The Tender For Law

Volume 6

Jun 05, 2014 2:44 AM

Mathew Wolfe

Real question in another group. "Can anyone tell me how to regain "man jurisdiction" in a case that has already begun? How does one even begin to respond to that one?

Read Comments

Mathew Wolfe

I learned the basics there. I guess I feel a little moral obligation to give back to those trying to learn. I don't know own where I would be without those willing to entertain my ignorant questions along the way.

Mathew Wolfe

The freedumb shit never set well with me tho. Just didn't make since. I kept looking until I found something that seemed based in reality. The creditor path seems to make more since. I want to help as many people get on the right track as possible. I've still got much to learn myself, but at least now I know where to focus my time...

Mathew Wolfe

Well it took me a little bit to come to that realization. I started out learning that I'm not a person... then I stumbled onto dean Clifford's stuff on trusts...and at the time, that made the most since. Everyone else was claiming to "vacate" and blah blah blah, but that didn't seem plausible. Then someone shared some creditors in commerce audios with me, and I've been trying to learn as much as I can about being a creditor ever since. This group helped me with a notice of mistake a while back, and so far it's proves successful.

Mathew Wolfe

I he noticed it seems this group takes a different approach to being a creditor than the creditors in commerce guys. They are more peaceful, "make all parties whole" kinda approach. This groups seems to be more of the "fuck them" approach! Lol

Scott Duncan

Pete, when Brad Tullar said "What is... The Tender For Law" he was answering according to the rules of Jeopardy.

This method of replying was a very funny reply, which you missed because you're from Quebec, which means you miss all the good jokes. :P

Chris Evan

Here is how I would respond to that question....

BLOCKED

I just have too much on my own plate with learning that I can not help someone who thinks that a magical jurisdiction such as MAN JURISDICTION exists. And if it does, by chance, perhaps he should ask the AUTHORities in that jurisdiction.

Los Blanc

The only obligation government has to man, is to the protection of his/her property. So, if one's status as a man requiring the restoration of property, is not in question, then one evidently hasn't authored a claim advanced before a court of record whereat a man can actually be heard (under oath or affirmation) in his undiminished "flesh and blood" capacity. But if that which is exclusive to a man; property, is not on the table, then you're dealing with rights to usufruct the fuck out of some fictional instrument in commerce. That's where groups like this attempt to educate with regards to navigating such fictions.....as debt is fiction / future speculation / a promise to perform / a contract....it's not capital, debt / contract compels the performance of capital. Hence the term tender for law

Los Blanc

Can i claim and name that which is exclusive to myself and no other within a society....(shrugs) sure....my breath, my heartbeat, my body, my labor and it's fruits are my property, so too is my control over my cognitive ability to exercise my liberty/self determination as to how i wish to enjoy my properties. It's pretty simple, actually...as principal, my interest appreciates public duty to uphold law by requirement or contract by consent; i.e. exercising liberty over property is not commercial...unless you want to leverage your capital to generate fiat for a corporate fiction. That's fun too, no doubt.

Regardless, if i'm not in control of that which is exclusive to me, then i suppose i'm either presumed dead and / or somebody is trying to make a slave out of me, no? In which case, one can't really administrate ones own reality let alone another author's legal fiction that is exclusive to no one.

Los Blanc

I'm not saying anything about you, Pete. The only thing i can claim about you, is whether or not you trespassed upon my property, or broke a verified contract with me. Otherwise, it's up to you to define yourself however you elect by your own determination, no?

On that note, if one by his/her own determination decides that they have no status as a man, good for them! Mr State Agent can presume there's property abandoned "at sea", giving the state the right to usufruct the shit out of that abandoned property via the otherwise non administered fiction.....because dead men can't navigate in commerce, right? So let the state handle your affairs/property if you're not man enough to do so yourself...play dead.

Los Blanc

Regardless, you can eliminate gold, silver and fiat but it's impossible to eliminate the concept of property without also eliminating the most fundamental means of production within a society, the human body and mind.

But hey, maybe Pete despises the concept of property because it implies the existent of man and his responsibility to it, a real thing, not a make-believe legal fiction used to compel the performance of real things / capital.

Chris Evan

THE TENDER FOR LAW is an examination of what you need to know to fight Judicial corruption, by examining the stuff you are LIED TO about.

SPOILERS: IT'S ALWAYS ABOUT ACCOUNTING AND SURETY.

You are BOUND by ACTS, STATUTES, and CODES when you use MONEY. On that money are the words THIS NOTE IS LEGAL TENDER: THIS NOTE - The note the words (NOTICE) is written on. IS LEGAL - CODES, ACTS, AND STATUTES with the force of law.

