The Tender For Law

Volume 6

May 05, 2014 7:35 AM

Read Comments

Cara Small

The paragraph that starts, "Let's go back to 1982." may have an error. I think it was meant to read "weasel words they used...". I may be wrong. Awesome read! Brain is clicking. Seems it was dumbed down enough for me, and I thank you.

Cara Small

Would you discuss the enforcement involved? I remember you saying something about him having to pay people back, that he charged for seminars, in your jurisdiction. I am wondering what your jurisdiction would do in this case.

Scott Duncan

The conversation between Dean Clifford and Darren Clifford was disgusting. It was a play for the recording. Dean stated this man's FIRST and LAST NAME no less than 4 times, to someone (Darren) who speaks to this man A LOT! They BOTH KNOW THIS. Well that man was raided by the ETF and rotted in jail for 4 days. He's done NOTHING WRONG. He's done nothing ILLEGAL, nor has he done anything UNLAWFUL. His handling and storage of firearms are what the safety standards SHOULD be...

...and they hurt him, and they hurt his family, and they put him in a cage, because Dean, CLIFFORD made a deal. You can ask Darren,CLIFFORD for the recording in question.

Scott Duncan

No. dean clifford was claiming to be Dean Clifford, which makes Dean,CLIFFORD a CERTIFIED security instrument for and on behalf of the CROWN ORGANIZATION (DEAN CLIFFORD=MONEY). The JOINDER of that organization to HER MAJESTY is through the UNDERTAKINGS of dean clifford, who, by way of joinder, ACTS as HER MAJESTY AND an ORGANIZATION (By AGENCY). Hence Dean (Agent), CLIFFORD (LEGAL SURETY) is who he is "legally" for the duration of this case.

Beverly Berta Braakschmack

On somewhat of the same note... apparently there is this ex-banker whom I've heard of that has a bit of an issue with the way some people think things should be done. For instance, he said a DECLARATION would hold more strength than NOTICE... I see a declaration being much the same as a STATEMENT (of live birth or what ever).

Beverly Berta Braakschmack

So, just as a Statement of Live Birth would be the embodiment for the Birth Certificate, correct?

I am just trying to figure out whether this fella has anything of value with what he is "teaching" others...

Beverly Berta Braakschmack

embodiment. Patents.!. The tangible manifestation of an invention. [Cases: Patents C=:>99.J 2. The method for using this tangible form. 3. The part of a patent application or patent that describes a concrete manifestation of the invention

Beverly Berta Braakschmack

Well sorry for being so dumb, but if someone out there is busy telling people they are smarter and have paperwork that creates "aftershocks" so theycannot disclose those papers that will miraculously change someone's life... I bring it here where I TRUST that I can dispose of that persons "knowledge" and possibly inform others on the same discrepancy...

Scott Duncan

Well you do not "Buy" a Cheque. Especially one that YOU wrote.

You write the cheque, and the bank CERTIFIES that the cheque is ALREADY HONOURED, and they did it by SECURING THE FUNDS. Their seal on your cheque SAYS SO (Certifies it). Let the mechanics of that sink in.

Scott Duncan

I PROMISED my Grandfather, that I would not lie to you. That fact alone means you will never get bullshit here. You will never be asked for money of ANY sort, and we do not beg for donations.

DON'T GET ME WRONG! I don't mind if you give us money! This Admiral would like to expand his fleet! Send me all the cash weed and hookers you can!

Anibal Jose Baez

Admiral Scott, if acting as the SOLE AUTHORIZED ADMINISTRATOR, do we need to RESIGN to all contracts with the government, in order to eliminate all presumptions of JOINDER?

Or should we just qualify our capacity if we need to engage with government, and let the surety take care of the bills?

It just seems all those licenses create the presumption of joinder. But at the same time, I am not scared to deal with government as the SOLE AUTHORIZED ADMINISTRATOR.

I have my thoughts about it, but I wanted to hear your knowledge about these contracts with the government. I am sure a few people probably have thought of the same questions.

Thank you for another great article.

