The first one is a Black rubber stamps that says: Bank of Canada I stamp that sucker on the front of the BoE, because the three parties of a BoE needs to be correctly IDENTIFIED on a BoE. So I stamp this one underneath the long series of numbers at the top of the instrument. As I said, I am pretty sure this long series of numbers identifies somehow the Bank of Canada, but I can't prove it, so I take no chances :P

The second one is a RED rubber stamp that says: SEE BACK FOR ENDORSEMENT. I put that sucker on the fron as well, so the one that receives this completed BoE, has no choice to turn that completed BoE, to see back for endorsement :D Apparently (not sure at 100%) if I don't do that, they have no obligation to turn that BoE, and can ASSUME that I haven't PAID for the debt, and I have made a mistake, so, I take no chances :P

The third one is a black subber stamp that says: ACCEPTED BY: I put that sucker at the top left on the back of the BoE, and I "GIVE" my signature just besides of it, at the right.... This mean that, as the sole authorized administrator for the DRAWER, I ACCEPT the debt on that BoE, and AUTHORIZE its DISCHARGE.......after all, Bank of Canada is MY bank :P

The fourth one, is a very special custom made stamp I have made..... Its goes like this ACCOUNT NUMBER: 26X-XXX-XXX Date INSCRIPTION NUMBER: 1196604XXXXXX I put that sucker right underneath the ACCEPTED BY stamp, it identifies the ACCOUNT NUMBER of PIERRE DAOUST, its inscription number, and the date the SOLE authorized Admin accepted that debt....

The fifth one is a black rubber stamp that says: Bills of Exchange Act R.S.C., 1985, c. B-4 I put that sucker underneath the fourth stamps, it's just to give a reference on where I have got all that shit from....I don't think it is necessary, but I think it's cool to put it :D

I NEVER DETACH THE BOE FROM THE ACCOUNT STATMENT.....do NEVER detach anything, that is Bank of Canada is job......not mine.....

I send the ORIGINAL to the beneficiary, and I keep a copy of it......if you decide to NOT administrate a BoE, but to VOID it instead, then you keep the ORIGINAL and send a copy....I never did that so far......do not mix stuff....

I send Registered Mail of course.... :P

The End. :/

Is it clear ? :)

Oh sorry, I always send this NOTICE with all completed BoE I administrate.....I don't SIGN this NOTICE, but I seal it with my special seal :D AVIS POUR FRAIS ADMINISTRATIFS CONCERNANT PIERRE DAOUST Inscription :1196604XXXXXX TOUS DROITS R�SERV�S / SANS PR�JUDICE �tant le seul Administrateur Autoris� pour la Personne nomm�e PIERRE DAOUST, voici les frais administratifs concernant toutes dettes publiques envoy�es a la personne que j�ai. Le premier processus administratif utilis� sera gratuit, gracieuset� du Seul Administrateur Autoris�. Il est entendu et nous convenons que,si je dois administrer une dette a plusieurs reprises, parce que le b�n�ficiaire de cette dette ne connait pas la loi, et/ou est de mauvaise foi, et/ou d�cide de me cacher certains �l�ments, et/ou est tout simplement incomp�tent, les frais suivants s�appliquent. Frais d�administration de $250.00 pour chaque communication envoy�s par MOI, au b�n�ficiaire de ladite dette. Taux horaire de $3000.00 l�heure pour toutes demandes d�informations suppl�mentaires. Soyez avis� que je ne rach�te AUCUNE dette publique, je choisi de l�administrer en compl�tant la lettre de change, donc, vous devez la pr�senter au paiement (Banque du Canada), sinon, PIERRE DAOUST, ayant le num�ro d�inscription 1196604XXXXXX et le num�ro d�assurance social 26X-XXX-XXX devient lib�r� de cette dette (art.84, Loi sur les lettres de change). Autoris� Par : Le seul administrateur autoris�

Good luck translating :P

My special seal ! :/

Please remove this Brauns Orig Libau T?lis......

Thanks...

Thank you, Captain.

