May 06, 2014 11:25 PM

If you're going to COURT you're doing it WRONG!

The mustache :O

Attorney at Law // Emphasis: AT

One thing I can say, as I haven't watched this yet... on Karl's FB page, the freedumbers say "Don't be afraid to USE YOUR NAME" :/

I am not afraid !....?

DON'T BE AFRAID TO ADMINISTRATE YOUR NAME!

I a. sooo not afraid :-D

It's only ADMINISTRATING of ACCOUNTING.

FIXED THAT FOR THEM! :D RUN AND TELL THE FREE DUMBERS!

I can't right now... :-(

Beverly Braakschmack, can you put a link of his page here ? :-)

Fuck that... I don't even wanna bother with those shit-spewing freedumbers...

Please ? :-(

Verb: administrate - work in an administrative capacity; supervise or be in charge of; "administer a program"; "she administers the funds" to manage or direct (the affairs of a business, institution, etc)

I can administrate by supervising the management and affairs of a business. Do you have a Bill?

:-D

A PUBLIC NOTICE compliments the ADMINISTRATIVE process.

@ 1:49 NOTICE... ALL PERSONS ENTERING THIS COURT FACILITY.... as soon as you walk through that door you have been deemed to be a PERSON and like the man said you are now "in" their court and under, I presume their juristiction; until you get your chance to address the judge. I know that Notices are only that and whether one takes heed of them or not is up to the individual. It all seems stacked in their favour.

Um, What Law requires me to rise?

The living do not have to rise, there is no law; but that is interesting in that if one remains seated will they be done for contempt?

No, they invite you to ADMIT contempt.

Aww shit. Fucking REALLY??? :-/.

I didn't stand... I asked what Law required me to do such a thing... There is no Law... They said it was customary... I was silent stayed seated & declined in action...

So when's the last time you saw a dead man rise?

Law of the DEAD?

"By what authority do YOU impose your custom on ME".

what happened then Jason did you eventually stand up for no particular reason or remain seated?

Fiona ? :-\

It was a special "CONFERENCE"... I blew my cover, I waived my right to be recognized as a person in a previous hearing...

I attempted to assault them with belligerence... they dissmissed... I was crushed...

Question Scott, should that read "Under what authority...?

Fucking WOW!

Oh fuck....

:-D

I'm down south... US etc... Not Canada...

Gerry, it would BE under whomever/whatever it was authorized BY. Just sayin'

Oh ffs...this could get ugly.

Gerry Odonothing, are you aware of the number one rule of the universe ? :-\

No shit right. Here's a CLUE it should read how Scott typed it.

He brings his Court into their Kourt. Hmmm.

No problems there lads, it's just that one is "under" their juristiction and they are "under" oath and the english language like the man said in the video is full of synonyms and could one be caught out using the word By; I'm only on apprentice footing in here amongst all of you, so ye can see how naieve I am.

We can certainly see how stupid you are, make no mistake, IT'S OBVIOUS.....

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Belligerent

Will you see it ? ...that's another story... :-D

Exactly Pete and like my mother used to say "there's no point in being stupid unless you show it"

Who me?

...and even then there's no point. You can't fix stupid.

If ye think the questions I ask are too hard I'll lay off.

If you would take the time to read instead of asking stupid questions, you wouldn't ask stupid questions

You're the expert Pete you were the first to use the word and you still havent pointed out the stupid question I asked and why that question was stupid.

I don't have to....I have red EVERYTHING in here, so I know... now, do the same and shut the fuck up....

Yes you do Pete, you used the word stupid so point out where I was stupid, It doesn't matter if you have read everything by now you had nothing read 18 months ago.

I used the word that needed to be used "under" the circumstances

Now, stop that shit and READ.....

Righty ho ho ho...:)

So long as we're singing off the same hymn sheet as I don't care what anyone calls me at anytime, no hard feeling there mate.

Great, there's a lots of reading to do mate....

LMAO: Usufruct usage... http://tinyurl.com/ljtp8hb

It's like a stock ticker for words...

