Today�s planet earth is an extraordinary place. More people choose to seek TRUTH, more people choose to speak the TRUTH, the corrupt government and the fraudulent bankers cannot keep any secret from humanity. Please support US to share above video around the WORLD, Participate be part of the CHANGE, Contribute consciousness into the system and assist US to RE-establish COMMON LAW back into the justice system. It is possible to CHANGE the unlawful game and stop the injustice, when we UNITE and STAND up to insist the CHANGE. ~~~ In gratitude ~~

Release the Kraken!

I wish everyone would print out and send this notice to there private utility crooks at least try to stop this crime against humanity: NOTICE & WARNING TO: EVERY/ALL UTILITY COMPANIES FOR EMBEZZLEMENT , THEFT BY DECEPTION & EXTORTION FAILING TO DISCHARGE ALL DEBTS PURSUANT TO 73RD CONGRESS. SESS 1. CHS. 48 49. JUNE 5, 6,1933 HJR 192 HR 1491 PUBLIC LAW 1 48 STAT 1 PUBLIC LAW 10 CHAPTER 48 STAT 112 PUBLIC LAW 73-10 40 STAT 411 TRADING WITH THE ENEMY ACT (TWEA) OCT 6, 1917 but not limited to: Since House Joint Resolution 192 (HJR 192) (Public law 7310) was passed in 1933 we have only had debt, because all property and gold was seized by the government as collateral in the bankruptcy of the United States. In 1863 the first Bank Act was passed. The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (or OCC) is a US federal agency established by the National Currency Act of 1863 and serves to charter, regulate, and supervise all national banks and the federal branches and agencies of foreign banks in the United States. The OCC was created by Abraham Lincoln to fund the American Civil War but was later transformed into a regulatory agency to instill confidence in the National Banking system and protect consumers from misleading business practices. The Lieber Code, or General Order 100 was also created by Abraham Lincoln in 1863. The National Bank Act (ch. 58, 12 Stat. 665, February 25, 1863) was a United States federal law that established a system of national charters for banks, the United States national banks. It encouraged development of a national currency based on bank holdings of U.S. Treasury securities, the so-called National Bank Notes. It also established the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) as part of the Department of the Treasury. This was to establish a national security holding body for the existence of the monetary policy of the state. The Act, together with Abraham Lincoln�s issuance of �greenbacks�, raised money for the federal government in the American Civil War by enticing banks to buy federal bonds and taxing state bank issued currency out of existence. The law proved defective and was replaced by the National Bank Act of 1864. The money was used to fund the Union army in the fight against the Confederacy. This authorized the OCC to examine and regulate nationally-chartered banks. The above only partially begins to include the historical records and other Acts of Congress that proves the US bankruptcy of 1933 and that there is no money, only credit that the American people are the Creditors. All utilities companies knowingly have been sending their (customers) dividends but, in fact, making each recipient believe that dividend was an invoice for services provided by the utilities companies. The Utilities Companies have mailed through the US Mail an intentional misrepresentation of facts, unfair business practices and each utility company and agents thereof have knowingly with forethought and malice created a fraudulent debt, defrauding the Creditor, that is the recipient of said dividends, that the utilities companies lead the recipient to believe through deception is an invoice. The utilities companies in turn then extract through extortionate measures payment from the customers instead of the utilities companies informing those same recipients that this dividend is in actuality payment to the recipient as a charged off debt pursuant to the incorporated in entirety documented evidence provided herein. Every/all utilities companies have thus created a convertible and fraudulent debt.(see ANALYSIS OF A COUNTRY EMBEZZLED). Every/all utilities companies have failed to pay off any of the public debt but rather unlawfully redirected ill-gotten gains into private corporate accounts through embezzlement, theft by deception, fraudulent conversion, and in violation to each all incorporated in entirety laws established through and as a result of the US Bankruptcy of 1933, wherein there is no money, only �bank Notes� which are but only a promise to pay. Thus all debts are to be discharged as agreed, but the utilities companies (and banks) through their greed have not discharged any debt, fraudulently making the utility customer deeper in debt by utilities companies use of �Bank Notes� or �promissory Notes� that the utilities companies add to the public debt side of the books rather than discharging the debts as stipulated in Public Laws, House Resolutions, and House Joint Resolutions. Additionally, the alleged invoices sent to every recipient is a dividend an/or a coupon to the recipient. The utilities companies all know this to be a fact. The Comptroller of The Currency also knows all of the above to be irrefutable facts, but is acting as a money laundering agency by/for/through/ the privately owned Federal Reserve, in Houston Texas, et al. The Comptroller of the Currency at County, State, and Federal level all know the incorporated documents and testimony to be true, but have yet to discharge any of the public debt, therefore have misappropriated funds through embezzlement, theft by deception, obtaining money through false pretenses, extortion and other predicate acts since the date of Comptroller of the Currency inception of 1863. All utility companies, which are private for profit corporations, regardless of location, are knowingly participating in the fraud and ponzi scheme with the intent to fraudulently convert this and every other country�s wealth into private industry accounts by fraudulent conveyance, embezzlement, theft by deception, creating fraudulent debts, ponzi scheme and fraud through the US Mail, just for starters. Every judge and every attorney in America, especially those who hold positions with several direct connections into the utilities companies bank accounts and acting as attorneys for the banks, most presumably in all other countries as well, since they all get their instructions from England the same place that all the banks get their instructions through the Comptroller of The Currency headquarters in London England, each knowing the above and incorporated to be true, since they are well versed on the US Bankruptcy of 1933 and that America still remains to date in a state of Emergency and operates under English Law, though that also is supposed to be a well kept secret. This means there �IS NO MONEY.� It further means that since there is no money American�s signatures are used as the credit to run this country. That in turn means that it is the American people whom are the Creditors not the Debtors, as the banks and utilities companies would like everyone to believe. The utilities companies have been operating with this knowledge with intent, forethought and malice to commit the crimes mentioned herein but not limited to. Due to the facts incorporated herein in entirety, all debts are to be charged off, including but not limited to every alleged utilities invoice, which each/all have actually been a dividend, for which every utilities company embezzled payment through fraud, using extortion and other threats to discontinue service if �Payment is not made.� These alleged invoices were dividends that every utilities company using deceptive business practice lead the public to believe were debts owed, when it is a fact that it is the utilities companies who owe the American public all those fraudulently received ill gotten gains plus the interest, stocks, bonds and other proceeds derived therefrom. All utilities companies are now put on notice that all debts are to be charged off pursuant to the stipulated and incorporated herein Acts et al. Authorized representative for______________________

