May 21, 2014 4:19 AM

Why are you talking to them?

I never they called asking what my attentions was

They ask who my lawyer was , all i said was click ,

The message they left on my phone after was ,, They need a statement of my attentions along with , Turning myself into the RCMP to deal with the warrants in Alberta , what are they up to ,, just waiting for a knock knock

Ok... How did they know who they were talking to?

They don't , that's there issue , its been two years with these warrants , they have fuck all , I never said nothing but a CLICK on my phone .

Oh... you're too stupid to advise.

Dumbing myself down to your level HURTS ME. So Fucking FOCUS ON THE FUCKING QUESTIONS!

The fucking phone rings...

you fucking answer.

How the fuck do they fucking know who they are fucking talking to, you fucking IDIOT!

I did answer and when they said who they was I hung up ,

Inviting them to leave a message. They can now REASONABLY PRESUME it was you.

You don't HANG UP you fucking pussy coward. The the big scary voice on the fucking phone going to hurt you?

YOU START QUESTIONING.

They will call back , I did something else when I sent the letter of mistake , Don't get upset but it caused some issues with them

You've already fucked yourself. You have no clue what you are doing and have no business trying anything I am teaching here.

Yes Scott I followed and did what I learned and sent the notice along with the affidavit, but i sent it not only to the court in AB , it went also to the Supreme court of Canada , addressed to Fort Mcmurray, AB

You've learned NOTHING, or this thread wouldn't exist.

How can you say that ?

Must have learned something or they would not have called ,,RIGHT

You better learn fast because they can sniff out ignorance and if they have an inkling you don't know what you're doing you're fucked.

No, they call unrepresented defendants all the time. Why do they even have your phone number?

well we will see over the next few weeks what I have learned and been reading , i got nothing to loose , I will test this

You aren't qualified to "test" anything. In fact, I deny the accuracy of ANY 'RESULTS" you may return.

I also don't let 7 year-olds with iPads do peer review on my work, for much the same reason.

How many people here had the balls to send the Notice of Mistake , Pete told me to send it I did

Can you tell us what you've done by sending that NOTICE?

I understand the nature of the outcome. But the issue is they don't have proof on me , They have a fuck all other then warrants ,

research , Eli Weakley, Like Scott has said SURETY they don't have they don't own , The rights of a BC , it does not belong to us , we don't own it , nor does the courts , they will have to get the title from the queen ,

Uhhhh....quite a few of us actually.

It doesn't take balls, idiot, it takes knowledge.

Wow hey guys I joined a month ago .... can you point me to the place to start .....? I'm stupid and brainwashed please show where to start helping myself

:-D

start with this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3P7izAUe3ZM

Ok done..... hehe .... so should my focus be on reading thru the files and then the posts ..... I find the posts very entertaining

Read Scott Duncans articles over and over and over. Ask questions

Copy that off to my research

Look up every word. Even the ones you think you know....like tail

Source? Current version of blacks law??

Any current law dictionary will do. Latest Blacks is NINTH. ONLY use the latest. Don't be like the Free-Dumbers and quote from an edition from the 19th century. IT'S 2014 not 1812.

Pete's Law Dictionary is the best.... :P

Untrue. I'm ONLY MENTIONED ONCE in Pete's Law Dictionary. ONCE.

Very low quality, for that reason alone.

This is a good starter.....

1). Do I have a PERSON. 2). Who created it. 3). When did it happened 4). Who is SURETY for that PERSON 5). Where is surety for that PERSON 6). What's the inscription/registration number of that PERSON

Are you mentioned in blacks ?

Sounds to me as if permission to use the NAME Scott Duncan has been expressed... :-)

No, but that's probably just cowardice :D

hahaha