Pete Daoust

Apr 02, 2014 2:11 PM
THOUGHTS !!!!!!! :D

Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: Apr 02, 2014 2:11 PM
https://www.youtube.com/embed/sN1iKfSfihw?autoplay=1
Type of Post: video
Place of Post: None


Michael A Rivera

Apr 02, 2014 8:08 PM
This is the power of Notice of Mistake, used correctly. I filed on the 22nd and by the 27th youll see Nolle Prosequi. Latin for do not prosecute.


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02055958814386E+016
Last Updated: Apr 02, 2014 8:08 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Scott Duncan

Apr 03, 2014 12:03 AM


Unique Facebook User ID: 927379467328526
Last Updated: Apr 03, 2014 12:03 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Tommy Atherton

Apr 03, 2014 12:18 AM
anyone willing to explain how, when and why "supra protest" is to be used in a bill of exchange instrument. ACCEPTOR SUPRA PROTEST, in contracts, is a third person, who, after protest for non-acceptance by the drawee, accepts the bill for the honor of the drawer, or of the particular endorser. 2. By this acceptance he subjects himself to the same obligations as if the bill had been directed to him. An acceptor supra protest has his remedy against the person for whose honor he accepted, and against all persons who stand prior to that person. If he takes up the bill for the honor of the endorser, he stands in the light of an endorsee paying full value for the bill, and has the same remedies to which an endorsee would be entitled against all prior parties, and he can, of course, sue the drawer and endorser. Is this used in such a situation whereby, if administrating for a PERSON of CANADA, the Bank of Canada, does not accept the drawers administrations for discharge when presented by the beneficiary? I don't understand the mechanics of using this! and what liabilities/obligations are assumed by the "acceptor supra protest(or)" - not sure if i used the suffix correctly here


Unique Facebook User ID: 1584308875165822
Last Updated: Apr 03, 2014 12:18 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Eamonn O Brien

Apr 03, 2014 12:49 AM
"Summary offences... In the case of a summary offence (an offence tried in the District Court before a judge without a jury) the Garda� (Irish Cops) must make a complaint to the District Court within six months of the offence being committed. These offences include most Road Traffic Offences like speeding, illegal parking and fixed charge notice offences..." Saturday the 5th of April will mark 6 months and 1 day since my arrest for driving with no tax, insurance, cert of road worthiness, not producing a license, not giving a name or address, not signing anything (the list could prob go on)... It's my understanding that no civil charges can be brought against a person after the 6 month mark. So I think next week I will hold the arresting Guard accountable for my time on the night... :D I may be mistaken but I don't think we've had an instance of anyone try this out yet? Could make for a great thread! :D


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02035706386866E+016
Last Updated: Apr 03, 2014 12:49 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Jessamee Hundley

Apr 03, 2014 1:02 AM
I have a debt that has been sold to a debt collection agency. I have NO contract OR business with these STRANGERS so here is my reply!! CONVERGENT HEALTHCARE RECOVERIES, INC 04/02/2014 P.O. BOX 5435 Carol Stream, IL 60197-5435 Dear sir or Madam, This letter serves to provide NOTICE of your unsigned anonymous claim of a debt in the amount of $444.80. I am not aware of any business and/or contact with your agency that would substantiate such a claim. A maxim of law states that one should know whom he/she is dealing with. Therefore any further correspondence from yourself must include a wet ink signature as well as identification substantiating who you are and your position within the agency you represent. Any correspondence lacking this basic requirement has no credibility and will be considered harassment. I conditionally accept your offer upon the completion of the following terms; 1. Please provide a certified copy of the contract which validates the debt claimed to be owed to your agency. 2. Please identify yourself to me as outlined above. I require government issued photographic identification. This measure must be taken to prevent fraud. 3. Understand that I DO accept phone calls regarding the matter at a rate of $3500 per call attempt. 4. Understand that unsigned offers shall constitute harassment and an administrative fee of $1500 shall be imposed for each unsigned offer received. 5. Understand that, as I am acting in good faith, any negative reporting to any agency/credit bureau is unwarranted and tantamount to FRAUD. Any reporting to an agency/credit bureau shall incur a fee of $5500 applicable to you. 6. Provide me with a BILL as well as specific instructions as to how to execute the provided instrument and DISCHARGE the debt via the PERSONS SURETY. Failure to provide me with a valid CONTRACT as well as identify yourself will leave me with no option but to assume you are a third party interloper making a FALSE CLAIM against me. I will and have made every attempt to handle this in good faith to resolve this matter for JESSAMEE HUNDLEY. Your cooperation and assitance is much appreciated. With love and regards, Jessamee Hundley Sole Authorized Administrator


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.01534055198697E+016
Last Updated: Apr 03, 2014 1:02 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Michael A Rivera

Apr 03, 2014 1:03 AM
This is all they sent the so called victim. They never sent me anything and I never stepped in the courtroom besides when i was arraigned again. No Surety so they know not to even bother me with any correspondence. Only the shitty public defendant lawyer kept trying for me to appear in court Monday even though it already appeared online it was closed, telling me oh the judge likes to speak with me and usually doesn't end a case without speaking to the accused. I told if he wanted to appear in court and waste his day by all means please do, but I was not gonna appear and fall for that stupid little scheme. They are slick n evil. Michael Rivera is already in the court custody as the birth certificate is filed in the case. Whats even more sick, is that I fired the lawyer and he still kept calling. Wake up Friends, Lawyers are not out to help you, even if you hire one, his interest and loyalty lies with the court first. We arw just WARDS of the court. In other words STUPID, of unsound minds.


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02055958814386E+016
Last Updated: Apr 03, 2014 1:03 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Michael A Rivera

Apr 03, 2014 1:07 AM
This is how you decline their offer to contract.


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02055958814386E+016
Last Updated: Apr 03, 2014 1:07 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Michael A Rivera

Apr 03, 2014 1:16 AM
Notice of Mistake


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02055958814386E+016
Last Updated: Apr 03, 2014 1:16 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


J.P. Alexander

Apr 03, 2014 1:33 AM
:-)


Unique Facebook User ID: 780666251957463
Last Updated: Apr 03, 2014 1:33 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Scott Duncan

Apr 03, 2014 5:07 AM
THIS is why I regard adults with imaginary friends with such contempt.

Unique Facebook User ID: 927379467328526
Last Updated: Apr 03, 2014 5:07 AM
Type of Post: photo
Place of Post: None




Laurent Vah

Apr 03, 2014 3:49 PM
Ok. So Pete was helping me to administrate a debt that was sent to the person, through the process of BOE. On March 11th, I sent them (The legal departement of the electric compagny) the remittance, completed to settle the account along with a letter explaining what i was doing. My person received another letter today from the legal departement. This is what it says. (it's translated) Dear sir, We confirm we received your letter. To check with our client we need proof of payment. We can only accept a statement of account as proof of payment. If you cannot produce this proof, then we expect you to pay within 10 days. If you default on the payment we have to start the procedure again. With regards, (signature) B2C Prelegal Tel: +32 xxxxxxxxxxx So they have kept the remittance and still claim the person owe them money. What's is the best course of action now?


Unique Facebook User ID: 275563289280277
Last Updated: Apr 03, 2014 3:49 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Scott Duncan

Apr 03, 2014 11:02 PM
This ignorant kook reminds me of Free-Dumbers. They both talk out of their asses from a position of ignorance. ...and stupidity. Before you watch this, REMEMBER THIS: BITCOIN WAS AN ALPHA TEST - It was created to PROVE THE CONCEPT, NOTHING MORE. Yet everyone talks like it's supposed to be a functioning currency, thus HUGELY missing the point. LITECOIN, DOGECOIN, etc. are the point. It was to introduce the concept of Cryptographic Currencies to the world. You can be an ignorant fuck, like this stupid christian, or you can be INFORMED and KNOWLEDGEABLE on the subject. I was right in 2008. I am still right NOW, no matter how butt-hurt you are about that reality, just remember, Reality doesn't care what you "believe". Neither do I. This is also what Free-dumbers sound like to me, so you can picture how I feel when somebody like this thinks they can add to, enhance, improve anything.I write or teach. Preach all you like, ALEX! Math doesn't care.

Unique Facebook User ID: 927379467328526
Last Updated: Apr 03, 2014 11:02 PM
http://www.youtube.com/v/PVkfLgW-xKQ?autohide=1&version=3&autoplay=1
Type of Post: video
Place of Post: None


Michael A Rivera

Apr 04, 2014 3:54 PM
Read Friends.


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02055958814386E+016
Last Updated: Apr 04, 2014 3:54 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Michael A Rivera

Apr 04, 2014 3:57 PM
Thank you Scott Duncan for setting me free, Mentally and physically. Mackximus Minimus


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02055958814386E+016
Last Updated: Apr 04, 2014 3:57 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Michael A Rivera

Apr 04, 2014 7:02 PM
FYI


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02055958814386E+016
Last Updated: Apr 04, 2014 7:02 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Michael A Rivera

Apr 04, 2014 7:02 PM


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02055958814386E+016
Last Updated: Apr 04, 2014 7:02 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None




Charles Bullock

Apr 04, 2014 10:44 PM
Thank You for the knowledge , I'm so glad to see man and women who think like I do . Rock on America . We can get our country back .


Unique Facebook User ID: 632704900137711
Last Updated: Apr 04, 2014 10:44 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Anibal Jose Baez

Apr 04, 2014 11:20 PM

Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02035927166068E+016
Last Updated: Apr 04, 2014 11:20 PM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None


Scott Duncan

Apr 05, 2014 12:55 AM
OK, UNLESS YOU ARE FEMALE AND WANT TO FUCK ME, I DON'T WANT TO BE YOUR "FRIEND"! STOP SENDING REQUESTS! You are not my "friend", and accepting such requests, diminishes those who have actually EARNED that position. You are NOT in the same category as my friends. Go "friend" a free-dumber. They make no such distinctions. Pay attention to this... You'll need it later. http://themisescircle.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/bitcoinfeedbackloops.jpg


Unique Facebook User ID: 927379467328526
Last Updated: Apr 05, 2014 12:55 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Isaiah Whitney

Apr 05, 2014 6:41 AM
I have a question regarding taxes. Should I simply quit filing returns or is that part of me administrating the PERSON I have? I'm leaning towards yes keep filing but could use some input. Thanks all.


Unique Facebook User ID: 791890220830179
Last Updated: Apr 05, 2014 6:41 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Michael A Rivera

Apr 05, 2014 7:14 AM
Reminder Notice of Mistake must be sent via Registered Mail and with Stamps and no meter. Value of $21 or more. There is no deviation. This keeps it in the private, corporation to corporation


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02055958814386E+016
Last Updated: Apr 05, 2014 7:14 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Michael A Rivera

Apr 05, 2014 5:24 PM
Here is everything I did. First this is what I filed in the court for my case. Notice first the offer declined and then the Birth Certificates and firing my Bullshit lawyer.


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02055958814386E+016
Last Updated: Apr 05, 2014 5:24 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Michael A Rivera

Apr 05, 2014 5:24 PM


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02055958814386E+016
Last Updated: Apr 05, 2014 5:24 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Michael A Rivera

Apr 05, 2014 5:25 PM
Now what I sent the Judge via registered mail and with a value of $21


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02055958814386E+016
Last Updated: Apr 05, 2014 5:25 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Michael A Rivera

Apr 05, 2014 5:25 PM


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02055958814386E+016
Last Updated: Apr 05, 2014 5:25 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Michael A Rivera

Apr 05, 2014 5:34 PM
Now what they sent me. You can notice how they always bullshit. First on the 25th they said the court finds no reason to respond and that I have a public defender. Hahahaha when I just fired him and they know it, then the very next day 26th dismissed by state and on the 27th officially stated as NOLLE PROSEQUI. Mind you that even the night before the cancelled trial the lawyer who is fired still called me on a Sunday night to try to convince me to go to court on Monday. I told him he could go and waste his time but the court already has Michael Rivera and the account is settled. Thats what they want to trick you into appearing. If I would have appeared then I would have been accepting SURETY all over again and would have tried to talk my way out and one little mistake on my part would have been very painful.


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02055958814386E+016
Last Updated: Apr 05, 2014 5:34 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Michael A Rivera

Apr 05, 2014 5:34 PM


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02055958814386E+016
Last Updated: Apr 05, 2014 5:34 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Michael A Rivera

Apr 05, 2014 8:06 PM
Here is everything I did. First this is what I filed in the court for my case. Notice first the offer declined and then the Birth Certificates and firing my Bullshit lawyer.


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02055958814386E+016
Last Updated: Apr 05, 2014 8:06 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Michael A Rivera

Apr 05, 2014 8:06 PM
Now what I sent the Judge via registered mail and with a value of $21


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02055958814386E+016
Last Updated: Apr 05, 2014 8:06 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Michael A Rivera

Apr 05, 2014 8:07 PM
Now what they sent me. You can notice how they always bullshit. First on the 25th they said the court finds no reason to respond and that I have a public defender. Hahahaha when I just fired him and they know it, then the very next day 26th dismissed by state and on the 27th officially stated as NOLLE PROSEQUI. Mind you that even the night before the cancelled trial the lawyer who is fired still called me on a Sunday night to try to convince me to go to court on Monday. I told him he could go and waste his time but the court already has Michael Rivera and the account is settled. Thats what they want to trick you into appearing. If I would have appeared then I would have been accepting SURETY all over again and would have tried to talk my way out and one little mistake on my part would have been very painful.


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02055958814386E+016
Last Updated: Apr 05, 2014 8:07 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Michael A Rivera

Apr 05, 2014 8:07 PM


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02055958814386E+016
Last Updated: Apr 05, 2014 8:07 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Scott Duncan

Apr 06, 2014 12:28 AM
NOTICE:If anybody gets a takedown notice for any of MY publications you have shared, point me at the one who issued the notice, and I will replace it with a video of me kicking them in the face.

Unique Facebook User ID: 927379467328526
Last Updated: Apr 06, 2014 12:28 AM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None


John Martin

Apr 06, 2014 5:06 AM
N Korea, Iran, Libya, Russia, China, pick one..... I believe this stuff works here in N America, but what about when the tyrants just say, "Fuck the law, the accounting, the surety. Take their stuff and imprison/kill 'em!" Are we not playing in a fairly refereed game, so far? Do you not believe the Sociopaths will 'break the law,' when pushed beyond a certain line in the sand??? <--- As in too many awake, aware, able... Is this not what Dean Clifford is getting a taste of currently? And by 'taste,' I mean - the tip of the iceberg!! Seems to me that he's in Bureaucratic Hell. And surely Gitmo would be a vacation compared to what's possible....


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.0205333887604E+016
Last Updated: Apr 06, 2014 5:06 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Scott Duncan

Apr 06, 2014 10:10 PM

Unique Facebook User ID: 927379467328526
Last Updated: Apr 06, 2014 10:10 PM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None


Scott Duncan

Apr 07, 2014 4:09 AM


Unique Facebook User ID: 927379467328526
Last Updated: Apr 07, 2014 4:09 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Chris Evan

Apr 07, 2014 3:28 PM
They offered 2 of these (I have only seen this one). This case here has seen 3 Notice of Mistakes and 2 different versions of the Birth Certificate. Now, they have told their ARMY to come get ME again. Since they have CHRISTOPHER EVAN SCHULTE in custody, I will refuse this offer, and let them know that should they proceed against any man any further, it will be under fraud and will, in fact, be involuntary servitude.


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02024820688268E+016
Last Updated: Apr 07, 2014 3:28 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Isaiah Whitney

Apr 08, 2014 1:57 AM
OK, so I know that filing tax returns is part of my duties as the sole authorized administrator for ELIJAH WEAKLEY. I know that I need to get a BILL in order to administrate this debt. So I plan to file and send an invoice for my time and efforts spent filling out these forms etc. Here is the letter I am planning to send with the filing/invoice. Any critique from the group and the Admiral is much appreciated. Illinois tax criminals 666 ripoff road Shithole, IL 99122 Dear sir or madam, I have completed your tax forms to the best of my ability for the PERSON/TAXPAYER ELIJAH WEAKLEY. I am not qualified in any way to act as a tax collector and therefore accept no liability for errors. Enclosed is an invoice for my time and efforts required to complete the paperwork as being forced to perform unpaid work is slavery/indentured servitude and that is illegal. I do not completely understand these tax forms so I am not sure what the tax liability is for this PERSON/TAXPAYER. As such I require a BILL be sent for the amount due containing a coupon/voucher or other instrument by which remedy is achieved. If you would be so kind as to include instructions for executing the instrument so the debt may be discharged via the SURETY of the PERSON/TAXPAYER in question that would be greatly appreciated. I eagerly await your timely response as it is very important to me that this matter is settled for ELIJAH WEAKLEY. With love and regards, For: ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Sole Authorized Administrator


Unique Facebook User ID: 791890220830179
Last Updated: Apr 08, 2014 1:57 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Will Bed

Apr 08, 2014 2:01 AM
Has there ever been a default notice thread in here ? I'm getting ready to send one out to the registrar general following statements / affidavit sent regarding I am a man and I have the person which they refused to oppose or confirm... It's been 4 months now, many emails and 3 registered statements... I came up with this (quick translation from French)... Anyone got cues or cool ballsy suggestions - if worth it -as it seems I'm getting ready to not be interested to ever talk to them again ? Hey hi so following my requests and statements from december/jan/feb/march in which you were clearly informed how important it was for me to get answers to my questions and/or objections to my statements which you clearly magnificiently failed to do, by this notice please understand that you defaulting to reply to my march 21st statement and affidavit within the terms stated i now consider your silence an acceptation of the affirmations and recognition that they are true facts reflecting reality, thanks so much ciao bye... And im getting their acceptation notarized...