Ok, I will do it, please remove this :-D

ok�

NOTICE of ADMINISTRATION FEES CONCERNING PIERRE DAOUST Inscription :1196604XXXXXX ALL RIGHTS RESERVED / NO PREJUDICE As the SOLE authorized Administrator for PIERRE DAOUST the person that I have, here are the ADMINISTRATIONS fees for all PUBLIC DEBTS sent to the person. The first administrative process used will be FREE, courtesy of the Sole Authorized Administrator. It is understood and agreed that if I have to administer the same debt several times, because the beneficiary of the said debt, does not know the law and / or act in bad faith, and / or decide to hide/concealed certain elements, and / or is simply incompetent, the following charges apply. An administration fee of $ 250.00 for each communication sent by ME, to the beneficiary of said debt. Hourly rate of $ 3,000.00 per hour for all requests of additional information. Be advised that I do not buy back any public debt, I chose to administer these debts by completing the bill of exchange, therefore, you must present that COMPLETED Bill of Exchange to the payment (Bank of Canada), otherwise PIERRE DAOUST, registration number 1196604XXXXXX, social insurance number 26X-XXX-XXX becomes automatically relief from the said debt (art.84, Bills of exchange Act). By: Sole Authorized Administrator ( SEAL)

Can this ^^^^^^^^^be considered a PROPER NOTICE ? :/

Have I "properly" notified what needs to be notified ? :D

Needs a a date.

WHY IT NEEDS A DATE ? :P

WHY ? :)

I was thinking for specific events, like a specific charge or something like that. It seems proper formatting, to date things, so they are current. Is it not needed to be recognized legally?

The "NO PARKING" notice has no date on it, let me go outside and double check that....

Nope, no date... :-\

It is not signed either, and I don't even know who put it there, I can only assume it's the city who presume being in control of that street. :-\

I am in CONTROL of that person.... :-D

Well, for public notices maybe it doesn't matter? I was just looking at the bill of exchange act under time constraints, the date is needed on a BOE, for sure. Ah� ok gotcha.

LOL.... ok, look at this.... :D PUBLIC NOTICE I DON'T BUY BACK PUBLIC DEBTS. From ANYONE, ANYTIME, ANYWHERE :D

I have some bills to administrate. In many ways, I am starting from square one again :-/ Now, to have some fun. Discharging and stamping. Oh � It's not my fault, I woke up and I had this thing in my pocket�

Is it a mistake to have this thing in my pocket? Who made this mistake? Is it YOU?

No, do not go all complicated about it.....it's there, that's all there is to know...... Do you have the RIGHT to the security/surety of that PERSON, you happen to have in your pocket, to WHOM bills were sent to ?

Ok, It is not mine, but I am holding it.

Imagine that PERSON ( Birth Certificate) being a dollar bill, but instead of a $20, or $50, or $100......it's written "UNLIMITED" on it :D

You are NOT holding it......you happen to "HAVE" it....

Ok�

I am a MAN, and I "HAVE" a person.....THAT IS ALL :P

I can understand that.

So you "HAVE" a PERSON, and bills are sent to it, right ?

Yes Sir.

There is a SURETY in regards of that PERSON, you happen to have, and that SURETY/SECURITY resides in Bank of Canada.

And you have the RIGHT to use it :D

FOR PUBLIC DEBTS.....,

Well, isn't that something� :-D

It's written in documents made by this person's creator :-o

Yes

So that's what I do......with debts sent to PIERRE DAOUST, I use LEGAL shit to fix LEGAL shit :D

I am clear on this now� I was thinking way wrong before.

Bill of Rights 1960 ( I use the Quebec Charter, it's an amazing document :D ) the right of the individual to life, liberty, SECURITY of THE person You see ? ....they are telling you THE person, you HAVE that thing, you are NOT that thing :D

The SECURITY of THE person, is that fucking SIGNATURE on the Birth Certificate :P

I told them ALL.....and no one is denying, or objecting to it, they act like cocaroches when I bring this up......

:-D

But I am very FIRM, precise, and AUTHORITARIAN with this shit :D

I tell them how it is......and invite them, almost beg them to tell me I am wrong :P

PLEASE, tell me I am wrong, and I WILL PAY :P

Ok, so I have looked and I cannot find where it says paying a debt with debt is illegal, Please pardon me if I missed it, it has been a little fucked.

Why are you looking for this ?

To verify.

Verify what ?

Why would you need to verify this, for what purpose ?