:D

:-o

We've been invaded !!! ZOMBIE APPOCALIPSE !!! ?

Pete Daoust, thanks for speak the truth and awake up other people

I don't think utilities company are FAILING in discharging debts, they are maybe failing in their OBLIGATIONS to present the completed bill of exchange to the PAYMENT......just saying :P

But as long as they don't take what's mine, they can do what the fuck they want ! :D

Pete Daoust, we need you to teach US to stand in our right, and not to bow down to the unlawful system .

Ok, can you say NO, and keep your hand in your POCKET ? :/

Lee Lai Ping, that was a question addressed to YOU ^^^^^, please answer the question

Hellos !! :/

when I was in court, I do revoke the name game, now, look into the next step

Ok, but my question was: can you say NO, and keep your hand in your POCKET ? :-o

:-D :-D

Um... ....I got nothin'.

She definitly have an accent, and it's not like mine....

It's like they're all 12 years old, and Pete is 19. You people aren't learning fast enough :(

I feel about 16 on the scale.... :-D

If one does not get rid of "beliefs," there is NO WAY to actually understand, and use the information provided by Scott. I did not start to LEARN, until I COMPLETELY got rid of having "beliefs."

i am a woman, i am invoke common law court, my friends, you all have your journey to challenge the system, yet, i am still learning, and i am willing to speak my TRUTH, maybe that is not your truth, but, i accept you as who you are, let us oversee the difference, focus on being the change we want to see in the world. ~ Peace and Light

Truth, like reality, is NOT a subjective thing. :p

Lee Lai Ping... I have an uncomfortable reality here for you. Sit down. ...ready? A WOMAN CANNOT BE A PERSON UNDER THE LAW. That has NEVER changed.

As an aside: I have a large penis, and this allows me to be a person under the law.

...no really! I'm not making that up!

...I DO have a large penis.

Hahahaha!

