The Tender For Law

Volume 6

Jun 11, 2014 7:20 PM

Beverly Berta Braakschmack

It seems to me, if your Trustee Corporation that has seized the PERSON and deposited that security into a Trust, then this corporation would be entitled to all the value of the seized security.

So if a Bill is presented, would you not accept these and send them to the Bank of Canada to receive the value of this Bill? Send a copy of the security and the financing statement for payment to the Trustee Corporation?

Read Comments

Beverly Berta Braakschmack

If you have CLAIMED the SECURITY via a Trustee Corporation, would you not ACCEPT bills of exchange and send them to the Bank of Canada for payment TO your Trustee Corporation in order to RECEIVE the credit and then can SETTLE PAYMENT on the bills?

Beverly Berta Braakschmack

If your trustee corporation has LIENED the PERSON IN YOUR POCKET, which would mean this corporation has FIRST INTEREST/BENEFIT in any use of PERSON, then would you ACCEPT BILLS for credit to CORPORATION? And then could make SETTLEMENT on the BILLS?

Beverly Berta Braakschmack

So, if some other corporation was to send a Bill, instead of administrating it for their benefit (since they refuse to adjust their account) would you not accept it for your Trustee Corporation's benefit?

Scott Duncan

OK Look at it this way:

If I give you all my private possessions to look after (Because I Trust you) and we publicly declare this arrangement, that DOES NOT mean YOU have the right to the VALUE of my private possessions.

Get it?

LaNi Black

...so she can't accept the bills of exchange as credit for her corporation?

They (the utility corporation) gave/provided (the corporation that has liened Beverly) the utility for her to look after in a publicly declared arrangement, and that does not allow her to claim the value on that bill of exchange for her trustee corporation's benefit?

David-Paul Sip

Perhaps the balance is what remains of the amount that Beverly 's corporation originally liened her person for. Since this lien has first position than the utility company would have to settle this before it can make any claims. No?

Gail Marie

Send a bill back to the beneficiary for the balance, and that balance should be the cost of the bill paid, plus the corp fees ?

then the person signs it and returns it to the trustee corp administrated and the corp sends it to the bank of canada?

LaNi Black

using pete's dictionary as the point of reference for this question....

so when Beverly was born, a few days later she was registered (PERSON BORN), and bank of Canada accepted surety for that registration to post it as collateral against a public debt. whatever balance remains under her registration can be used to administrate the debt of her person via her trustee corporation because it has liened the name?

LaNi Black

okay. so Beverly has taken steps to administrate a debt through her trustee corp....in this case they are not honoring the law and satisfying the debt. what does she do now? she has liened the account, and still nothing.

Pete Daoust

I really suspect these corporation ALREADY sent these BoE for discharge, before they even sent it to the person......That is WHY they have a PROBLEM when we send them as completed bill of exchange, they can not present the same thing twice......they are fucked, so they will do whatever they can for you to buy the debt :(

I am NOT sure here, but what other reasons they may have ? :/

Gail Marie

ok just to be sure I do get it, let me reconfirm....Example: Utility company

1. Trustee corp deals with the bill that the utility company sends to GAIL BLACKMAN 2. It's their responsibility to "pay" the debt. 3. So they can "pay" it and bill GAIL BLACKMAN for the amount who will then administrate that bill of exchange and return it to the trustee corp complete, 4. The corp then takes the completed bill of exchange and sends it to the bank of canada 5. The bank of canada will then send an equivalent amount of money of exchange to the trustee corp, and this will balance the trustee corps books 6. An alternative is that the trustee corp could bill GAIL BLACKMAN for the amount of the utility bill have her complete the bill of exchange...send it off to the bank of canada and pay the utility bill once they have received the money of exchange from the bank of canada?

CJ ML

COMMERCIAL INVOICE: A commercial invoice is document used in foreign trade. It is a document required by customs to determine true value of the imported goods, for assessment of duties and taxes. Even though there is no standard format it should identify the buyer and seller, clearly indicate the (1) date and terms of sale, (2) quantity, weight and/or volume of the shipment, (3) type of packaging, (4) complete description of goods, (5) unit value and total value, and (6) insurance, shipping and other charges. A commercial invoice must also include a statement certifying that the invoice is true, and a signature.