Anibal Jose Baez

It's just that most people are scared to deal with government, and "scared" of having licenses, and permits. It seems very paranoid to me.

I am not scared about that, because of what I know now. Am I thinking wrong?

Beverly Berta Braakschmack

If you resign all contracts, how then can your PERSON operate in commerce? Unless and until there is a different monetary system where the people extend their "full faith and credit" there is no BENEFIT to that.

Anibal Jose Baez

Until something else is in place, the way I see it is that: shit, it's not my fault! As long as I operate, and qualify my role as the SOLE AUTHORIZED ADMINISTRATOR, what do I have to worry about? I know about surety, and accounting. If I am "taking care of business", what's to worry? Are they going to shoot me? :/

But we are programmed to be irresponsible, and to hide our heads under the sand. So I heard many times people saying "you must quit all contracts with government." That always seemed illogical to me. Like magically disappearing from the commercial reality.

So, it's good to put to rest that you don't have to fear the person you happen to have in your pocket. I have been asked that questions a few times lately, and perhaps newbies won't go that route. It just really bothers me to hear you have to fear shit, I hate that non-sense.

Thanks for your answers, Beverly, and Scott!

Chris Evan

This Massachusetts Birth Certifiicate thing is fucking with my head. There is a CERTIFICATE of LIVE BIRTH here, but no Birth Certificate. And those idiots (a bunch of them that I asked about a year ago) said there is NO DOCUMENT called the Birth Certificate, only the CERTIFICATE of LIVE BIRTH.

James Baal

Standing with both feet on land, I am watching in silence the Admirals navy positioning itself.. here and there a few drills and maneuvers..no one saw them coming, no one will realize they are here untill its to late... Those who know, brought them here....Its going to be Apocalyptic....very soon....Great Article Scott ......about dean CLIFFORD ....interesting and disturbing move ...

Chris Evan

Pete Daoust, Jesse Alexander, Michael A Rivera, Kirsten Carlstrom (the list could go on...) and I have all tried to figure out why ours are all different. Some have 1 signature. Some have a tear off coupon. I can get 2. One on bond paper sealed and registered by the STATE and one sealed by a COUNTY.

Chip Douglas

"John Scott Duncan = REGISTERED AGENT for the CROWN ORGANIZATION. In order to ACT as AGENT in this CAPACITY you MUST be ACTING AS HER MAJESTY"

And this seems to be a good reason why you have said Scott, that a TAKEN name has more power in law?

Pete Daoust

PERSONAL legal definition : :D

PERSONAL. Belonging to the person. 2. This adjective is frequently employed in connection with substantives, things, goods, chattels, actions, right, duties, and the like as personal estate, put in opposition to real estate; personal actions, in contradistinction to real actions; personal rights are those which belong to the person; personal duties are those which are to be performed in person.

Tom Davies

"Scott Duncan No matter! In the mean time, I hear some crazy Admiral of a Private Navy plans on collapsing the banking system and starting a war, so there's that..."..............LOL Scott Duncan that comment made me think of this tonight. :p http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xyqxc_the-crimson-permanent-assurance_fun

Eamonn O Brien

2 yrs ago it took me 3 months of running around just to get that piece of paper... I wouldn't know who to start asking questions to regarding it now...

For the indefinite future I'll be reading the main article repeatedly... Questions will most likely follow... :p

Eamonn O Brien

Regarding Pete's comment about creating a new Person for "foreigners", my girlfriend is from England. When she moved here she needed to apply for a PPS number (Irish Social Services Number) in order to begin employment. She applied and they eventually issued a brand new number for her. She didn't apply for citizenship or anything like that, just for an "Irish" person...

PPS actually stands for PERSONAL PUBLIC SERVICE number...

Chip Douglas

"When the REGISTRAR GENERAL tells the public that their only role is to "record events", they are making a Robert Menard-grade lie of omission."

How would you more accurately describe what the "role" of the Registrar General is Scott, what are they omitting?

