I'll do that again and attach that Notice VOID too. The first time I received a Notice I did just that (asked for a Bill) and they kept coming (just another Notice). The last notice I made VOID, and now this one. In all it is 11 Notices. If I paid this shagging thing it might have been cheaper! :)
That's not crazy enough Chris Evan, the government are going to replace the TV licence with a Public Service Broadcasting Charge from the 1st Jan 2015. That will cover the LEGAL PERSON for the use of any technology,, computer, tv, laptop, mobile phone, etc. Happy days!
Please provide evidence that using a television set is illegal. Applying for a license would mean to get permission to do something that is otherwise illegal to do?
Please provide evidence that LEE EDGELY in fact HAS a television set.
What television set? :D
So is it an order or an offer? Beverly Berta Braakschmack Apparently an inspector of TV's came to me Gaff and observed evidence of a TV set at the premises. I think they define a Television Set under the Broadcasting act 2009 Pete Daoust.
I am {B} tuttle, the air conditioner repair man! LOL bobby deniro was great even thou it was a short part, but the point was he was the mistake.
i have seen it a hundred thousand times. i worked QC in repairs at NAD electronics, and that was one of the few disks they had to check the repaired machines with.
the government coming through the ceeling, bagged & tagged, here is your receipt mrs buttle! LOL
So I've just received pretty much the same letter in EAMONN O BRIEN'S mailbox. However, it is addressed to THE OCCUPIER.
I'm thinking send it back notifying them that there are no persons at "address" by that name...
By writing across in red is it just a quicker way to deal with it than typing out a document and printing it off etc...? Same message different execution?