Well, they accuse, so they have to prove whatever they claim, and if the car isn't CHRIS's, you dont have to waste YOUR time due to their mistake... Pete Daoust, notice and fee schedule ?
So basically they should have cited SGMI for allowing an unlicensed driver to operate the truck. Yes? Correct the mistake. And tell them to fuck off. Yes?
So they sent CHRIS a ticket for a CORP owned by CHRIS which let an unlicensed driver employee use the CORP vehicule ??
Did the CORP know the employee did not have a license ?
CHRIS has NOTHING to do in this, if I have shares of MICROSOFT, I am sure I won't receive traffic tickets from some shit that happened with MICROSOFT ? :/
Yup. First they sent a notice that said I could not refuse it as it was a criminal matter, then they said I had a hearing. (I correct both of these mistakes)
Pete, I did this once already....that is why I want to administrate this through CHRIS. They made the error and charged the wrong account...I tried correcting them once, and they did it again....almost as if it is procedure for them. 2 different cop shops too.
They have been notified of your fees ?
Tell them, you have been notified, on xx month xxxx, you remained silent = acceptance of the fee schedule, here's your invoice, now learn to administrate your shit correctly... I dont have this kind of time to waste.
Here in B.C. when one insures a car, for a PERSON, or a Corp. the insurance is based on the "primary driver's" records. Perhaps this is how CHRIS got the citation?