Chip Douglas

Scott Duncan Well you do not "Buy" a Cheque. Especially one that YOU wrote. You write the cheque, and the bank CERTIFIES that the cheque is ALREADY HONOURED, and they did it by SECURING THE FUNDS. Their seal on your cheque SAYS SO (Certifies it). Let the mechanics of that sink in.......now apply that ACCOUNTING to the BIRTH CERTIFICATE and get REALLY creeped out.

"...the (PROVINCE OF ONTARIO) CERTIFIES that the (BIRTH CERTIFICATE) is ALREADY HONOURED, and they did it by SECURING THE FUNDS. Their (Registrar General's) SEAL on your (BIRTH CERTIFICATE) SAYS SO (Certifies it). Let the mechanics of that sink in.......now apply that ACCOUNTING to the BIRTH CERTIFICATE and get REALLY creeped out."

Did i apply that properly, Scott?

Chip Douglas

One thing i cant get past.....hasnt Scott before on here ive seen, made a very velied-analogy, to the Birth Certificate, as some sort of nuclear-warhead that was sent to us by mistake, but a mistake that we need to correct.....he seemed to be implying that we were meant to end-up with something else other than the Birth Certificate

Scott Duncan

I speak VERY consicely, and choose my words carefully. There is NOTHING "VEILED" ABOUT WHAT I WRITE!

DO NOT EVER IMPLY THAT AGAIN.

I DO NOT KEEP "SECRETS". I DO NOT CHARGE MONEY. I DO NOT LIE.

Saying otherwise implies that I have broken my oath. Stop it NOW, and stop searching in the Great Library of Your Ass, for answers.

Scott Duncan

If that's true, you'd best read my writing a little closer. There are things you don't grasp yet. That's NOT the same as "holding something back".

These are YOUR limitations. Not mine.

Read what I write; Do what I say. Repeat until you clue in.

Eamonn O Brien

Here in Ireland, the form I posted earlier is from a book that the hospital keeps. Along with that book the hospital registrar goes to the registrar general (this was procedure in 1985) and is authorised to act as informant.

The pic is the section of my BC that shows the "informant"

There are 2 signatures on the BC, informant and registrar's...

Cara Small

I found out a friend of mine knows her and has had her stay at their place only 25 min from where I live. They weren't even aware of her book until WELL after it became known among those who didn't even know her at all. She sounds like a pretty cool woman. I have not read her book(s?), but may as I haven't seen much of a female influence (directly) in the study my studies of legal/law.

Cara Small

Deferred expense[edit] A Deferred expense or prepayment, prepaid expense, plural often prepaids, is an asset representing cash paid out to a counterpart for goods or services to be received in a later accounting period. For example if a service contract is paid quarterly in advance, at the end of the first month of the period two months remain as a deferred expense. In the deferred expense the early payment is accompanied by a related recognized expense in the subsequent accounting period, and the same amount is deducted from the prepayment.[2] The deferred expense shares characteristics with accrued revenue (or accrued assets) with the difference that an asset to be covered later are proceeds from a delivery of goods or services, at which such income item is earned and the related revenue item is recognized, while cash for them is to be received in a later period, when its amount is deducted from accrued revenues.

For example, when the accounting periods are monthly, an 11/12 portion of an annually paid insurance cost is added to prepaid expenses, which are decreased by 1/12 of the cost in each subsequent period when the same fraction is recognized as an expense, rather than all in the month in which such cost is billed. The not-yet-recognized portion of such costs remains as prepayments (assets) to prevent such cost from turning into a fictitious loss in the monthly period it is billed, and into a fictitious profit in any other monthly period.

Similarly, cash paid out for (the cost of) goods and services not received by the end of the accounting period is added to the prepayments to prevent it from turning into a fictitious loss in the period cash was paid out, and into a fictitious profit in the period of their reception. Such cost is not recognized in the income statement (profit and loss or P&L) as the expense incurred in the period of payment, but in the period of their reception when such costs are recognized as expenses in P&L and deducted from prepayments (assets) on balance sheets.

Scott Duncan

They "secured" ALL value with the birth certificate. If i write you a Cheque, then that is a PRIVATE matter. If I CERTIFY it, then the bank will withdraw the funds from my account, and honour the cheque with those funds. If I have no funds, but the bank has overdraft benefits, then the certified cheque will pass, but I STILL OWE THE BANK.