What debt would you like to BUY ? :/

The fact that it is illegal to pay a debt with debt. If I get picked up by thugs with guns II know where to look for it. Or Know it well enough to stand up.

obsrtuction

Why in the fuck, a THUG would pick you, in regards of a FUCKING debt.....WHAT DEBT ?

Fuck, you're in Canada Man, the land of the FREE :D

Ok, I get it.

Oh, is it here, or in the US ? ...I think here it's the Land of the Brave, and in US it's the land of the Fucktard......sorry, I would obviously need to VERIFY all this :/

Let's FOCUS on ADMINISTRATING these BILLS......what BILL would you like to administrate :)

I have 3 at this time that require immediate attention.

What are they...

they are charges from my stay at remand a while back.

Do you have a BILL ?

Hellosss ?? :/

No bills. I have to go pick it up. Monday. I did things mistakenly as undue influence has been applied. I have to get all of that.

Oh....so you have NOTHING to administrate ? :(

Fuck, I was so excited... :(

Oh yes, i have some notices .

*sigh* :(

You said: I have 3 at this time that require immediate attention. Why the fuck you've said that ? :(

I have three things. I have to pick up the disclosure to get these things, or visit the clerks at the court house� I have to pick it up live as sole authorized admin. I will then have them to process. So, monday I will let you know.

I need to have the correct tools to admin them.

Ok...but a bill can easely come via mail, just saying, as the SOLE authorized Administrator for the PERSON, you can say on the phone: I "WISH" you could send me this BILL as soon as possible, because I AM READY to take care of it... :D

I "WISH"......

Ok, that sounds better. I will do that.

Or in WRITING, this work too, and sometimes better... ;)

Depending on what kind of fucktard you end up with on the phone :/

Here in Quebec, they are very special kinds of fucktard, they are ROBOTS.....

So I do this stuff in writing.....

She sounds about 90� they left a message for pick up.

So pick it up....and SHUT UP, just pick it up... :D

Ok. That seems pretty simple.

Hey.... I am here to pick up bills Who are you ?: I am the sole authorized administrator for JASON LEBLANC :D

But...but...what's your name ? ADMINISTRATOR HAHAHAHA!!!! :D

Bring the BC with you.....and tell them, I ADMINISTRATE THIS :P

Time to have some fun.

Just be relax, and do the right thing, and SAY THE RIGHT WORDS.......think before you speak, and if you are not sure, shut up... :)

"I NEVER DETACH THE BOE FROM THE ACCOUNT STATMENT.....do NEVER detach anything, that is Bank of Canada is job......not mine....." Fuck. I've been sending them that piece of shit, DETACHED from the statement paper... Still waiting to hear back from them, none of them ever mentionned I did anything wrong, but they're fucktards so maybe they couldnt even tell : /

Why have you DETACHED these ?, Will Bed

Probably bad programming glitches not cleared off yet ? But I can't recall it ever been discussed yet ? The upper part is an invoice. Not a remittance voucher. My understanding was that we needed to administrate/return the bill itself, the voucher, the part that looks like a cheque ; not the whole thing ? It's just now that it strikes me, that when you tear it off, you actually accept it, but fuck, I'm accepting it ANYWAYS for the PERSON !?

The upper part is an account statment :P

When you tear it off, it seems like you BUY it :/

Well, I get it, as in the upper part / statement IS the debt ? Actually, I picked up a NEW statement in WB's mailbox for one debt that's been administrated already, but I have reasons to believe they may just have not received their payment from WB's SURETY by the time they sent out this new STATEMENT AND COUPON... That would seem to mean I did not actually buy that debt back when the voucher was detached ? Seems like it has not yet been bought/paid for ? If I had bought it, then they would have returned the vouchers REFUSED, right ? But even if it may SEEM like it, the INSTRUCTIONS I send along should be enough to clear any doubt... As it stands, I have reasons to believe they accepted their instructions and are proceeding... Anyways... It will be 60 days on Tuesday since they received the Bills of Exchange, and as a good administrator I'll be asking for an update on this account as well as explainations as to why they sent the latest statement... I guess then I'll know what's up with all that...

Please read this, Janick Paquette

Thanks!