Nice!!!!! Kent Barrett

Just wait until the BlackBox algorithms on WALL STREET get ahold of this... http://www.ted.com/talks/kevin_slavin_how_algorithms_shape_our_world

A video of "going to court," and not one single mention of the words accounting, and/or surety?

BELIEF is the ONLY reason guys like this can get money from people in seminars. They all have these "secrets" to sell, that must come from some special "authority".

Did he say his technique is called "bring-your-cunt-AT-court"? Which is not the same as "bring-your-cunt-IN-court". Because if you "bring-your-cunt-ON-court", it's REALLY gonna hurt. Something like that.

What's wrong with hugging, and smoking dope? :/ That totally was a low blow!

...So, the rock is surety....? :/

You are surety only if you meet ON the rock, if I understood correctly. Then he grabs the two ends of his moustache, and says some magic words. Bingo! Free-dumb wins again... NOT! Of course, no hugs after the win, much less dope. So, no after-party, I guess. :(

Ah I get it now... So what's all the bullshit that Scott guys been talkin' for years? :p

The truth does not require many words. Scott has been the ONLY man to distill the WHOLE fraud in less than 100 words:

It's ALL accounting, and surety. The rest is "busy work". It's a club, and we are not part of it. The end.

The difference between IMPLIED and EXPRESSED:

implied, adj. (16c) Not directly expressed; recognized by law as existing inferentially <implied agreement>. See IMPLY (1). Cf. EXPRESS.

express, adj. (14c) Clearly and unmistakably communicated; directly stated. Cf. IMPLIED. - expressly, adv.

That would be the only reason to study "clubhouse rules" like a law dictionary... to know what you are saying in your paperwork.

No but seriously, that mustache is fucking disgusting :-\

I found this guy interesting. He may be full of shit, I don't know. It's clubhouse rules in my opinion. All I care about is SURETY and ACCOUNTING. I don't get off on legal shit I have other hobbies.

The interviewer is basically mocking the legal system as he is not asking Karl any "hard" questions. This advertisement is to show how ridiculous "law" would be for everyone to learn and know, and that INFINITECOIN will allow people to just walk away from those complicated words... I mean laws :D

Imagine if say 10% of EVERYONE, simply refused to work for fiat money and would only work for infinitecoin or dogecoin? Then corporations would be COMPELLED to get interested in crypto currencies too :D

Cryptocurrencies literally separate money of account from money of exchange. The advertisement is to show what one has to learn if they want to operate within this monetary system provided by law and suggests a much simpler alternative.

Ok, if someone in here have a direct access to this guy, could you tell him about the mustache ? :(

Maybe he has no idea about its existence ! :(

:-D

I could not watch more than 2 mins of this

Why not? :D

Because at 2 minutes, he seems to say "a person" doesnt walk into a court, when he's saying "a person, well a man or a woman, when they enter into the court..." When actually men and women are NOT recognised into a court...

Will got to the answer before me, nice one will. I have to admit i've been following the "freetard "movement for about four years now and have some "so called friends" who are now turning on me because their BELIEFS are being questioned, Some of these freetards that i know are giving people legal advice and leading them up the garden path to the slaughter, for example taking plenary summons to the high court against the banks for fraud to try hold off the banks repossessing their homes.They are doing this for cash too. I'm fucking sick and tired of their shit at this stage. I might not be very intelligent but bullshit always smells like bullshit to me.Thanks to scott i'm on the right track now.

FOUR YEARS !!!!!!!!!!!!! :-o

Holy shit fuck !!! :(

I know dude, what a fucking waste of time !! .John harris started me off with "its an illusion:"

Me too, John Harris was the FIRST video I have watched ever.... :)

I just happened to got lucky and received some blasting shit from Scott Duncan, by PURE LUCK, online, in a Dean Clifford Thread, and he was so right, so I dumped everything, and started listening to Scott.....

I always been very lucky......ALWAYS !! :D

Way back on 2009 !! since then my life is a downward spiral !! At least I'm not a debt slave anymore.

