The Tender For Law

Volume 6

Jun 17, 2014 3:25 PM

Pete Daoust

Ok, Yusef EL, WHAT DO YOU WANT FROM THIS GROUP EXACTLY ?

It's been a few times you are trying to post some UNAVAILABLE attachment in here, WHAT DO YOU WANT ?

Read Comments

Yusef EL

My Apologies I thought the post were coming up. The link will appear at the bottom of the post. I have a blogtalk that is dedicated soley to the topics that are discussed in this group.

We deal with presentments, International Bills of exchange, Promssory Notes, Executorship, Private Trust, etc.

We have many knowledgable guest on the show as well.

You can review our archives and come to your own conclusions here:

My show is http://www.blogtalkradio.com/highfrequency

Once again my apologies. Peace to the Gods!

Scott Duncan

That is NOT what this group discusses.

This group discusses ACTUAL SOLUTIONS. I show people how to STOP THEM. I show people how to BUILD THEIR OWN FUCKING BANKS.

Private Law, Contract Law, Property Law, are DERIVED fro SURETY and ACCOUNTING. If you are discussing ANYTHING derived from SURETY and ACCOUNTING, you are discussing clubhouse rules for a club YOU ARE NOT A MEMBER OF.

In short, you are wasting time and making noise.

Yusef EL

We do the same thing we just do it in a public forum. We deal with PUBLIC and PRIVATE. If you are in the private you are not a part of their "clubhouse" and are not susceptible to thier rules. If anyone in here is studying the law then they should know the break down of law and what constitutes public and private and where the power lies.

We have entire shows dedicated to suing third party debt collectors and so forth. If you have any NEW information we are more than open to hear it. We are all about solutions. However a Maxim of Law states thaat "many men know many things, no man knows everything."

Yusef EL

We deal with the Financial Accounting Standards Board and other topis dealing with Accounting (Money of Account). My concentration is Private Trust where all the power lies. Perhaps if you looked at topic in our archives you would see all the topic we discuss. We have a Nationwide audience.

LaNi Black

How the hell did he get in here? o_O

My opinion of the founding fathers? Why? Am I supposed to have some deeply intellectual prose about men because they considered people with my skin tone chattel?

They were skillful psychological manipulators, barbarians, and theists.

I think that's all that's needed here....

Don't call me in for this foolishness.

LaNi Black

Yusef El is likely a Moor, and this is true about that movement....

"Private Law, Contract Law, Property Law, are DERIVED fro SURETY and ACCOUNTING. If you are discussing ANYTHING derived from SURETY and ACCOUNTING, you are discussing clubhouse rules for a club YOU ARE NOT A MEMBER OF.

In short, you are wasting time and making noise."

LaNi Black

Lastly, I am NOT the token feisty black woman opinion on all things 'slavery, black, AND/OR American' (see what I did there? :p ), I am not about to carry that mantle like it's some prized race horse.

No thank you.

Anibal Jose Baez

I know that for every man or woman that wants to put their race, or difference between races, as some thing of importance, then those are helping to perpetuate difference between humans. If you keep bringing it up, it will always exist.

The funny thing is that in REALITY almost all humans, regardless of race, are considered SLAVES, but STILL a few humans want to act as if only THEY suffer from slavery. Slavery it is NOT exclusive of a particular race, as we come to find out in this group, and it was not "abolished."

I just know there is something very wrong with that self-destructive "I am black/latino/minority, and discriminated" stuff. It's more like an EXCUSE, than a real thing. Just sayin'.

LaNi Black

"If you keep bringing it up, it will always exist." You desperately want that to be true. :/ Sigh. Here in REALITY.....

'I' don't keep bringing it up. As a matter of fact, my comments about it are ALWAYS IN RESPONSE to another highlighting it.

These little presuppositions you toss around, discrediting the actual brutality and suffering of people who were treated as, and considered, less than human, by people who coincidentally had children that they taught to do the same (and, then those children had children...and, so on....), then defending it with a very narrow view that is your perception of excuse making black people (which, quite un-ironically, is that same teaching presenting itself in our CURRENT day), is an EXCUSE to ignore the actual systematic discrimination that affects our every day. You will NEVER understand that, nor am I interested in debating it with you. I will never know this life with white skin, nor will I know assumed competence and/or privilege before demonstrating merit. It simply won't happen, only because of my skin color. It is irrelevant to what we are doing here, and it has nothing to do with TTFL.