Now is it the size that allows you this status, or are less well-endowed men also allowed to be "persons under the law"? :D

"when I was in court, I do revoke the name game, now, look into the next step" Lee Lai Ping, i remember reading about you awhile back going to court, and where the justice actually said to you something like- "...unless you give me the power, there's nothing i can do to help you".....did you ever actually find out what he meant by that, id like to know myself what exactly he meant by- "...unless you give me the power..."

In other words, Lee Lai Ping, your do not have a PERSON with STANDING to do all that you are planning to do (if it even was possible to do). Let this sink in. And you have COMMON LAW as PRECEDENT to support what Scott has said. <<Common law (also known as case law or precedent) is law developed by judges through decisions of courts and similar tribunals, as opposed to statutes adopted through the legislative process or regulations issued by the executive branch.[1]>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_law

Mackximus Minimus, Chip Douglas, thanks for the information, I am looking into this, have a wonderful evening

ABOVE ALL, REMEMBER THE #1 RULE OF THE UNIVERSE!

Evidently, Lee Lai Ping is not familiar with the number 1 rule. :P

" Chip Douglas, thanks for the information, I am looking into this, have a wonderful evening" What? All i did was remind you of something that you should've took as a clue from that Justice.. What was that Justice then Scott really trying to say to her back then when he said- "...unless you give me the power, there's nothing i can do to help you..." ?

http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/quotes/n/napoleonbo103585.html

I recall these words from the Justice Chip. I imagine that the Justice would be the best person to ask. How could folks know what the Justice meant or was thinking? My guess would be that the Justice was waiting for Lee Lai Ping to act like the sole administrator and state what she required of the court. Perhaps the Justice was accepting the role of Trustee? Only a guess.

Hmmmm, Chip Douglas, I get the feeling that maybe, after she deflected surety for the person (if that is what she did) the justice was requesting to be appointed trustee so that he could act as administrator on the person's behalf. It reminds me of a similar situation for dean clifford, where he could only have the assistance and protection of the Aquilae Trust once he requested it, because Dean CLIFFORD has been liened into the Aquilae trust, so any and all matters pertaining to Dean CLIFFORD would be outside of the court's jurisdiction...my apologies if I have not recalled the details accurately.

Good answer David- :-)

You are correct, Stuart.

Could the JUSTICE be appointed as trustee, and I keep my ADMINISTRATOR role, and INSTRUCT the trustee on what to do ? :/

I have the "right" to be a fire truck... Reality shows that I can only PRETEND to be one. ...just like women have the RIGHT to be recognized a PERSONS under the law. ;)

Well, get a chick name first, and maybe the number will change :P

Joey Spirit, I learned that everyone have different path to walk on, not one road is the perfect one to fit all, I choose to invoke common law grand jury back into the justice system, then , man, woman is the one that have say in court, not the per-decide judge.

1960 Bill of rights eliminated the need for Grand Juries.

There hasn't been a grand jury in Canada since...

1984 :P

Cookie please :D

Old courthouses with the two jury boxes necessary to accommodate the 24 jurors of a grand jury can still be seen.[25] The grand jury would evaluate charges and return what was called a "true bill (of indictment)" if the charges were to proceed.[26] or a verdict of nolle prosequi if not.[24] The practice gradually disappeared in Canada over the course of the twentieth century, after being the subject of extended discussions late in the 19th.[24] It was ultimately abolished in 1984 when the Nova Scotia courts formally ended the practice.

Joelle !!! :D

Do you have a picture of you ? :/

I really have no idea what a Joelle looks like :(

...like she has with me.

Send it in PM, I swear I won't share it 8-|

She doesn't want YOU looking at HER the same way SHE looks at ME :P

...because that's some nasty perverted shit there...

there is no True Bills because there is no true claims anymore they are all just transactions of security interests. Therefore all those who engage in the process have an interest in the matter including the administrator acting as justice. This puts everyone in the courtroom in the pathetic position of "unclean hands" liars and thieves unless of course you choose to do business with the pirates.....