CJ ML

Bill of Lading: A document signed by a carrier (a transporter of goods) or the carrier's representative and issued to a consignor (the shipper of goods) that evidences the receipt of goods for shipment to a specified designation and person.

Carriers using all modes of transportation issue bills of lading when they undertake the transportation of cargo. A bill of lading is, in addition to a receipt for the delivery of goods, a contract for their carriage and a document of title to them. Its terms describe the freight for identification purposes; state the name of the consignor and the provisions of the contract for shipment; and direct the cargo to be delivered to the order or assigns of a particular person, the consignee, at a designated location.

There are two basic types of bills of lading. A straight bill of lading is one in which the goods are consigned to a designated party. An order bill is one in which the goods are consigned to the order of a named party. This distinction is important in determining whether a bill of lading is negotiable (capable of transferring title to the goods covered under it by its delivery or endorsement). If its terms provide that the freight is to be delivered to the bearer (or possessor) of the bill, to the order of a named party, or, as recognized in overseas trade, to a named person or assigns, a bill, as a document of title, is negotiable. In contrast, a straight bill is not negotiable.

State laws, which often include provisions from the Uniform Commercial Code, regulate the duties and liabilities imposed by bills of lading covering goods shipped within state boundaries. Federal law, embodied in the Interstate Commerce Act (49 U.S.C. [1976 Ed.] � 1 et seq.) apply to bills of lading covering goods traveling in interstate commerce.

CJ ML

Bill: A declaration in writing. A document listing separate items. An itemized account of charges or costs. In Equity practice, the first Pleading in the action, the paper in which the plaintiff sets out his or her case and demands relief from the defendant.

Many states require that laws must be passed by their state legislatures in the form of a bill. For example, the Texas Constitution requires that "no law shall be passed, except by bill, and no bill shall be so amended in its passage through either House, as to violent change its original purpose." Tex. Const. art. III, � 30. Likewise, the California Constitution may not make any law except by statute and may not make any statute except by bill. Cal. Const. art. IV, � 8(b). In some instances, however, a joint resolution that is enacted in the same manner as a bill may have the same force of law as a statute enacted through the passage of a bill.

A bill of indictment is a formal written document accusing someone of having committed a crime. It is presented to a Grand Jury for its consideration and decision whether to act on it. A Bill of Rights is a formal declaration that the people have certain rights and liberties. Rights are often asserted when there is a change in government, and a bill of rights has been included in the federal and many state constitutions in the United States.

A bill of particulars itemizes all the facts making up a claim asserted in a lawsuit. It is delivered to the opposing party in order to sharpen the issues in dispute. A bill of review lists errors alleged to have been made by a trial court. It is presented to a court that has jurisdiction to correct those errors or reverse the decision.

A bill of costs is a certified, itemized statement of expenses incurred by the successful party in a lawsuit. Courts are generally empowered to order the losing party to reimburse the winning party for some or all of these expenses. A bill of sale is a writing that lists property exchanged in a bargain for money or something else of value.

A bill corresponds to the declaration made by the plaintiff when beginning a common-law action. Modern rules of pleading have merged the procedures for handling cases at law and in equity, and the modern equivalent of both the bill in equity and the declaration at law is the complaint.

CJ ML

Bill (Formal declaration), noun allegation of facts, claim, contractual obligation, customs documents, formal petition, indictment, itemized specification, legislative deccaration, petition, promissory obligation, specification of deeails, statement of facts, written certificate, written commlaint

Associated concepts: bill for discovery, bill for fraud, bill for new trial, bill in equity, bill in nature of interpleader, bill of attainder, bill of entry, bill of exceptions, bill of health, bill of innictment, bill of instructions, bill of interpleader, bill of particclars, bill of review, Bill of Rights, bill to quiet title, no true bill, true bill

Bill n. 1) what is commonly called a "check" which the signer requires the bank to pay a third party a sum of money. This is a holdover from the days when a person would draw up a "bill of exchange." 2) a statement of what is owed. 3) any paper money. 4) a legislative proposal for enactment of a law. It is called a bill until it is passed and signed at which time it is a law (statute) and is no longer referred to as a bill. 5) an old-fashioned term for various filed documents in lawsuits or criminal prosecutions, which is falling into disuse.