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.01541127535701E+016
Last Updated: Apr 08, 2014 2:01 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Steve Lemieux

Apr 08, 2014 3:04 AM
�The Social Security Act does not require an individual to have a Social Security number (SSN) to live or work in the United States, nor does it require an SSN simply for the purpose of having one... �We do not have the authority to require an employer to provide or deny employment or services to anyone who refuses to disclose his or her number. This is a matter between the individual and the employer.� Department of Health & Human Services letter from Vincent Sanudo, Director, Office of Public Inquiries, March 24, 1995


Unique Facebook User ID: 458370044339963
Last Updated: Apr 08, 2014 3:04 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Scott Duncan

Apr 08, 2014 1:24 PM
Most of you don't see yet, how this frees you from commerce... but you will! ;)

Unique Facebook User ID: 927379467328526
Last Updated: Apr 08, 2014 1:24 PM
http://www.youtube.com/v/7JvAI741Tm4?version=3&autohide=1&autoplay=1
Type of Post: video
Place of Post: None


Francisco Dami�n Folch Torres

Apr 08, 2014 9:11 PM
Johnston's law: "Anything that can be decentralized, will be decentralized."


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02047749395472E+016
Last Updated: Apr 08, 2014 9:11 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Eamonn O Brien

Apr 09, 2014 6:45 PM
So here is the draft affidavit and invoice I've done as a result of my arrest 6 months ago... It's my first affidavit and invoice so I'd be grateful for any help... For anyone un-informed members - I was arrested 6 months ago while driving home. Plenty of charges could have been brought but I refused to give a name or sign anything and was released without charge... 6 months is the time limit for summary cases to be filed with the court here in Ireland. I am now issuing a bill for my time on the night... Chris, Pete, Scott, Mackximus, Beverly, Ceit... Some uncertainties - I'm issuing the bill through the person as the administrator yes? Should the affidavit be signed and qualified? Is asking for a cheque the right thing to do? Or should I ask for 1 billion Dogecoin? :p Cheers for any help guys...


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02035706386866E+016
Last Updated: Apr 09, 2014 6:45 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Eamonn O Brien

Apr 09, 2014 6:45 PM


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02035706386866E+016
Last Updated: Apr 09, 2014 6:45 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Isaiah Whitney

Apr 09, 2014 10:20 PM
Has anyone had success ADMINISTRATING tax debt with the IRS 1040-V? I assume this would be executed like a Bill of Exchange but I can't find any solid information. Thanks in advance.


Unique Facebook User ID: 791890220830179
Last Updated: Apr 09, 2014 10:20 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Michael Webb

Apr 10, 2014 1:33 AM
So... Julian Figiel posted questions about ACQUIRING-FIRE-ARMS-OUTSIDE-OF-THE-LAW because he/she/it IS SOVEREIGN. A few were baited before I posed two questions: :1. How did The Tender for Law turn into Firearms Acquisition for "Sovereign-Citezens"? 2. Why do I smell a shooting spree at Lambton Golf and Country Club? And within minutes of posting my questions, Julian pipes in with, never mind I'm going to comply with "man's law" and proceeded to delete the entire post before I could reply with... That's what I thought you FUCKING SHILL! Perhaps this can serve as an example of yet another "Scottism" -->> "SERIOUSLY, DON'T BE EVIDENCE!"


Unique Facebook User ID: 661311360571317
Last Updated: Apr 10, 2014 1:33 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Beverly Berta Braakschmack

Apr 10, 2014 7:13 AM
This is kinda funny because "who" are they going to go after? How can they seize any "capital gains earnings" if someone doesn't consent to the transaction?

Unique Facebook User ID: 1.0151988293247E+016
Last Updated: Apr 10, 2014 7:13 AM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None


David Vilaca

Apr 10, 2014 1:28 PM
Bitcoin Expo this weekend in Toronto. There will be a law forum at 11am on Saturday. What question do we (as the TTFL team) want to pose to Ethereums legal panel? Who here will be going?

Unique Facebook User ID: 431342553693049
Last Updated: Apr 10, 2014 1:28 PM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None


Jared Rapp

Apr 10, 2014 6:20 PM
Why is Bitcoin talked about so much in this group? Is it because that model allows people to make money tax-free or start up their own bank or something?


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.01531111940967E+016
Last Updated: Apr 10, 2014 6:20 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Ceit Butler

Apr 10, 2014 6:32 PM
So, I just checked in and discovered a "reported post". Seriously, knock that shit off. This is a forum for free speech and censorship is NOT taken kindly. If you have a problem with something posted, I believe there is an application for filing a "Hurt Feelings Report" kicking around here somewhere. :p If you do not feel that this adequately addresses your concerns, then you are cordially invited to FIND THE FUCKING DOOR.


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.0153923542315E+016
Last Updated: Apr 10, 2014 6:32 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Michael Webb

Apr 10, 2014 8:44 PM
Does this mean Jim's eldest son is the proud new owner of an awesome calculator watch?

Unique Facebook User ID: 661311360571317
Last Updated: Apr 10, 2014 8:44 PM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

Apr 10, 2014 9:37 PM
Oh fuck, this guy from Nevada received a BoE , over a million dollars :-o

Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: Apr 10, 2014 9:37 PM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None


Apr 11, 2014 2:02 AM
I've had a default judgement against me...I didn't accept being a defendant (because it was a private settled agreement) my paper work was not accepted by the court and the clerk proceeded with a judgement against me. The liar is now threatening garnish wages (my husband is an employee)....I went deposit a NOM and BC and decline their offer...the clerk said i have to send all to the plaintiff and complete a motion to be defendant. I don't want to be a defendant and am wondering if depositing a praecipe with a NOM is something I can do, is it too late (I think I should have used the praecipe initially? In Robb Ryders video about praecipe, he says in Canada praecipes can be used instead of motions.


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Apr 11, 2014 2:02 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Shawn Cornell Folkes

Apr 11, 2014 7:55 AM
Update: So I get a letter from the Crown, indicating that they want to "drop the charge" against...I dont know WHO against (since the one and only time they ever tried to "read the charge" I INTERRUPTED them by repeatedly asking "who is YOU?", and of course I received no answer)... for "Threatening Death to Government Officials", since there is suddenly a "lack of public interest" for the Crown to continue its "case" against me. The little dick Crown called me quite a few times and finally set a date with me to come back to court. I went yesterday. Before court started... I ran into two liars...sorry lawyers I used to use. As I finish talking to them. ..another guy in a suit in his mid 50's walks up and offers his hand to introduce himself... but I already know him O'Driscoll. What I didnt know.... Hes now the Head Crown Attorney for the Region. Hes...the big cheese (confirmed by my one ex lawyer...who came RUNNING up to me later to ask me if I knew who that was and asked me about what the big cheese said to me)... He satbdown in front of rhe court eoom...and talked to me for 45 minutes. He said the little dick Criwn brought my case to him. The case apparently died on ODriscolls desk. He also told me he came ro court that day for the sole purpose of seeing me (he had ni ither business there and actuallybgot up and left the building after we spoke), gave me his personal line number...and invited me to dinner. Who would have known paying attention and doing my bestbto follow and execute all ive learned HERE...wiuld wind me up where I am now...charge dropped and a visit and dinner invitation from the head Crown...a dude Ive had epic court battles with. I...ah... was gonna say... I believe I owe this group a thanks...only problem is that...its not a belief...It's a FACT!!!!


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02041354931625E+016
Last Updated: Apr 11, 2014 7:55 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

Apr 11, 2014 7:27 PM
Hhaaaaa!!!....these HACKERS :P A major cybersecurity flaw that exposes encrypted information to hackers has forced the Canada Revenue Agency to shut down its filing system and push back the deadline for online returns.

Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: Apr 11, 2014 7:27 PM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None


Chris Evan

Apr 12, 2014 6:14 PM
Whats your name? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hNoS2BU6bbQ&feature=youtu.be


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02024820688268E+016
Last Updated: Apr 12, 2014 6:14 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

Apr 12, 2014 10:38 PM
:-P


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: Apr 12, 2014 10:38 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Scott Duncan

Apr 14, 2014 5:08 AM
MESSAGES FROM CHRISTIANS... ...Translated to what they are saying IN REALITY.

Unique Facebook User ID: 927379467328526
Last Updated: Apr 14, 2014 5:08 AM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

Apr 15, 2014 2:02 AM
There was a special "event" this past week-end in Toronto, I showed up !!! :-) , and I was NOT deceived.... :-)


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: Apr 15, 2014 2:02 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Steve Lemieux

Apr 15, 2014 4:56 PM
This one is for Gail xoxo :)


Unique Facebook User ID: 458370044339963
Last Updated: Apr 15, 2014 4:56 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Mathew Wolfe

Apr 16, 2014 4:01 AM
Ok here is a more in depth explanation of my first video. http://youtu.be/C1EB4tUBWlg


Unique Facebook User ID: 865677426782970
Last Updated: Apr 16, 2014 4:01 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Beverly Berta Braakschmack

Apr 16, 2014 6:43 PM
...just had to share :D

Unique Facebook User ID: 1.0151988293247E+016
Last Updated: Apr 16, 2014 6:43 PM
http://www.youtube.com/v/QPNE9k7Q4CQ?autohide=1&version=3&autoplay=1
Type of Post: video
Place of Post: None


Paul O'Shea

Apr 16, 2014 9:49 PM
Notice of mistake has been used sucessfully in ireland yesterday. Happy fucking days folks,The cops were so freaked out that they arrested me in the courthouse for refusing to give my name and i was only observing the proceedings of the day.


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02057274595802E+016
Last Updated: Apr 16, 2014 9:49 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Chris Evan

Apr 16, 2014 10:50 PM
Anyone seen this yet?

Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02024820688268E+016
Last Updated: Apr 16, 2014 10:50 PM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None




Pete Daoust

Apr 18, 2014 1:27 PM
:P ..... HAHAHAHA!!!!

Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: Apr 18, 2014 1:27 PM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

Apr 18, 2014 4:43 PM
That whole "It's all about surety, and WHO accounts for it" is the most PRICELESS stuff we've learned in here...... (Well, to me :/ ) I wish I could find the relation for this, in computer science, and/or MATHEMATIC science...... What could you give as an example for this Scott Duncan Where is SURETY in computer science, and how can you determine WHO accounts for it ? WHO/WHAT is accountable for SURETY in computer science ? There must be a relation to it.....


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: Apr 18, 2014 4:43 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Jo Xappie

Apr 18, 2014 6:00 PM
I guess this is doable???


Unique Facebook User ID: 1620495888164360
Last Updated: Apr 18, 2014 6:00 PM
Type of Post: photo
Place of Post: None


Beverly Berta Braakschmack

Apr 20, 2014 10:32 PM
It is my understanding that DISCHARGE is payment of an obligation via money or some other valuable thing, OR there is no claim. If, for instance a person was to lien a court file re: bank claim for a credit card or line of credit... and that person received notice of discharge of that lien, this would be construed as the claim was dropped �that there is no claim from the bank?


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.0151988293247E+016
Last Updated: Apr 20, 2014 10:32 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Anibal Jose Baez

Apr 21, 2014 12:03 AM


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02035927166068E+016
Last Updated: Apr 21, 2014 12:03 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Jo Xappie

Apr 22, 2014 12:47 AM
This was a great movie, The Man Who Sued God. here's the best part of the movie:

Unique Facebook User ID: 1620495888164360
Last Updated: Apr 22, 2014 12:47 AM
https://www.youtube.com/embed/pOvI9jdNV3I?autoplay=1
Type of Post: video
Place of Post: None


Chris Evan

Apr 22, 2014 4:07 PM
Scott Duncan, a few of us have been hearing back from some of these persons sending inchoate accounting instruments stating that these are not commercial debts, but consumer debts and as such are not governed by the LAW. They are saying that the COMMERCIAL laws don't apply....only consumer laws apply. What the hell are they talking about?


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02024820688268E+016
Last Updated: Apr 22, 2014 4:07 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Jo Xappie

Apr 22, 2014 6:32 PM
This article blatantly shows that those who make up the rules can change them at anytime for any reason and at any expense.

Unique Facebook User ID: 1620495888164360
Last Updated: Apr 22, 2014 6:32 PM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None


Colin Stephen Tonks

Apr 22, 2014 9:14 PM
Sir Harry Gibbs was a member of the High Court of Australia from 1970 to 1981 and the Chief Justice of the High Court of Australia from 1981 to 1987. He stated: �When this evidence is reinforced with the contents of the Charter of the United Nations, the continued usage of any legislation that owes its very legitimacy to the parliament of an acknowledged foreign power cannot be supported by either legal opinion or indeed historical evidence. I therefore have come to the conclusion that the current legal and political system in use in Australia and its States and Territories has no basis in law.�

Unique Facebook User ID: 1.01523951670811E+016
Last Updated: Apr 22, 2014 9:14 PM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

Apr 23, 2014 11:30 AM
So WHAT our dear government and/or, their AGENCIES, will do with a guy like me, Scott Duncan ? And WHO will make the call ? And WHAT should I "prepare" my self for ? Thanks Pete. :)


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: Apr 23, 2014 11:30 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Eamonn O Brien

Apr 23, 2014 1:54 PM
Notice for the Irish 5-0... I've kept it simple... How we lookin'? :p


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02035706386866E+016
Last Updated: Apr 23, 2014 1:54 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Colin Stephen Tonks

Apr 23, 2014 8:56 PM
Here a [humorous] video to brighten everyone's day or night, depending on where the fuck you are, that promotes Cairns in Far North Queensland.


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.01523951670811E+016
Last Updated: Apr 23, 2014 8:56 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

Apr 24, 2014 7:48 PM
So a BILL OF EXCHANGE is a VALUABLE SECURITY, right ? :/ Valuable security-- The words �valuable security� denote a document which is, or purports to be, a document where by any legal right is created, extended, transferred, retracted, extinguished or released, or where by any person acknowledges that he lies under legal liability , or has not a certain legal right. Example: X writes his name on the back of a bill of exchange. As the effect of this endorsement is to transfer the right to the bill to any person who may become the lawful holder of it the endorsement is a �valuable security�. So now we have this super duper Criminal Code. :) Criminal Code � April 2, 2014 340. Every one who, for a fraudulent purpose, destroys, cancels, conceals or obliterates a) a document of title to goods or lands, b). a valuable security or testamentary in- strument, or c). a judicial or official document, is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding ten years So no one can destroys, cancels, conceals or obliterates COMPLETED bill of exchange, right ? Am I right here or I am just jerking off :D HAHAHAHAHA!!!!! :D


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: Apr 24, 2014 7:48 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


David Johansen

Apr 25, 2014 3:48 AM
Scott, besides ignorance, what are twelve most important things that people do that cause you harm? (save the rest for later) and not including grammatical errors.


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.020477456099E+016
Last Updated: Apr 25, 2014 3:48 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Mathew Wolfe

Apr 25, 2014 2:26 PM
OK I've been listening to the cic guys and they talk about going to court as the accommodation party for the defendant to settle the debt and balance the account. They talk about being authorized to enter a GUILTY plea and STAND UNDER the charges if they can inspect the original charging instrument. Then they a4v it. If they don't accept that payment they conditionally accept the fact that there may be a defect in the instrument if they are allowed an opportunity to correct the defect....so on and so forth I was told by some smart dudes in this group to never accept surety or a charge. Always refuse for cause or void the instrument. Which way is better and why? Or are these just two different ways to skin this cat?


Unique Facebook User ID: 865677426782970
Last Updated: Apr 25, 2014 2:26 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Jody Riddell

Apr 25, 2014 2:54 PM
ive been reading through a bunch of threads and a few people are referencing buck 0 5. can someone point me to the thread that explains this reference please?


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.01528408882108E+016
Last Updated: Apr 25, 2014 2:54 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Colin Stephen Tonks

Apr 25, 2014 10:46 PM
The Australian Government has and continues to degrade our civil liberties and human rights and this really began with disarming our population via what some consider a well orchestrated false flag event in 1996. Other authoritarian laws are ready to be passed such as the anti-association law which prohibits individuals or groups meeting.