Let's circle back around to this please.... "A WOMAN CANNOT BE A PERSON UNDER THE LAW. That has NEVER changed." Ummm.....what? It is understood that we have a person in our pocket, for whom we administrate shit. Okay. But, women cannot be a person under law, as a penis wielding semi-evolved chimp can?? Why? Joelle Spirit Right, and how is this different for men? Men too have the RIGHT to be recognized as PERSONS under the law. What makes us different, except for the penis thing? We've tried tackling this issue before but we don't seem to get very far likely because the men here out number the women. 2 hrs � Unlike � 2

http://womenshistory.about.com/cs/lives19th/a/blackstone_law.htm In the 19th century, American and British women's rights -- or lack of them -- depended heavily on the commentaries of William Blackstone which defined a married woman and man as one person under the law. Here's what William Blackstone wrote in 1765: Source: William Blackstone. Commentaries on the Laws of England. Vol, 1 (1765), pages 442-445. By marriage, the husband and wife are one person in law: that is, the very being or legal existence of the woman is suspended during the marriage, or at least is incorporated and consolidated into that of the husband; under whose wing, protection, and cover, she performs every thing; and is therefore called in our law-French a feme-covert, foemina viro co-operta; is said to be covert-baron, or under the protection and influence of her husband, her baron, or lord; and her condition during her marriage is called her coverture. Upon this principle, of a union of person in husband and wife, depend almost all the legal rights, duties, and disabilities, that either of them acquire by the marriage. I speak not at present of the rights of property, but of such as are merely personal. For this reason, a man cannot grant anything to his wife, or enter into covenant with her: for the grant would be to suppose her separate existence; and to covenant with her, would be only to covenant with himself: and therefore it is also generally true, that all compacts made between husband and wife, when single, are voided by the intermarriage. A woman indeed may be attorney for her husband; for that implies no separation from, but is rather a representation of, her lord. And a husband may also bequeath any thing to his wife by will; for that cannot take effect till the coverture is determined by his death. The husband is bound to provide his wife with necessaries by law, as much as himself; and, if she contracts debts for them, he is obliged to pay them; but for anything besides necessaries he is not chargeable. Also if a wife elopes, and lives with another man, the husband is not chargeable even for necessaries; at least if the person who furnishes them is sufficiently apprized of her elopement. If the wife be indebted before marriage, the husband is bound afterwards to pay the debt; for he has adopted her and her circumstances together. If the wife be injured in her person or her property, she can bring no action for redress without her husband's concurrence, and in his name, as well as her own: neither can she be sued without making the husband a defendant. There is indeed one case where the wife shall sue and be sued as a feme sole, viz. where the husband has abjured the realm, or is banished, for then he is dead in law; and the husband being thus disabled to sue for or defend the wife, it would be most unreasonable if she had no remedy, or could make no defence at all. In criminal prosecutions, it is true, the wife may be indicted and punished separately; for the union is only a civil union. But in trials of any sort they are not allowed to be evidence for, or against, each other: partly because it is impossible their testimony should be indifferent, but principally because of the union of person; and therefore, if they were admitted to be witness for each other, they would contradict one maxim of law, "nemo in propria causa testis esse debet"; and if against each other, they would contradict another maxim, "nemo tenetur seipsum accusare." But, where the offence is directly against the person of the wife, this rule has been usually dispensed with; and therefore, by statute 3 Hen. VII, c. 2, in case a woman be forcibly taken away, and married, she may be a witness against such her husband, in order to convict him of felony. For in this case she can with no propriety be reckoned his wife; because a main ingredient, her consent, was wanting to the contract: and also there is another maxim of law, that no man shall take advantage of his own wrong; which the ravisher here would do, if, by forcibly marrying a woman, he could prevent her from being a witness, who is perhaps the only witness to that very fact. In the civil law the husband and the wife are considered as two distinct persons, and may have separate estates, contracts, debts, and injuries; and therefore in our ecclesiastical courts, a woman may sue and be sued without her husband. But though our law in general considers man and wife as one person, yet there are some instances in which she is separately considered; as inferior to him, and acting by his compulsion. And therefore any deeds executed, and acts done, by her, during her coverture, are void; except it be a fine, or the like manner of record, in which case she must be solely and secretly examined, to learn if her act be voluntary. She cannot by will devise lands to her husband, unless under special circumstances; for at the time of making it she is supposed to be under his coercion. And in some felonies, and other inferior crimes, committed by her through constraint of her husband, the law excuses her: but this extends not to treason or murder. The husband also, by the old law, might give his wife moderate correction. For, as he is to answer for her misbehaviour, the law thought it reasonable to intrust him with this power of restraining her, by domestic chastisement, in the same moderation that a man is allowed to correct his apprentices or children; for whom the master or parent is also liable in some cases to answer. But this power of correction was confined within reasonable bounds, and the husband was prohibited from using any violence to his wife, aliter quam ad virum, ex causa regiminis et castigationis uxoris suae, licite et rationabiliter pertinet. The civil law gave the husband the same, or a larger, authority over his wife: allowing him, for some misdemeanors, flagellis et fustibus acriter verberare uxorem; for others, only modicam castigationem adhibere. But with us, in the politer reign of Charles the second, this power of correction began to be doubted; and a wife may now have security of the peace against her husband; or, in return, a husband against his wife. Yet the lower rank of people, who were always fond of the old common law, still claim and exert their ancient privilege: and the courts of law will still permit a husband to restrain a wife of her liberty, in the case of any gross misbehaviour. These are the chief legal effects of marriage during the coverture; upon which we may observe, that even the disabilities which the wife lies under are for the most part intended for her protection and benefit: so great a favourite is the female sex of the laws of England. Source: William Blackstone. Commentaries on the Laws of England. Vol, 1 (1765), pages 442-445.