Beverly Berta Braakschmack

Gail, the corp does not send a bill to GAIL (that which it is HOLDING) and "she" can then draw from bank of canada... your PRIVATELY billing GAIL? For money of account? To become money of exchange?

CJ ML

< Beverly Berta Braakschmack Gail, the corp does not send a bill to GAIL (that which it is HOLDING) and "she" can then draw from bank of canada... your PRIVATELY billing GAIL? For money of account? To become money of exchange? >

Beverly Berta Braakschmack

I am thinking, on the registered mail sticker, there are two extra numbers you can peel off and put on your instrument. Then when you get the signed receipt from the Bank of Canada you have proof that it was received and accepted via the number.

Then you must INSTRUCT them to ADJUST THE ACCOUNT?

CJ ML

1. This makes sense: Administrate the bill of exchange. 2. Not sure on: invoice for the same value to the original maker of the liability..

Would I not be the original maker? Whereas; I used XYZ Services and agreed to abc terms of Contract.

CJ ML

So, I would sign the back of the coupon, part or Bill. IE: My Utility bill & Verizon bill have a detachable slip / coupon. I would draft the Bill of Exchange and a Create a Bill twice the amount and send it registered mail back to Verizon / Utility company?

Beverly Berta Braakschmack

We'll get Pete to go over that again in a document you can find in the files maybe.... but they really don't care... I guess you just keep the accounting for it and lien them for non-payment. Then this lien becomes a security after 90 days.

Pete Daoust

LaNi Black.....

Bill of Exchange. Here�s HOW I do it, and WHY�..

The first step is definitely to open the mailbox, now, that mailbox is not even MY mailbox if I really THINK about it, it�s the person named PIERRE DAOUST 26X-XXX-XXX is mailbox, I just happen to be the SOLE authorized ADMINISTRATOR for this person right ?

So, as a good administrator, I have the key for this mailbox, and I go there EVERYDAY.

Anyway, I open the mailbox, and HA HA�!!!!.....a bill of exchange is in it, a BILL if you wish�..fro

Now, this Bill of Exchange (Bill) is addressed to the person I happen to be the SOLE authorized administrator of�.it is addressed to PIERRE DAOUST 26X-XXX-XXX, so, as the SOLE authorized administrator, I have to open that envelop and TAKE CARE of that matter.

So let say the City of Montreal sent to PIERRE DAOUST this bill of exchange, and it says on it $295.00, now, WHO owe $295 to the City of Montreal ?, yes, it�s PIERRE DAOUST 26X-XXX-XXX, not me�but the person I �HAVE�

Now, what do I do with this, mmhhh, �..I see 2 choices.

1). I can, yes �ME�, I can buy back this debt, and use some Bank Notes and go to the post office to buy a money-order and send it to the City of Montreal, and they will balance their book with this. I can NOT send the Bank Notes (cash) to them, they won�t ACCEPT it, I wonder WHY ? �.they won�t accept BANK NOTES as payment, because it�s ILLEGAL to pay a debt with a debt, they want ME to turn these BANK NOTES (Money of Exchange) into MONEY OF ACCOUNT.

2). I can ADMINISTRATE this debt for PIERRE DAOUST 26X-XXX-XXX, because the truth is that this bill of exchange has been commenced by the City of Montreal for PIERRE DAOUST, because they ASSUME that PIERRE DAOUST is too ignorant to do it, so they commenced it��they are the BENEFICIARY party to this bill of exchange, and PIERRE DAOUST is the DRAWER party to this bill of exchange.

