 1196604XXXXXX (in black)
Date: ________ (in black)
VOID (in red)
:P
VOID is for VOIDING non desirable shit that you don't want to ADMINISTRATE......like an ORDER from some strangers.....I never used the VOID stamp, so far.... :)
Sorry Capitain I didn't know you had been blocked by that IDIOT. People like that deserve to remain CHILDREN of the state.
Pete Daoust said I can't comment in the other thread, this idiot blocked me
But yes, these are the rubber stamps I have...
Here are the stamps that you suggested in another thread:
Accepted by: (in black)
Bank of Canada (in black)
See back for endorsement (in red)
Bill of Exchange Act (in black)
Account number 26X-XXX-XXX (in black)
Inscription number 1196604XXXXXX (in black)
Date: ________ (in black)
VOID (in red)
Pete Daoust said:
I can't comment on that thread, Jason Moreland.....here in Quebec, the person has an INSCRIPTION number.....you guys I think it's a REGISTRATION number....
Every corporation also has an INSCRIPTION number, here in Quebec, instead of starting with 119, it starts with 116....
The Inscription number here in Quebec startes with 119 unless you were born in the years 2000. Then it would be 120.
ex: Inscription # 11975045214
1 = one person
1975 = year of birth
04 = Qu�bec
5214 = number on the Live Birth Record
On the Seal you have :
the incription number 119......
+
Sole Authorized Administrator
and the middle is at your convinience. I wrote Janick
I wanted to put a drawing or logo but it was too expensive! :/
I used VOID on the TV Licence NOTICE once, I think it confused the feck out of them. It took them two months to get back to me, when they did I asked for the BILL, I have never heard from them again. That was about four months ago.
At least it's summer Capitaine Pete :) Btw I have been curious so may as well just come out and ask. I get that you're taken name is Pierre or Pete. But when you were in court why would the QRA want PiERRE DAOUST and not JOSEPH PIERRE GILLES DAOUST. I have missed something. :/
There is the name DAOUST.
There is the person's name, which is PIERRE DAOUST.
There is the beneficiary's name, which can be Pierre, Joseph and Gilles ( I took Pierre)
There is the male declarant's name, which is FATHER DAOUST.
There is the female declarant's name, which is MOTHER DAOUST
There is the SURETY signatory's name, which is BRUNO BERNIER.
So David-Paul Sip....
The DRAWER of that BILL is: MOTHER AND FATHER DAOUST (persons)
The DRAWEE of that BILL is: BRUNO BERNIER (The State)
The BENEFICIARY of the BILL is: Joseph Pierre Gilles (The human)
:D HAHAHAHAHA!!!!
I had asked this in the Jason Lerato stamps thread and did not repeat the question here. I was thinking of combining a few of these stamps into one. Is there a specific reason why you have kept them separate Pete?