I am wholly disinterested in what you think is wrong with that. What you think is just an excuse, and not a real thing, is absolutely, without prejudice, unimportant to me.

LaNi Black

And, that whole 3/5ths, less than a human being thing......please share - what other human group lived that? What magic eraser fixed the generational psychological effects of that? Serious inquiry. I am interested in reading about their experience.

LaNi Black

Here in reality....that birth certificate and registration of the PERSON has fucked over generations, upon generations. Is "I am forced surety, and its' not my fault' also self-destructive? Or did it actually happen, and we are learning, through diligence and discipline, to undue the very real generational consequences of that? As angry as you are about that, I don't get how you even dare to venture an opinion into territory completely unknown to you, which, by the way, was compounded by this forced legal PERSON enslavement that has you so very riled up. You're dealing with one thing.

You mad, or nah?

And, I promise.....don't you mention it, and I won't say another word about it.

Anibal Jose Baez

I see. You believe to be some "Black Jesus." You'll carry that weight for everybody, right?

Your stand on "black people are the only ones that suffer from slavery" it is ignorant, and reveals a complete lack of knowledge on the history of humanity. And also a complete lack of empathy towards people that are not "black", and suffer from fucking slavery. But you cannot see that, because your caught-up in playing willing victim.

Anibal Jose Baez

Ok, my bad. I am crazy. Now is denial that you have not been presenting your "blackness" as something difficult to suffer from? I know where this is going. NOWHERE! You just keep been the oppresed black woman fighting for "equality" (just for blacks), while I go ahead and have a real life. I do not suffer from such illness. Peace, Lani.

Scott Duncan

"...the best analysis of the human genome so far doesn't account for various superficial differences" - What a steaming pile of bullshit.

Seriously. Shut up and hit the books. You're talking out of your ass.

Scott Duncan

For those who think Matthew Gundry might not be talking out of his ass, here are some dumbed-down articles from the people who are actually on the front lines of this shit.

http://harvardmagazine.com/2008/05/race-in-a-genetic-world-html

http://www.kenanmalik.com/lectures/race_oslo.html

http://www.americanscientist.org/bookshelf/pub/race-finished

Scott Duncan

Explain how you "See plainly" that "...the best analysis of the human genome so far doesn't account for various superficial differences".

I really want EVERYONE to see out here in public, what brain-damaged thought process, lead you to believe that this is even a rational statement.

Matthew Gundry

My comment about 'plainly seeing' was about being able to observe those superficial differences. I genuinely don't understand why you keep saying there's no difference between black and blonde. btw I'm reading those links you put up.

Scott Duncan

Here in REALITY, our species is doomed, due to A LACK OF GENETIC DIVERSITY. If NOTHING kills our species off, we will be wiped out because we have a dead genome. We're mammals (which, as life-forms go, have a LOT of serious genetic issues) and ALL mammals are doomed.

Chris � S�illeabh�in

As for ENCODE, Scott Duncan. I think we will find the link in the non-coding RNAs. In relation to the great ape theory soon enough. If they can figure out 3.2 billion combined A, C, G and T nucleotides that make up genes and their regulatory sections in 5 years. We on the right course, to know the rest. Dare I say it next year, if the same number of participates are still working on it. There's much studying & testing going on with mutagens as we speak in relation to epigenetics exciting times.

Scott Duncan

Chris � S�illeabh�in, appears to have been doing his homework! :D

He's on the right track, and I regret that I don't have the time to type out the proper response it deserves (It'd take me 2 days). The fact that he grasps some of the base concepts means he's actually qualified to ask questions and form a valid position...

...which is why ACTUAL UNDERSTANDING trumps bullshit like ""...the best analysis of the human genome so far doesn't account for various superficial differences".

KNOWLEDGE AND IGNORANCE ARE NOT EQUAL!

http://youtu.be/HhGuXCuDb1U

Scott Duncan

Adding nucleobases is supposed to do what, now? Uracil is ALREADY one of the four nucleobases in the nucleic acid of RNA. They're supposed to bind, WHERE, again?

Uracil adenine, cytosine, and guanine. Those are the nucleobases of RNA.

Your statement is like saying "We need to add more metal to the car".

Matthew Gundry

Ojection! Point of butt-hurtness. As Scott pointed out, race is too fuzzy a concept to differentiate black and blonde but then what is the basis for those characteristics? btw That 'best analysis' line of mine was an attempt at sugar coating (yes, bullshitting) to give you, Scott, the benefit of the doubt. I still can't make sense of what you mean by 'black and blonde are the same thing'.