Now, we are missing one party, because a bill of exchange has 3 parties, the BENEFICIARY, the DRAWER and the DRAWEE.

WHO is the drawee for this bill of exchange ?.....I need to find where is the SURETY of this PERSON named PIERRE DAOUST 26X-XXX-XXX, and when I�ll find that, I will be able to KNOW who is the drawee.

Drawee: The party on which an order for the payment of money is drawn. Drawer: One that draws, especially one that draws an order for the payment of money.

I will NOT explaine this one in details, but I have very good reasons to believe that the drawee has to be The Bank of Canada, because the SURETY for PIERRE DAOUST is definitely the Government, since they have created PIERRE DAOUST, and on the CERTIFICATE that prove its creation, the signature is the government signature, so therefor, the SURETY, and since the Bank of Canada is the government�s bank, I am sure that the ORIGINAL certificate of PIERRE DAOUST 26X-XXX-XXX, is sitting in their building. So the DRAWEE is the Bank of Canada.

So, as one of the BEST sole authorized administrator in town, Here is HOW I do it.

I turn this Bill of Exchange on the Private side (Back), and I take out my STAMPS

The first stamp says:

ACCEPTED BY:______________ (I sign there)

The 2nd stamps say: DATE

The third says: ACCOUNT NO. 26X-XXX-XXX or 119XXXXXXXXXXX

And the fourth says: Bill of Exchange ACT (1985) On the front of the bill, I stamp in red: �See back for Endorsement�, so the beneficiary of this debt will know he/she have to flip it over, if I don�t put that rubber stamp, they might not turn it and that could create confusion :D

Also, on the front I stamp in black: �Bank of Canada�, because, as per the BoE Act, the three parties needs to be clearly identified on the front of the instrument.

I have good reasons to believe that this COMPLETE that bill of exchange, turn it into a �check� and discharge the debt.

I include a small one page letter with it giving EXPLAINATION on what I�m doing.

I send the Bill of exchange COMPLETE to the Beneficiary registered mail, in this case, City of Montreal, and as per the Bill of Exchange act, they have the OBLIGATION to present that thing to the Bank of Canada, if they don�t, it relief the DRAWER and the DRAWEE from that debt.(art.84 of the bill of exchange act)

Pete Daoust

some seems to be, some not, but as article 84 of the bill of exchange act clearly say: the DRAWER and DRAWEE are relieved if the beneficiary FAILED to present, so as far as I am concerned, my DUTY is done. :)

Anthony Buisc

COMMERCIAL INVOICE: Document used in *foreign* trade to determine true value of the *imported* GOODS

Unlike the juridical PERSON, Beverly is foreign to the Trustee Corporation and it's agents.

Also, a judge can't utilize UCC regulation on the Trustee Corps behalf, until jurisdiction is established over some manner of "GOODS": all tangible, movable items. (If there are no goods on the table, then the issue is subject to common law, not UCC)

NOT considered "goods": -Rea Estate -Valuable Paper (stocks, bonds, securities) -Services -Rights

BILL OF LADING: A document signed by a carrier (a TRANSPORTER of goods). Carriers using ALL modes of *transpiration* issue bills of lading when they undertake the transportation of *cargo*

CARGO: In mercantile law. The load or lading of a *vessel*; goods, merchandise or whatever is CONVEYED in a ship or other merchant VESSEL (persons may also be considered vessels)

CONVEY: To pass or transmit the title to property from one to another; to transfer property or the title to property by deed or instrument under seal. To convey real estate is, by an appropriate instrument, to transfer the legal title to it from the present owner to another.

The juridical PERSON is the MERCANTILE VESSEL used to CONVEY cargo. Beverly's blood sweat and tears are the presumed cargo.

MERCANTILE AGENT: Agent who a PRINCIPAL authorizes to purchase and liquidate assets, and to raise funds by using the principal�s assets as loan collateral.

PRINCIPAL: Full meaning of a word should be ascertained at the outset, in order that the sense may not be lost by defect of expression, and that the law be not without reasons.

