The Tender For Law

Volume 6

May 24, 2014 8:10 PM

Neil Friesen

I am new to this group and I have a question...

On June 9th i am to appear in court. this date is only to plead guilty or non guilty for 7 alleged fraud charges from CRA amounting to 3 million.

I have been reading these files and am coming to more understanding of who I am and who i am not.

My first question is how should I approach the courts on the 9th if its a "plead guilty or not guilty"? I am going to file into the courts the NOTICE OF MISTAKE but just wondering what more should I do right now specifically on that date.

thanks

Read Comments

Pete Daoust

1). WHO is charged with this ? 2). Is there ANY other PERSONS (corp. and/or ANY) involved ? 3). WHY THE FUCK WAIT SO LONG BEFORE YOU ASK ? 4). WHAT have you done so far ? 5). HAVE you hired a LAWYER ? 6). HAVE YOU SIGNED ANYTHING ?

For a starter....

Neil Friesen

2. CRA is involved, and one other PERSON is the owner of a company that screwed me. I own a financial investment company and that one other PERSON stole from peter to pay paul and therefor my clients got ripped off. And in all this i was only the sales person for that company. 3. I waited so long cause I couldnt afford a lawyer (they wanted $500,000 to take my case) 4. I have been reading up on your files. 5. NO lawyer I am representing myself 6. Not signed anything

Neil Friesen

to continue...as i said I owned a financial investment firm for over 40 years with no previous issues. Suddenly this company decides not to pay clients back and now they want MY head. The real issue also lays with CRA wanting 3 million plus.

Neil Friesen

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/manitoba/businessmen-face-charges-over-millions-in-tax-evasion-fraud-1.2448637 when you see this link you will see the picture on the top of the PERSON that owned that other company and you will see the false allegations in the article made to me.

Neil Friesen

AIKINS LAW

Re: Your Charges under the Income Tax Act and Excise Tax Act I attended what I am beginning to believe is the last Case Management Conference ("CMC") on your behalf on Wednesday, April 30, 2014 at 1:00 p.m.. At the CMG I was unable to confirm with the Court my continued representation of you in this matter. I did indicate to the Court that we had met and discussed the defence of the case and the issue of my retainer should the matter go forward to preliminary inquiry and trial. In the course of the CMC the Crown did confirm that upon a guilty plea by each of you, the position on sentencing would be a 2 year conditional sentence (house arrest) and a fine of $3.3 million for each of you. At the CMC I indicated that I did not believe there was an appetite on your part to plead guilty and pay the fine of $3.3 million each. Nevertheless, I informed the Court that I would convey the Crown's position to you for your consideration. I was unable to properly discuss the mechanics of the preliminary inquiry and what agreements might be made in order to cause for a more efficient use of time at the hearing, because the issue of my retainer remains unresolved.

Neil Friesen

The following is from the lawyer; Case Overview It is alleged One World United Inc. (OWU) created and marketed a false tax write-off scheme. Participants contributed an amount in cash to OWU. In return, the participant received an ``invoice`` for business losses equal to four times the amount of cash contributed. The participant could then use these losses on their individual income tax return to reduce their total income for the year, and if the losses exceeded their income, they could also carry the losses back up to 3 years or save them for future years. In addition, the ``invoice`` could also be used to claim a GST refund. Participants were attracted to this scheme because it would provide a tax write-off giving an immediate return of the initial investment through tax refunds, plus there was a promise of a lucrative return on the investment in the future. Jeff Dyck is the President and sole shareholder of One World United Inc. It is alleged that he actively designed, promoted and oversaw the implementation and day to day activities of the alleged scheme, referred to in OWU records as the �Tax Incentive (TI)� program and later the �Business Builder Affiliate (BBA)� program. Neil Friesen is the proprietor of �Neil Friesen & Associates� an �alternative investment provider�. It is alleged that he was the main sales agent of OWU and also took part in the design of the alleged scheme. For each participant Neil Friesen referred to OWU he received a commission between 10% and 35% of the participant�s cash contribution. It is alleged that Jeff Dyck, in his role as President and CEO of OWU, was aware that the invoices issued to participants contained false information and amounted to false statements. It is further alleged that he was aware that the invoices would allow the participants to claim false deductions on their Income Tax and GST returns. It is alleged that Neil Friesen was aware that the invoices issued to participants did not meet the Canada Revenue Agency�s requirements for Income Tax and GST deductibility and amounted to false statements. It is further alleged that he was aware that the invoices would allow the participants to claim false deductions on their Income Tax and GST returns. Quantum The Audit Division of the Winnipeg Tax Services Office has adjusted the tax returns of all individuals who participated in OWU. The results of the federal tax, provincial tax and interest reductions/refunds as a result of claiming false OWU invoices as deductible expenses/input tax credits are: Income Tax