Unique Facebook User ID: 1.01523951670811E+016
Last Updated: Apr 25, 2014 10:46 PM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None


Mathew Wolfe

Apr 26, 2014 4:30 PM
Ok guys this is my first time doing this so if yall don't mind proofreading these. AFFIDAVIT OF Mathew Wolfe 104 Harrison St Victoria, Texas 77904 I, Mathew Wolfe, hereinafter referred to as Affiant, hereby certify and declare that the following facts are true, and correct to the best of the Affiants personal knowledge and understanding. Affiant declares that: 1. Affiant is of the age of majority, of sound mind and competent to testify. 2. Affiant is domiciled in the State of Texas. 3. Affiant has in his possession a Birth Certificate (Exhibit �A�), a SECURITY INSTRUMENT which denotes a SECURITY OF THE PERSON and the holder of the original title to this document is the UNITED STATES, therein SURETY for the LEGAL TITLE of MATHEW WOLFE. 4. Affiant is BENEFICIARY of this PUBLIC TRUST. 5.Affiant is aware and knows that the Affiant as the UNDERSIGNED SECURED PARTY is �Holder in Due Course� of this SECURITY INSTRUMENT, and holds a prior, superior, security interest and claim on the DEBTOR. 6. Affiant is aware and knows that I, in my PRIVATE CAPACITY extends credit to the PUBLIC via my SIGNATURE. 7. Affiant is sending a Notice Of Mistake to correct any PRESUMPTIONS (Exhibit �B�) 8. Affiant is also returning any and all offers made or presented to me under the PRESUMPTIONS that I am surety for the legal name. By:______________________________ SOLE BENEFICIARY


Unique Facebook User ID: 865677426782970
Last Updated: Apr 26, 2014 4:30 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Mathew Wolfe

Apr 26, 2014 4:30 PM
Le Ann Schramek, Clerk EXHIBIT: B Justice of the Peace, Pct No. 2 Victoria County, Texas 6605 C. North Navarro, Victoria Tx, 77904 NOTICE OF MISTAKE (RE: Citation #: 025479 speeding, Failure to change address on Drivers License) Dear Le Ann Schramek, 1) In the matter of SURETY for the LEGAL NAME, I believe that there has been a MISTAKE as the SOLE BENEFICIARY has been INCORRECTLY IDENTIFIED as the accused. 2) If I, AND/OR PERSONS AND/OR FRIENDS OF THE COURT AND/OR SUCH OTHER PARTIES ACTING IN MY INTERESTS, have led the COURT to believe by responding to �You� and or �MATHEW WOLFE� and/or SUCH OTHER IDENTIFICATION THIS COURT HAS ADDRESSED ME AS, that I am the PARTY WITH SURETY in this matter, then that would be a MISTAKE and please forgive me. 3) As I have no knowledge of who �You� and or �MATHEW WOLFE� and/or SUCH OTHER IDENTIFICATION THIS COURT HAS ADDRESSED ME AS, I RESPECTFULLY ASK; by WHAT AUTHORITY is the COURT ADDRESSING me as such? 4) As the SURETY BOND (BIRTH CERTIFICATE) has been deposited into the COURT, WHAT EVIDENCE does the COURT have that I, as the SOLE BENEFICIARY of the TRUST have any SURETY in this matter? 5) As the GOVERNMENT is the SOLE SIGNATORY PARTY on the SURETY BOND (BIRTH CERTIFICATE), with SOLE AND FULL SURETY as TRUSTEE for the LEGAL NAME, WHAT EVIDENCE does the COURT have that I am a TRUSTEE for the LEGAL NAME. WHAT EVIDENCE does the COURT have that I am a TRUSTEE and have ANY SURETY with respect to the LEGAL NAME? 6) WHAT EVIDENCE does the COURT have that I am an OFFICER, an AGENT, a TRUSTEE or an EMPLOYEE of the State of Texas? 7) WHAT EVIDENCE does the COURT have of any WARRANT OF AGENCY for the principal? 8) WHAT EVIDENCE does the COURT have that there has been any meeting of the minds, any PROPER NOTICE given, any considerable CONSIDERATION offered, or that I have ANY INTENT to CONTRACT in this matter? As such, I am returning your OFFER, DECLINED, for immediate DISCHARGE and CLOSURE. AUTHORISED BY:_______________


Unique Facebook User ID: 865677426782970
Last Updated: Apr 26, 2014 4:30 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Steve Lemieux

Apr 26, 2014 5:54 PM
Some of you might find this document an interesting read from a "public" point of view... "What is the �Notice of Live Birth� Form?"


Unique Facebook User ID: 458370044339963
Last Updated: Apr 26, 2014 5:54 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

Apr 26, 2014 6:19 PM
I have to start a thread on this one.... :D (can't resist :P ) Mackximus Minimus wrote.... If not acting completely under a private trust, the SOLE AUTHORIZED ADMINISTRATOR is the other most reasonable position to assume. If all it's surety, and accounting, as the SOLE AUTHORIZED ADMINISTRATOR: we can't be surety, we have PROOF of who is surety, we know were the surety is, we know what to give in consideration to settle the accounting, we know how to give instructions via notices to administrate all this. Would they come out, and "show us the chains"? :D


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: Apr 26, 2014 6:19 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Laura Bird

Apr 28, 2014 3:14 PM
Wanted to see what Scott thought of this article!!!!


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.01532716143359E+016
Last Updated: Apr 28, 2014 3:14 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Chris Evan

Apr 28, 2014 5:17 PM
What do we think of this outline of Negotiable Instruments? Granted it is for the Philippines....

Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02024820688268E+016
Last Updated: Apr 28, 2014 5:17 PM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None


Chris Evan

Apr 28, 2014 8:47 PM
http://www.onedollarbill.org/decoding.html haha...no sense in decoding ALL of it....such as the fancy writing in the upper left corner or the OTHER seal on the fucker!

Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02024820688268E+016
Last Updated: Apr 28, 2014 8:47 PM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None


Declan � Reilly

Apr 29, 2014 10:10 PM
To limit money is to limit political power ~ Stefan Molyneux

Unique Facebook User ID: 1.01521124199147E+016
Last Updated: Apr 29, 2014 10:10 PM
https://www.youtube.com/embed/joITmEr4SjY?autoplay=1
Type of Post: video
Place of Post: None




Lee Edgely

Apr 30, 2014 2:01 PM
This is another letter from the TV Licence crowd, it looks like it will be the last one before they lodge a Complaint with the District Court. The last letter that they sent to the LEGAL PERSON I made VOID. So whats the story here? I am asking for help on this: I think that I should do the same thing again as it is just another order. mark it received and accepted, then void over the signature, yes? Scott Duncan, Pete Daoust and everyone else that can help.


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.01529407782786E+016
Last Updated: Apr 30, 2014 2:01 PM
Type of Post: photo
Place of Post: None


Chris Evan

Apr 30, 2014 7:13 PM
Can a corporation use "lawful money of the United States"? Basically, what are the advantages to a corporation demanding United States Notes and in lieu accept Federal Reserve Notes? A little further, by ENDORSING the Instruments as Lawful Money, would that not be underwriting the United States debt privately, instead of them needing to go to a private bank?? I remember reading the stuff David Vilaca posted a few weeks back and this got me to thinking about good ways to launder money.


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02024820688268E+016
Last Updated: Apr 30, 2014 7:13 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None




Will Jefferson

May 02, 2014 12:47 AM
Ok, so my buddy in Manitoba was taken for a ride by some scammers who gave him a phony cheque for 6,100$ which he deposited and now the bank claims he owes them the amount. He doesn't have it, the money already went to pay a few personnal debts he had and the rest went to his fiance. The bank is desperate for some money and in their haste made my buddy think they were going to call the cops on him (he's quebecois), but they just wanted him to take a copy of the bad cheque to the cops. So today I sent him to the bank with a letter asking them to help him administate this debt via his PERSONs surety and to give him a signed bill and/or remittance, this landed him in the managers office at which point they refused to give him the remittance until he goes to the cops, he says "no, give me the remittance first" and NOW they ARE threatening to call the cops even though my buddy has remained in good faith. So now I have amended the letter which he is planning on registered mailing tomorrow morning I was hoping to get some insight from you guys on wether or not this will be effective and if the fee schedule is indeen enforceable. Here it is, you may find it familiar; Dear Mr Randy Brown, Manager at Westoba Credit Union, I, Matteo, am the Sole Authorized Administrator, for the PERSON the government created when I was 21 years old, and named DANNY MATTEO BEAUREGARD, and has the registration number 11987xxxxxxxx. I choose to NOT buy back ANY debt addressed to that PERSON. If me, or anyone else, have lead you to believe, that I am one of your "employee", and/or "agent", and/or "the queen" and/or, "an organization", and/or, a "slave" and/or a "legal person", that would be a MISTAKE, and please forgive me. Please, dear Westoba Credit Union HELP me on administrating this debt via that person's surety, which is the Bank of Canada. I wish to remain in honour and to settle this debt in good faith, if I or anyone else have led you or Westoba to believe that i am guilty of any kind of fraud or criminal activity then that would be a MISTAKE, and please forgive me. So far I have done everything in my power to settle the debt in good faith and therefore I must insist that you refrain from going to the authorities (RCMP) and claiming that I am doing anything otherwise. Deviation from this will impede my ability to settle the debt and may result in harm to my person, which will benefit no one including Westoba. My FEE SCHEDULE for false claims against myself is $50,000(CAD) and another $50,000(CAD) for any harm that results from any false claims made. Please send a proper SIGNED BILL complete with a tear off REMITTANCE slip within 14 days so that I may settle the debt, or I will UNDERSTAND that this debt is not in existence anymore. With LOVE BY:_______________________________ Sole Authorized Administrator for DANNY MATTEO BEAUREGARD


Unique Facebook User ID: 861229973892415
Last Updated: May 02, 2014 12:47 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

May 02, 2014 3:42 PM
FOR THOSE OF YOU WHO NEEDS "INSPIRATION" :P

Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: May 02, 2014 3:42 PM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None


Colin Stephen Tonks

May 03, 2014 4:29 AM
The following court transcript supports our long and on-going arguement concerning Common Law and Citizen's Common Law Rights: Accessed: Saturday, 3rd May 2014. Available:

Unique Facebook User ID: 1.01523951670811E+016
Last Updated: May 03, 2014 4:29 AM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

May 03, 2014 3:57 PM
I wonder if there are any idiotic religious fucktard in this group, out of the 297 members, ANY FUCKTARDS IN HERE ? I wanna play ! :D


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: May 03, 2014 3:57 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Colin Stephen Tonks

May 03, 2014 11:19 PM
The Great Leap Backward: Criminal Law Reform with the Hon Jarrod Bleijie

Unique Facebook User ID: 1.01523951670811E+016
Last Updated: May 03, 2014 11:19 PM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

May 03, 2014 11:48 PM
Get it ? .......... :P

Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: May 03, 2014 11:48 PM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None


Colin Stephen Tonks

May 04, 2014 1:14 AM

Unique Facebook User ID: 1.01523951670811E+016
Last Updated: May 04, 2014 1:14 AM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None


Steve Lemieux

May 04, 2014 2:48 AM
This was written by a friend of a friend and so I share it with you. Maybe you can find some remedy in this communication for yourself or someone you know. Please share it as you will, perhaps an eye or two can be opened. I've removed personal contact information in order to protect the presumed guilty... :) Last time I checked, google was still functional, so stop watching TV and start looking into what's really going on in those shit holes called court houses... To: XXXXXXXXX@XXXXXXXX Subject: EXPOSE THE FRAUD PUBLIC INQUIRY DEMANDED INTO TRAFFIC COURT FRAUD I wish to express my concerns over the situation in the Provincial Court (Traffic). I do some work as a Paralegal and a Provincial Court Agent, helping people with Traffic Tickets among other things, I also operate what I call the Legal Help Society as part of my service. The recent articles in the Edmonton Sun regarding; �The Tough Road Ahead�by Rick Bell, in the Edmonton Journal regarding the �Photo Radar Cash Cow� by Dave Staples, in the Edmonton Sun "Denial of Justice" (Apr. 1, 2014) by Kevin Martin and CTV News article by Sarah Richter, "Province looking to take traffic infractions out of the Provincial Court", caused me to contact you . I believe the people involved in the Traffic Ticket Agent Industry are partly responsible for some of these articles, I am not among them and I do not really subscribe to their views. They appear to have also gotten the Edmonton Criminal Trial Lawyers Assoc. and their Calgary counterparts to issue statements to the media concerning "The Erosion of Civil Rights", if the accused in a Traffic Ticket Matter cannot confront their accuser, (the cop who issued the ticket) in a so called�Court of Law�. If they think that by confronting a cop, in a so called Court of Law will get them any justice or preserve their civil rights, they are sadly Mistaken and Delusional. I Do Not Say What I Am About To Say Lightly, my experience has been, that it �JUST DOESN�T MATTER� if you face your accuser or not. The Provincial Court (Traffic) system is so RIGGED and so FRAUDULENT, and on so Many Different Levels, that its very Difficult if not Impossible, to get your head around all the different frauds involved, just so you can defend yourself properly. Because of this �SYSTEMIC FRAUD� it's very difficult to win your case at any time, if at all. Without going into too many legal details, I believe, that the �Fundamental Issue� is that the Provincial Court(Traffic) OPERATES ILLEGALLY, I will explain. The Provincial Court of Alberta (Traffic) and the so called crown prosecutors who bring these �fraudulent quasi-criminal�(a very important legal concept) traffic charges forward, and who run the trials, and who seem to �Control and Operate This Court For Their Own Benefit�, fall under the mandate of the Provincial Minister of Justice(J. Denis). However the �Traffic Safety Act�(The Act) under which people are prosecuted (persecuted), falls under the mandate of the Minister of Transportation (W. Drysdale). Pursuant to sec. 22 of the Act, the Minister has the �Alberta Transportation and Safety Board�(the Board) administer the Act on his behalf. Starting at sec. 27 of the Act, the Alberta Transportation and Safety Board is vested with �All The Powers� of the Court of Queen's Bench for the trials of civil actions, which allows the Board to become a Superior Court in it's own right, just like the Court of Queen's Bench, (almost). The Board has the Right to Hold Hearings, Reviews and Appeals as to ANY MATTER coming before it under the TRAFFIC SAFETY ACT, which is �Administrative Law�, and not a law of �General Application�(which would apply to everybody). Any decision of the Board �CAN ONLY BE REVIEWED� by a Court of Superior Jurisdiction ( i.e. the Court of Queen's Bench, the Court of Appeal of Alberta, The Supreme Court of Canada), and only on �ONE ISSUE� pursuant to sec. 47.1 (1), (2), (3) of the Act, that being of "PATENT UNREASONABLENESS". My question is; �What Business Does The Provincial Court (Traffic) An �Inferior Court�, Have Sticking It's Nose Where It Doesn't Belong?� Under the Act,"ONLY� the Alberta Transportation and Safety Board is the �Court of Original Jurisdiction and First Instance� (or at least it's supposed to be). Both the Minister of Justice(J. Denis) and the Minister of Transportation(W. Drysdale) know whats going on, and I will be referring to that shortly. The �Inferior Court� being the Provincial Court of Alberta (Traffic) by �USURPING THE JURISDICTION� of the Alberta Transportation Safety Board, is involved in a FRAUD. The �Superior Court� being the Alberta Transportation and Safety Board, CANNOT DELEGATE any of it's Powers or Jurisdiction to the �Inferior Court� as this would be an UNCONSTITUTIONAL DELEGATION and a FRAUD. Discussions between the Minister of Transportation and the Minister of Justice are currently underway to �QUIETLY TRANSFER OUT� of the Provincial Court System this �FRAUDULENT and ILLEGAL TRAFFIC COURT�(and not for the reasons that they claim) and to set up a type of Adjudicator answerable only to the Alberta Transportation Safety Board, where the matter �HAS ALWAYS BELONGED�. The people opposed to this plan are naturally the Traffic Ticket Agents,also the Traffic Court Commissioners, the crown prosecutors , and others (including the Police) involved in this �CORRUPT AND FRAUDULENT INDUSTRY� centered in and around the Provincial Court (Traffic) ,who stand to lose their jobs. A tip from a friend revealed that questions concerning these issues would be brought forward by Wild Rose justice critic Mr. Shane Saskiw and Liberal justice critic Ms. Laurie Blakeman, during Question Period in the Legislature on Thurday, April 10, 2014. They both weighed in on the Minister of Justice, as to the Erosion of Civil Rights and the Right to Confront Your Accuser in a Court of Law. The Minister was able to deflect their questions by claiming that Any Talks Were Preliminary and Nothing Had Been Decided, and that any defendant would always be able to confront their accusers. It appeared, although I may be wrong that both the honorable members Blakeman and Saskiw appeared to be in �Lockstep�, in representing the interests of the Traffic Ticket Agents and their associates, and I believe failed to ask the �Real Question� of why the matter was in the Provincial Court (Traffic) in the first place? As you probably know, the �REAL ANSWER� to the question ( $41,300,000 in revenue from traffic fines for 2013 in Edmonton alone) is�Money�. Pursuant to sec. 7.1(1)(2) "REVENUE OFFSET" of the Provincial Offenses Procedure Act , Procedures Regulation, Alberta Regulation 233/1989, the Crown (prosecutors) can claim �16.67 %" of all fines collected by the traffic court, with the balance going pursuant to sec. 162(1) of the Traffic Safety Act, to the municipality where the alleged offense occurred, usually into their police budgets. Little wonder that these so called crown prosecutors �FRAUDULENTLY STEER� traffic violations towards the�COURT THAT THEY CONTROLLED�, 16.67% of $41.3 million(plus) is,( let me do the math) at least $ 6,884,710.00 if not more, in Edmonton alone for 2013,and possibly $ 100 MILLION PLUS for the Province as a whole, and these �CROOKS� claim that they represent the Minister of Justice, sure they do, or do they really(only he can answer that)? Money corrupts and has corrupted our Courts of Justice. (contact Shannon Prithipaul (pres. edmt. crim. trial lawyers assoc.)concerning the defunding of Legal Aid) Upon Reading The Entire �Traffic Safety Act�, the Provincial Court of Alberta is �NOT MENTIONED ONCE�, the only Courts ever mentioned are the Alberta Transportation Safety Board and the Court of Queen's Bench. These so called crown prosecutors will argue that the sec. 2 of the Provincial Offenses Procedure Act allows them to bring the issue before the Provincial Court(traffic). They will claim that sec. 2 of the Act states that; "... this Act applies to every case in which a person commits or is suspected of committing an offense...", Thats All Fine And Good , however they FRAUDULENTLY AND DELIBERATELY FAIL TO INFORM any defendant who they prosecute (persecute), that the First Part Of That Sentence that they refer to under the Act, starts out by stating; "SUBJECT TO ANY EXPRESS PROVISION IN ANOTHER ACT, "....blah,blah, blah (you know the rest). Most people reading this sentence,( if they knew where to look and what to look for) would not know and fail to understand what it really meant, and would think it to be meaningless Legal Gibberish. If one breaks down the sentence, it's quite simple; Ques: What does "Subject To" mean? Ans: Anyone who has bought or sold real estate knows, any present or former real estate agents know, any first year law student knows, any lawyer engaged in real estate conveyancing knows, most if not all lawyers know. Most English speaking, moderately intelligent people in the world know what it means, its an "ESCAPE CLAUSE".It would appear however, that certain so called crown prosecutors have never heard of this Legal Phrase and don�t know it�s true meaning, and they claim to have gone to law school( were they asleep during classes). Ques: What does " Any Express Provision" mean? Ans: Anything Expressly Provided. Ques: What is Expressly Provided ? Ans: "Permission" must be Expressly Provided. Ques: by who or what must this Permission be Expressly provided by? Ans. Hold on it�s coming. Ques: What does "In Another Act" mean"? Ans: In Another Act Ques: What other Act? Ans: The Traffic Safety Act, this Permission is to be expressly provided by the Alberta Transportation Safety Board, THATS WHO. I maintain that the Best Place To Hide Anything is in "PLAIN SIGHT", especially if you wish to Confuse, Lie To, Cheat, and otherwise Rip Off People, who don't know any law and certainly don't know how to defend themselves against these so called crown prosecutors, who are deliberately out to take advantage of them. The phrase that I have been referring to, �SUBJECT TO ANY EXPRESS PROVISION IN ANOTHER ACT� is located in the FIRST PART, of the FIRST SENTENCE, of the FIRST REAL PARAGRAPH( being sec. 2), in the Provincial Offenses Procedure Act. This is just part of the MASSIVE FRAUD(and there�s more) being practiced in the Provincial Court (Traffic). I would ask at this time that that you support my Call For and Demand, that the Minister of Justice, the Minister of Transportation and the Premier of Alberta appoint a PUBLIC INQUIRY into the Fraudulent Operations of the Provincial Court of Alberta (Traffic) and into the Fraudulent Conduct of the so called crown prosecutors, the Traffic Court Commissioners and the police who operate this Criminal Enterprise. Further that all Present and Future Prosecutions in the Provincial Court (Traffic) be Suspended pending the Outcome of this Public Inquiry. If your interested in knowing more about these issues, give me a call at Res. 000 000 0000, Cell. 000 000 0000. DON�T BELIEVE ANYTHING THAT I�VE JUST SAID, CHECK IT OUT YOURSELF. Regards , XXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXX


Unique Facebook User ID: 458370044339963
Last Updated: May 04, 2014 2:48 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Isaiah Whitney

May 04, 2014 9:17 AM
Looking to ADMINISTRATE a PROPERTY TAX BILL for this PERSON I happen to have.


Unique Facebook User ID: 791890220830179
Last Updated: May 04, 2014 9:17 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

May 04, 2014 3:59 PM
If you�re a MAN or a WOMEN, you are the SUPREME being on this planet, and no other Man or Woman has AUTHORITY over you, unless he/she takes it by FORCE, or you decide to GIVE it to him/her, and if any Man or WOMAN forces any kind of AUTHORITY on you, he/she DEPRIVES you from being FREE, and you become his/her SLAVE. WHY WOULD YOU �GIVE� AUTHORITY TO ANOTHER MAN/WOMAN TO ENSLAVE YOU ? So the question: BY WHAT AUTHORITY is �the only question� BY WHAT AUTHORITY��and you better find it fast, or GO FUCK YOURSELF, just FUCK YOU :P I WILL NOT "BUY BACK" ANY FUCKING PUBLIC DEBT anymore, because it's MY right to decide so....and that is the ONLY logical way I can HELP my Country........ (Haaa...these "rebels" Sundays :D )


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: May 04, 2014 3:59 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None




Colin Stephen Tonks

May 05, 2014 12:49 AM
One hot summer day, Boonga, an aboriginal stockman, came to town with his dog, tied it under the shade of a tree and headed into the pub for a cold one.. Twenty minutes later, a cop entered the bar and asked, "Who owns the dog tied under that tree outside?" Boonga called out, �It�s mine, mate." "Your dog seems to be in heat", the cop said. Boonga replied, "No way. She's cool as, 'cause she's tied up under that shade tree." The cop said, "No! You don't understand. Your dog needs to be bred." "No way," said Boonga. "That dog don't need no bread. She ain't hungry 'cause I fed 'er this mornin'." The exasperated cop said, "NO! You don't understand; your dog wants to have sex!" Boonga looked at the cop and said, "Well, go ahead. I always wanted a police dog..."


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.01523951670811E+016
Last Updated: May 05, 2014 12:49 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


May 05, 2014 2:47 AM
Is anyone else having trouble with ppsa.ca not loading?


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: May 05, 2014 2:47 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

May 05, 2014 5:40 AM
Scott Duncan on SURETY (For the newbies) Have fun reading :) FaceBook is having to endure the fact that people with chronic Dunning�Kruger effect still think that their ignorance has the same standing as my knowledge; and they will happily state many unkind things regarding my character when I challenge their "pulled-out-of-their-ass" mythology. Some don't even go that far, and will simply lie about what I said, and claim I don't post evidence. I don't have to post "evidence". I'm not trying to PROVE anything to you. That said, this is not a debate centre either. You assume ALL LIABILITY when you ask to join this group. This, by default, means you have "SURETY", because SURETY equals LIABILITY. I don't need to provide "proof" of this; as my banning you from the group should be compelling enough to show the difference between who's in charge, and who's liable. Before we get to the actual issue of SURETY, and why you must avoid it, we must take a quick journey back in time to learn where the legalese that enjoins you came from. Those of you who endured the content-free 1.2 decades of the Public Fool System, will remember certain things, not the least of which is Shakespeare. The plays of Shakespeare are sold to you as "Olde English". In fact, it was sold as "Olde English" when these were first-run plays. There is a problem with this, though. Nobody ever spoke in the manner that Shakespeare wrote, and they most certainly never used the words. Shakespeare produced most of his major works between 1589 and 1613, all of which were sold as "Olde English". Popular periodicals of the time show that you were often considered "learned and of good taste" if you could speak in this "Olde English". So let's go read some really, really Olde English. Let's pick a really old English document, completely at random. We'll pick...The MAGNA CARTA. A quick read of the MAGNA CARTA will swiftly reveal two things. The first is that that it's pretty readable, not backward and convoluted like a Shakespeare play. There may be a few archaic words you may need to look up (to ascertain their meanings), but it's still pretty readable, and there are no words that Shakespeare used. There's also no letter "U". This is a very important fact to remember, because *spoiler alert*, when courts or legal documents refer to "YOU", they are in fact, granting you SURETY in the matter. If you look at a WARRANT, or a ticket from a Policy Enforcement Officer, it will have a name and it will then refer to that name as "YOU" from then on. For example, "JOHN Q PUBLIC, YOU have been charged with (insert bullshit offence here)". YOU=SURETY If you're ever in a courtroom and do not wish to have the "benefit of SURETY", you have but to object to being addressed as "YOU". There are many ways to do this. Dean Clifford might say, in response to being addressed as "YOU", "If I have led the court to believe that I am SURETY in this matter, then that would be a MISTAKE. Please forgive me." (FUN FACT: A court MUST ALWAYS grant forgiveness when asked and/or requested) Others, like myself, are a lot more succinct. For example, I might respond, "FUCK YOU! You're a YOU, I'm a ME! By what AUTHORITY do YOU address ME as a "YOU"?", because I can get away with it. The reason I can get away with it is that I UNDERSTAND the UCC as opposed to ONE PEOPLE'S PUBLIC FRAUD which spreads mythology and bullshit about the UCC. Now there may be a certain "pretend radio" talk-show host (who speaks in a manner that would suggest he is hosting a show with a dick in his mouth), who would demand "proof of this", ignoring the fact that the UCC is, in fact, the proof. Section 1, Subsection 308, of the UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE covers RESERVATION OF RIGHTS. This is a well-known fact, and this is how you use it. On entering the court, you aggressively make the first motion, that being, the RESERVATION OF YOUR RIGHTS. But since you're the only one in the courtroom with ACTUAL STANDING, you can be a total dick about it. You don't RESERVE YOUR RIGHTS, you RESERVE ALL RIGHTS! Not just yours, EVERYONE's. You remove everyone else's rights and give them to yourself. WHY? Because "Fuck off that's WHY!" You're the only one with STANDING. If you HOLD the power, WIELD it...don't be such a pussy! If you're entitled to ALL RIGHTS, CLAIM THEM. This is how you do it. When the "justice" starts speaking, interrupt them. Say, "Point of order!" They will immediately be silent. At that point, state "I believe I am the only party with standing, so barring objection from the court, I wish to RESERVE ALL RIGHTS now, and henceforth. Are there any objections from the court?" As the court has no standing to respond, simply speak to the record as such, "Let the record show that I have reserved all rights, and the court has not objected." At this point if they say anything to you, you simply say, "Objection. The record shows that I have reserved all rights, and I have not granted you leave to speak. Why are you speaking?" Do the same when opposing counsel attempts to speak. You will then be posed the question, "How do you wish to proceed in this matter?" for that is the one question a slave has the right to ask. What is their master's wish? You'll recall in other articles and comments, the levels of the caste system and how they give instructions. NOBILITY (KINGS AND QUEENS) EXPRESS THEIR "WISHES". ADMIRALTY ISSUES INSTRUCTIONS BY REQUESTING, ADDRESSING THEIR SUBORDINATES AS "MR". GENERALS GIVE ORDERS. Now even the talk-show host who sounds like he's got a dick in his mouth, won't "demand proof" of the fact that if you have all the rights, and everybody else has none, you are CLEARLY the KING. So you are going to have to learn to give instruction by expressing your wishes. This is why they are asking how you "wish to proceed". Courts grant and test your SOVEREIGNTY all the time. You simply have to listen to the words they are using. At this time you may respond, "I wish to prove to some ass-wipe who sounds like he's got a dick in his mouth, the things I know, so I wish to go to trial PRO SE. But I wouldn't recommend this...I would simply wish the case to be dismissed. If they say anything else besides "I agree, case dismissed", you exercise your AUTHORITY by questioning. MASTERS QUESTION, SLAVES ANSWER. For instance if a "justice" said anything except "I agree. Case dismissed," you question why they are even speaking. "I'm sure you'll recall Mr. (insert justice's name here) that at the beginning of these proceedings I explicitly reserved all rights, including yours. Have I not made my wishes clear?" Always remember to respond in the form of a question. A question serves the dual-purpose of establishing your authority, and negating the possibility of UNDERSTANDING; because if you UNDERSTAND, you accept SURETY. As stated before, the most powerful of these questions is, "Who are you?" UNDERSTANDING cannot be presumed until that question is answered. Above all, questioning deflects SURETY. Quite possibly one of the most useful documents I have ever published is my NOTICE OF MISTAKE for Dean. This is a useful, powerful document that also instantly removes SURETY. I framed it in such a way that you can replace the name "Dean Clifford" with your name, and you can make a pad of these things. Have lots of copies to hand out to friends and opposing counsel. Hell the court clerk loves these things too...make sure the court clerk has one as well. Just make sure you UNDERSTAND what the document says. Read it carefully and understand what the words mean, because you will be challenged. And remember, the NOTICE by its very nature, presents several questions. Do not permit the proceedings to move forward without these questions being answered! Because so many people ask for it, transcribed here is the copy of THE ROGUESUPPORT NOTICE OF MISTAKE. ***Begin NOTICE OF MISTAKE NOTICE OF MISTAKE In the matter of SURETY for the LEGAL NAME, I believe that there has been a MISTAKE as the SOLE BENEFICIARY has been INCORRECTLY IDENTIFIED as the accused. If I, AND/OR PERSONS AND/OR FRIENDS OF THE COURT AND/OR SUCH OTHER PARTIES ACTING IN MY INTERESTS, have led the COURT to believe by responding to �You� and or �DEAN CLIFFORD� and/or SUCH OTHER IDENTIFICATION THIS COURT HAS ADDRESSED ME AS, that I am the PARTY WITH SURETY in this matter, then that would be a MISTAKE and please forgive me. As I have no knowledge of who �You� and or �DEAN CLIFFORD� and/or SUCH OTHER IDENTIFICATION THIS COURT HAS ADDRESSED ME AS, I RESPECTFULLY ASK; by WHAT AUTHORITY is the COURT ADDRESSING me as such? As the SURETY BOND (BIRTH CERTIFICATE) has been deposited into the COURT, WHAT EVIDENCE does the COURT have that I, as the SOLE BENEFICIARY of the TRUST have any SURETY in this matter? As the GOVERNMENT is the SOLE SIGNATORY PARTY on the SURETY BOND (BIRTH CERTIFICATE), with SOLE AND FULL SURETY as TRUSTEE for the LEGAL NAME, WHAT EVIDENCE does the COURT have that I am a TRUSTEE for the LEGAL NAME. WHAT EVIDENCE does the COURT have that I am a TRUSTEE and have ANY SURETY with respect to the LEGAL NAME? WHAT EVIDENCE does the COURT have that I am an OFFICER, an AGENT, a TRUSTEE or an EMPLOYEE of the CROWN? WHAT EVIDENCE does the COURT have of any WARRANT OF AGENCY for the principal? WHAT EVIDENCE does the COURT have that there has been any meeting of the minds, any PROPER NOTICE given, any considerable CONSIDERATION offered, or that I have ANY INTENT to CONTRACT in this matter? As such, I am returning your OFFER, DECLINED, for immediate DISCHARGE and CLOSURE. AUTHORISED BY: ***End NOTICE OF MISTAKE If you truly UNDERSTAND what this document says and/or does, this is one of the most powerful documents you can wield in court. If you have the Dunning�Kruger effect you will likely go to jail. Used properly the NOTICE OF MISTAKE will ALWAYS remove any real or implied SURETY the court believes you may have. You will notice the court always refers to "belief". When I say belief is evil, it is not just a disparaging remark against adults with "imaginary friends" (which they totally deserve), it is yet another example of why this statement is profoundly true. All belief is evil. You are taught from childhood to "respect belief", and are constantly reinforced with the really dumb freedom that it is your "right to believe what you want". If I had the authority and/or power to remove just one right from humanity, and no more, the right to "believe" would be the one that I would eradicate. In all my years of studying, and being part of the Nobility, the curtailing of this one "RIGHT" would exponentially increase quality of life for all humanity. I calculate it would take two generations for it to "stick". Belief is the end of questioning. Belief is intellectual bankruptcy, and is the exact opposite of knowledge. You will never question if you "believe". Let's leap back to the 1500's to Shakespeare. This is where the concept of addressing somebody as "YOU" indicated the assignment of SURETY. No writings before this contained any such logistic mechanisms. Don't "believe me"...go look for yourself. Go look at the MAGNA CARTA yourself; and ask yourself why there's no "YOU" before Shakespeare. And ask yourself why the MAGNA CARTA, in all its current published forms, no longer has, "To do right by Alexander". There may be three readers amongst you who understand what I just said there, and all of them are Scottish I guarantee you. In any courtroom proceeding in the western world, SURETY IS PRESUMED, and it must be deflected from you. As a "justice" is not a PERSON under the law, the only PARTY that can ACCEPT SURETY is the PARTY making the CLAIM. There may be certain readers who talk like they have a dick stuck in their mouth, who will demand proof of this...and so I direct you to the Rules of Civil Procedure (wherever you are) to look up SECURITY FOR COSTS. Let's zoom back to the present (so we can get as far away from belief as possible) where the word "YOU" is part of the English language, as are the titles, "Mr.", "Miss", and "Mrs.". All of these titles and means of addressing you, are in fact, assigning and/or presuming SURETY...yes, on YOU. The easiest mnemonic exercise you can do to make deflecting these titles second nature is to replace the titles "Mr.", "Miss", or "Mrs." with the word, "bitch", in your head; and to respond as if they had addressed you as "bitch", because being addressed as "Mr.", "Miss", or "Mrs." is doing exactly that. As for the word "YOU", think of that as a tennis ball which must be served back. Assert your AUTHORITY by questioning whenever they address you as "YOU"; "Are YOU addressing ME?" If they're stupid enough to say yes, or even to imply the affirmative, be like that guy who talks like he has a dick in his mouth and demand proof; "By what authority do YOU address me as a PARTY OF SURETY?"...or something along those lines. Your only objective is to serve the "YOU" back to them. So that's today's word, "SURETY". It's something you don't want, and I've just shown you how to give it back.