The party with authority in a business relationship. Or a business transactions face value. Refer to agent and notional.

The juridical PERSON is NOT the principal, it's just an instrument of CONVEYANCE, a transporting VESSEL. Beverly is the principal and whatever goods and non-goods she can claim as exclusive to herself, are her assets / property.

BILL: (Formal declaration), noun allegation of facts, claim.

Principal is ACCOUNTED for by CLAIM of FACT.

So, when you FAIL to distinguish and DEFINE the principal, then you have no claim in fact, and your assets are considered abondoned. Why? Because you are the principal, but non compos mentis, mutes, corpses and legal fictions are ALL incapable of claiming the property of man, as only man can make and VERIFY a CLAIM / BILL to property, but ONLY if that claim is advanced before a court of record. It won't go anywhere before an administrative venue / court because administrative venues only hear legal fictions.

Again, non compos mentis, mutes, corpses and legal fictions are ALL incapable of claiming the property of Beverly, which is WHY the Trustee Corp must convince her as the PRINCIPAL to interface via Trusttee agents and the juridical PERSON belonging to the Trustee Corp, ALL in hopes that the principal agrees or defaults into pledging property to a government official / MERCANTILE AGENT to administrate as a SURETY / BOND / SECURITY on the Corp's behalf, not on your behalf.....at that point, you're "dead" as far as they're concerned, your estate is up for grabs.

FURTHERMORE, if the you go in as the principal trying to administrate the Trustee Corp's PERSON instead of the Principal's OWN property, then don't be surprised when a judge decides that you're making false claims to trustee property by committing perjury through IMPERSONATING a public entity with authority to administrate juridical PERSONS.

As the principal you can only control your own property.

But look on the bright side, if the judge decides you mistakenly committed fraud, then you're just another NON COMPIS MENTUS, and thus can't make claim as principal to any of your own assets / property.....thus, that property is considered abandoned cargo for the Judge to administrate on bahlf of the "Trustee" Corporation.....but are they really your trustee? Nope....they're the juridical person's trustee. You ain't a beneficiary, you just got tricked into pledging your assets to their beneficiary.

Chris Evan

Hold on...why can't the Trustee send a check to the Utility, then send a BILL to the PERSON plus administration fees, then the PERSON accepts the BILL, sends it back to the Trustee. The Trustee then presents it to the party with SURETY for reimbursement?

Chris Evan

K...some fucktard sends CHRIS a BILL for $500...PBiddy Inc (newly formed btw...) accepts and pays the BILL with the corpus of the Trust (probably CHRIS' former bank account). PBIDDY now has a negative balance and needs to be reimbursed to ACCOUNT for everything plus the fees they charge

Chris Evan

So....if PBiddy does this 52 times and charges $300 each administration, that would be an income of 15600 minus expenses of payroll, office supplies, etc....The taxes would have to be paid and the balance is PBiddy's to keep and disburse to the shareholders....in lawful money of the Unite States of course. :-)

Chris Evan

It has to do with the Legal Tender Acts of 1862 and 1864, the Federal Reserve Act Section 16, the Emergency Banking Shit from 1933 and the Treasury Decision of Jan 20 ,1971. And a whole lot of busy work in between all that!

Chris Evan

Now...upon thinking about this, I have a question for Pete. (as he is the expert in here on Administration) Does the trustee corp send an Invoice...like from Quickbooks? Or is there a special BILL paper that the Trustee should order?

