The Tender For Law

Volume 6

Jun 03, 2014 1:01 PM

Pete Daoust

That's in a month !! :/

H.R. 2847: This New Bill Will Go Into Effective On July 1st, 2014. It Will Usher In The True...

investmentwatchblog.com

What is FATCA? The Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act became U.S. law in March 2010 but will take effect around the world on July 1, 2014. The goal of the law

Read Comments

Pete Daoust

To properly resign, lien the NAME, and send a LETTER OF RESIGNATION to your local MP. Be sure the PPSA# is in the body of that letter with the date of registration being the SAME DATE as resignation.

PPSA is PROOF of resignation.

Anibal Jose Baez

Brauns Orig Libau T?lis, check this out!

<<I REQUIRE A CONFIDENTIALITY NONCOMPETE AGREEMENT TO BE SIGNED BEFORE A NOTARY SEALED AND DELIVERED ALONG WITH A CHECK OR SATISFACTORY AGREEMENT FOR PAYMENT BEFORE WE START SPEAKING----I HAVE TO KNOW WHO I AM SPEAKING WITH; AND BECAUSE OF THE DIFFICULTY I WILL CONTROL DATA COLLECTION AND FOUR STAGE FILING PROCESS FOR A SPEEDY SUCCESS.>>

Yeah, the accounting is for HIS bank account, hahaha!

Anibal Jose Baez

I noticed the Vital Statistics Office, and told them "I've got this shit, baby! The the BC has been DELIVERED, and I am acting as the Sole Authorized Administrator". And by the way, I know THE TRUTH! So here it's our new deal. I play, IF YOU pay! Deal!

Anibal Jose Baez

No, Xappie, no lien to the name, yet. Just giving NOTICE of my capacity, and making a public record that I AM NOT SURETY for that name. So, Sole Authorized Administrator is, for now.

Let's say Ethereum will probably solve some technical problems I may have, like a BILL OF LADING with the government (married) If you are married, and lien the name, the government still has "first in line," as I understand.

Pete Daoust

NOTICE OF MISTAKE In the matter of SURETY for the LEGAL NAME, I believe that there has been a MISTAKE as the SOLE BENEFICIARY has been INCORRECTLY IDENTIFIED as the accused. If I, AND/OR PERSONS AND/OR FRIENDS OF THE COURT AND/OR SUCH OTHER PARTIES ACTING IN MY INTERESTS, have led the COURT to believe by responding to �You� and or �DEAN CLIFFORD� and/or SUCH OTHER IDENTIFICATION THIS COURT HAS ADDRESSED ME AS, that I am the PARTY WITH SURETY in this matter, then that would be a MISTAKE and please forgive me. As I have no knowledge of who �You� and or �DEAN CLIFFORD� and/or SUCH OTHER IDENTIFICATION THIS COURT HAS ADDRESSED ME AS, I RESPECTFULLY ASK; by WHAT AUTHORITY is the COURT ADDRESSING me as such? As the SURETY BOND (BIRTH CERTIFICATE) has been deposited into the COURT, WHAT EVIDENCE does the COURT have that I, as the SOLE BENEFICIARY of the TRUST have any SURETY in this matter? As the GOVERNMENT is the SOLE SIGNATORY PARTY on the SURETY BOND (BIRTH CERTIFICATE), with SOLE AND FULL SURETY as TRUSTEE for the LEGAL NAME, WHAT EVIDENCE does the COURT have that I am a TRUSTEE for the LEGAL NAME. WHAT EVIDENCE does the COURT have that I am a TRUSTEE and have ANY SURETY with respect to the LEGAL NAME? WHAT EVIDENCE does the COURT have that I am an OFFICER, an AGENT, a TRUSTEE or an EMPLOYEE of the CROWN? WHAT EVIDENCE does the COURT have of any WARRANT OF AGENCY for the principal? WHAT EVIDENCE does the COURT have that there has been any meeting of the minds, any PROPER NOTICE given, any considerable CONSIDERATION offered, or that I have ANY INTENT to CONTRACT in this matter? As such, I am returning your OFFER, DECLINED, for immediate DISCHARGE and CLOSURE. AUTHORISED BY: ***End NOTICE OF MISTAKE

Anibal Jose Baez

I hear you, Michael. I have been here for over a year, I am STILL discovering things said by Scott months ago, today, that totally went over my head. It's many years of programing, so it's understandable for it to take some time for things to sink in. That has been my experience.