Sooo... Anyone else could chip in with thoughts on this Bill of Exchange "proper administration procedure" and the reason to send them the ENTIRE paper/statement withOUT detaching the coupon from it ? Am I the only stupid fuck around here who somehow managed to fuck up on this by thinking I should tear the coupon off and keep the statement ??

Nope, you are not the only one Will Bed, I did that too :D

And it's way less "STUPID FUCK" than buying back the debt and pay for it :P

And.... Have you had any trouble with that thing being teared off and sent back on its own ? Do you have reasons to believe that NOT tearing it off the entire page makes the processing of the whole thing much easier or straight fwd for whoever fucktard is fucking the puppy with that at the other end ?? :p Any of them ever informed you that you had to return THE ENTIRE THING and/or that tearing it off actually is a MISTAKE ?

They NEVER informed me of ANYTHING The NEVER communicate with me other than keep-on sending back the debt to the person.....I had to figured it all by my self..... But since I do it the way I mention in here......they stopped sending back the debt.......

MMMM... and everytime they would send the debt back, you would administrate ALL the coupons over and over again ???

To make a long story short, :D I covered ALL THE FUCKING ANGLES :D

DO THIS with this BILL, Eamonn O Brien....

Eamonn O Brien.... DO THIS :/

(In relation to the other thread) Ah sure I know all that... I just thought I needed a document with the heading "BILL" on it or something... I never posted (on Facebook) the original invoice when I mentioned Panda at first, only two sections from it so that's where you may have not realised I had a bill all along...Apologies for causing confusion... No worries... So on the back something like... "As sole authorised administrator for EAMONN O BRIEN, I hereby authorise the process of this bill...." by (SIGNATURE HERE) Sole authorised administrator for the legal person EAMONN O BRIEN PPS . XXXXXXXX

Do EXACTLY what this thread says :D

Please present this bill to THE CENTRAL BANK OF IRELAND for payment...

I've done it with a �60 fine before if you can remember. Worked no problem...

Ok....

Fuck, do you guys can read ??? :( Leigh OftheHouseof Collins, have you red this thread ? :(

Yup.

And you asked why writing on the back ? :/

Eamonn mentioned it in a comment. So I asked. I was thinking wrong. Thought others may be curious to writing on the private side .Forgive me. I will do exactly what this thread says. :)

LOL.....you don't have to DO it, you can do whatever you want, I was just concerned about YOU reading before asking questions.... :P

Thanks for YOUR concern. Appreciated. I am with the program. :D

I usually DO whatever I want. It has consequences at times. :P

Yes, we SAW that !! :P HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!! :D

Milady :D

It's just that I have to delete these stupid posts you drop in here...so please read before you drop a HUGE stain-shit in here... :D

Eamonn O Brien started it. :P

Panda did... :p

And just to clarify, I did ask as to what I could be referred to as. I was informed that women have no rights and to read my Bible. I was booted out of TTFL. I did alright as 'My Lady". :P

hmmmm.... :-/ Massachusetts is for fucking slaves. PERIOD!

I did everything right and they denied me the security of the person and cut the fucking power!

:O

But are electric bills public debts, in Massachusetts, Chris?

Yes

Pete Daoust: in the NOTICE OF ADMINISTRATION FEES " ... donc, vous devez la pr�senter au paiement " "you must present that COMPLETED Bill of Exchange to the payment (Bank of Canada)" Janick Paquette: c'est AU paiement et non POUR le paiement? It's TO the payment and not FOR the payment?

can you explain why?

Because the payment is the bank, since they hold the surety.....please Scott Duncan, correct me if I am wrong in the wording here !

Isn't the BANK OF CANADA the drawee who will make the payment TO the beneficiary by using the SURETY? And in the letter you are adressing the Beneficiary to get the payment FROM the BANK. Because it is my understanding that the BANK is HOLDING the SURETY. Please correct me if I'm wrong! :)

Read article 84 of the BoE act.

