The Tender For Law

Volume 6

Apr 02, 2014 2:11 PM

Pete Daoust

THOUGHTS !!!!!!! :D

Santos Bonacci outside court, Melbourne, Australia, April 1st. 2014

youtube.com

The corruption is being revealed more and more blatantly around us everywhere we look... the injustice of the powers to be, fines are a huge revenue source f...

Read Comments
Unique ID: 462493170453287_647881341914468
Unique Facebook User ID:
1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated:
https://www.youtube.com/embed/sN1iKfSfihw?autoplay=1
Type of Post:
video
Place of Post:
None

Read Comments

Anibal Jose Baez

The Magistrate Adjourned the case until the 1st of July. Santos Bonacci is planning to use the person's surety to settle the matter via a promissory note, before July 1st 2014. Can this "work" at this point?

My thoughts are that since Santos failed to be acting as the SOLE AUTHORIZED ADMINISTRATOR for the PERSON (he was not ADMINISTRATING the PUBLIC DEBTS being sent to his PERSON), SOMEONE is trying to ADMINISTRATE the ESTATE without authorization, to SETTLE the ACCOUNTING, and also looking for the SURETY. And.. since he applied for bail, and has shown-up twice for the matters of SANTOS BONACCI... smells like SURETY to me. Am I wrong?

He is double minded, because of "belief". As a consequence, he LIES, as well. It's all accounting, and surety. At the end, he had to end-up being called to ACCOUNT for the UNBALANCED BOOKS.

Will Bed

This is where you realize how IMPORTANT it is to ADMINISTRATE the PERSON in the very fuckin most flawless way you can by SYSTEMATICALLY and CLREALY DEFLECTING SURETY EACH AND EVERY TIME anyone may be lead to believe that YOU could be the SURETY...

Anibal Jose Baez

I don't wish harm to Santos, and/or Dean. Yet, people have to see that if your guru is in jail, he CAN'T be a GURU! Much less for toll tickets. Is that so difficult to see? :/ And even still when some are acting in TRUST LAW, "they" are not following the Rule of Law, which MUST produce many other interrogatives (like about INVOLUNTARY SERVITUDE).

The problem is that Santos, like Menard et al., says some truth, but also many lies. He also has a problem with his "positions" : he says he has nothing to do with the person, but on the other hand he IS ACTING as IF he "IS", at least surety, for the person. He said that acting as/for the person is FRAUD, and then he goes commit some FRAUD by acting.

A "reporter" asked him the greatest question I heard, "If you don't have any regard for them, why do you come in? Why do you entertain them?" http://youtu.be/sN1iKfSfihw?t=7m35s

Whoever listens to this, will be as lost as before, even with this "secret" information he presents.

That is why I don't get excited, and/or emotional about this video, nor I will post it in my wall. It's just a study video, for me. At the end of the day, people will STILL keep getting hurt when following what this kind of people say. They will "run" with it, and get hurt, and STILL remain blind. That's how I feel about this.

Anibal Jose Baez

I know, for ME, it was not Dean, or Santos, or any others that brought me to Scott Duncan. It was ME. It has been ALL ME, ALL ALONG! It is MY instincts of survival, MY unstoppable drive to search for knowledge and "truth" that has done anything. Dean Clifford didn't come knocking on my door. The same reasons why I am friends with a few here, and then empathy (if any), develops from that.

I see what you say Pete, but I see it now as an "emotional" "feel good" thing to say "Ohh, but thanks to his videos, I am here now". So what? Reality doesn't care what I "think".

Am I alone on this? :/ I know you have good intentions, Pete, I just can't process the "Ohh, but thanks to his videos, I am here now" with my new programming.

Michael A Rivera

Its like my case, simple sent the judge and district Attorney my Notice of mistake by registered mail a week before my trial was to begin and it wasnt over no ticket, it was a criminal charges and I didnt show up for the trial. Its all about SURETY and Accounting. The bullshit appointed lawyer even called me on Sunday night trying to make me appear monday morning for the trial. Nolle Prosequi. Case closed prior to hearing.

Anibal Jose Baez

I remember Scott saying this:

<<FAITH=TRUST BELIEF=KNOWLEDGE ALCHEMY=CHEMISTRY ASTROLOGY=ASTRONOMY NUMEROLOGY=TRIGONOMETRY This creates a credulous population that 1: VALUES "Belief". 2: WILL COMPLY with that "belief" 3: DOESN'T KNOW/DENIES THEY ARE TOLD WHAT TO BELIEVE.>>

Jo Xappie

Me and a friend are having a disagreement, and I'm about to Buck-O-Five him. He seems to think The Motu Proprio ON THE JURISDICTION OF JUDICIAL AUTHORITIES OF VATICAN CITY STATE IN CRIMINAL MATTERS issued last July can be used here in Ontario in the Courts, I say it has not force and effect??????

http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/francesco/motu_proprio/documents/papa-francesco-motu-proprio_20130711_organi-giudiziari_en.html