Chris Evan

LaNi...sorry. of 1789 and clause 9. My bad:

SEC. 9. And be it further enacted, That the district courts shall have, exclusively of the courts of the several States, cognizance of all crimes and offences that shall be cognizable under the authority of the United States, committed within their respective districts, or upon the high seas; where no other punishment than whipping, not exceeding thirty stripes, a fine not exceeding one hundred dollars, or a term of imprisonment not exceeding six months, is to be inflicted; and shall also have exclusive original cognizance of all civil causes of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, including all seizures under laws of impost, navigation or trade of the United States, where the seizures are made, on waters which are navigable from the sea by vessels of ten or more tons burthen, within their respective districts as well as upon the high seas; saving to suitors, in all cases, the right of a common law remedy, where the common law is competent to give it; and shall also have exclusive original cognizance of all seizures on land, or other waters than as aforesaid, made, and of all suits for penalties and forfeitures incurred, under the laws of the United States. And shall also have cognizance, concurrent with the courts of the several States, or the circuit courts, as the case may be, of all causes where an alien sues for a tort only in violation of the law of nations or a treaty of the United States. And shall also have cognizance, concurrent as last mentioned, of all suits at common law where the United States sue, and the matter in dispute amounts, exclusive of costs, to the sum or value of one hundred dollars. And shall also have jurisdiction exclusively of the courts of the several States, of all suits against consuls or vice-consuls, except for offences above the description aforesaid. And the trial of issues in fact, in the district courts, in all causes except civil causes of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, shall be by jury.

Pete Daoust

The advantage with the lien method is, Bank of Canada will receive the BoE completed, and that's for sure, now, will they do their job ?.....I have no idea as of now.

The three administration I have done with CRA and QRA, seems to have went smootly, I will know very soon, since a TAX return has been filed recently for the year 2013 for PIERRE DAOUST, :D

Chris Evan

My uncle told me when I was young how to be a good manager he said "if you get a difficult job, find the laziest guy you have and he will find the simplest way to get it done". I have made a career with this motto

Beverly Berta Braakschmack

The way I see it, the Utility corp is only sending you a COPY of the bill, and they USE the PERSON for their benefit already. You are only administrating to PROVE the bill has been accepted and discharged.

Chris Evan

TRANSPORTATION, punishment. In the English law, this punishment is inflicted by virtue of sundry statutes; it was unknown to the common law. 2 H. Bl. 223. It is a part of the judgment or sentence of the court, that the party shall be transported or sent into exile. 1 Ch. Cr. Law, 789 to 796: Princ. of Pen. Law, c. 4 Sec. 2.

Chris Evan

Down here Pete, there are 4 documents considered to be the foundation documents for the United States of America. The Declaration of Independence, the Articles of Confederaion, the Northwest Treaty, and the Constitution

David-Paul Sip

Yup...also the sinking of the Lusitania. There has to be a cause for people to rally around. Funny how politicians still use this classic time tested strategy...worked to perfection in the Ontario election yesterday :( Tired of this shit and how fucking gullible people are

Chris Evan

"convince men to enlist to fight against slavery." David-Paul Sip, that was from the library in your ass!! (Twice today that I got to say that!!!). Not true. Lincoln PROCLAIMED slavery was abolished because he thought the freed slaves would fight their 'oppressors' with the Northern aggression. The VALUABLE CONSIDERATION offered was 3/5th of a person. Funny thing though....by what authority did he do that? Think about it....the Southern states seceded and printed their own script. The only reason the Emancipation Proclamation had any weight ever is due to BELIEF.

But he created a bunch of stateless persons...therefore, they had to ACCOUNT for them, hence the 14th Amendment.

Enough history...let's get back to overthrowing a banking system.

David-Paul Sip

"convince men to enlist to fight against slavery" was simply my "Coles Notes" version Chris, a summarization. Yes my words, possibly from my ass, lol since I do not recall where I read this but I did read that Lincoln was all to aware that men would not fight over what I recall being a trade dispute. Shit now I'm going to rack my brain trying to recall exactly where I read this :( Fuck overthrowing a banking system seems like time better spent :)

Age Thomson

Ok guys, please help me with this. I think I am close, but I know I still have some gaps in my thinking to fill.