Presentment for Payment Marginal note:Necessity for presentment article 84. (1) Subject to this Act, a bill must be duly presented for payment. Marginal note:If not presented (2) If a bill is not duly presented for payment, the drawer and endorsers are discharged. Marginal note:Manner of presentment (3) Where the holder of a bill presents it for payment, he shall exhibit the bill to the person from whom he demands payment. R.S., c. B-5, s. 85. _____________________________ Pr�sentation au paiement Note marginale :Obligation 84. (1) Sous r�serve des autres dispositions de la pr�sente loi, il est obligatoire de pr�senter, en bonne et due forme, la lettre au paiement. Note marginale :D�faut de pr�sentation (2) Le d�faut de pr�sentation en bonne et due forme lib�re le tireur et l�endosseur. Note marginale :Mode (3) Pour pr�senter au paiement une lettre, le d�tenteur la montre � la personne de qui il exige acquittement. S.R., ch. B-5, art. 85. _____________________________

See ? :-D

Now Janick Paquette, look up the LEGAL definition of the word OBLIGATION

in French or English?

In Italian :-\

ok... in English is says: obligation n 1 a moral or legal requirement; duty 2 the act of obligating or the state of being obligated 3 (Law) a legally enforceable agreement to perform some act, esp. to pay money, for the benefit of another party 4 (Law) a a written contract containing a penalty b an instrument acknowledging indebtedness to secure the repayment of money borrowed 5 a person or thing to which one is bound morally or legally 6 something owed in return for a service or favour 7 a service or favour for which one is indebted ? obligational adj

:-)

Why I asked was because in the art. 84 of the BofE act OBLIGATION only apears in French.

They use the word "MUST", look up the LEGAL definition of that word....

Are you blond ? :-D

I think i am! :/

Let me check the word...

http://www.thefreedictionary.com/must

See ? :-D

They MUST present that thing to the bank, THEY HAVE NO FUCKING CHOICE, tell them :-P

I KNOW THAT! ok so either I'm f*cking blond or my question isn't clear! :) I just wanted to know the difference between TO or FOR in the following sentence: "you must present that COMPLETED Bill of Exchange to the payment (Bank of Canada)" "It's TO the payment and not FOR the payment?"

FOR the payment at/to BANK OF CANADA.

At the payment :-D

Regarding the Bank of Canada, the bank headquarters are located at the Bank of Canada Building in the nation's capital, Ottawa. I was reading art. 6 of the BOE Act and became curious... Therefore, I am led to believe that there are branches of the Bank of Canada provincially. Would this be the Royal Bank of Canada?

Holy fuck shit !!!! :O

:D

Are you fucking kidding me, Leigh OftheHouseof Collins :'(

NO

I found some links...I asked first before I created a shit stain

WHY do YOU ask ME if I am kidding? :/

RBC is a commercial bank

This was covered before, Pete? Never mind, I am gone to bed.

Is it LEGAL ? :-P

TO/FOR/AT ... sigh!

I thought it was a pretty simple question in the first place! :P :/ :D

the bank of canada has regional offices http://www.bankofcanada.ca/about/contact-information/regional-offices/

If it's LEGAL. and MY signature is on a SURETY bond regarding that thing I "must" do Kent Barrett is talking about, well, I'm on my way.... :-)

Ok, but I am NOT the one who needs to deal with Bank of Canada, so what do I care ? :-\

Janick Paquette, in French it's "au paiement"

Thanks Pete Daoust! Now, can you explain why? :D

It doesn't make sens! :/

Why you're blond ? :-P

pourquoi "au paiement" au lieu de "pour le paiement � la BANQUE...."?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qhm7-LEBznk

Scroll up, Already explained :-P

Comment vas tu Janick Paquette ? How are you doing Janick Paquette ? Vois tu ce que je veux dire ? Are you getting it ? Frenglish for the win !

:-D

That's some confusing translation there. In English Art.84 says FOR=POUR but then in French it's switched to AU=TO, I don't know if they're equivalent but it seems to me the BoE is to be presented FOR payment TO "the person from whom he demands payment" = " la personne de qui il exige acquittement." So I'm confused as to whether this person(BoC) is HOLDING surety/payment or if they ARE surety/payment? Either way I think the important part is that once the completed BoE is sent to the Beneficiary there is no obligation on us anymore and what they do or don't do with it is not our fault. Im part frenglish and that FOR/TO bit still sounded weird to me so I thought I should say something.

Looking at it in terms of obligation you could say both. They ARE obligated and/or they HAVE an obligation. Correct me if I'm wrong.

What's the difference ? :/

There isn't in terms of obligation, the important part. But otherwise it seems confusing and I just felt the need to clarify.