Neil Friesen

part 2 ; Theory of Case This case will rely primarily on: 1. Documentary evidence seized from the residences of Jeff Dyck and Neil Friesen and from the offices of NFA, including evidence seized from computers at these locations. 2. Witness interviews with former OWU employees and with OWU/NFA clients/participants. 3. CRA working papers including a widespread analysis of invoices and participants associated with the alleged fraud and large scale financial analyses of all known bank transactions conducted by Jeff Dyck, companies associated with Jeff Dyck, Neil Friesen and companies associated with Neil Friesen for the period from January 1, 2008 to December 31, 2010. Martin S. Minuk *

Aikins, MacAulay & Thorvaldson LLP 30th Floor - 360 Main Street | Winnipeg, MB R3C 4G1 Email msm@aikins.com | Direct Line (204) 957.4697 | Fax (204) 957.4411 aikins.com

Neil Friesen

Jeff used some to get his company going, he was took and scammed him by a US company for a few million (so I was told). He also took the clients investment funds and paid a lot to new investors to make them think they were making money. AKA 'taken from Peter to pay Paul'.

Neil Friesen

I had no idea it was a scheme until the end when the clients suddenly didnt get anymore returns and all was coming to light. What you see in the link from CBC was not accurate as I have from my own pocket paid back some clients including that sad story of this man that passed away. From One World united i made $700,000 over 4 years.

Neil Friesen

i contacted one world united accountant numerous times and specifically asked him if all these loses were legit and documented. his answers were "yes everything single dollar is documented on the books and not to worry".

Neil Friesen

I can and will say that I was only the sales person, I'm not sure what YOU mean when you say 'victim.' Pete even my lawyer till a few weeks ago said that they had no proof and that CRA is trying to make a case and an example of me. (I no longer have a lawyer as of a week ago, why, he wanted a 200K RETAINER NOW, he has filed with the court that he will walk away for no payment of the retainer.

Neil Friesen

Yes, I am a sales person that is all I really know. I would in MOST cases after an interview send clients home 2 to 4 times and more if I thought they did not understand it after I showed them, and if they wanted to invest, not only with Jeff's deal but with ALL the investments on the table (often 3 to 5 investments at time). I can have out to 150 clients that will say the same thing. They often got upset at needing to come back...but that's the way I did my business and they kept coming....

Pete Daoust

What you've done Neil Friesen, only the GOVERNMENT can do it, STEAL from others is government's business, so now, the GOVERNMENT wants what's theirs, plus interest and penalties.....

Make no mistake, you will PAY.... :P

By today's date, and the date of your court case, you might have seen us as your LAST HOPE, and thought we might come up with a MAGICAL BULLET to get you out of this shit, unfortunately no, we have none of these "MAGICAL BULLET".

The BEST you could do is tell the justice you agree to GIVE BACK what you've took from these strangers.......The nice back yard you have is, in REALITY, someone else's efforts/time.....