Applies in the U.S., or no? Also, unmarried women.....uh....what of them?

Only in CIVIL LAW Jurisdiction, so it would depend on which STATE you were in.

Unmarried women are not PERSONS under the law in either jurisdiction. Marriage can be a VERY powerful legal weapon if used properly.

The only CIVIL LAW jurisdiction in the States is Louisiana. I think....

And Puerto-Rico ? :D

Yup...I was thinking STATES. But yup! That territory is a CIVIL LAW jurisdiction. :-)

I know a greasy spic from there too.... :-)

It's the same thing when folks thinks about CANADA, they forget QUEBEC :D

Fuck Quebec!!

It's like they have a different word for EVERYTHING!

And no one cuts the service :P

Can you make that clearer? Common law is what we are under, yes? Well, in most states...with exception of LA, and some civil statutes in CA? https://www.law.berkeley.edu/library/robbins/CommonLawCivilLawTraditions.html So, MD, NJ, UT, and the rest....common law is the functioning law?

Powerful, in that, women are not recognized as persons until they are the wife of a penis holder, and become part of his person? What about lesbian marriage? How is this recognized then?

Yes.

It's not. Different or "re-worded" "Licenses". The government owns them all.

That's truly fucked up.

You have a TWO TRILLION DOLLAR TRADE DEFICIT, THAT is fucked up.

HAHAHA!!.. :D

But, gay marriage is recognized, because both of the husbands are persons under law?

Trade deficit, yeah....that's fucked up too.

TWO TRILLION. THAT'S DEFICIT, Not DEBT

That's what gets added to the EXISTING debt this year!

I could've married twice. I was waiting to be in love. Now, I'm going to marry a gay man. He'll leave me the hell alone and mind his damn business, and we'll both benefit. I hate old, white men....and their dumb ass laws.

How is this 'not recognized as a person' business in any way beneficial to women? If at all...

LaNi Black, you would have to marry a guy who can wesponize that!!

So, needs to be well versed in this to legally strategize me into better standing under common law?

It's not. ALL LAW is designed with the auxiliary purpose of repressing women. That's what the Abrahamic religions are for. It's been going on for over 5000 years. Sorry you missed it :P

That's what gets added to the EXISTING debt this year! :-o That is CRAZY shit... !!!

this isn't fucking funny. how do I get out of this?

I have an idea :D

transgender sex change?

You don't. You just understand it better.

legally recognized as a man?

what Pete?

I recognized that bullshit in religion, which is exactly why I left. I didn't know the laws surrounding my existence uphold the same oppression all around me.

Well, just don't get in, so you won't have to get out... :/

Do you "have" a PERSON, LaNi Black ? :/

I thought I did. I thought I was not a person, but I have one. Apparently, that ain't it either.

maybe that's backwards

wait

yes. I have a person in my pocket. (Don't riddle me, I can't concentrate right now!! I am fuming.)

