The Tender For Law

Volume 6

Jun 16, 2014 6:41 PM

Read Comments

Gail Marie

Jules Yap doesn't know who they are "I am a person, not a corporation. A blogger who obviously is on their side. Could they not have talked to me like normal people do without issuing a C&D [cease and desist]?"

Gail Marie

In cases of unauthorized use of the name lawyers are an easy target...they scoff at your paperwork and continue on as if it is worthless...that is as far as my experience has taken me so far...we'll see how they respond from here.

Scott Duncan

That's the thing all of you (especially infiltrators) don't get... I haven't even started! When bodies start piling up... then you'll know I've "shifted into first gear" in my larger initiative.

That's why I smack down all the "peace and love" types when they speak up. My intent is NOT "peaceful". I intend to hurt people. Yes... even children.

Scott Duncan

To those that think, "I don't care what injustice you suffered, you don't target children":

You didn't care that MINE was targeted! What's changed? Why is the law "special" for me?

I can get third parties to kill your kids too! The Government says it's ok!

...so I am going to avail myself of that!

If you are a JUSTICE, expect ALL of your PERSONAL information to be distributed tho every whack-job "sovereign citizen" west of Poland.

Chris Evan

UNDERWRITER, insurances. One who signs a policy of insurance, by which he becomes an insurer. 2. By this act he places himself as to his responsibility, in the place of the insured. He may cause a re-insurance (q.v.) to be made for his benefit; and it is his duty to act with good faith, and, without quibbling, to pay all just demands against him for losses.

Chris Evan

Underwriter A company, usually an investment bank, that an issuer hires to place a new issue with investors. The issuer normally hires several underwriters for a single issue, where each is responsible for placing a certain amount of the new issue. The underwriters contact potential investors to gauge interest and sell the issue. Underwriters guarantee the price for a certain number of shares of the new issue. Because of their expertise on placing securities with investors, using underwriters often increases the chance that the placement will be successful. An underwriting firm is also called a house of issue. See also: Bracketing, Oversubscribed, Undersubscribed, Underwriting agreement.

Scott Duncan

No.

I WANT the infiltrators and stealth theists and free-dumbers to run back to their flock and squawk about what I've done.

I'm not hiding. I want it VERY clear to ALL governments, who's doing this. I WANT them to know WHERE it's coming from.

Pete Daoust

The Union Jack has been in use in Canada dating back to the Scottish settlement in Nova Scotia in 1621.[51] At the close of the Great Canadian Flag Debate of 1964, which resulted in the adoption of the Maple Leaf Flag as Canada's national flag in 1965, the Parliament of Canada voted to make the Union Flag the symbol of Canada's membership of the Commonwealth and its allegiance to the crown. The move was a concession given to conservatives who preferred to keep the old flag, with its Union Flag in the canton. The Royal Union Flag (as it is now known in Canada) is flown alongside the Maple-Leaf Flag on Commonwealth Day and other royal occasions and anniversaries.[51] The Union Flag was also the official flag of the Dominion of Newfoundland (1931�1949) and continued after Newfoundland became a Canadian province (now Newfoundland and Labrador) until 1980.

Will Bed

Liening the bank... Is all I got in my head now... The mofos have failed to return the promissory note, failed to pay the invoice, and failed to prove they are above the law... The creditor wants to collect what is owed.

I love how it seems the TT4L learning curve won't ever stop getting steeper and steeper... The power of the exponential function ?

I really need to tackle that trust & maritime law stuff...........

Paul O'Shea

I am so excited after reading this thread and I cannot wait for the next phase. Thank you Admiral for your time and input here on the TTFL.I cannot offer you much but if you fancy a holiday in ireland I would be delighted to have you as my guest and that's an open offer.

Stuart Stone

Damn, I hate it when I walk in late...

