NOTICE OF ADMINISTRATION
ADMINISTRATION FEES CONCERNING PIERRE DAOUST 26X-XXX-XXX
Being the sole Authorized Administrator of the person named PIERRE DAOUST, here are the administration fees concerning public debts that are sent to this person I happen to have.
The first administrative process will be free, courtesy of the Sole Authorized Administrator, which is "ME", the Man that have this person.
It is understood and agreed that if I have to administrate a debt more than once, because the beneficiary is simply incompetent, the following fees will apply.
If you already presented this debt to the payment, without my authorization, that will be YOUR problem, and be consider FRAUD by "ME".
Fees of $250.00, on the alleged debt, each time sharing information on my part to the beneficiary of said debt
Fees of $3000.00 per hour for any additional information.
Be advised that I do not buy any public debt, I choose to administrate them by completing the bills of exchange you supply with it, so you need to address the surety of the person named PIERRE DAOUST with the inscription number 119xxxxxxx and/or the Social Security number 26x-xxx-xxx for your remittance. Said surety is in Bank of Canada.
With Respect, Honor, Dignity and integrity.
Authorized By: (seal)
:P
Pete Daoust what's ur bill of exchange look like bc mine nvr work. They send em bk maybe im doin somethin wrong but man have i been trying to fig that shit out. Also wut is the "inscription number"? U put in that notice?
Well Us "retards" won't be bothering you anymore.
Pete Daoust, please relieve this man of the burden of group membership. He shouldn't have to endure "retards" like us.
When writing a notice, is it be advantageous to write them in the present tense by eliminating the (ed) and (ing) from the end of a word when possible?
To eliminate the (ing) makes the word like a RULE, a constant, rather than just a momentary condition that is subject to change.
In other words, why would I want to suggest to the reader of my notice that some of my conditions are momentary instead of rules / law that can't be subject to outside conditions of contract fostered by presumption?
...before I get to my above homework, one last question for today.
From Pete's NOTICE: "The first administrative process will be free, courtesy of the Sole Authorized Administrator, which is ME, the Man that have this person."
Is there a significant legal difference in saying, "i, a man" that administrates this person, instead of "ME, the Man"?
1st) I can't logically claim that I'm "THE (only) man" without committing perjury. However, I can claim i'm a man...or at least a hybrid-monkey.
2nd) Upper and lower case letters signify different statuses:
- the government may mistakenly know me as Los Monkey Blanc
- the government may also mistakenly know me as LOS MONKEY BLANC
- but...the government fraudulently knows me as Los Monkey -BLANC.
- and given all the allowable mistakes in law, i can claim that people refer to me as los monkeyboy (nickname galore) blanc ......(Capitis diminutio minima), no?
Regarding accounting; (General jurisdiction over fields / land, army, Lieber Code, etc.) if the principal Creditor is a "peaceful inhabitant" under the Lieber Code, then it's the occupying Trustee Corporation's DUTY to protect the private property of the "non-combatant" creditor, right? Or should the BELLIGERENT creditor "combat" with a few NOTICES just to make sure all is in order in GOOD FAITH / TRUST?
OR should I refrain from mashing all that shit together into a disgusting stew of misinformational CAPITUS DICKUS ERECTUS?
Pete Daoust....I was thinking....the Administration fees that the Trustee for CHRIS charges are $300 per BoE completed. I am thinking of changing that to a percentage such as 20% of the BoE for a Service Fee....it makes more sense in my brain...