TENDER - tender verb ten�dered ten�der�ing Definition of TENDER

transitive verb 1: to make a tender of 2: to present for acceptance : offer "tendered my resignation" intransitive verb : to make a bid or tender Origin of TENDER Middle English tendren, from Anglo-French tendre offer First Known Use: 15th century

THIS NOTE IS LEGAL TENDER=THIS NOTE IS A TENDER FOR LAW

This forum is where you can ask all your questions, and we don't have to keep typing the same answers over and over. To that end, I am telling you to WATCH THIS FIRST:

http://youtu.be/3P7izAUe3ZM

NOT watching this, and then posting a question and/or making idiotic statements which reveal you HAVEN'T watched this, means you are DELIBERATELY ignoring these instructions, and you will be banned.

Post your question, we will do our best to answer. OFF TOPIC POSTS WILL BE PURGED. We want people to be able to use this as a central reference and a place to go for help, where people will take the time to do so.

Post any questions on LAW, MONEY, CONTRACTS, and JURISDICTIONS and how they are connected.

Keep it civil, even if Scott doesn't. (It's Scott after all. Seriously, it's better than paying him) Remember that Scott chooses his words carefully. LEARN WHAT THOSE WORDS MEAN.

And when your examination of these things is done, you will see that we also have a REAL SOLUTION to the problem. YOU CAN'T BUY that shit ANYWHERE! :D

...no really. You can't. It's copyrighted.

TL;DR - IT'S ALWAYS ABOUT ACCOUNTING AND SURETY. THIS NOTE IS LEGAL TENDER = OFFERING AN UNCONDITIONAL "BENEFIT" OF ACTS, STATUTES AND CODES.

Los Blanc

Chris, what is the dollar backed by? The full faith a credit of the U.S.

-Credit is Debt

-Debt is a promise to perform

-A promise to perform is a contract

-A contract is NOT capital, it compels the performance of capital.

So then, what is the "capital" / chattel? We are. We, are the principal which backs the fiction.

Hence we have right as ADMINISTRATORS...right?

Chris Evan

So you need two thing simultaneously to back the FEDERAL RESERVE NOTE. You need FAITH and CREDIT.

Credit A term used in accounting to describe either an entry on the righthand side of an account or the process of making such an entry. A credit records the increases in liabilities, owners' Equity, and revenues as well as the decreases in assets and expenses.

A sum in taxation that is subtracted from the computed tax, as opposed to a deduction that is ordinarily subtracted from gross income to determine adjusted gross income or taxable income. A claim for a particular sum of money.

The ability of an individual or a company to borrow money or procure goods on time, as a result of a positive opinion by the particular lender concerning such borrower's solvency and reliability. The right granted by a creditor to a debtor to delay satisfaction of a debt, or to incur a debt and defer the payment thereof.

Los Blanc

Yup....there's no silver or gold, so man's labor is the only property left backing the fiat monetary system.

That being the case, one has no right of usufruct over the leverage his/her property generates in legal commerce if one claims no right to the property actually backing that commerce; a dead man can't act as administrator, dead men and fictions can't make claims to property nor acknowledge who is meant to hold the blue ink pen; either a State Agent managing it's idiot mute chattel, or a simple man managing his property / affairs like a man should when navigating both reality/law AND fiction/legal commerce....."tender for law".

Scott N Tara

Los Blanc, you have revealed the following:

1: You have NO CLUE what MONEY is. 2: You have no idea what CURRENCY is. 3: You have not watched the REQUIRED VIEWING (Conveniently posted in this thread).

It is time to shut your fucking noise-hole now.

Last warning.

Los Blanc

HAahaha...it's interesting the hostility one receives from those who fail to back their own opinionated assertions with factual claims. :) Typical, but interesting none the less, seeing as it amounts to whining.

But we all know whiners can't make claims, they have to settle for filing complaints in a diminished capacity before an administrative venue. So by all means, kiddos, whine to your little hearts out to your superior Guru and file your complaints like any self respecting plaintiff would.

See, when it comes to the reality that man creates and convokes the assembly of government, facts are facts. And none of you have made a claim of any fact to the contrary....(shrugs) sure, your opinions do just fine for backing a whiner's complaint...but complaints have no standing before a verified claim to the contrary.

Seems y'all would've figured that out by now. Oh well....cheers!

http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=plaintiff&allowed_in_frame=0

Pete Daoust

01001000 01100101 01111001 00100000 01000011 01101000 01110010 01101001 01110011 00101100 00100000 01100111 01101111 00100000 01100110 01110101 01100011 01101011 00100000 01111001 01101111 01110101 01110010 00100000 01110011 01100101 01101100 01100110 00100000 00001101 00001010 01001000 01000001 01001000 01000001 01001000 01000001 01001000 01000001 01001000 01000001 01001000 01000001 00100000 00100001 00100001 00100001 00100001