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: May 05, 2014 5:40 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Scott Duncan

May 05, 2014 7:35 AM


Unique Facebook User ID: 927379467328526
Last Updated: May 05, 2014 7:35 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


May 06, 2014 12:04 AM
There is a situation some may be aware of where by a bank has received a default judgement against the person I hold in my pocket. The bank is the plaintiff and it's the lawyer who is sending me notices about garnishing and now threats to take my house. He also has claimed a few things in the latest letter that are not true that, because of the success of this fraud to date, need to be rebutted by someone I trust. What I's like to prevent is any possibility of joinder with the lawyer, to date he has not provided proof of standing and is a 3rd party interloper. I'm thinking that all the trustee responses to his correspondence should be sent to the bank CFO and the court file. The idea being, the claims are rebutted, but not allowing him (the lawyer) to create any kind of joinder. Any comments, insights would be appreciated.


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: May 06, 2014 12:04 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Eamonn O Brien

May 06, 2014 8:48 PM
Scott may remember about a year ago we touched on the subject of social welfare payments/unemployment benefits... Here in Ireland the application for such benefits requires one to provide details that qualifies the applicant as a habitual RESIDENT. Once the application is approved the benefit, usually cash, can be collected each week by signing for it at a local post office. So what is one doing when collecting said benefit? By signing each week is the man/woman conjuring money into existence, therefore "extending the overdraft" and increasing the debt which will be then passed onto employees' income tax levies? People who have jobs often joke to friends without that they are "paying their dole/benefits"... That's making alot more sense now...


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02035706386866E+016
Last Updated: May 06, 2014 8:48 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Scott Duncan

May 06, 2014 11:25 PM
OK... Lets see how much you've learned! FREELY COMMENT ON THIS VIDEO! :D

Unique Facebook User ID: 927379467328526
Last Updated: May 06, 2014 11:25 PM
https://www.youtube.com/embed/45g50a7kD68?autoplay=1
Type of Post: video
Place of Post: None


Shane Pennell

May 07, 2014 11:10 AM
Hey guys! I could use some advice... What should I do if the utility company is ignoring the completed BOE? I have administrated the public debt(hydro) on two properties I have and gave 30days for rebuttal. They responded with a threat to cut service, so I send an email that stated that the debt had been administered lawfully and DO NOT cut service because children would be put in danger without the public utility. They respond with registered mail stating that the PERSON who holds the account is responsible to pay or they will send to collections. I send an email thanking them for the correspondence, and tell them that I am not the PERSON, I am the SOLE AUTHORIZED ADMINISTRATOR for that name and I have sent them the completed BOE with instructions to discharge the debt. The manager of the office sends me a personal email to threaten collections if they don't receive payment, and that they will not respond to the matter anymore. I return her email stating I have completed the BOE, returned it in due course, and they are now the holder and they can do whatever they please, but I suggest to present it Bank of Canada for discharge. So, they cut the service at my tenant's house and I am forced to pay to regain power. I have emailed the manager to state that there is an obvious dispute over payment and I would like some remedy for being enslaved to their debt. I am being ignored... Fucking cocksuckers knew that they would put me in a awkward position by cutting the power at the tenants house. The debt was $700 at my place and only $300 where they cut the power. I am going to continue to complete any BOE that they send me. This time I'll send a notarized copy of the BC and a NOM. How do I respond if they cut the power? How do I respond that they did cut the power? Thanks guys. :)


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.01528359500503E+016
Last Updated: May 07, 2014 11:10 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Kawni Gilroy

May 08, 2014 1:27 AM
OMG.....I am truly in shock.....so I posted my speeding ticket a couple weeks ago which I sent back Refused for Cause, Without Dishonor, Without Recourse, Non Assumpsit. Remember, I was coming down a hill and only sped up for a about 3 seconds over the speed limit. I got the letter from the Courthouse today and the amount of the ticket is $1,266.00.....are they f**king crazy???? I see this cop writing these tickets every morning in the same spot....I am now guessing this is a trap and they are incahoots with the Courthouse...


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.01523662217197E+016
Last Updated: May 08, 2014 1:27 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Rick Hiltz

May 08, 2014 2:35 AM

Unique Facebook User ID: 1.01523057623409E+016
Last Updated: May 08, 2014 2:35 AM
https://www.youtube.com/embed/HI64HjwhRAo?autoplay=1
Type of Post: video
Place of Post: None


Jason Lerato

May 08, 2014 12:43 PM
Lmao.... So true. Such bullshit these faith healers

Unique Facebook User ID: 1.01527421669471E+016
Last Updated: May 08, 2014 12:43 PM
Type of Post: photo
Place of Post: None


David Grant

May 08, 2014 9:48 PM
Thanks Pete Daoust


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.0205480648833E+016
Last Updated: May 08, 2014 9:48 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Chris Evan

May 09, 2014 12:59 AM
Lots of newbies... THE TENDER FOR LAW - SITE PRE-LAUNCH PHASE! THE TENDER FOR LAW is an examination of what you need to know to fight Judicial corruption, by examining the stuff you are LIED TO about. SPOILERS: IT'S ALWAYS ABOUT ACCOUNTING AND SURETY. You are BOUND by ACTS, STATUTES, and CODES when you use MONEY. On that money are the words THIS NOTE IS LEGAL TENDER: THIS NOTE - The note the words (NOTICE) is written on. IS LEGAL - CODES, ACTS, AND STATUTES with the force of law. TENDER - tender verb ten�dered ten�der�ing Definition of TENDER transitive verb 1: to make a tender of 2: to present for acceptance : offer "tendered my resignation" intransitive verb : to make a bid or tender Origin of TENDER Middle English tendren, from Anglo-French tendre offer First Known Use: 15th century THIS NOTE IS LEGAL TENDER=THIS NOTE IS A TENDER FOR LAW This forum is where you can ask all your questions, and we don't have to keep typing the same answers over and over. To that end, I am telling you to WATCH THIS FIRST: http://youtu.be/3P7izAUe3ZM NOT watching this, and then posting a question and/or making idiotic statements which reveal you HAVEN'T watched this, means you are DELIBERATELY ignoring these instructions, and you will be banned. Post your question, we will do our best to answer. OFF TOPIC POSTS WILL BE PURGED. We want people to be able to use this as a central reference and a place to go for help, where people will take the time to do so. Post any questions on LAW, MONEY, CONTRACTS, and JURISDICTIONS and how they are connected. Keep it civil, even if Scott doesn't. (It's Scott after all. Seriously, it's better than paying him) Remember that Scott chooses his words carefully. LEARN WHAT THOSE WORDS MEAN. And when your examination of these things is done, you will see that we also have a REAL SOLUTION to the problem. YOU CAN'T BUY that shit ANYWHERE! :D ...no really. You can't. It's copyrighted. TL;DR - IT'S ALWAYS ABOUT ACCOUNTING AND SURETY. THIS NOTE IS LEGAL TENDER = OFFERING AN UNCONDITIONAL "BENEFIT" OF ACTS, STATUTES AND CODES.

Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02024820688268E+016
Last Updated: May 09, 2014 12:59 AM
https://www.youtube.com/embed/3P7izAUe3ZM?autoplay=1
Type of Post: video
Place of Post: None


Isaiah Whitney

May 09, 2014 8:53 AM
I have a fellow employee at work who has been fairly receptive to my information regarding taxes yet still filed with intent to buy back these PUBLIC DEBTS attached to his PERSON. This PERSON owes roughly $800.00 USD to the IRS. So when he filed turbotax gave him the option of setting up a payment plan with the IRS. He did accept that option. He brought this correspondence to me today seeking help with the matter. It seems to me the IRS is making him an offer and this payment plan agreement/contract has not been finalized. The terms laid out in this correspondence are rather intrusive and I pointed that out. I want to discharge this debt via the SURETY of this mans PERSON. So there are what appear to be INCHOATE INSTRUMENTS provided. These are different from any I have seen in my limited experience. I am not sure if these have been provided to grant remedy for the fee associated with the payment plan but I am leaning in that direction. I would really appreciate some input on this. Can this entire debt be discharged with these. I am going to try in lieu of any advice contrary.


Unique Facebook User ID: 791890220830179
Last Updated: May 09, 2014 8:53 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Leonard Fitzgerald

May 09, 2014 12:59 PM
I am fresh to this group and would be happy to share in wisdoms gleaned in reciprocation to abuses being done in the arena of legalities and law. Dealing in words is a dangerous business and cannot to often be stressed that thats what the law deals in. This is the perpetual realities of even unrealities we deal with daily to our credit or detriment. A tangle and dance that effects have affects upon us all.


Unique Facebook User ID: 771449292916345
Last Updated: May 09, 2014 12:59 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

May 09, 2014 2:32 PM
Steven Sharp, when you have these kind of question, I need you to post them in the group Steven Sharp in Private: Hey Pete, There's a particular article I found. Seems it was written by Scott, but I wanted to make sure instead of assuming. Would you happen to know if Scott wrote this? https://www.facebook.com/notes /942359415830531/ Pete answer in private: It pretty looks like it is, but I can't be too sure, I haven't seen him doing it.. :P


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: May 09, 2014 2:32 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Paul O'Shea

May 09, 2014 8:01 PM


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02057274595802E+016
Last Updated: May 09, 2014 8:01 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Javier Alfredo Villela

May 09, 2014 11:11 PM
Ok, i live in Lost Wages(las vegas, nv) and i recently made a personal affidavit declaring that im not a negotiable security and i retained all my unalienable and unalienable rights given God and supported by u.s. constitution. I also stated my fee schedule for public servants attempting to obtain a security interest without my expressed written consent, the fee for my forced compliance under stress, threat, and duress aka interfering with my rights is 50 g's per infraction. i get it notarized and then I went to public records to get it entered into record. THEY PUT A HOLD ON IT sayin they have to review it first, they call me back later and say they REFUSE TO ENTER IT into public record and tell me i cant use it. My question for the group is: What would you do now? What would be the most accurate techniques for combating their censorship of my rights?(I believe I should be able to charge them for contracting with me just as they charge for contracting with them! Any good advice would be greatly appreciated, sincerely javier)


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.01532138053406E+016
Last Updated: May 09, 2014 11:11 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Howard Posehn

May 10, 2014 12:35 AM

Derek

The original NOTICE OF MISTAKE, and, "POINT-OF-ORDER!..."- threads all into one..... Above all, questioning deflects SURETY. Quite possibly one of the most useful documents I have ever published is my NOTICE OF MISTAKE for Dean. This is a useful, powerful document that also instantly removes SURETY. I framed it in such a way that you can replace the name "Dean Clifford" with your name, and you can make a pad of these things. Have lots of copies to hand out to friends and opposing counsel. Hell the court clerk loves these things too...make sure the court clerk has one as well. Just make sure you UNDERSTAND what the document says. Read it carefully and understand what the words mean, because you will be challenged. And remember, the NOTICE by its very nature, presents several questions. Do not permit the proceedings to move forward without these questions being answered! Because so many people ask for it, transcribed here is the copy of THE ROGUESUPPORT NOTICE OF MISTAKE. Scott Duncan: *Sigh* Submit it as an EXHIBIT in an AFFIDAVIT. They can't refuse your SWORN TESTIMONY! NOTICE OF MISTAKE 1. TAKE NOTICE THAT: In the matter of SURETY for the LEGAL NAME, I believe that there has been a MISTAKE, as the SOLE BENEFICIARY OF A PUBLIC DOCUMENT has been INCORRECTLY IDENTIFIED as an "accused" and/or a "suspect". 2. FORGIVE ME: If I, AND/OR PERSONS AND/OR FRIENDS OF THE COURT AND/OR SUCH OTHER PARTIES ACTING IN MY INTERESTS, have led A COURT and/or STATUTORY BODY and/or A GOVERNMENT SERVICE and/or AGENTS and/or OFFICERS of such bodies, to believe, by responding to �You�, and/or �JOHN SCOTT DUNCAN�, and/or SUCH OTHER IDENTIFICATION, such bodies HAVE ADDRESSED ME AS, that I am the PARTY WITH SURETY in this matter, then that would be a MISTAKE, and please forgive me. 3. If I, AND/OR PERSONS AND/OR FRIENDS OF THE COURT AND/OR SUCH OTHER PARTIES ACTING IN MY INTERESTS, have led A COURT and/or STATUTORY BODY and/or A GOVERNMENT SERVICE and/or AGENTS and/or OFFICERS of such bodies, to believe, by responding to �You�, and/or �JOHN SCOTT DUNCAN�, and/or SUCH OTHER IDENTIFICATION, such bodies HAVE ADDRESSED ME AS, that I am, in ANY CAPACITY, a Pro Se litigant and/or a LEGAL PERSON in this matter, then that would be a MISTAKE, as I DO NOT CONSENT and WAIVE THE BENEFIT to such titles (Waiver of the CHANGE OF NAMES ACT OF ONTARIO). Please forgive me. 4. THEREFORE: As I have no knowledge of who �You� and or �JOHN SCOTT DUNCAN� and/or SUCH OTHER IDENTIFICATION ANY COURT and/or STATUTORY BODY and/or GOVERNMENT SERVICE and/or AGENTS and/or OFFICERS of such bodies [HEREAFTER "YOU"], HAS ADDRESSED ME AS, I RESPECTFULLY ASK; by WHAT AUTHORITY ARE "YOU" ADDRESSING me as such? 5. As the SURETY BOND (BIRTH CERTIFICATE) has been deposited into the COURT [In the custody of Justice Wailan Low, ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE: Court File Number CV-11-430464], WHAT EVIDENCE does the COURT have that I, as a MAN who is not lawfully entitled to the BENEFITS of a BIRTH CERTIFICATE [PPSACA13078], have any SURETY in this matter? 6. As GOVERNMENT is the SOLE SIGNATORY PARTY on the SURETY BOND (BIRTH CERTIFICATE), with SOLE AND FULL SURETY as TRUSTEE for the LEGAL NAME, WHAT EVIDENCE do YOU have that I am a TRUSTEE for the LEGAL NAME. WHAT EVIDENCE do YOU have that I am a TRUSTEE and have ANY SURETY with respect to ANY NAME? 7. WHAT EVIDENCE do YOU have, that I am an OFFICER, an AGENT, a TRUSTEE and/or an EMPLOYEE of the CROWN? WHAT EVIDENCE do "YOU" have of any WARRANT OF AGENCY for the principal? 8. WHAT EVIDENCE do "YOU" have that there has been any meeting of the minds, any PROPER NOTICE given, any considerable CONSIDERATION offered, or that I have ANY INTENT to CONTRACT in this matter? As such, I am returning your OFFER, DECLINED, for immediate DISCHARGE and CLOSURE. [ AUTHORISED BY: ] [ AQUILAE Trust Seal] - "POINT-OF-ORDER!"..... (Scott has typed-out two versions of this so far...use some words at your own peril) :/ Here is my court room position in a nutshell. You do not accept surety � EVER. Step 1: Reserve all rights. (get Derek Moran [im honoured to be mentioned, by the way] to parrot how to do that...he loves that shit) Step 2: Direct your case and do not let them proceed. Present NOTICE OF MISTAKE, and REMEMBER THE FUCKING QUESTIONS IT CONTAINS. If they do not answer these questions you object, and declare that unless the questions in your NOTICE OF MISTAKE are answered, you CAN NOT UNDERSTAND THE NATURE AND CAUSE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS. Anything outside of this supports their position that you are �playing� their game, and thus it is presumed that you understand the rules. The only way to counter this is to declare that you CANNOT UNDERSTAND the rules without these questions being answered. Think very carefully about this. If you are a novice at chess, and did not know about castling and its rules, you might raise the obvious question, �Why do you get to move two pieces?� If I refuse to explain that rule to you, and even deny you the chance to present your understanding of the rules, would you continue playing chess with me? If you attempt to stop the game for this reason, that's when you're going to �understand� that this was a chess game for money; and that I have big, burly thugs to enforce this game. You claimed to know the rules for the engagement, even if you later disclaimed being an expert. If you UNDERSTAND, you accept SURETY. As stated YOU=SURETY If you're ever in a courtroom and do not wish to have the "benefit of SURETY", you have but to object to being addressed as "YOU". There are many ways to do this. Dean Clifford might say, in response to being addressed as "YOU", "If I have led the court to believe that I am SURETY in this matter, then that would be a MISTAKE. Please forgive me." (FUN FACT: A court MUST ALWAYS grant forgiveness when asked and/or requested) Others, like myself, are a lot more succinct. For example, I might respond, "FUCK YOU! You're a YOU, I'm a ME! By what AUTHORITY do YOU address ME as a "YOU"?", because I can get away with it. The reason I can get away with it is that I UNDERSTAND the UCC as opposed to ONE PEOPLE'S PUBLIC FRAUD which spreads mythology and bullshit about the UCC. Section 1, Subsection 308, of the UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE covers RESERVATION OF RIGHTS. This is a well-known fact, and this is how you use it. Version #1: On entering the court, you aggressively make the first motion, that being, the RESERVATION OF YOUR RIGHTS. But since you're the only one in the courtroom with ACTUAL STANDING, you can be a total dick about it. You don't RESERVE YOUR RIGHTS, you RESERVE ALL RIGHTS! Not just yours, EVERYONE's. You remove everyone else's rights and give them to yourself. WHY? Because "Fuck off that's WHY!" You're the only one with STANDING. If you HOLD the power, WIELD it...don't be such a pussy! If you're entitled to ALL RIGHTS, CLAIM THEM. This is how you do it. When the "justice" starts speaking, interrupt them. Say, "Point of order!" They will immediately be silent. At that point, state "I believe I am the only party with standing, so barring objection from the court, I wish to RESERVE ALL RIGHTS now, and henceforth. Are there any objections from the court?" As the court has no standing to respond, simply speak to the record as such, "Let the record show that I have reserved all rights, and the court has not objected." At this point if they say anything to you, you simply say, "Objection. The record shows that I have reserved all rights, and I have not granted you leave to speak. Why are you speaking?" Do the same when opposing counsel attempts to speak. You will then be posed the question, "How do you wish to proceed in this matter?" for that is the one question a slave has the right to ask. What is their master's wish? Version #2: *judge begins to speak at his trial* "Point of order!" *judge goes silent* "BARRING ANY OBJECTION FROM THE COURT, at this time I WISH to reserve ALLl rights. Is there ANY objection from the court? *Jeopardy Music* Any objections? *Clock Ticking* ....Lookin' for OBJECTIONS FROM THE COURT! Going Once... (repeat second and third time) As the court has NOT objected I have , IN FACT, reserved ALL rights. (It is a FACT that's ON RECORD, and I wish the court to SHUT ITS FUCKING PIE-HOLE!) (...be silent). QUESTION: if you have RESERVED ALL RIGHTS, and they don't understand what you are referring to, when you speak of the PUBLIC RECORD, ASK your BITCH SLAVE, WHAT THE FUCK? ...like so: "Point of ORDER! It is MY UNDERSTANDING THAT THIS IS, IN FACT, A COURT OF THE PUBLIC RECORD. Am I MISTAKEN? As I, myself have, IN FACT, RESERVED ALL RIGHTS (Not YOUR rights, ALL rights. The rights of everyone in the court have been surrendered to you!) I wish to convene a COURT OF THE PUBLIC RECORD (Barring ANY objections from the court). First: You are not making MOTIONS. Do NOT allow them to say that they are. Re: "I don't understand", respond that you require the supernumerary to RECUSE HIM/HER SELF as they are on record as being LEGALLY INCOMPETENT to do their job. You'll recall in other articles and comments, the levels of the caste system and how they give instructions. NOBILITY (KINGS AND QUEENS) EXPRESS THEIR "WISHES". ADMIRALTY ISSUES INSTRUCTIONS BY REQUESTING, ADDRESSING THEIR SUBORDINATES AS "MR". GENERALS GIVE ORDERS. The fact that if you have all the rights, and everybody else has none, you are CLEARLY the KING. So you are going to have to learn to give instruction by expressing your wishes. This is why they are asking how you "wish to proceed". Courts grant and test your SOVEREIGNTY all the time. You simply have to listen to the words they are using. At this time you may respond, "I wish to prove to some ass-wipe who sounds like he's got a dick in his mouth, the things I know, so I wish to go to trial PRO SE. But I wouldn't recommend this...I would simply wish the case to be dismissed. If they say anything else besides "I agree, case dismissed", you exercise your AUTHORITY by questioning. MASTERS QUESTION, SLAVES ANSWER. For instance if a "justice" said anything except "I agree. Case dismissed," you question why they are even speaking. "I'm sure you'll recall Mr. (insert justice's name here) that at the beginning of these proceedings I explicitly reserved all rights, including yours. Have I not made my wishes clear?" When you're in the court room dealing with these babbling, sacks-of-shit, learn to use the breaks. Repeat after me, �I DO NOT UNDERSTAND THE NATURE AND CAUSE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS�. If they ignore your question, then your next response should be, �OBJECTION. If the court cannot answer my question, then I do not understand the nature and cause of these proceedings.� Keep repeating that, and repeating that, and repeating that...until they answer your fucking question. Always remember to respond in the form of a question. A question serves the dual-purpose of establishing your authority, and negating the possibility of UNDERSTANDING; because before, the most powerful of these questions is, "Who are you?" UNDERSTANDING cannot be presumed until that question is answered. Above all, questioning deflects SURETY.