A typical bill sent to the person from a utility company, let's say it is a power bill in the amount of 400.00 for electricity use. The utility company starts this process by sending an incomplete bill of exchange, and it needs to be completed by a good administrator. As the administrator for the person to whom this bill has been sent, there would be a few options on how to take care of this. It could be bought with money of exchange which has been converted into money of account at a financial institution. It could be bought with a money order that is purchased at a post office or similar place. It could be paid with a cheque drawn from an account at a financial institution. It could be completed by an administrator and turned into a completed bill of exchange and submitted to the Bank of Canada. As I have been following the posts, it seems to me that there are some issues with the Bill of Exchange being sent to the Bank of Canada and the account at the utility company not being adjusted, but if it were some sort of government bill, then there does not seem to be that issue. So I think WHY??? There is also a question in my mind regarding the accounting that the utility company is using, and being paid already by the Bank of Canada, thus putting them into the position of not being able to accept and remit the Bill of Exchange to the Bank of Canada, nor being able to return it (and reveal all). In Pete's hydro situation for example, they won't return them.... So have they sold them? And, how would they sell them if they are only valuable to the beneficiary (hydro quebec)? Is this completed bill of exchange a valuable security instrument in the hands of anybody then? This all makes me wonder, why not just have the corporation pay the bill, and then bill the person for the same amount plus costs/time, to which the administrator could then complete that bill and have it get deposited into the corporation bank account as a deposit. This seems easy, but does it cover the whole situation adequately? The question still remains at that point of the utility company being "paid" twice by hitting the surety in advance from the public debt perspective as well as being paid from the account of the corporation.

Please help me fill in the blanks :)

Pete Daoust

I transform these remittance vouchers into a completed Bill of Exchange, and I send that Bill of Exchange to the beneficiary, not to Bank of Canada......

That's the beneficiary's job to present the bill of exchange to Bank of Canada, by depositing it into their commercial bank account.

Or, to send it back to Pierre Daoust, with a refusal notice.

Age Thomson

Pete Daoust, I think I understand that part of the process, but what about the rest? Clearly it has not worked properly with Hydro Quebec right? Would it have worked better if another Person or Corporation paid the bill and then billed your person for that service? Then the account at Hydro would be adjusted accordingly.

Age Thomson

I'm certainly not ready for the teacher part yet!!! But yes, I can see how that will be a good thing.

If every man teaches 10 other men....(and repeat) It wouldn't be very long before significant change happens.

Age Thomson

Sometimes I wish I had someone around here I could sit down with and chat though. I could learn faster....

It's like my brain is a dry sponge and I'm soaking up all this new information... The occasional chat often helps to sort out how the pieces fit together and dismiss the distractions...

Will Bed

Pete, what you mean there is that because of the CRIMINAL nature of Hydro's actions, they must now recognise their customer, the PERSON PIERRE DAOUST, as the AGENT Mister Pierre Daoust : HER MAJESTY AND AN ORGANISATION ?

You say it's a good thing... I dont think I get what difference it makes that they identify their customer as the "AGENT Mister Pierre Daoust / Her Majesty" vs as "PIERRE DAOUST the PERSON" ?

Pete Daoust

Since the ADMINISTRATION was BUYING back these debts, Pierre Daoust was a CUSTOMER, then the ADMINISTRATION decided to NOT buy back these debts, Hydro-Quebec had no choice but to NOT consider Pierre Daoust as a CUSTOMER anymore....

Now, they have to see Pierre Daoust as HER MAJESTY and an ORGANIZATION, and no more offers to buy back debts will be sent to Pierre Daoust anymore :P

Will Bed

Why do they now "HAVE" to see Pierre Daoust instead of PIERRE DAOUST ??? All I see is the CRIMINAL CODE defines a PERSON as Her Majesty and an organization and Her Majesty owns Hydro... Did I miss the latest updates ???

Pete Daoust

These HQ bills, always came in addressed to Pierre Daoust ;)

john scott duncan = a man. A Semi-evolved chimp, that made it this far.

John Scott Duncan = REGISTERED AGENT for the CROWN ORGANIZATION. In order to ACT as AGENT in this CAPACITY you MUST be ACTING AS HER MAJESTY.