BANK=GOVERNMENT. You had no "money" (Value) to secure, so the government MAKES A DEBT in the same manner the bank does.

The Consolidated Revenue Fund is the ACCOUNT FOR THAT DEBT.

Everyone get that?

Eamonn O Brien

Am I right to be picturing the government hypotheticaly walking into the Irish Central Bank (Or whatever bank issues currency in your country) in order to do this?

"Hello, we'd like to extend the overdraft on the EAMONN O BRIEN account"...

Eamonn O Brien

So the fear for them, if any, would be for everyone to know this tomorrow. Therefore stop working, stop struggling to get paid to pay bills and to simply authorise an overdraft... The national debt goes up but fuck it, just send me a bill... Oh, I'll just authorise an overdraft for that...

Swings n roundabouts...

Eamonn O Brien

I meant as in a bank might sell the debt of a mortgage off (securitise it) in order to profit... So the bigger the overdraft on the EAMONN O BRIEN account the more debt they have to sell off... I may be complicating it...

Stuart Stone

Mackximus Minimus questioned way further up about the possible need for resigning from all contracts (as suggested by freedumbers elsewhere):

My take on this is: Acting as Sole Authorised Administrator, you are facilitating/ensuring that the correct accounts are debited/credited by accepting certain charges via a Bill of Exchange and instructing the beneficiary where to go to have the accounts balanced.

To take it to the next level:

When the person is liened into a private trust, the trust and/or corporate charter can be set up to enable the trustee(s) exclusive use of trust property:

Any of those pre-existing contracts also become property of the private trust, which can be used by (the board of) trustees for their exclusive benefit.

In effect, enabling the trustee to use licences, passports, Social Security Numbers etc, for the benefit of the new slave master (corporation).

Would this be an accurate summary?

Eamonn O Brien

"...the act of SECURITIZING your NAME is now complete, the GOVERNMENT henceforth can now LEGALLY presume ENTITLEMENT to all value attached to the SECURITIZED NAME"

Scott, could you define "value" in this sentence?

If I for instance apply for a driving license by producing ID etc and the license is issued, where or what is the value in that scenario?

Chip Douglas

Scott, you've talked at length about how this is about surety, but also, ALL about ACCOUNTING. Accounting involves a ledger, where on one side is the DEBIT, and on the other side, is the CREDIT (a ledger kinda looks like the 'cross' Jesus supposedly got hung-on in a weird way)

So is there any CREDIT involved in all of this equation whatsoever?

Will Bed

Thanks Eamonn ! What a read ! Took me quite a few reads actually to wrap my head around the whole thing, but I think I�m getting it and feeling stupid about it... Typing this sounds so much like what is explained in Money as Debt III� though I kinda never saw the whole picture� or is it even the whole picture yet ?

So when a PUBLIC DEBT is sent to a PERSON, and we use the Bill of Exchange to discharge that debt, that debt is actually being paid with the unlimited credit / value available to the PERSON which has already been securitized - as an unlimited ever increasing debt - with the Birth Certificate, and we have the RIGHT to allow for it�s unlimited increase, in that sense we not only ARE the only VALUE/CREDITORS for the PERSON, but we have the RIGHT to create DEBT, we are CREDITORS for the Govt and the overall sum of all those debts - a huuuge negative amount - is accounted for in the Consolidated Revenue Fund and when we use the Birth Certificate to extinguish a PUBLIC DEBT, it�s extinguished by ANOTHER PUBLIC DEBT which did not exist before, and they�d like us to keep RE FUNDing their shithole with INCOME tax ?

So the overall PUBLIC DEBT is ever increasing no matter what we�d like to do about it� It was designed to be that way... And the ONLY WAY to break the system - and eliminate PUBLIC DEBTS - would be for everyone to administrate those debts through the PERSON�s SURETY, until the system implodes by itself due to all those PUBLIC DEBTS only increasing THEIR OWN CRF DEBT to a point where there actually is no positive amount deposited at all to keep their scam afloat ?