Unique Facebook User ID: 294473387379215
Last Updated: May 10, 2014 12:35 AM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

May 10, 2014 4:15 PM
Jimi Townsend sent me this in PRIVATE Conversation d�marr�e vendredi Jimi Townsend 09/05/2014 18:53 Jimi Townsend income tax is a scam run by the federal court. if you have an rtp, you already have a rubber stamped ex parte court order to seize all your belongings. they are running out of victims and the victims are getting harder to deal with. send a registered affidavit; request for particulars for anything you want to know about. also get on the treasury dept. web site and get the FOIA form and send a FOIA request to every federal govt agency. this will likely get you white washed and you will lose all your govt records, debts and credit rating. wish ya luck


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: May 10, 2014 4:15 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Rick Hiltz

May 11, 2014 6:54 AM
Scott or Pete here is a question for either of you. I`ll Take a stab at answering myself but here goes I was not born in Canaduh I was a by product of West Germany by a Canadian father and German mother . When i was 11 it was explained to me that if i didn`t become a Canadian citizen i could become interned in a camp should Canaduh ever go to war with Germany again much like the Japanese during WW2. So under duress i gave up dual nationality and became a person of Canadian descent . I'm guessing the surety in my case would be the name of the citizenship certificate as no B/C exists


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.01523057623409E+016
Last Updated: May 11, 2014 6:54 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Anibal Jose Baez

May 11, 2014 3:08 PM
I like this!

Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02035927166068E+016
Last Updated: May 11, 2014 3:08 PM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None


August le Blanc

May 11, 2014 3:42 PM
Ok, I have some stamps, I need to get some more, I have a void stamp� I am getting a stamp as sole authorized admin with the correct info on it� So I need to pick up, A bank of canada stamp, a date received stamp A bill of exchange act 1985. stamp� I also have the corporate seal� What else?


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.01530787868601E+016
Last Updated: May 11, 2014 3:42 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Alan Madden

May 12, 2014 9:21 AM
Thanks for adding me here Pete...greetings from Johannesburg...


Unique Facebook User ID: 802896513055720
Last Updated: May 12, 2014 9:21 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Phillip Prater

May 12, 2014 10:09 AM

Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02062936480077E+016
Last Updated: May 12, 2014 10:09 AM
Type of Post: photo
Place of Post: None


Eamonn O Brien

May 12, 2014 2:25 PM
There was a thread started by "Maximus Legis" regarding discharging of public debt in which I was posting about my ongoing dealing with the Waste Management Company I use, Panda... The thread and Maximus seem to have left Facebook... So I thought I'd re-post it here... I received an invoice for x amount from Panda with a number of remittances (instructions on how to pay a debt). I replied asking the company to confirm that they had supplied all/every remittance. They replied with a letter re-stating the previously supplied remittances and also included "bank transfer" which had been omitted originally. So I then replied asking for a bill... *An invoice outlines the cost of goods/services. *A bill informs the PERSON that they are in debt for the cost amount of goods/services. They have replied by issuing a copy of the original invoice. So, should I write back requesting a bill again and inform them of administrative fees they will incur should they respond with anything but a bill? Cheers for any comments...


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02035706386866E+016
Last Updated: May 12, 2014 2:25 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Shelin Wilder

May 12, 2014 8:37 PM
I am excited to follow this group. Thank you for approving my request. Now I am off to tend the land and will check back in later this evening.


Unique Facebook User ID: 771530089549379
Last Updated: May 12, 2014 8:37 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


David Grant

May 12, 2014 11:05 PM
Out of province warrants , does anyone no how they work??


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.0205480648833E+016
Last Updated: May 12, 2014 11:05 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Anibal Jose Baez

May 13, 2014 12:37 AM

Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02035927166068E+016
Last Updated: May 13, 2014 12:37 AM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None


Nina Wildes

May 13, 2014 12:38 AM
Thanks for the add and excited to follow your group and learn and share.


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02026360287564E+016
Last Updated: May 13, 2014 12:38 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


May 13, 2014 4:28 AM


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: May 13, 2014 4:28 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

May 13, 2014 1:20 PM
This is a SPECIAL thread regarding Municipality TAXES . We will talk about MUNICIPALITY taxes..... First, we need to find out WHERE the mistake was made, in regards to this property that has been acquired by the PERSON, we happen to have in our pocket. A MISTAKE was made, and you will find out in the ACT OF SALE, read this document, the MISTAKE is clearly identified in there... ;)


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: May 13, 2014 1:20 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Rick Hiltz

May 14, 2014 12:14 AM
Scott LOL got a call from my bank manager and he explained to me that recent conversations he and his customer service manager have had with me and the run in i had with another branchs manager has caused them some concern and they feel the need to close my accounts and to have me move my investments to another bank with in 2 weeks ........They have also trespassed me from both branchs


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.01523057623409E+016
Last Updated: May 14, 2014 12:14 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Bruno Hiller

May 14, 2014 3:42 AM
My wife and I are going to the hospital right now to have our second child. We are extremely excited and I was wondering what to do about the certificate of live birth... Any tips on how to fill it out our should I avoid it altogether?


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.01542042560802E+016
Last Updated: May 14, 2014 3:42 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Chip Douglas

May 14, 2014 10:55 PM
Does this throw-a-wrench into things Scott, in terms of the NBA "forcing" this guy to sell a team that he doesn't even 'own' as it turns out the TRUST does?

Unique Facebook User ID: 1671218449781399
Last Updated: May 14, 2014 10:55 PM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None


Chip Douglas

May 15, 2014 1:14 AM
I know that Robert Menard isn't one of your most favourite people Scott, but.....was he onto something at all when he posted the back of this Birth Certificate from British Columbia, and how it says - "FOR TREASURY USE ONLY" on it?

Unique Facebook User ID: 1671218449781399
Last Updated: May 15, 2014 1:14 AM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None


Anibal Jose Baez

May 15, 2014 11:31 AM
<<Thanks to Matt Corallo, a veteran Bitcoin developer, you can easily create your own at coingen.io. He has automated the process of modifying the source code to create custom currencies. Just enter in the name for your new currency, a logo image and set a few parameters (or accept the defaults), and you can have your own cryptocurrency. Source code and some customizations cost a bit extra. Once you have your own 'coin,' you just need to convince people that it is worth something.">> So many things come to mind! :D

Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02035927166068E+016
Last Updated: May 15, 2014 11:31 AM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None


Janick Paquette

May 15, 2014 7:05 PM
OK... so Mackximus was talking about the Affirmation of Truth in Gail's Thread the other day and so I had help from Gail to find the english version. Here it is... NOTICE This NOTICE is done in GOOD FAITH, DIGNITY, HONESTY, and INTEGRITY and with the TRUTH. I am the SOLE AUTHORIZED ADMINISTRATOR for GAIL BLACKMAN, with registration date of xx/xx/xxxx, certificate # XXXXX, and social insurance # XXXXXXXXX I am a WOMAN. I am NOT GAIL BLACKMAN. My name it's a PRIVATE matter, and none of anyone's business. I am NOT SURETY for GAIL BLACKMAN. PROOF of who is SURETY for GAIL BLACKMAN, the ONLY and SOLE SURETY and/or signatory party being PROVINCE THAT ISSUED BC HERE, is provided in Exhibit A, a BIRTH CERTIFICATE and/or SURETY BOND/PUBLIC RECORD # XXXXXXX, with REGISTRATION DATE of October 10, 1962. I, as a WOMAN, am not lawfully entitled to the BENEFITS of a BIRTH CERTIFICATE. I am not a SLAVE, and/or OFFICER, and/or a government AGENT, and/or a TRUSTEE, and/or a Government EMPLOYEE of the CROWN, and/or CRA. YOU are given NOTICE that as the SOLE AUTHORIZED ADMINISTRATOR for GAIL BLACKMAN, I will NOT buy back ANY public debts that come under the legal name GAIL BLACKMAN, and/or account XXXXX. I will only ADMINISTRATE these public debts, and send them back to its beneficiary, so they can be presented to THE BANK OF CANADA, and/or to which ever pertinent party, for complete DISCHARGE and settlement of the account. A BILL, for proper accounting practices, it is been requested from YOU, IF there are any alleged debt/s owed under the legal name GAIL BLACKMAN, and/or under account number XXXXXXX Please, send a BILL to administrate the debt immediately. Also, REMITTANCE, and/or instructions on how to properly fill out the BILL and/or bill of exchange and/or negotiable instrument and/or �payment voucher�, are been requested from YOU to properly discharge any/all public debts owed. If you send me a BILL, and REMITTANCE, and/or instructions on HOW to properly fill out the INSTRUMENT with no delays, I will administrate the debt FOR FREE, this first time only. Please be advised that if YOU, and/or any of your agents, acts either in BAD FAITH, and/or create unnecessary delays, and/or create any CONTROVERSY that takes more of MY time and ENERGY, then ALL other administration done for the legal name GAIL BLACKMAN is subject to FEES. YOU have been NOTICED. Any questions regarding this NOTICE please contact, ONLY IN WRITING, the administration offices for GAIL BLACKMAN, with registration date of XX/XX/XXXX certificate # XXXXXX, and social insurance #XXXXXXXX, at: 8750432 CANADA INC 2-157 Harwood Ave, Ajax, Ontario L1S 4G8 AUTHORIZED BY: 8750432 CANADA INC Duly Authorized Trustee Corporation ____________________________________ Now I've translated it to the best of my knowledge, in French and was wondering if I could have your thoughts on it? :D Thanks! AVIS Cet AVIS est fait de BONNE FOI, avec DIGNIT�, HON�TET�, INT�GRIT� et avec V�RIT�. Je suis la Seule Administratrice Autoris�e pour la personne JANICK PAQUETTE et/ou JANIK MATINE PAQUETTE N� d'inscription 119xxxxxxxxx et/ou Num�ro d'Assurance Social xxx xxx xxx. Je tiens � mettre les choses au clair pour �viter toute confusion. Je suis une FEMME. Je ne suis pas JANICK PAQUETTE/JANIK MATINE PAQUETTE. Mon nom est d'affaire PRIV� et ne regarde personne. Je ne suis pas la SURET� pour JANICK PAQUETTE/ et/ou JANIK MATINE PAQUETTE. La preuve est que la SEULE SURET� et/ou partie signataire est le QU�BEC., voir pi�ce-jointe A, soit un Certificat de Naissance et/ou SURETY BOND/DOSSIER PUBLIC N� du BC ? Avec Date de la Copie d'Acte de Naissance ? Je, en tant que FEMME, n'ai pas l�galement le droit aux B�N�FICES, du CERTIFICAT DE NAISSANCE. Je ne suis pas une esclave et/ou un OFFICIER et/ou un AGENT DU GOUVERNEMENT et/ou un CURATEUR et/ou un EMPLOY� DU GOUVERNEMENT de la COURONNE et/ou de L'AGENCE DU REVENU DU CANADA. Vous �tes donc AVIS�, qu'en tant que Seule Administratrice Autoris�e pour JANICK PAQUETTE / JANIK MATINE PAQUETTE, je ne rach�te AUCUNE DETTE PUBLIQUE qui me parviendra sous le nom l�gal JANICK PAQUETTE et/ou JANIK MATINE PAQUETTE et/ou au num�ro de compte 119xxxxxxxxx et/ou xxx xxx xxx. Je vais seulement ADMINISTRER ces DETTES PUBLIQUES et les r�exp�dier � leurs B�N�FICIAIRES pour quelles soit pr�sent�es � LA BANQUE DU CANANDA et/ou quelconque partie pertinent, pour compl�ter la D�CHARGE et le r�glement des dites dettes. Une FACTURE, pour une pratique comptable ad�quate, VOUS sera demand� S'IL y a quelconque pr�tendu dettes qui appartiennent � la personne JANICK PAQUETTE et/ou JANIK MATINE PAQUETTE et/ou sous le N� de compte ????? . SVP envoyer une facture pour administrer la dette imm�diatement. Aussi une REMITTANCE et/ou les instructions sur le COMMENT remplir ad�quatement la FACTURE et/ou LA LETTRE DE CHANGE et/ou DOCUMENT N�GOCIABLE et/ou FORMULAIRE DE PAIEMENT, vous sont demand� pour D�CHARGER ad�quatement quelconque/toutes DETTES PUBLIQUES qui appartiendront � la personne JANICK PAQUETTE et/ou JANIK MATINE PAQUETTE. SI vous me faites parvenir une FACTURE et/ou LA LETTRE DE CHANGE et/ou DOCUMENT N�GOCIABLE et/ou FORMULAIRE DE PAIEMENT sans d�lais, je vais administrer la dette GRATUITEMENT, pour cette premi�re fois seulement. SVP soyez AVIS� que si, VOUS et/ou n'importe lequel de VOS agents, agissez soit de MAUVAISE FOI et/ou cr�ez des d�lais inutiles et/ou cr�ez quelconque controverse qui prendront encore plus de mon temps et de mon �nergie, alors TOUTES autre administration fait pour la personne JANICK PAQUETTE et/ou JANIK MATINE PAQUETTE sera sujet � des FRAIS ADMINISTRATIFS. VOUS avez �t� AVIS�. Pour toutes question concernant cette AVIS, SVP contacter La Seule Administratrice Autoris�e pour la personne JANICK PAQUETTE et/ou JANIK MATINE PAQUETTE au N� inscription xxxxxxxxxxx et/ou N� Certificat xxxxxxx et/ou N� Assurance Social xxx xxx xxx au : Adresse Ici Autoris� par : La Seule Administratrice Autoris�e pour JANICK PAQUETTE et/ou JANIK MATINE PAQUETTE N� inscription xxxxxxxxxxx et/ou N� Assurance Social xxx xxx xxx.