First lucky shit that happened to me, I was born in Quebec :D

Me too pete, I'm so lucky to have found TTFL. I was unluckily born in ireland "hibernia" land of eternal winter. Moved to switzerland in 1994 came home in 2010 what a big mistake !! Actually I'm still a lucky bastard because I'm still alive !!

"Land of eternal winter" :) 11th of May (SUMMER) and its

howling and pissing outside.

May isn't Summer Gerry... :p

Its 8 celcius here at the moment with howling winds and some "sunny showers"

You should all move to Quebec :-\

Ps: I am in the so called "sunny south east"

Is that an offer pete ?, have you a spare villa for me ??

I can't speak frenglish but i speak denglisch

I'm in the west where the rain falls horizontally :)

Common Law expert !!! :D

That makes me think of Chris Evan, the "chicken expert" :D

HAHAHAHAHAHAAH!!!!!!.... :D

Me: Hey guys, are we in a Common Law court ? :/ Judge: Yes Me: What the fuck are we doing here ? :-o Judge: I have no idea :/ Me: Any "expert" around ? , so we can fix this thing ? Judge: Yes, Karl is here..... Me: GREAT !!!!! :D

:-)

No Pete,Lets get this straight. You are in a rock not at or on a rock, just remember it's all jigsaw puzzles, googly goggly sloppy lazy.

I am the fucking rock :-D

Pierre is rock in French :-P

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ukbu9dmmzJg&feature=kp

"The rules of the court are gonna be held in that rock!" -Karl

I'm thinking he smoking rocks. And maybe hiding thousands of indigenous women in his mustache. :-D

Scott, means "The Shield". ;)

EARLIER IN THIS THREAD: "Question Scott, should that read "Under what authority" - asked by someone who NEEDS REMINDING OF THE RULES!

NUMBER ONE FUCKING RULE OF THIS GROUP! SCOTT IS ALWAYS RIGHT!

IF I SAY "BY WHAT AUTHORITY" I, in fact MEAN "BY WHAT AUTHORITY"!

TO OFFER SOMETHING ELSE MEANS YOU THINK I HAVE MADE A FUCKING MISTAKE, AND I HAVE NOT.

YOU ARE NOT SMARTER THAN ME.

YOU DO NOT KNOW AS MUCH AS ME.

I CHOOSE MY WORDS VERY CAREFULLY, AND CHANGING THEM IS A DIRECT OFFENSE AGAINST ME.

YOU DO NOT GET TO QUESTION IF MY WORDING IS CORRECT. YOU ONLY NEED PONDER WHY IT'S CORRECT. DO NOT EVER DO THAT AGAIN, Gerry Odonothing.

SO, TO CLEAN UP THE SHIT-STAIN:

IT IS "By what authority do YOU impose your custom on ME".

NOT FUCKING "UNDER".

NOT FUCKING "THROUGH".

:D

NOT FUCKING "IN".

DO NOT EVER REWORD WHAT I SAY!

DO NOT EVER REWORD WHAT I SAY!

DO NOT EVER REWORD WHAT I SAY!

ARE WE FUCKING CLEAR ON THIS?

TO ALL THE NOOBS:

In case you missed it. I take re-wording of the things I say PERSONALLY. YOU DO NOT CHANGE MY WORDS. EVER.

IF YOU CHANGE MY WORDS YOU SPREAD LIES AND ARE NO BETTER THAN THE SYSTEM/PEOPLE YOU ARE FIGHTING

ARE WE FUCKING CLEAR ON THIS!

Lazy as I am, I will definitely not try to "REWORD" you, and plus, I had to google "reword" to make sure I grasp this, so... :/

In French it's "reformuler", but no need to remember that ....for you...

But there are plenty of tards who "reword" what I say to them, one in particular, got his electricity shut down last week, after 3 months of REWORDAGE :(

I don't know about you guys, but this guy has the same hair cut as Brian Alexander ... :-o

Small world !! :/

i think that would be the lack of haircut. we both don't go to the same stylist. can not get them to accept my coupon.

Aye Aye Admiral.