So when a PUBLIC DEBT is sent to a PERSON, and we administrate it through the PERSON�s SURETY, it turns into ANOTHER / A NEW PUBLIC DEBT. The original one has been accounted for, and the new one will be sent around again eventually, and it�ll keep spinning forever and ever increasing but everyone will be happy�

If I'm getting this right, whoever thought about this entire thing were indeed a bunch of beatable arrogant fucks.

Chris Evan

What Does Securitization Mean?

The process by which an issuer creates a financial instrument by combining other financial assets into a security and then marketing different tiers of the repackaged instruments to investors. The process can encompass any type of financial asset and promotes liquidity in the marketplace.

Chris Evan

bond n. 1) written evidence of debt issued by a company with the terms of payment spelled out. A bond differs from corporate shares of stock since bond payments are pre-determined and provide a final pay-off date, while stock dividends vary depending on profitability and corporate decisions to distribute. There are two types of such bonds: "registered" in which the name of the owner is recorded by the company and "bearer" in which interest payments are made to whomever is holding the bond. 2) written guaranty or pledge which is purchased from a bonding company (usually an insurance firm) or by an individual as security (called a "bondsman") to guarantee some form of performance, including showing up in court ("bail bond"), properly complete construction or other contract terms ("performance bond"), that the bonded party will not steal or mismanage funds, that a purchased article is the real thing, or that title is good. If there is a failure then the bonding company will make good up to the amount of the bond.

"The process by which an issuer creates a financial instrument" hahaha = BOND!!!! :-D

Chris Evan

hahaha....look at this legal definition of LAW:

A body of rules of conduct of binding legal force and effect, prescribed, recognized, and enforced by controlling authority.

The only way to prescribe, recognize, or enforce is to control authority!!

Chip Douglas

So much great info Scott on the link between the Birth Certificate and the Consolidated Revenue Fund. A few weeks ago you, me, and Pete talked a bit regarding the Security of the Person in relation to the Bank of Canada. Is the Birth Certificate evidence to the Security of the Person we have in the Bank of Canada, the same as it is the link to the Consolidated Revenue Fund?

Chip Douglas

I suppose, as Scott just pointed-out to Chris Evan above- "NONE OF THIS IS HIDDEN," and in both our Bill of Rights, and the Charter/UK Canada Act, if they say- "EVERYONE has the right to...Security of the Person," then they would have DECLARED it so, so maybe no need to get the Birth Certificate involved in this aspect.....?

Lei Gh

I remember NOT signing papers after birth of my youngest. I was tired and I didn't have a name ready for a baby girl to be put on paper. Thought she was a he. THEY would not let up on the importance of my signing of these documents...until I did. :(

Chris Evan

Hiding in plain sight...the Beverly Mass Police Department has their website clearly marked on their cruisers....www.BeverlyPD. org. So I looked up what .org means. It makes a lot more sense after reading this article acdozen times!

Anthony Buisc

Are BOB DAUST, Bob DAUST and Bob Daust the same person, whereas as 'bob daust' is the actual dude administrating that person?

Or are they all separate entities to be utilized for different commercial applications?

Chip Douglas

"When the REGISTRAR GENERAL tells the public that their only role is to "record events", they are making a Robert Menard-grade lie of omission."

Robert Menard's recent video reminded me of this comparison you made, and, if you could pen a more accurate description for the Register General of what he honestly does, how would you describe it Scott?

Scott Duncan

The EVENT they record was when a REORGANIZATION occurred. They cant record the event of your birth! Calendars are MAN MADE, and the information ITSELF is just "witnessed"...

...just like people "witness" Jesus, Aliens, Bigfoot and Nessie! They CAN record when THEY (using their own rules) REORGANIZED something.

CJ ML

Reorganization, in the corporate context, refers to the initiation of a plan to restructure a corporation. such restructuring may involve one company being merged with another.

The process of carrying out, through agreements and legal proceedings, a business plan for winding up the affairs of, or foreclosing a mortgage upon, the property of a corporation that has become insolvent.