Ok, so that PERSON, you happen to have in your pocket, has a deficit this year, just saying :D

Does she have a person?? :-/

that's exactly what I am trying to find out chris

She said YES, can't you read ?

I am parroting you, Pete...but, only you actually have one because of your penis. I am just learning this today.

Oh, so don't bother with that stupid deficit :/

so the men have a two trillion dollar deficit?

YES! LaNi Gets a cookie! :D

NO...PERSONS for fuck sakes :(

ah! right, Pete.

men with persons, specifically.

Are you guys all on drugs ?? :(

what did I say?

Only MALE PERSONS.

There is also a GENDER marked on the Birth Certificte. That's important, LEGALLY.

right. why did Pete ask if I was on drugs?

apparently.

now why?

and, how do i leverage it?

as a woman, without a person, unless I hitch to a penis

>:-{

Marry a mama's boy, that you can manipulate, and take control over the administration. Just sayin'.

Oh for fucks sake....are you kidding me? If he ain't Alpha, he ain't shit.

A white one :D

Probably, Pete...how did you know? -_-

so my only recourse is to marry? I had decided against that.

Hey, it's better than the position you have now, LaNi. Plus, is no different than what you see today. Many women run the money part of a marriage anyways. If you want a stronger position in law and commerce, marrying a mama's boy, and taking over the administration is a real option.

A 5 feet 6 inch, 120Lbs white boy..... :D

Just to be clear....single women do not have personhood either under common or civil law? the only way to gain footing is to marry a human with a penis?

I'm nauseated.

Relax.....no big deal, you are sit on a GOLD MINE :D

Welcome to reality. Sorry you missed it. Better late than never, I guess.

Where is that video of a woman of the industry demanding some respect? Scott! :D

Listen to Pete Daoust.

Corporate PERSONS have no gender, and limited liability.

so a corporation, I am first director, I lien the name....I win?

BETTER than a penis...

I had already decided what Pete suggested, if I ever did marry.

You are also a SHAREHOLDER, and SHAREHOLDERS RULE

I'm not fully comprehending the affect of women not being persons...the appearance is that both men and women receive the same benefits.... say for example, Lani was going to sue or lien someone, the fact she is a single woman (ie not a person), would void any action she may take? or vice versa, if she was being sued, she would not be able to administrate and or defend herself if she went to court?

Just remember the CAPACITY you are ACTING in, at ALL TIMES.

you promised not to lie. Incorporate in DE, name myself first director and shareholder, lien my legal name, and escape this vagina prison? for good?

Yes.

Thank you.

The UCC statement is PROOF of the transfer.

I thought UCC only matters in the water?

ALL CLAIMS MUST BE SETTLED before you lien the name

fine. I'll use life insurance loc to do that.

would that work?

Woah, that is VERY important info!

Chris Evan, Bobis Youruncle!

Please clarify UCC for me....matters in maritime only, or nah?

Under the UCC you can make a FINANCING STATEMENT (which is a lien)

The financing statement asserting that the corporation liens my name for whatever amount, and other creditors are second in line, should there be any?

Fuckin' mind blowing shit this stuff here! Glad you caught it LaNi and delved deeper. So much for fuckin women's lib eh?

I'm so mad, I could kill

Yes. Also an affidavit CONSENTING to the seizure of the name. It's yours to give. It's not the Government's to refuse.

so, as first director and shareholder, I can also make corporation provide for any expenses, living, business, and otherwise.

I hate that we are baited to waste so much fucking time marching and shit, and this is the fucking law, and you need chess strategy to escape. such fucking bullshit man, it's ridiculous.

LIENS are TREATIES. They are the bridge between two jurisdictions (Public/Private)

A bridge with a vanguard though, right?

Admiralty Maritime law is the FOUNDATION AUTHORITY for all ACTS AND STATUTES in LEGAL Jurisdiction.

To block unwanted/unwelcomed commerce and coercion?

Neither jurisdiction has the right. Your PERSON is PROPERTY of another PERSON, BY CONSENT.

Common and Civil will back the fuck off then? Excellent.

Free-Dumb babbling *DELETED*

thank you.

My Pleasure

so, my last question?? common and civil will lay back and circle jerk themselves into a coma, while my force field of liened first directorship and shareholder-dom protects me? #Peeewwnpeewwwnnn???? I hope.