From reading the thread...my take so far:

Scott doesn't charge for his information/knowledge, which consequently doesn't involve commerce and/or legal tender, keeping his activities outside of commercial jurisdictions, therefore personal liability is removed (same as the IKEA example above).

Naming & providing commercial information (underwriters etc) of various entities that have caused harm to others also remains outside of/ is not bound by commercial/legal jurisdictions, so long as he does not receive personal benefit.

Liening/freezing the assets of these entities and their chattel property (children) into a private trust, will cause civil death and afford these 'persons' no protection from the legal jurisdiction, as well as adding value to the respective trusts that lien these persons.

To now take it one step further: Kurnell in Sydney is where Captain Cook landed in 1770. On that site today, there are numerous brass plaques explaining what the invaders did to the locals, without recourse...

They shot at the natives, harming some, and in the following years, many massacres and atrocities occurred...

My question for many years was this: How could so many atrocities be committed without someone being held to account for their actions?

The answer that appears to be coming clearer is this: The natives were not recognised as a person before the law, therefore any harm that befell them could not be legally adjudicated/punished.

Therefore, by the same principle, if these dirtbags have the(ir) person liened into a private trust, they no longer have the protection of the 'law' and any harm that they are subjected to cannot be legally enforced against the perpetrator...because they are now subject to a different jurisdiction.

Wow, kudos to you Admiral Scott Duncan...you promised that everything would be perfectly legal...

I'm sure there are many more implications here, but this is as far as my brain can grasp at this moment.

Will Bed

Jason Moreland Remember you need 2 signatures and surety for a valid negotiable instrument.

The document's got both parties' signatures, and I guess SURETY is proven by the lien they had on the PERSON's car until payment of the debt was made in full...

Pete Daoust I sent them a recap of everything they didn't do - they haven't replied to the last 3 communications - and all the questions they didn't answer - silence is acceptance of the statements I made - and gave them a final 10 days to act, saying else I may have no choice but to fwd the entire paperwork to the Attorney General of Quebec... They got that one mid last week... Not sure if that'll be scary enough to get them to honour their obligations...

Will Bed

They got the invoice early april, which they first refused saying they weren't going to pay any fees...

They got a statement, which also stated the amount wasn't for fees but for a value, which they ignored... They got a notice, which they ignored...

Before defaulting them, I wanted to make sure they have a hellova whole bunch of undertakings in their hands, 2 and a half pages to be exact, with all the facts documenting their failures, but I guess that is a notice of default...

Will Bed

Well I'm giving them a last 10 days to return the paper, pay the invoice, or prove they are above the law...

Then... Is there already a thread about liens somewhere in here ?

Too much to learn not enough time... I've been reading Mackximus Minimus's first PDF since this morning I'm not even 1/4 way through...

Will Bed

That's the first option I had in mind, probably the easiest too (?), but I'm still not quite sure yet if I can/wish to put my trust in the justice system or what would be the pro's and con's of each option...

I'm actually kinda lost with what I should tackle first anyways... Trust, maritime, reading Mackx's anthology, reading again all the pinned stuff, not losing track on the newer threads...

Above all I, wanna learn and I know there's so much valuable knowledge I have yet to gain here, and the empowering potential of this promissory note case seems verrrry valuable...

Without knowledge, you can have all the time(x)energy you want, you'll still be nothing more than an hyperactive worthless breathing machine, or at best maybe a slave...

Janick Paquette

OK, few questions about the PROPER NOTICE for idiots:

1) a copy of the Lien on the Vessel.... would that be the Birth Certificat?

2) ... There is now no confusion as to what this document IS, and WHO it is. ... what it is is pretty clear but WHO it is... by putting PUBLIC NOTICE you identify WHO is sending this Legal document? :/ can't connect that one.

3) in the example of the PUBLIC NOTICE, ...the Vessel known as ***redacted shit here***is now the LAWFUL PROPERTY of the AQUILAE TRUST.... do we need to have a Trust to make a PUBLIC NOTICE? :/