Reorganization is ordinarily accomplished by way of a Judicial Sale of the property of the corporation. The purchasers then often form a new corporation to which substantially all assets of the old are transferred.

CJ ML

Thanks. I was starting to think they were bankrupting the "infant" legal entity, because of insolvency. Then, transferring all property and claims to the NEW GOVERNMENT CORPORATION who then forms a PERSON / CORPORATION entity and pledges that PERSON / CORP to service the debt.

Cara Small

When some one is REGISTERED to vote they show up (if they follow through with their duty that is) and fill out a ballot. On that ballot there are words that appear to be persons associated with parties. I was just thinking that MAYBE the words that appear to be a PERSON may in fact be a corporation.

Eamonn O Brien

If you look at it from the their point of view...

I want to be in a corporation involved in commerce... To engage in commerce I need a person... I also need the backing of some people to elect my person into this corporation. Let's hold a vote... People can pick their favourite person. Hopefully they pick mine... And yes Pete, due to consent by voting, I can now administrate on behalf of those persons who elected my person... :D

Chip Douglas

"A Special Type of Crown Corporation: The Bank was founded in 1934 as a privately owned corporation. In 1938, it became a Crown corporation belonging to the federal government. Since that time, the Minister of Finance has held the entire share capital issued by the Bank. Ultimately, the Bank is owned by the people of Canada."

Scott Duncan No.

The government does not, and CAN not form a CORPORATION. EVER.

...and don't cite "crown corporations", because they are simply policy-based entities with one client (Government), and are NOT corporations.

http://www.bankofcanada.ca/about/

Scott Duncan

Oh, and you might recall that I pointed this out a long time ago, Gail. I linked it to THIS:

http://www.thestar.com/news/canada/2011/03/03/tories_rebrand_government_of_canada_as_harper_government.html

...which states it was published on Thu Mar 03 2011. Try to keep up :P

Scott Duncan

Chip Douglas I'm not sure what you are trying to say with that post. It only proves my point. A government can ACQUIRE a corporation, just like it can an employee. It cannot CREATE one.

(Actually, before 1933, it could, by referendum. See Canadian National Railways, and even THEN it had to be held by SOME private interest.)

Chip Douglas

But Mel Cappe, a former clerk of the Privy Council, finds nothing amusing in the development.

�It is not the Harper Government,� Cappe said in an interview, tersely enunciating each word. �It is the Government of Canada.

�It�s my government and it�s your government.�

David-Paul Sip

Well lookey here a few GOLD NUGGETS! I found the answer to a question I had regarding SURETY for my wife :) Read this entire thread Zsolt

Scott Duncan "You provided the Matrix Foundation with the FOREIGN instruments. The "Citizenship" card you have will say "Joey,SPIRIT" indicating JOINDER with your SURETY (The ones who "imported" you)."

Is the NUMBER on the CERTIFICATE OF CANADIAN CITIZENSHIP what one would use in place of the REGISTRATION NUMBER found on the BIRTH CERTIFICATE in all correspondance?

David-Paul Sip

Scott Duncan "BANK=GOVERNMENT. You had no "money" (Value) to secure, so the government MAKES A DEBT in the same manner the bank does. The Consolidated Revenue Fund is the ACCOUNT FOR THAT DEBT. Everyone get that?"

I do "get that"! Since the objective is to bring the system down then the means to achieve it is to make folks aware that they do not need to buy these public debts, they can simply DISCHARGE them. By doing so the outstanding balance of of the CONSOLIDATED REVENUE FUND will begin to grow exponentially very quickly. Therefore what is already unsustainable will be magnified causing the system to implode. Does this about sum it up? :D

Anibal Jose Baez

We are basically "savages" being handed AK-47s, and do not even fully comprehend how those exactly work. Hahaha! Well, it is the truth. So, there is that!

All that Admiral Scott is concerned about is to have a whole bunch of AK-47s out there. That helps his agenda. And if one lives in a world that is constantly trying to kill you, a free AK-47 is a fucking sweet deal.