The Tender For Law

Volume 6

Apr 10, 2014 1:33 AM

Michael Webb

So... Julian Figiel posted questions about ACQUIRING-FIRE-ARMS-OUTSIDE-OF-THE-LAW because he/she/it IS SOVEREIGN.

A few were baited before I posed two questions:

:1. How did The Tender for Law turn into Firearms Acquisition for "Sovereign-Citezens"?

2. Why do I smell a shooting spree at Lambton Golf and Country Club?

And within minutes of posting my questions, Julian pipes in with, never mind I'm going to comply with "man's law" and proceeded to delete the entire post before I could reply with...

That's what I thought you FUCKING SHILL!

Perhaps this can serve as an example of yet another "Scottism" -->> "SERIOUSLY, DON'T BE EVIDENCE!"

Read Comments

Carlos Rivera

What is your problem? I was looking for advice on how to assert my sovereignty and I realized my post was irrelevant to this page. I wasn't "baiting" anyone and I definitely I didn't expect someone to start accusing me of a "shooting spree" and analyzing the post. Chill out and go find something productive to do.

Will Lawful Man

Pete Daoust, your words ' The next tard who post a Rick Astley video gets banned on the spot, without NOTICE' is not logical. Your words were the NOTICE in response to the posting of the offending Rick Astley video, unless of course, I am mistaken, in which case, please forgive me.

Cara Small

I proposed the Rick Astley stipulation many months ago. Happy to see it is now in effect. Scott, I am pretty sure few people understand THIS NOTE IS LEGAL TENDER. The few that do would have had to have been here at one point or another as it seems ALL have the delusion that they own something they didn't create. Oh yeah and the OPPT will fix it all. Just sit back and relax.

Cara Small

To think I paid to go to a seminar where it was said "Then there is this Tender for Law thing....." while looking directly into my eyes. I didn't even blink. I was thinking "Bring it on. Yes. Let's discuss THAT!" Only NO ONE was discussing it but Scott. Now the one I quoted above IS EVIDENCE.

Scott Duncan

There was a time everyone thought I was just "crazy" so nobody was paying attention. 2 years LATER and RESULTS are coming back. People see the ONLY SUCCESSES in ANY of the "law movements", and start reading back through the posts, and notrice that I AM ALWAYS RIGHT.

Even worse, I am showing EVERYONE how to do it... FOR FREE!

Mary Croft discusses that in her latest post.

I AM A DIRECT THREAT to all the Seminar "Gurus". Pretend answers and "spirits", for $$$, is NO MATCH for ACTUAL ANSWERS for FREE!

Pete Daoust

Another fucking concept I am having a hard time to grasp.... :(

I received this Skype message from a fellow I�ve know for years and who, I thought, was intending to assist us.

�This info. is NOT for everyone. I have spent a many of hours (sic) on this stuff and am NOT about to give it all out for free. U feel me?�

Pete Daoust

No but seriously, I can comprehend Larken, a Quebecois form Nowhere Quebec appears on his AMERICAN page, and tells him that he didn't had to spend a year in jail over a stupid income tax issue, and I could had fixed his issue in 15 minutes....

That's tough on the ego, so maybe my approach was a little bit too INSECURE :D

Pete Daoust

Larken is a very angry man that has a very specific agenda, so best is to leave him alone, he will make some damages, but I think he could use a better and more effective method, but it seems that it's none of my business...

Pete Daoust

I am happy he is angry, I was just questioning his methods....he has a large audience and I had this funny idea he could have made more damages faster with my help :-D , I have these funny ideas sometimes, I am so angry that I find it's too slow..

Howard Posehn

I've seen Larken's work shared on numerous forums on Skype and the internet. He is well known and does good productions. As long as people are getting truth is the most important thing; superseded only by revenge.

Cara Small

OK so this "dude" Joe Bucks. Any one here heard of him? He has popped up in a group and is claiming to use Winston Shrout stuff "with success". I was discussing the person NOT being MINE and that the party with surety is identified on the instrument, as some one was using the charter (of CANADA) as some form of defence. "Hey I have rights because the charter says so and you are infringing on them." sort of thing. So he then claims- "Discharge will come back and bite you when Gold and Silver comes back into fashion and it looks like it will. I only know Setoff because I know I'm no fiction. Good luck to you" Joe Bucks. I ask if he could be more specific and he points AGAIN to a Winston seminar.

Scott N Tara

It's neither. Yes we tend to adopt Scott's mannerisms, as he does give us all the answers.

After years, it's hard not to.

Currently there are 3 of us logged into this account. Scott and Tara are not among them.

Howard Posehn

"Roguesupport Nx It's neither. Yes we tend to adopt Scott's mannerisms, as he does give us all the answers.

After years, it's hard not to. " It does not take many words to give a truthful answer. When truth is spoken, it will contain those words. Scott gives us the truth. It should surprise no one that one who is studying Scotts words and comprehending the emotion and thought behind those words, should sound like him in writing their conception to questions. Drones who have adapted well to the words and teachings of Scott should be a force to reckon with for the system.

Scott Duncan

That's the idea, anyway. It's slow going. There are mostly butt-hurt whiners with hurt feelings out there. Just finding people who can even THINK is a herculean task.

...ask everyone in this group, if they think they are stupid, and they will answer with a resounding "No".

J.P. Alexander

So speaking of stupidity i've been asked to be personal security for a 2016 presidential candidate. I said yes because its free everything and as I work my ass off in real life I enjoy free shit. Im supposed to start on the 2nd of next month he will be speaking after the race at Taladega. So I know presidents take orders and are sold to the highest bidder. I've spoke with this man on several occasions and his hearts is in the right place I just don't think he really gets it yet. Being a bullet dummy for anything is pretty stupid though.

Chris Evan

Jesse Alexander...what does this mean?

"So speaking of stupidity i've been asked to be personal security for a 2016 presidential candidate. I said yes because its free everything and as I work my ass off in real life I enjoy free shit. Im supposed to start on the 2nd of next month he will be speaking after the race at Taladega. So I know presidents take orders and are sold to the highest bidder. I've spoke with this man on several occasions and his hearts is in the right place I just don't think he really gets it yet. Being a bullet dummy for anything is pretty stupid though."

You are going to work for these idiots?

J.P. Alexander

Well I've debated it in my head. The guy probably won't win, but he has created a huge following, but he's not skull and bones :-) but if he did win I can expect a pardon and a job in Washington. Can you imagine a Scott Duncan simudrone in that position? ;-D

J.P. Alexander

Don't get me wrong I know presidents do what they are told and I'm not STUPID enough to BELIEVE a NEW president is going to change anything. They are just scapegoats. I don't believe any one man can change a system as powerful as that. Hell, look at JFK.

Cara Small

" As soon as we can. I might be killed first."- :(. I am sending good vibes so that doesn't happen. I believe in the power of belief and will do my best to believe you to live a long life. Hehe

Scott I think some of us will prove you wrong BTW. Some of us will NOT forget.