This shit has been written by lawyers, I would imagine, so of course it's confusing :D

That's the WHOLE game, confusion and controversy....

Raising and educating Men and Women so they can become FUCKTARDS, and writing acts as much confused as we can, so they can NEVER know the truth :P

Read this thread Jason Lerato :)

And when you finish reading, THINK, and come back for the first step ;)

You da man Pete Daoust!

:D

I don't know if I am da man, but I know I am a MAN, and I have a PERSON :D

hehe

Reading

I don't have stamps...

Get some :P

The first step Jason Lerato. You will act in good faith, and tell CRA that you have received this debt, and you WISH to take care of it asap. You will tell them that you are the SOLE authorized Administrator for JASON LERATO, and you need CRA to disclose ALL methods available for you, to ADMINISTRATE this PUBLIC debt, via the SURETY of JASON LERATO, the PERSON you happen to "have". So you need to draft a nice letter.... :D It should stat like this.... Montreal, May 16th 2014 Att: CRA Subject: Public debt administration. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED / NO PREJUDICE Dear CRA... ............. :D

I'm writing this down... Please continue

So you need to draft a nice letter.... :/ And remember, I WISH...., I don't demand, I don't ask, I don't request, but I HAVE A WISH, and the wish is for them to DISCLOSE stuff to me ;)

I ALWAYS "wish" , everyone gets that ? :D

I fucking "wish" you do this, public servant, and since it's a fucking "wish", you have no fucking choice to do it, unless it's ILLEGAL :P

OK

Post the creation when it's done :)

I take it the letter does not need to be long in nature correct? Just to the point

YES.

One page will be more than enough :)

If I recall correctly, Scott said ALL RIGHTS RESERVED / NO PREJUDICE Should be the first thing you put at the top of your document.

In one of his documents that I read!

ALL RIGHTS RESERVED / NO PREJUDICE should appear on every creation.......but I don't recall Scott Duncan saying it MUST be at the top.......and I never put it on the top, but after the subject....

It can be anywhere. You only need demonstrate intent.

I thought Scott said to not have all rights reserved? "What fucking rights are you reserving?" etc... :-/

Only when reserving LEGAL rights. If ADMINISTERING the LEGAL PERSON, OF COURSE you want to reserve all rights. If you are ENSLAVING the legal person, you do not. ENSLAVING means LIENING and RESIGNING from ANY AND ALL GOVERNMENT SERVICE. If you do THAT, you DON'T want to reserve LEGAL rights.

So that's why NoM shouldn't have it as one is deferring all liabilities including administrative duty...

OK, DO NOT TURN MY WORK INTO AN ACRONYM YOU LAZY FUCK!

NOTICE OF MISTAKE, NOT FUCKING GAY-ASS "NoM"

Notice of Mistake*, apologies... I usually don't do that...

Gay-ass...lol!!

It's annoying when people do it with other shit, it's OFFENSIVE when you do it with MINE.

Understood

I take it I should not call Cra... Should be done with letters correct?

Gay-ass !!! :D HAHAHAHAHAAHAHAAH!!!!!

Yes, lazy Jason Lerato :P

Did he just said "GAY-ASS"? :D http://youtu.be/m1agaZinJHg

Writing letter today and I'll post it here. In doing this... Is Cra gonna target me and drag me to court or is the success rate they will stop the attack. ? New at this... Gotta ask

If CRA is ATTACKING me, they better have a good reason to do so :D

And they better be ready for one heck of a belligerent response :D HAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!

The ONLY question you need to ask is: IS THIS SHIT IS LEGAL OR NOT. period

Ok Jason Lerato...here is the best answer I can give... 1) Is CRA's going to target "me": No, definitely not, if ever they TARGET something, it will be the PERSON you happene to have in your pocket, and I think they ALREADY done that ? ...no ?

2). Drag me into court: NO, for what ?....what have you done ?... :/

The "success rate", this is not a fucking TEST or something, I am doing something I have the RIGHT to do, I AM TELLING THE FUCKING TRUTH......what "success rate" has to do with this ?? :/

Just FOCUS on the letter you need to draft Jason Lerato, and post it here when you'll finish it.....

