"Belief is the end of questioning. Belief is intellectual bankruptcy, and is the exact opposite of knowledge. You will never question if you "believe".
Absolutely love this...
"
In all the wars with England, no other Scottish king ever came so
far.
It was an incredible achievement.
Alexander's head must have swelled with every passing day.
He was 17
and he was on the brink of achieving his family's longest-held
ambition.
Half of Britain was nearly his.
But then fate dealt a devastating blow.
King John died.
On the face of it, his death should have been good news for
Alexander,
but with John out of the way, the need for the barons' war vanished.
The barons who had once opposed King John now flocked to his son's
side -
the new king, Henry III.
Both Alexander, King of Scots,
and Louis, the French prince, had outgrown their usefulness.
The English barons sent them packing.
There was no deal for Alexander - all of his grand ambitions fizzled
out.
Henry III reissued Magna Carta
and all references to Alexander's claims were omitted -
not even a footnote.
Despite loud protests, the ground was cut from beneath his feet
and he was left out in the cold.
And it got worse. The Pope gave his backing to Henry III.
Alexander found himself excommunicated...
... the powers of the Scottish church suspended.
Back to square one.
"
https://books.google.ca/books?id=yzk7AwAAQBAJ&pg=PT75&lpg=PT75&dq=%22To+do+right+by+Alexander%22+MAGNA+CARTA&source=bl&ots=fKLsYxyOG8&sig=yrvftfiWCdms5Ad5Yiri7OxAxIQ&hl=en&sa=X&ei=4BOTVNjMEsjUoATE8YDoAQ&ved=0CB0Q6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=%22To%20do%20right%20by%20Alexander%22%20MAGNA%20CARTA&f=false
I recall a documentary which claimed Shakespeare's writings could not have possibly been written by he and likely that of a Noble or Aristocrat, using "Shakespeare" as his pen name so he could stay out of any limelight.
Does Scott Duncan see any validity in that claim?
If so, was this a stab in the back of those who he made ridicule of in the writings?
http://www.toptenz.net/top-10-possible-authors-for-the-works-of-shakespeare.php
I sounds as though the use of the terminology "old english" is then a unique way to "create fictional language" into a current time without having to legitimize it to the reader.
Similarly, the removal of the text regarding "Alexander's claims" causes the reader of the "reissued Magna Carta" to not have access to that bit of vital information and therefore cannot learn the LIE created by OMISSION, leaving them to depend on that belief without any counter argument.
I used to see these type deceptions in my profession as a Sales & Marketing Designer/Coordinator. Since my departure, I see it everywhere, as part of the "culture" and as social engineering. I am revolted by it and it sickens me to see children even exposed to it.
Well, Josie the Outlaw won the boobs award of the year, so the dumbass award was the only award left to win, it's more a math thing than anything else, no worries.... :/
But Christopher Koziol, why would you want to be in this group? Your profile describes you as a "Freemanontheland". Are you still a "Freeman-on-the-land"? :/
Here in Quebec, it has been LEGALLY declared that I, as a HUMAN FUCKING BEING, have the RIGHT to the SURETY of the person....
How can it be a CONCEPT, if it has been legally declared ? :/
Why do you think "Legal" jurisdiction gives a hot shit about what fits "Your" definition?
There's no such thing as "YOUR" fucking definition of reality.
2+2=4 is not MY definition of a mathematical fact, it's UNIVERSAL.
Holy fuck. your brains don't work.
WE'VE BEEN THROUGH THIS SHIT TOO FUCKING MANY TIMES!
IF YOU ARE NEW, WE HAVE NO INTEREST IN YOUR IGNORANT BACKWARD PROGRAMMED POSITION. NOT EVEN A LITTLE BIT!
Shit like " Not sure why you feel the need to deconstruct everything I say and debate semantics. I just use the words I'm comfortable with." WILL GET YOU FUCKING BANNED!
NOW, I want someone BESIDES me to explain why this is the case, so when the stupid whiner gets all butt-hurt and whining to everyone else about my "arrogance" and my "ego", you can counter by pointing them to THIS post, and show it's not true.
GO!
If you're new in here, chances that you value the wrong things and think wrong are 99.99999%
If you are new in here, chances that you've been lied to are 99.99999%
If you are new in here, chances that you are part of the majority are 99.99999%
If you are new in here, chances that you have no idea that it's ALL about surety and accounting are 99.99999%
If you are new in here, chances that you are IGNORANT are 99.99999%
If you are new in here, according to the FACT that chances that you've been lied to all your life are at 99.99999%, well chances that you will lie are at 99.99999%
Good Luck :/
If you accept these facts fast, and read a lot, chances that you catch up are 49.99999% :D
Hey, please consider that I have no high school degree... :D
Also, LAW is very precise, the words used and their definitions are VERY precise. We expect the same level of precision in any and all communication here.
If one is in this group, one is only here for the sole purpose of advancing Admiral Scott's agenda. Anything that one "gets" here in terms of knowledge, and/or anything else, it's just a by product of the Admiral's agenda.
The number 1 rule is: Scott is ALWAYS RIGHT! Admiral Scott in the one that holds/has the knowledge. In more than 2 years that this group has existed, the Admiral has PROVEN over, and over, that this is a FACT. Nobody has been able to challenge his knowledge.
Anyone that comes to the group has nothing new to show to the Admiral. If one is here, one is most likely a programmed sack of shit. He is not interested in "our opinions." So to anyone new, and/or old here, unless is a question regarding the matters taught here, one is better staying quiet.
All he asks is for us to shut the fuck-up, read, and learn. Then make questions, and then, if one knows what one is talking about, participate by adding input, if needed.