Unique Facebook User ID: 802541149837689
Last Updated: May 15, 2014 7:05 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Scott Duncan

May 16, 2014 5:49 PM
THEIST BASHING TIME! I'm tired of explaining why I treat theists like the pieces of shit that they are. It's time to let someone else explain too. When you are an ADULT with an IMAGINARY FRIEND, and you BELIEVE that crap, YOU HARM EVERYONE. This WHOLE SYSTEM stays running, because YOUR DELUSIONS are more important to you than REALITY. That harms thinking people, and there is a HUGE shortage of them.


Unique Facebook User ID: 927379467328526
Last Updated: May 16, 2014 5:49 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Eamonn O Brien

May 17, 2014 12:39 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=4djilxYxPzg I came across this... :/

Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02035706386866E+016
Last Updated: May 17, 2014 12:39 PM
https://www.youtube.com/embed/4djilxYxPzg?autoplay=1
Type of Post: video
Place of Post: None


Paul O'Shea

May 17, 2014 3:39 PM


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02057274595802E+016
Last Updated: May 17, 2014 3:39 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

May 17, 2014 5:54 PM
Just added a Sovereign UnderGod in the group :-o


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: May 17, 2014 5:54 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Ceit Butler

May 17, 2014 7:49 PM
Well that's an hour of my life I'll never get back! Transcript follows: Sovereign UnderGod: actually im not begging for money i was answering their questions is all... Me: You posted a link to your gofundme "campaign"... How is that "not begging for money"? Sovereign UnderGod: i was explaing why i have done all this... u guys asked i wasnt campaining to u http://youtu.be/D2Wjjvip-Wk this is why u didnt let me finish explaining Me: If put even the TINIEST amount of effort into investigating this group first, you would have noticed a few things. First: The name. "The Tender for Law" is in reference to money, and the "legal tender" attached to it. This group teaches you how to detach yourself from that legal tender. Sovereign UnderGod: and the only reason im campaining is to raise awareness...im not expectingto get funds ok but y its there for remedy for the fraud http://www.lectlaw.com/def/f111.htm "Fiction Of Law" Defined & Explained www.lectlaw.com Me: Second: The pinned post, and many OTHER posts, address the illogical fallacy that is religion. You're coming into the group with two strikes against you already. If you want to raise awareness, RAISE AWARENESS! Asking for money will turn away more people than it attracts. That kills your message. Sovereign UnderGod: you have no idea what religion i am Me: Remedy for the fraud? Remedy from who? Who are you going to take this matter to, the courts that are perpetuating the fraud? Sovereign UnderGod: no its administrative...i am the court Me: As if it matters WHICH religion you ascribe to, they are all EQUALLY ludicrous. Sovereign UnderGod: NO its called UCA Unique Collective Awareneess collective conciousness my friend maybe u shouldt be so quik to judge here http://one-heaven.org/covenant/article/8.html that might explain Me: ALL religions are bullshit. Belief of any kind, especially in a "higher power", or "divine creator" is nothing more than delusion. Adults with imaginary friends. Sovereign UnderGod: its all of us.... whois the high power collective conciousness Me: Ahh, yes. Frank O'Collins...I'm sorry, I just can't take anything seriously that comes from a man that claims to have had visions from angels. Sovereign UnderGod: judge not lest ye be judged Me: Funny, the "non-religious" guy is now quoting the Bible... Sovereign UnderGod: oh is that bible? 'er babble? 500+ followers on my babble so far...been here a month Me: It's funny, anyone who ISN'T religious would be locked up and medicated if they claimed to have an invisible, all-powerful, omniscient friend that watched over them from above. Who sent visions of winged beings to deliver messages to them, who they talked to on a regular basis and asked for personal favours. But if you attach a religious label to this insanity, suddenly it becomes socially acceptable. Sovereign UnderGod: i never claimed that at all u assumed did i? Me: You follow Frank O'Collins, who DOES make these claims. Your "religion" originates from a man that does. Sovereign UnderGod: is this what u are talking about? http://youtu.be/gPOfurmrjxo George Carlin on Religion and God youtu.be its not quite religion...if you took the time to read that UCA link you would see what im talking about its a failsafe against religion is what i would call it Me: I think I've been quite clear and concise in what I am talking about. While I respect and agree with the man, I'm not sure how George Carlin entered the conversation. Sovereign UnderGod: u said "an invisible man" "wh always need samoney" lol Me: The entire concept originates from a man who is an admitted former Jesuit priest, who claims that angels have visited him on multiple occasions. That taints ANYTHING else that he may have to say. Sovereign UnderGod: its protection against religion thats not actually correct he was a janous priest and the hjesuits TRIED to recruit him now he fights them he has dissolved the vatican with his law and now im using it to dissolve the BAR Temple Bar priests of Baahl evil fucks Me: Dissolved the Vatican, eh? They seem to still currently be alive and thriving Sovereign UnderGod: window dressing they are falling crumbling the lien is cured in june Me: Your name is "Sovereign underGOD"... You don't get to announce yourself by his name, and then claim to NOT be religious. See how that works? Sovereign UnderGod: 3 year lien process its in the judges benchbook... its what gives them immunity Me: So it must be true? Sovereign UnderGod: works for me If the entire thing is fraud, why would you want to associate yourself with any part of it? i tried to fight it...it is easier to infiltrate destroy from within Me: There is NO "higher power", there is NO "creator". We're all just semi-evolved chimps and originated from stardust. That's it. How have you "infiltrated" anything? Sovereign UnderGod: yes but there is 100 monkey effect and critical mass collective concious is real Me: You're publicly campaigning to raise funds to take them down. This word you're using, "infiltrate", I do not think it means what you think it means. Sovereign UnderGod: lots of studies prove it no im campaining to gain awareness for critical mass Me: Well, collective retarded-ness, perhaps Sovereign UnderGod: i am not expecting money besides i get money from promisorries Me: "Infiltrate, verb: to enter or gain access to (an organization, place, etc.) surreptitiously and gradually, especially in order to acquire secret information." Tell me, how does publicly campaigning for cash fit into your stealthy plan? Sovereign UnderGod: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cUZFnaVPaoU The 100th Monkey Theory - The Law Of Critical Mass #275 www.youtube.com i was quiet tell i set up the account now i am exposing with proof Me: So what is it you are infiltrating with this "UnderGod" crap, and how? Sovereign UnderGod: i have infiltrated and now i am showing the masses whats up it lets the judges know that i know their secrets thats all anyway good luck...have fun try not to judge Me: You have infiltrated what, exactly? And how have you accomplished this? Sovereign UnderGod: well their system by applying the remedy available the birth bond redeemed at the treasury wickit and deposited to the DTC i have a direct treasury account with 100 billion in it...i have all the account numbers would u like to check it? do u know anyone elase that can offer you account numbers ? http://www.dtcc.com/ Me: And what could referring to yourself as "under god" possibly have to do with that? Sovereign UnerGod: OMG u r stuk on tha arent u no pun intended lol its a mecanism to secure my person in court the judge immediatly knows that i know their secrets they treat me with fear they are afraid Me: Of course they do... Sovereign UnderGod: as they should be they are public servants Me: So, I have to ask. Of all the people commenting on the thread, why exactly would you choose me to respond to privately? Sovereign UnderGod: i messaged the others...u are the only one willing to convers i guess well because its pretty easy to bash someone when they cant defend themselves hey tey kiked me Me: Okay...but why leave the group forum...the one where everyone WAS speaking to you? Sovereign UnderGod: without letting me explain and are now on attack they baned me i didnt leave they banned me then attacked when i couldnt defend those are your buddies hey not very honorable IMHO poor excuse for "administrators" Me: We don't take kindly to bullshit. Leading with money and religion...it was only a matter of time. Sovereign UnderGod: well its not bullshit i can bak everything so there ya have it they are afraid i guess no biggie i have my own groups going..just wanted to have some decent conversation Anything involving money or religion IS bullshit. but i guess you all cant even have a discussion without being afraid of where it might lead wich leads me to believe that its them tat is bullshit Me: No, we just don't tolerate lies. You obviously have NO idea what money is. Sovereign UnderGod: lol yaok Me: Anyways, this is going nowhere. Sovereign UnderGod: thats why i use paper instruments ya good luck..have fun..stay safe nice chatting bye


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.0153923542315E+016
Last Updated: May 17, 2014 7:49 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Paul O'Shea

May 18, 2014 1:41 PM

Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02057274595802E+016
Last Updated: May 18, 2014 1:41 PM
https://video.xx.fbcdn.net/hvideo-xfa1/v/t42.1790-2/10294561_713933505330464_805730083_n.mp4?efg=eyJybHIiOjQ1NywicmxhIjoyNzA0LCJ2ZW5jb2RlX3RhZyI6ImxlZ2FjeV9zZCJ9&rl=457&vabr=254&oh=6c17ec8904a555a5e7145a5479862bc1&oe=56F2C8A8
Type of Post: video
Place of Post: None


Anibal Jose Baez

May 18, 2014 5:31 PM
Awesome!

Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02035927166068E+016
Last Updated: May 18, 2014 5:31 PM
https://www.youtube.com/embed/SHrjs7VkSGU?autoplay=1
Type of Post: video
Place of Post: None


Anibal Jose Baez

May 18, 2014 8:24 PM

Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02035927166068E+016
Last Updated: May 18, 2014 8:24 PM
http://www.youtube.com/v/KW_wYvZ1eZg?version=3&autohide=1&autoplay=1
Type of Post: video
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

May 20, 2014 4:35 PM
SFC Inc, just received a "peremptory inquiry" from CRA !! :-o PEREMPTORY. Absolute; positive. A final determination to act without hope of renewing or altering. Joined to a substantive, this word is frequently used in law; as peremptory action; F. N. B. 35, 38, 104, 108; peremptory nonsuit; Id. 5, 11; peremptory exception; Bract. lib. 4, c. 20; peremptory undertaking; 3 Chit. Pract. 112, 793; peremptory challenge of jurors, which is the right to challenge without assigning any cause. Inst. 4, 13, 9 Code, 7, 50, 2; Id. 8, 36, 8; Dig. 5, 1, 70 et 73. They are looking for PERSONAL information about an ex-employee of SFC Inc. His address, his phone number, his cell number and stuff like that... The first letter they've sent was only an "INQUIRY", and as the CEO of SFC Inc, I responded: Please provide us with a written guarantee that we won't stripped this person from his right to PRIVATE LIFE, as the Quebec Charter article 5 says, and we will gladly go to step two with your inquiry. Step 2 being my hourly rate (which they have no idea at this time). And now, without responding, they just sent the same inquiry, but this one is a PEREMPTORY inquiry :D I just don't want SFC Inc, to violate someone's rights.....that is all :(


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: May 20, 2014 4:35 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

May 20, 2014 6:25 PM
Tantrum ? :/

Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: May 20, 2014 6:25 PM
https://www.youtube.com/embed/CBVFpYN0iNo?autoplay=1
Type of Post: video
Place of Post: None




David Grant

May 21, 2014 4:19 AM
Is there anyone here , I could use a little advice , got a call today from the crown , he does not understand my request , lol , Notice of Mistake


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.0205480648833E+016
Last Updated: May 21, 2014 4:19 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Kenneth Paul

May 21, 2014 4:04 PM


Unique Facebook User ID: 1418151238455385
Last Updated: May 21, 2014 4:04 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

May 21, 2014 5:33 PM
60 days of jail for this fucking theist for having KILLED his 13 years old daughter by slapping her in the face, because he was not happy with how she washed the kitchen floor..... he broke her neck .... The sweetest of my children, "he said, weeping in court, now, if she was the "sweetest" one, what about the others ??.... WHAT THE FUCK IS WRONG ????

Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: May 21, 2014 5:33 PM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None


Cara Small

May 21, 2014 6:39 PM
Apparently it is now presumed you are lying about not drinking and driving and you must prove otherwise. I was stopped at a check and I asked why I was being stopped. He said he wasn't stopping ME (could have fooled me). It was a check for drunk driving and valid licenses and insurance. So I gave the prick the license. Then was asked if I had anything to drink this evening. They DO know that in order for one to live, one must drink......right? At this point my options were to say sweet "F" all and end up being hauled off anyway, tell him it is none of his business and get hauled off, or be honest and up front and hope he isn't a complete steroid junky moron (I realize the odds). "Yup. I had a couple of sips of his at dinner." He then said, "So if I was to ask you to blow for me..." I interrupted with "I would say, 'No'." He, of course, got really offended as some men seem to think it is their right to have you blow for them. There was some discussion about providing proof and swearing affidavit. He threatened to haul ME to jail and criminally charge the person. At this point I WANT to say "I don't go anywhere with strange men with guns, and I don't blow for ANYONE for free (unless I initiate)", but I am sure my passenger would have been even more horrified with my non-compliant behaviour so I simply repeated "No". He then took the license and "ran" it then came back and blablablaed about how he was going to "let" me leave THIS time and IF he had a partner with him he would have hauled me off so I better be good next time and blow even if I haven't drank a drop. I am curious as to where I would have led them to believe I am to be violated at their whim. When I signed for the driver's license, is an answer I have been told. That can be easily fixed with notice, however, I know the next moron who blocks my travels won't give a rats ass about any notice. I also don't think that signing for a driver's license IS where that presumption comes from. Please correct me if I am wrong, but is not signing for the license agreeing to follow the rules of the road? And if one has NOT broken ANY of those rules when pulled over, does that not mean I have every right to keep going until proven otherwise? AT LEAST produce reasonable evidence that suggests I AM breaking one of those rules. The mere fact of being pulled over in the first place is already violating MY time, but I KNOW if I was to tell him THAT, I probably wouldn't be typing this.


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02066034553543E+016
Last Updated: May 21, 2014 6:39 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

May 22, 2014 4:34 PM
Private message received from Lacy Lacey Hatt Hi Pete this is Kenny Hatt .i use my wife's FB account.I am very interested to speak to you by telephone if you are willing Please message me your # and a convenient time to call.thank you Pete Daoust About what ? Lacey Hatt A general conversation about crypto currency and the things we are learning at Tender for Law. NOTICE All private messages I receive from strangers regarding this group, will be posted in this group. Now, why ME ? :/ Why not asking Scott Duncan ? HE IS THE BEST !!!!.....why the fuck ME ? :( ...I am the TOKEN in here :/


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: May 22, 2014 4:34 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Anibal Jose Baez

May 22, 2014 9:29 PM
:D

Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02035927166068E+016
Last Updated: May 22, 2014 9:29 PM
Type of Post: photo
Place of Post: None


Bruno Hiller

May 23, 2014 4:43 AM
If there was a free man out there, I mean truly free... he or she would be helping others break their chains. I'm looking for that help here.


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.01542042560802E+016
Last Updated: May 23, 2014 4:43 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


David Vilaca

May 23, 2014 1:58 PM
Warning, From the office of the Deputy Chief of Police. Peter "eat a dick" Sloly. Pacer Report on carding to Ontario Court of Justice. From a policing perspective, this is a very sensitive topic. For a police officer, there is no greater insult than to be labelled a racist. They want the community to understand they serve and protect irrespective of race, colour, creed, religion, age, sex and/or sexual orientation, etc. They do not dispute that there have been and continue to be examples of policing that has been driven by bias. They feel that they have been and continue to be tainted as a profession by these allegations, proven or otherwise. It's a hurt feeling report : ( http://www.torontopolice.on.ca/pacer/ The last paragraph is almost as good as the line on my fake ticket.

Unique Facebook User ID: 431342553693049
Last Updated: May 23, 2014 1:58 PM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None


Scott Duncan

May 23, 2014 3:23 PM
OK, maybe I'm just "too biased" to read the point of this properly. I need all of your help here. I'm pretty sure this says "It's OK to 'PROFILE' because 'Everybody does it'". Am I missing something here?

Unique Facebook User ID: 927379467328526
Last Updated: May 23, 2014 3:23 PM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

May 23, 2014 7:35 PM
David Vilaca OK�.Let�s INVOICE :P The first thing I need to do, when I decide to CLAIM money from another, it�s to NOTIFY them on WHY I claim. This is usually done by sending a Notice. Example: Notice of Breach of Trust. You did that, you were not suppose to do that, so now you�ve stripped me from this and that RIGHT, and I �CLAIM� this amount of MONEY for that stripped right, and that amount for this specific one, and blablabla�.if you don�t restore this, I want that�and so on�.. You give them X amount of days to CONTEST what you think you can CLAIM�you tell them if they don�t contest, an INVOICE will show up in their mailbox. Then, you proceed with the INVOICE, check the legal definition of INVOICE, and create one�..you need to specify the Payment-Terms: like due upon receipt, ot net-10-days, or whatever you feel like�. 1). You send that invoice. 2). If you don�t receive payment according to the terms, you send an account statement, written PAST DUE on it, in RED. 3). If you don�t receive payment, you send a NOTICE, saying you have NOT received payment, and you give them 3 days to pay. 4). If you don�t receive payment, you send a FINAL Notice saying, Hey fuck, what the fuck is going on ?, and give them another 3 days. 5). If you don�t receive payment, you send a Notice of Default, saying Be advised, since you haven't responded to my CLAIM, and haven't challenged my invoice, we have no other choice than to send you this notice of default. We are nice folks, so we will give you an extra 3 days to pay the amount claimed. If we do not receive payment, we will follow up with the LIEN process 6). If you don�t receive payment, you proceed with the LIEN.