OK thanks

The ONLY one thing CRA's whole fucking structure lies on, is YOU "BEING" the fucking PERSON. Same for IRS in USA.... You "DESTROY" that "presumption", and they have NOTHING........absolutely NONE A FUCKING thing. So you will tell them the TRUTH, I am the SOLE ADMINISTRATOR of that PERSON, and it's NOT MY FAULT, and I want to use the person's SURETY to administrate that PUBLIC fucking debt. They just can't DEAL with the truth, they can only deal with LIES.

But we've been programmed to "BE" the person.......and for some of you, it seems to be very difficult to deprogrammed that bullshit... :(

Quick question... What does it really mean when you say to the courts "I reserve ALL rights"?

It means that if there are some rights flying around in this court, you reserve them all for you... :/

And that is why Scott said that you have to put ALL RIGHTS RESERVED/WITHOUT PREJUDICE at the TOP of your DOCUMENTS. For Preventing it from interpreting the addressee as "reserving rights"! :)

FREE-DUMB!!!!

OK... Thought so... That's why I posted it. Gone

*sigh* :(

I think you meant to post this in some other group. It has NOTHING of what we have learned here. It's like you are almost purposely ignoring ALL that has been handed to you here. :/

No not at all. That's something different. I had concern over that last post and that's why I put it here to confirm it was shit

I appreciate what you all teach me here and it's sinking in. Once my notice of mistake is complete I'll post it here to make sure it's good

Well, at least you are a "peaceful inhabitant", hahaha! :P

That last one came from a guy some of you know... Trent goodbaudy. I like some of what he had to say but most no.

So, you are purposely ignoring rule #1 and rule #2. How many time has Scott, and/or Pete used the words "peaceful" and/or "inhabitant" in ANYTHING you have read here? :/

None. And I'm ignoring nothing. I'm still in learning and in this group multiple times an hour reading files and posts

So your goal Jason Lerato, is to pull shit from your ass, post it here, and want us to confirm your ass is full of shit ? :-o

Man. I apologize for posting it here. Won't happen again

You seems to have to much "fraudster" in you, Jason Lerato, you've been into it too long, Now, you post another piece of shit like this one you just deleted in this group, and I ban your "fraudster" ass. LAST WARNING for you.

Understood

I warm you, Jason, mixing this method with ANYTHING other than what has been taugh by Scott, and/or possibly Pete, WILL very llikely end you up as SURETY for JASON LERATO. I say this for your own good. I wish you luck, I hope you are not butthurt.

Smiles. Thanks. No it's good. I meant no offense. I've had to relearn lots cause of what dean Clifford taught me over the years. I can take correction from you guys. I trust you all. I appreciate what I've learnt so far

Stop blaming Dean Clifford about your bullshit.......fuck off with that shit, the buck stops here, shut up and read and learn.....The next fucktard who blame Dean Clifford in here for the bullshit he pulls out of his ass, I FUCKING BAN THE FUCKER Dean CLIFFORD is paying his fucking BILLS, as we speak...and he will PAY them all..... BE A FUCKING "MAN", fuck do I hate you ?

BE the "MAN"! Try this self-improvement method! It's an ancient Quebecois Form of meditation: First make sure you have a glass of crappy red wine, and some REALLY raunchy cigarettes. When you are drunk and coughing, that's when you start to become a REAL man. Next, close you eyes and take long, deep, breaths... ...Feel the manliness build. ...as you breathe, you will feel the urge to emit the battle-cry of the Manly Quebecois! "....HELLOS?"

:D

I totally went there!

Getting all that "Freedumb" crap in your head under control and dismissing it as crap everytime it pops up is needed to get the "Truth" instilled. I'm sure many here know of "My Private audio" with Angela Stark and the platform she has for the "Guru's" to preach. That is where I first heard of "Peaceful inhabitant." Releasing all that shit from these Guru's takes great effort. Read and absorb, sleep and arise. I went through this days on end for weeks. BURNT OUT FROM TRUTH. So many will not want to give up all the shit they have learned for that would admit a waste of time. The ones who will, do fine.

"My Private audio" with Angela Stark ?? Nope, I have no idea :/

That's why you caught on to the truth of this so fast. ^^^^^

Not worth posting site.

I've decided to get customized stamps and administer my tax bill. By what I read here it seems the answer