Send them a Notice of CLAIM, (Avis de R�clamation)

Isn't it what I did but without the TITLE?

Nope. :P

so your boyfriend has just cause to file a claim because the CRA has harmed him and stolen his property he should send a letter of demand requiring his property be returned immediately using section 337 of the criminal code of Canaduh

I wouldn't do that, I would first CLAIM what they took from my person, and advise them what will be invoiced if they do not give back what they've took from the person, and give them 3 days to act.

And the invoice would kick asses... :D

Mmmmmm... Can you PROVE the money is not yours ? Or can you PROVE that under marriage, a female person becomes property of the male PERSON and - I guess - all her property becomes his ? On a side note... Why do all you guys have accounts and/or credit and/or loans and/or whatever in both names ? See, I never knew you could be victim of whatever bullshit another party claims on your partner, but I always thought I'd make it clear : I'll never get into marriage I'll never buy a house under 2 names I'll never buy a car or furniture or whatever shit with a "shared responsibility"... :( And we know "money" isnt safe in a bank. I never liked to let others get control of whats mine... Say what you want, if the system comes crashing down, you'll need cash. Even if it's technically worth nothing, the average idiots will, after a few days, trust nothing but cash, because that's all they've ever known and cash will still be valuable... So keep the minimum you NEED in a bank account but store enough outside a bank so that if page 144-145 of last year's Flaherty's budget comes effective, you're not fucked...

Well, you're lucky to be in here at your YOUNGER age than us, Will Bed

ALL RIGHTS RESERVED/WITHOUT PREJUDICE AGENCE DU REVENU DU QU�BEC a/s M�lissa Corriveau 4, place-Laval, bureau 500 Secteur L462P1 Laval, QC H7N 5Y3 N� N.E.Q. : 226xxxxxxx N� de r�f�rence: 101xxxxx REGISTERED MAIL: RN 001 175 XXX CA Bonjour Mme Corriveau. I have sent a letter on the 24th of April 2014, advising you to unfreeze the account # xxxx-xxx under the name JANICK .... . Unfortunatly I didn't get a response from you. You have taken $$$ from the person JANICK PAQUETTE'S account. I am advising you to give back the ???$ to this account and unfreeze it within 3 days or you will be invoiced. See the Administration fees attached. Please act accordingly ! Regards ! Authorised by: Sole Authorised Administrator for JANICK PAQUETTE 26x xxx xxx / �.. address of the person here.

how's that?

Yeah I know :( but that doesn't change I never accepted to rely on anyone for anything for as long as I can remember... Different times different cultures ?

If I would have known all this in my 30's.....I would have made some drastic different moves, Will Bed, and I am COUNTING on you to lift up the shit through the fan :P

Do NOT compare you and Janick :D ....two different planet :D

Did I? :/ Let me check!

Janick, I think your MAN should write to CRA or whoever... If it's his person's money, HE should claim it !

Modified! Now how's that? :P

What does lift up the shit through the fan mean Pete Daoust ?? I dont compare... That's just some of the shit I self programmed to myself some 18 years ago...

Ok, Janick, you have to read the PROPER NOYICE FOR IDIOT thread, from Scott Duncan... I DON'T SEE NOTICE OF CLAIM on your NOTICE OF CLAIM :(

And I think he should make it clear that since april jhes been wIting for them motherfuckers to fix that shit up, and 2 months without access to his person's money affects his person's integrity so they better get their shit back on track, fast

Oups! I was just focusing on the content of the text. Just copy/past the top of the letter. My bad! :)

Maaaaan! I can't wait for this automatic click to come on when I receive these letters from them!

I'm on it Pete! Have read half of it so far....

Nope! Read it all and the draft is not something I can relate to. I don't have a corporation, Trust, etc...

Janick Paquette, if you don't read Scott Duncan's articles, at least 5 times, you will go nowhere, and will ALWAYS make mistakes.

Stop interupting my reading then! :P

I'm on it ever since. What I can comprehend so far is that a "PROPER" NOTICE is all about - identifying WHO you are and remove all possible variables. Variables being: a) Where the Notice is sent b) Who sends the Notice (WHO is saying this) ------> so you remove the consequences of ignoring the Notice. ....to be continued... :D