I have a hard time answering the phone because of that, for instance:
"Good afternoon (PLACE WHERE I ENJOY A LIVING)"
"Oh hi! Is this Beverly?"
"Eeeer... ahhhh. who's asking?"
(phone rings)
Me: Hellos !!!
Fuctard: MISTER PIERRE DAOUST PLEASE
Me: Who's calling ?
Fucktard: BLABLABLA
Me: Wait please (put on hold)
ME:: Administrator can I help you
Fucktard: Mister DAOUST ?
Me: I am its Sole Authorized Administrator, if you want to speak to PIERRE DAOUST the person, they only method to do it is "IN WRITING"
thats the point. if I dont sign for its acceptance, they can claim all they like but they can not prove it which provides ME with plausable deniability.
But on the other end, what's the big deal of ADMINISTRATING a communication sent to the person via regular mail ?
Other than to PROVE, I am in GOOD FAITH, I don't see the big deal there :D
i hear you pierre. so then right off the bat i should tell them if they want me to work for them i expect some compensation. otherwise i am to busy. or do i HAVE a duty to administrate for the 'person', OR can i just pass that off to the party who is surety for the person?
Yeah I don't think it's an approach I'd take. But say you didn't reply in the time given and they try to hassle you ask for proof of timely delivery or something along those lines. They can't prove shit!
what about writing to the surety and asking them to explain how to administrate the situation? are tey obligated to whole/full discolsure for the proper procedure?
And more to David's "pointed" question, here "in" CANADA/Canada, you can't be compelled to sign for anything.
Which bring's me to the question, IN commerce, why would you service yourself?
I've used this method on a number of occasions and its worked fine. -- I am in recei--pt of your letter dated bla bla bla -----------. You are a third party interloper. I-- have no contract with you, any further correspondence ----will----incur a fee of 10 million euro------------------------. All rights reserved---------------