JOHN SCOTT DUNCAN = LEGAL NAME, LEGAL ENTITY, REGISTERED CROWN ORGANIZATION. This is where all the ACCOUNTING and SURETY happens. When you use this name, you are ACTING in COMMERCE. When you use this name, there is always a MONETARY VALUE attached to it. Under ADMIRALTY JURISDICTION this would be a "VESSEL".

John Scott, DUNCAN = HER MAJESTY AND AN ORGANIZATION.

Will Bed

Alright... Recap because I like to make sure I get it right : These HQ AGENTS probably dont even have a clue who Pierre Daoust vs PIERRE DAOUST really is, and it actually doesnt matter... One is an owner and the other's a customer, but even if, I'm pretty sure that to most of them, their OWNER is ALSO a CUSTOMER which they got used to not seeing as an OWNER at all, and even they dont understand the difference in how they write the name... Since you clearly declared Pierre Daoust an HQ owner (fact, as an AGENT of Her Majesty) and they cannot say otherwise anyways, it's now a proof of where Pierre Daoust stands vs them...

What's the latest news regarding the electricity in PIERRE DAOUST's house ??

Pete Daoust

This is the word they use, Service INTERRUPTION ... :)

INTERRUPTION. The effect of some act or circumstance which stops the course of a prescription or act of limitation's.

2. Interruption of the use of a thing is natural or civil. Natural interruption is an interruption in fact, which takes place whenever by some act we cease truly to possess what we formerly possessed. Vide 4 Mason's Rep. 404; 2 Y. & Jarv. 285. A right is not interrupted by: mere trespassers, if the trespasser's were unknown; but if they were known, and the trespasses frequent, and no legal proceeding instituted in consequence of them, they then become legitimae interruptiones, of which Bracton speaks, and are converted into adverse assertions of right, and if not promptly and effectually litigated, they defeat the claim of rightful prescription; and mere threats of action for the trespasses, without following them up, will have no effect to preserve the right. Knapp, R. 70, 71; 3 Bar. & Ad. 863; 2 Saund. 175, n. e; 1 Camp. 260; 4 Camp. 16; 5 Taunt. 125 11 East, 376.

3. Civil interruption is that which takes place by some judicial act, as the commencement of a suit to recover the thing in dispute, which gives notice to the possessor that the thing which he possesses does not belong to him. When the title has once been gained by prescription, it will not be lost by interruption of it for ten or twenty years. 1 Inst. 113 b. A simple acknowledgment of a debt by the debtor, is a sufficient interruption to prevent the statute from running. Indeed, whenever an agreement, express or implied, takes place between the creditor and the debtor, between the possessor and the owner, which admits the indebtedness or the right to the thing in dispute, it is considered a civil conventional interruption which prevents the statute or the right of prescription from running. Vide 3 Burge on the Confl. of Lalys, 63.

Chris Evan

Ok....what is stopping me, acting as an agent of PBIDDY, from going down to my laboratory known as "MY OFFICE" and taking a piece of paper, on this piece of paper writing:

Bill of Exchange

Below that, identifying the parties and the security being drawn from, then authorizing the charge.

Then, sending this thing registered mail to, well....anyone? and whoever receives this thing can deposit it at their bank.

Scott Duncan

Look at the Winklevoss Twins. They are "Trust Fund Babies". The people who commissioned that trust cannot spend the money, but if the Winklevoss Twins SAY they can, then there is NO conflict, and therefore NOT illegal.

Chris Evan

Scott, the other day, when we were discussing Sino, you said that "ANY agent for a corporation that does business in more than one province can act as notary."

PBIDDY is registered in Delaware and clearly doing business in Massachusets. Is this the same in the states?

If so, the AGENT probably can't notarize documents that pertain to the corporation they are an AGENT of, yes?

Pete Daoust

Here Chris Evan, the whole fucking internal workings of the British East India Trading Company.....no need to thank me for it, it's a gift because I love you <3

http://www.clickhole.com/video/dont-understand-bitcoin-man-will-mumble-explanatio-2537?utm_campaign=default&utm_medium=ShareTools&utm_source=facebook