That is ALL I have to say on this, if someone else see it different, take the lead.......but if you LIE, you are banned :P

Neil Friesen

Pete if I was guilty I would not be asking for help..just so you know I DID NOT STEAL a dime. That is not how I am, but as you don't know me and see all that CRA is telling or saying I did with NO proof, and my former lawyer said to me that CRA doesn't have proof and does not understand why they keep coming. He did say a few times that they could walk away from this just before court as they don't have evidence that I did anything wrong other the selling it. Neil Friesen

Pete Daoust

I just have some difficulties to BELIEVE you, I have sold stuff ALL my life, and I always KNEW EXACTLY what I was selling.....100% of the time, I knew it :/ ....and ask everyone in here, I am NOT the most intelligent guy around :D

Neil Friesen

I knew what I was selling, and it could very well be that the investors will get their money back. It wasn't what I was selling that brought CRA down it was that the company didn't show a profit and we hope it will, then CRA will want us all to pay the tax. It was that CRA was not happy that we all got to write-off the expenses which the accountant verified, each dollar.

Neil Friesen

The company had, has a loyalty program that would help business get and keep customers and give them a 10% discount when they bought from them and when they would tell others and or refer friends then they the referrers would also get cash on their Loyalty Card etc. Or they could put it on Facebook as an example, a little like advertising but at a LOT less money....this is a simple explanation.

Pete Daoust

Neil Friesen in private:

Pete If I may ask and if you will reply. You and Bev seem to know a lot about the courts etc. Where did you get the knowledge.. and have there been many that you both have helped successfully and why do you send the time to help others. . Neil Friesen

Scott Duncan

This guy just wants to "game the system" and has NO idea what money even IS...

...Let's look over his "Private" messages to me and we can see.

Conversation started 7 May Neil Friesen 07/05/2014 11:02 Neil Friesen

Hi Scott, I ask this be kept private please. I was told you may be able to help or give me some ideas - help with CRA. About 4 years ago I was the salemam for a company that also had tax write-off's (the company expenses) clients could deduct. The company was not able to make a profit at that time all though it looks like it's turning around. It was a legal company set up right.

. CRA a few years later disallowed ALL the deductions

.CRA is now coming after all the clients and myself and want their money back from the tax refunds.

. CRA raided my office and my home looking for evidence that I was partner and anything else they could find that may link me to the company, remember I was only the rep. not a shareholder nor an owner.

. CRA wants me to pay 3.3M and house arrest if I plead guilty or Fed Jail time???

. At the same time CRA wants the refunds back with interest from the clients/investors.

. My lawyer wants a retainer for 200K or he walks which he will June 9th when I must go to court to plead, I will plead not guilty. So I will in court with no lawyer.

. My lawyer can't understand why CRA is so aggressive as he knows they have no proof other then I sold the investment. CRA said I copied it from another business that didn't work out... BS as all JVA or business are set up the same. Owner, Shareholder, Partner or Sole Proprietors etc.etc. I was neither.

. We talked to a lawyer before starting and she said all looks good if the company makes money.

. So CRA wants, 3.3M, jail time and all the funds back and when or if the company makes money CRA will demand we pay tax.

. The lawyer thinks CRA wants to make an example of me. I've sold financial products for 35 years with no problem.

Any ideas that may be able to keep me from court or jail? I am not interest in any kind of 'straw man.'

If you need other info please email me at neilcfriesen@yahoo.ca or call 204-223-9068. I need help ASAP, about 2 weeks left till the 9th of June.

Thank you Neil

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

WELL I'D BETTER KEEP THAT PRIVATE then! What with all those "Financial Products" being sold. :D

Remember when I said he doesn't know what money is? :D

As I have NOT kept it private, I don't expect to be "appreciated" :D

Secrets are for people ashamed of what they are doing. Since I do not accept undertakings from strangers, I am removing surety by publishing it. :D

Scott Duncan

I of course, respond!

Scott Duncan

Ok, I don't know who told you that I'd help, but tell them to stop.