I have my own navy... I'm pretty sure I can take her...

oh dear.... the rest of us vaginas DO NOT support the tomfoolery. do not lump us together.

Jeez, what the hell did you do now? :p

*piece

dammit!!! what is wrong with people??!?!?!?!

That's one angry (and illiterate) blonde!

I deleted her free-dumb ALL CAPS post. She's praying to Menard as we speak.

Who was it that was asking why "all blondes are bad"? I think the overwhelming evidence on the subject speaks for itself. :D

But, my last question....please. so, my last question?? common and civil will lay back and circle jerk themselves into a coma, while my force field of liened first directorship and shareholder-dom protects me? #Peeewwnpeewwwnnn???? I hope. 6 mins � Like

Daniel J Wentz has marines on his boat! He'll happily dispatch them to my aid. I think I'm safe from Free-Dumb-Cum-Slut (all she'd be good for).

<<I hate that we are baited to waste so much fucking time marching and shit, and this is the fucking law, and you need chess strategy to escape.>> LaNi Black, I hear what you are saying, but these things are NOT hidden, and we have failed to be fully responsible of our lives. Look at all the time that took you to ask the right questions, and only because you were mad as hell. But, you finally are on to something! What I am trying to say is that part of the programing is for us to always identify the problem, immediately blame someone else, and never actually do anything about it. It's the bankers, it's the government, it's white people, it's the devil, anybody but OURSELVES. I stopped blaming everyone, and came to accept full responsibility for my life. Nobody was deceiving me. I was a willing participant, and I was deceiving myself. But not any more.

I agree with everything there, and while not hidden, they are INTENTIONALLY obscured as fuck. Sometimes all there is is an impotent rage.

Is this all found in a contract law book?

NO. It's found in MANY books.

I like to read, love it even. I need a list. I need a list, now.

Shit, Lani is fuming!

I need a blow-job. Let's deal :D

....and my lunch has returned, and placed itself on my desktop. -_-

I am, Mackximus. It's not like I wouldn't prefer to leave everyone alone, and reciprocally be left the fuck alone. But, being fucked over, in every facet of life, takes it's toll.

I decline that offer (red line, non-assumpsit, or what the fuck ever....BY:_____________) So. About that list.....Scott???

oh Scott Duncan.....such a ladies man you are!

No consideration, No undertakings. :P

http://www.stabilitees.com/store/image/cache/data/Designs/peace-of-shit-686092464-800x800.jpg

:D

It's the word in the streets! :P

"Case in Point!!" Mackximus, I am trying not to do all of this: "What I am trying to say is that part of the programing is for us to always identify the problem, immediately blame someone else, and never actually do anything about it. It's the bankers, it's the government, it's white people, it's the devil, anybody but OURSELVES. I stopped blaming everyone, and came to accept full responsibility for my life. Nobody was deceiving me. I was a willing participant, and I was deceiving myself. But not any more." But, we're negotiating 'Operation Deep Throat' What the entire fuck??!?!?!? :/

Tell me what books, dammit!!!!!! Come on!!!

It's a big list.

And?

Start with the ANUAL PRACTICE manual for the region you are in. It ALWAYS refers to the source authorities.

Region. North American continent? or referring to East Coast of north America?

this is country specific?

In ONTARIO it's called the ONTARIO ANNUAL PRACTICE. In the US your STATE will have one, and it will be called something really retarded

EVERY fiscal year, a new one comes out.

Just like our nurse practice acts..... okay.....

do I need to go to the bar association of the state to obtain a copy?

EXACTLY! "Just like our nurse practice acts"

Okay.... a few people will live another day.....

what else?

That's it. That is a map to all the books you'll need to read, and it won't be quoting from a copy of BLACKS FUCKING LAW FROM THE FUCKING 1700's!

Gold!

That Free-Dumb shit drives me nuts. EVERY time I see quotes from a law dictionary from the 1700's, I just want to bitch-slap the shit out of them.

I am appreciative....my corporation (unless I choose a 5 or 10 year shelf with established credit for other reasons) will cost less than $400. Awesome!!! I bow to you.

...while you're down there...

Hahahahaha!

....kick you?? <_< sado/masochist, huh??? Alright. I'm into that.

#BOOM

How do you kick while you are bowing?

a roundhouse

While bowing?