If you want help with an issue, DISCUSS IT IN THE TENDER FOR LAW! I get no benefit helping you, and helping you "in private" is practicing law. Helping you in PUBLIC is DISCUSSING law.

And I am the surety fo that.

So, I see how YOU benefit from your proposal...exactly how do I, benefit?

Scott Duncan

He responds with...

Neil Friesen:How would you like to benefit? Neil Scott Duncan 15:18

I respond with...

Scott Duncan: None of your business. I am quite capable on my own. You are not qualified to provide any benefit to me, and it's hubris to think you can.

YOU came to ME remember? This means you need something from me. I need nothing from you.

Scott Duncan

The BONUS lesson here is that you need to think VERY CAREFULLY before you send messages with undertakings (Like keeping things "private") when I have not asked to even talk to you, muchless curtail my speech!

Pete Daoust

You were out there, all these years, catching small fish with these so called investment scams, and now you are a HUGE fish, solidly hooked on the baits....... :D

Sorry if it hurts, but it's the AWFUL truth :(

Scott Duncan

He KNOWS this, of course, being an "expert sales weasel"...um I mean "expert salsesman", who sells "Financial Products". Being an "expert" on financial products, he'd know the TENDER FOR LAW attached to the money involved. :D

Neil Friesen

Yes, He knows and admits I did not participate in tax fraud etc. yet he can't convince the CRA lawyers or CRA to stop them from moving forward. I often wonder what CRA must have told the Judge so he signed the order.

Scott Duncan

If you KNOW, why did you get a lawyer? Why weren't you incorporated, so your liability is limited? (Oh that's right. Pesky "regulations" regarding "Financial products"!)

I'm not even involved in this and I smell fraud.

Scott Duncan

No, they wouldn't. Liability doesn't magically appear. It's why LTD. is written after corporate names. LIABILITY IS LIMITED. It doesn't become a magic "FULL SURETY" spell, just for you. Fuck off with that shit.

Scott Duncan

Neil Friesen, this is an "answer or be banned question, so pay attention: YOU said, "In this case even if it all went through a corp. CRA would still come after the me". What are you basing this fantasy you pulled out of your ass, on?

Gerry Odonothing

What I am saying Admiral is that you people in THE TENDER FOR LAW are sharper than the sharpest knife I have in my drawer. I could go all Nobel Literature Award Irish but fuck it I'm only from a council house and me Ma (if she was still alive would tell me that I have high notions like the Kerry goats, they live on top of the mountain you see).

Gerry Odonothing

The last time I "got in" I got burned and at 56 reproducing myself once, which I consider fair as everybody should do if they feel so inclined and blah blah blah if it goes wrong and DA STATE has to pick up the pieces; which it is straining at the leash to do in all CROWN juristictions because of the lucrative grants available; anyway WE (God save Da Queen) do tend to succumb in general to the percieved law (I don't mean you of course as it is quite obvious to me that you're nobody's fool when it comes to protecting you and yours). That all said I am a sovereign as stated in the most important document ever produced in this part of the world and furthermore I only have a passive respect for those (politicians and pigs) who recognise the Sovereign Constitution of �ire, the only bonafide and the original of the five existing; anybody else can fuck off. Google the Proclaimation of 1916 and tell me where i have to be Democratic or Socialist or Communist? They can all fuck off I'm Sovereign and that document proves it so the Queen can fick off as the Government of ireland Act was passed by the Crown in 1922 but according to the Sovereign Constitution of 1919 ratified on Independance day january 21st it takes a two thirds majority to pass any act.

Pete Daoust

On the other end, I have been reading some stuff about the PUBLIC debt, and I think there is some issues about it.....I am not sure but, there's seems to be some problems ahead......just saying :/

Unless they can vote an ACT about the maximum LEGAL age to live, yeah, that could be a solution, everyone needs to legally die at 67.5 years, or something like that :(

Anyways !!! :/