I don't think you understand basic physics.

no clue...

Yes, I KNOW that part.

If you had a clue, you wouldn't be asking/bowing.

Here.

I'll change it to 'punch' you...

that I can do. while bowing. with my eyes closed. and, I won't miss.....

So, just so I'm clear here... You are feigning gratitude in order to inflict violence on me?

I really wonder why people can't see why I'm better than they are...

no, no, no.....I'm not feigning it. I actually am grateful. You said, "while you're down there..." I filled in the blank with a suggestion. I didn't know where you were going with that. It's just the first thing that came to mind. You seem like you're into that kinky shit.

I seem that way do I? Why?

Being only here for the 'tail', and all.....

normal convention bores you. your IQ is too high. It's that, or boiling babies, just for curiosity sake.

For argument sake, I'll go with sadomasochism....

The mythology your kind makes up about me is fascinating. You all just pull shit out of your asses, and brand it "true" and construct a bunch of presumptions on top of it. Tail... Yes. I really like having sex. I also don't lie about it. Where does a "like of violence" come into your self-made mythology of yours?

Oh fuck, Scott. I'm joking. I haven't branded anything as true, nor have I compounded it with erroneous presumption. I don't know a damn thing about what you like.

Please explain how you think these things are connected.

It was a joke, dammit! My word!!!

Even in a "joke" capacity, it makes no sense.

...nope. Still not getting it.

Why? Is there no point of historical reference for high IQ and sadomasochism?

Does convention not bore those who are brilliant?

Blacks Law Dictionary are not that old and they are all relevant in law(first edition 1890ish)However that being said, there is NO rule of law anymore so when you live in a made up legal system of bullshit you have to learn a little bullshit to reject or navigate through it....

*"Does convention not bore those who are brilliant"? What does "convention" have to do with it?

How do you get "bored" of a woman giving herself to you?

If a man get's "bored" she's thinking about something else during the act, or he is being manipulated by sex.

"conventional" sex. the norm, the standard....the same. if you appreciate that woman, you don't. but, if it's a barter transaction, the stipulations may be a little different.

Yes... The stipulations are mine. :P

I didn't understand that last one.... If a MAN get's "bored" SHE's thinking about something else during the act, or is being manipulated by sex.

It doesn't mean I would benefit from violence.

okay. then, you don't. there. all better now???

I used to be into sadism, necrophilia, and bestiality, but then I realized I was just beating a dead horse.

-_- I rest my fucking case....

lol

something outside of the norm. my point, exactly. other people skydive. you're no longer into that.....lol

Your ability to miss the point is breathtaking.

MEANWHILE AT AQUILAE LAB...

I got the pun. I got your point: need for heightened sexual stimulation does not equal violence....for you. What else?

Wrong... Try again.

I think I can't be right..... I have no idea what this volley is, that is happening right now. I was wrong about your point?

or wrong about the pun?

Surrender clause: "I think wrong, and I value the wrong things!"

I don't know.

Yes.

Oh fuck.... -_- the hell???

"I think wrong, and I value the wrong things!" Yes.

"I think wrong, and I value the wrong things!" ...as it relates to the sadomasochism.......or, nah?

The BAR put a Copywrite on the language. Interesting. No license required to hunt Attornies.

copyright on what language?

Legalese

I am likely wrong. I am still learning. Scott knows.

You are not wrong. All LEGALESE is COPYRIGHTED.

So when you use it in court, you are practicing law without a license? Is that why they can say that?

Thanks Scott.

Adam Thomas thinks it's English. He "demanded proof it wasn't". Ceit Butler raised the point that LEGAL definitions are DIFFERENT than ENGLISH definitions, and are therefor NOT ENGLISH. He then had a seizure, and babbled incoherently (speaking in tongues?), got banned and the rest is history. The point being; My PROOF is self-evident.

Notice a court has INTERPRETERS, not TRANSLATORS? ;)

I had to block Adam Thomas. I couldn't take the mindless babble.

AT someTHING.

*GASP*

Am I wrong again?

Look up what ATTORN means and you will see what an ATTORNEY does ;)

Lightbulb moment...

...wait for it.

You against your-Self

...and he drops the ball :(

they take or transfer something

I was rootin' for ya too, Jason!