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: May 23, 2014 7:35 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Scott Duncan

May 24, 2014 10:18 AM
DaFUQ? OK, sometimes I think I may worry TOO much about my own personal biases... but still... I cant make ANY sense of this "update". Have the Clusterfuck-To-Victory Crew finally given up all pretense, and joined Dean Clifford in the realm of batshit insane? SOMEBODY make sense of this post for me please?

Unique Facebook User ID: 927379467328526
Last Updated: May 24, 2014 10:18 AM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None


Neil Friesen

May 24, 2014 8:10 PM
I am new to this group and I have a question... On June 9th i am to appear in court. this date is only to plead guilty or non guilty for 7 alleged fraud charges from CRA amounting to 3 million. I have been reading these files and am coming to more understanding of who I am and who i am not. My first question is how should I approach the courts on the 9th if its a "plead guilty or not guilty"? I am going to file into the courts the NOTICE OF MISTAKE but just wondering what more should I do right now specifically on that date. thanks


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.01534530047847E+016
Last Updated: May 24, 2014 8:10 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None




Age Thomson

May 26, 2014 3:32 AM
Hello all. I'm new to the group this week. I've spent quite a while already reading old posts and the documents posted. I have a couple of questions. The first I'm sure is an easy one. Could someone bump the thread about the dogecoin stuff that had 1300+ comments? It was referred to in another thread I was reading but I can not find it with this mobile app... Perhaps I can when I get home. My second question is in regard to something Scott Duncan has said in multiple threads about how we are thinking wrong, and putting value on the wrong things. I have for a long time (back into my teens) always held the position that the only thing I really have that is of any value is my time. I remember discussing this with my wife (girlfriend at the time) when she had brought home a case of beer for me and then carelessly dropped it in the driveway and smashed half of it. She thought I was mad about having the beer, and I was trying to explain that the beer is only beer, bought with money that is only money. Both of which I can easily replace, but the time is gone forever. My question is.. Am I on the right track with that line of thinking or should I be digging into that a little more? Have you guys already covered this in another thread that I haven't gotten to yet? Thanks for your time, thanks for keeping all the posts up (even the ones you refer to as shit stains have something there to ponder)


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.01529892417665E+016
Last Updated: May 26, 2014 3:32 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Rick Hiltz

May 26, 2014 10:22 PM
Where can i find the link to Pete`s Video


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.01523057623409E+016
Last Updated: May 26, 2014 10:22 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Ceit Butler

May 27, 2014 1:01 AM
Lily-livered cowards, I say! Only Admins should be allowed to remove posts. :p


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.0153923542315E+016
Last Updated: May 27, 2014 1:01 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Tara Duncan

May 27, 2014 1:13 AM
Where were we? Oh, yes...welcome new member, Starwalker Ad Infinitum - and...................he's gone! Scott Duncan OK GANG! A Free-Dumber is back for a SECOND ROUND! GO GET `IM, MARINES! 17 mins � Like � 2 Scott Duncan I thought Pete Daoust, "fixed you up". What kind of sloppy work is this? So let's hear about all the Free-Dumb "Successes", since you oozed back in here. GO! 10 mins � Like � 1 Chris Evan Maybe he has proof this time.... 10 mins � Like � 1 Starwalker Ad Infinitum i just got back online and was reading the replys. 8 mins � Like Scott Duncan ...OK, so let's review "The Score". http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Freeman_on_the_land... Freeman successes - Freeman on the land - RationalWiki rationalwiki.org Despite the numerous failed attempts to use freeman legal methods, freemen will ... See More 7 mins � Like � 2 � Remove Preview Starwalker Ad Infinitum some of you are so rude. so kwick to judge. and fyi i am not the fastest typer and usong an old slow phone on a sketchy conection. i dont live on facebook 6 mins � Like Ceit Butler I wouldn't advise playing the "hurt feelings" card in here... 6 mins � Like � 1 Tara Duncan Now, now, Ceit. Don't be so kwick to judge. 6 mins � Like � 4 Ceit Butler 5 mins � Like � 1 Scott Duncan OMG, you're about to be beaten up by GIRLS. 5 mins � Like � 2 Starwalker Ad Infinitum i i am not spening my fee mins online trying to debate a bunch of name calling strangers of 5 mins � Like Ceit Butler Oh, my mistake...I assumed that was why you rejoined 4 mins � Like Tara Duncan How then are you spending your fee time? 4 mins � Like � 2 Scott Duncan 4 mins � Like Scott Duncan That's "spening", dear 4 mins � Unlike � 3 Tara Duncan I stan corrected. 3 mins � Like � 2 Ceit Butler Should that be "correcte"? 3 mins � Like Kent Barrett I think he ran out of fee time. This appears to be cut off "a bunch of name calling strangers of". 3 mins � Like � 1 Kent Barrett Correct� in Frenglish. 2 mins � Unlike � 2

Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02034833945604E+016
Last Updated: May 27, 2014 1:13 AM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None


Ceit Butler

May 27, 2014 1:51 AM
Let's have a warm, Tender For Law welcome for Laura BlessedbyGod Johnson!


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.0153923542315E+016
Last Updated: May 27, 2014 1:51 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


August le Blanc

May 27, 2014 5:04 AM
Void is still my favorite.... Thoughts? SOLE AUTHORIZED ADMINISTRATOR FOR JASON FREDRICK LE BLANC. PMB 206 � 204 1440 52 ST NE. Calgary, Alberta, T2A-4T8 REGISTERED MAIL THE PROVINCIAL COURT OF ALBERTA HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN CASE NO: XX PLAINTIFF V JASON FREDERICK LEBLANC DEFENDANT IT IS MY WISH FOR YOU TO VACATE THE WRONGFUL ISSUE OF A WARRANT AND CUSTODIAL ORDER. THERE HAS BEEN A MISTAKE, HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN, ON GUIDANCE FROM THE CROWN, WRONGFULLY ISSUED A WARRANT FOR THE ARREST AND DETENTION OF THE PERSON, I HAPPEN TO HAVE TO THE SOLE AUTHORIZATION OF ADMINISTRATING. WE ATTENDED, IN THE CAPACITY OF SOLE AUTHORIZED ADMINISTRATOR, TWO DIFFERENT COURTS, COURT ROOM 508 AND CMO ON APRIL 4TH, 2014, IN HONOR, GOOD FAITH AND INTEGRITY. AN ADJOURNMENT WAS SCHEDULED IN BOTH COURTS, TILL MAY 9, 2014 FOR, UPON ARRIVAL AT THE COURTHOUSE ON THE DATE OF MAY 9, 2014. THE DOCKET ONLY SHOWED ONE OF THE COURTS, THE CMO COURT, FOR THE PERSON I HAPPEN TO HAVE. UPON INVESTIGATION IT WAS DISCOVERED, COURT ROOM 508 HAD THE PERSON I HAPPEN TO HAVE, SCHEDULED TO APPEAR ON APRIL 9TH, 2014. A MONTH EARLIER, AS A RESULT OF THIS WRONGFULLY SCHEDULED DATE, A WRONGFUL WARRANT WAS ISSUED FOR THE ARREST AND DETENTION OF THE PERSON I HAPPEN TO HAVE, IT IS NOT MY FAULT OR ANYONE ASSOCIATED WITH THE SOLE AUTHORIZED ADMINISTRATION OF THE PERSON, I HAPPEN TO HAVE. IN THE CAPACITY OF SOLE AUTHORIZED ADMINISTRATOR, UNDER DURESS AND COERCION, I ATTENDED A MEETING, ON BEHALF OF THE PERSON, I AM THE SOLE AUTHORIZED ADMINISTRATOR OF AND WAS TOLD, THE PROBATION OFFICE HAS A POLICY TO EXECUTE ANY OUTSTANDING MATTERS. I WISHED TO REMAIN IN HONOR, I DECLINED THE OFFER, ON BEHALF OF THE PERSON I HAPPEN TO HAVE AND VACATED THE PREMISES IMMEDIATELY, AS MISTAKEN IDENTITY, SEEMS TO BE A CAUSE FOR LOSS OF LIBERTY TO ME, THIS INCIDENT JEOPARDIZED THE SECURITY, LIBERTY AND LIFE OF THE PERSON I HAPPEN TO HAVE, AS SOLE AUTHORIZED ADMINISTRATOR. I AM THE SOLE AUTHORIZED ADMINISTRATOR OF THE JASON FREDRICK LE BLANC TRUST, CREATED BY THE VITAL STATISTICS DEPARTMENT OF ALBERTA, AND DESCRIBED IN AN EVENT AS A 'RECORD OF LIVE BIRTH'. THE SURETY BOND DEPOSITED INTO THE COURT WAS CREATED AUGUST XX, 1964, DERIVED FROM SAID LIVE BIRTH RECORD, SHOWN IN EXHIBIT 1 (BIRTH CERTIFICATE REGISTRATION NUMBER:XXXXXXXXXX) TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE THE BIRTH CERTIFICATE IS THE SURETY FOR ALL MATTERS CONCERNING PUBLIC ACCOUNTS. WHY WOULD WE HAVE BEEN BE GIVEN IT TO HAVE? I HAPPEN TO HAVE THIS PIECE OF PAPER, CALLED A BIRTH CERTIFICATE. I WAS TOLD IT IS A FOUNDATION DOCUMENT. WHAT DOES THAT MEAN? I WAS GIVEN A BIRTH CERTIFICATE WITH A NAME THAT IS NOT MINE, WHEN I WAS A YOUNG MAN OF FOURTEEN YEARS OLD, BELOW THE AGE OF CONSENT. I WAS NEVER INSTRUCTED ON WHAT IT IS FOR AND TOLD NOT TO USE IT FOR IDENTIFICATION. IT USED TO STATE ON THESE BIRTH CERTIFICATES: NOT TO BE USED FOR IDENTIFICATION. TO USE FOUNDATION DOCUMENTS FOR IDENTIFICATION IS PROHIBITED BY THE VITAL STATISTICS ACT. HOW CAN I POSSIBLY BE SOMETHING THAT IN REALITY, IS JUST A PIECE OF PAPER? IF NOT TO BE USED FOR IDENTIFICATION, HOW DOES THE GOVERNMENT IDENTIFY ME WITH THESE DOCUMENTS? THERE IS A MISTAKE IN THE STYLE, FORM AND SPELLING OF THE NAME OF THE PERSON, i HAPPEN TO HAVE, AS SHOWN BY EXHIBIT 1. I HAVE NO IDEA WHO THE LEGAL PERSON NAMED JASON FREDERICK LEBLANC IS. IN REVIEWING THE RECORDS OF THIS OTHER PERSON, WHOM I HAVE BEEN MISTAKENLY IDENTIFIED AS, THIS MISTAKE HAS BEEN REPEATED DUE TO UNDUE INFLUENCE, SINCE 1981, WHEN I WAS FIRST MISTAKENLY CHARGED AS THIS LEGAL PERSON, AT THE AGE OF SEVENTEEN, WHO HAS A DIFFERENT NAME THEN ON THE GOVERNMENT PROPERTY OF THE BIRTH CERTIFICATE. AS THE GOVERNMENT AND ITS AGENT ARE THE ONLY SIGNATORY PARTY, WHAT EVIDENCE DO YOU HAVE THAT THE SOLE AUTHORIZED ADMINISTRATOR IS THE SURETY IN THIS MATTER? IN THE MATTER OF SURETY FOR THE LEGAL NAME THERE IS A MISTAKE, THE SOLE AUTHORIZED ADMINISTRATOR, HAS BEEN INCORRECTLY IDENTIFIED AS THE ACCUSED. IF I AND/OR PERSON AND/OR FRIENDS OR ANYONE ACTING IN MY INTERESTS HAS GIVEN YOU REASON TO BELIEVE THAT I AM SURETY FOR THIS MATTER THAT WOULD BE A MISTAKE, PLEASE FORGIVE ME. I AM NOT A�YOU�; I AM ME, IN THE CAPACITY OF SOLE AUTHORIZED ADMINISTRATOR. I RESPECTFULLY ASK BY WHAT AUTHORITY DO ATTACH ANY NAME DERIVED FROM ANY PUBLIC DOCUMENT TO ME? THE SOLE AUTHORIZED ADMINISTRATOR, WILL NOT BUY BACK ANY PUBLIC DEBT BUT WILL DISCHARGE ALL PUBLIC DEBT, ARE NOT WE ENTITLED TO LIFE, LIBERTY AND THE SECURITY OF THE PERSON? THIS NOTICE IS INTENDED TO CORRECT ANY MISTAKES THAT HAVE BEEN MADE. I RESPECTFUL DECLINE YOUR OFFER AND WISH FOR IMMEDIATE DISCHARGE, TO CLOSE ANY AND ALL OUTSTANDING ACCOUNTS WITH THE CROWN. AUTHORIZED BY: The Sole Authorized Administrator Seal. The Duly Authorized corporate trustee seal.


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.01530787868601E+016
Last Updated: May 27, 2014 5:04 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Scott Duncan

May 27, 2014 6:35 AM
FREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE-Dumb.


Unique Facebook User ID: 927379467328526
Last Updated: May 27, 2014 6:35 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Rick Hiltz

May 27, 2014 9:38 PM
A little off topic but well worth watching Program or be Programmed: Ten Commands for a Digital Age Some here will have a grasp of this. It explains a few things the most significant being we are always a step behind and it has happened through out our history, pay particular attention to what he says at the end.........................

Unique Facebook User ID: 1.01523057623409E+016
Last Updated: May 27, 2014 9:38 PM
https://www.youtube.com/embed/imV3pPIUy1k?autoplay=1
Type of Post: video
Place of Post: None


Sallie Pelz

May 27, 2014 10:55 PM
Hello


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02032542432695E+016
Last Updated: May 27, 2014 10:55 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

May 28, 2014 1:15 AM
:-( Folks: You don't want to pay ? Me: It's not that, I just don't want to buy. Folks: What ?? Me: You need to buy before you can pay. Folks: Wow...I don't follow you here. I am not sure anymore about teaching folks .... :-(


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: May 28, 2014 1:15 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

May 28, 2014 3:13 PM
Jason Lerato PLEASE BE MORE SPECIFIC HERE.....all "details" please. I just went to court house with friend who is paying his traffic fine Clerk: payment will be $600 Me: $20 is fine Clerk: no full payment is required Me: then your refusing payment. Bills of exchange then puts you in dishonor and discharges the debt please make note of that Clerk: your right... $20 is fine


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: May 28, 2014 3:13 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


David Grant

May 28, 2014 8:15 PM
hey Pete are you on here got to ask you something


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.0205480648833E+016
Last Updated: May 28, 2014 8:15 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Scott Duncan

May 29, 2014 1:59 AM
Awesome :D


Unique Facebook User ID: 927379467328526
Last Updated: May 29, 2014 1:59 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Matthew Gundry

May 29, 2014 8:45 AM
http://www.westegg.com/etymology/#exchequer The Moors introduced the Abacus to Europe so that the Europeans could multiply, and the monks spread this device throughout Europe. In Britain, it was used but with their own twist to it: they used a checkboard and checker-like pieces (rather than the usual rods and beads) -- and this gave British version gave rise to the "exchequer" in "Chancellor of the Exchequer." That black and white tile pattern certainly gets about - the vatican and masons really seem to dig it too.


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.01529083859568E+016
Last Updated: May 29, 2014 8:45 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Scott Duncan

May 29, 2014 5:53 PM
This one can't be shown enough... so I'm showin' it again...

Unique Facebook User ID: 927379467328526
Last Updated: May 29, 2014 5:53 PM
https://www.youtube.com/embed/eOykY2SMbZ0?autoplay=1
Type of Post: video
Place of Post: None


Daniel J Wentz

May 29, 2014 10:44 PM
Scott Duncan vs. The Government. :D

Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02021762657264E+016
Last Updated: May 29, 2014 10:44 PM
https://www.youtube.com/embed/S0n2vurSBIQ?autoplay=1
Type of Post: video
Place of Post: None


David Vilaca

May 29, 2014 10:46 PM
Hey Ontario Administrators now is the chance to send a Notice of Mistake and invoice for administration, after all Joinder is cause for a bill. Chief Electoral Officer Elections Ontario 51 Rolark Drive Toronto, Ontario M1R 3B1 866-714-2809 (fax) info@elections.on.ca If you write to us, please be sure to include: Your name The mailing address, phone number, and e-mail address where we can contact you A detailed description of what you are complaining about � in other words the �who, what, when, and where� of your complaint. If your complaint is about something these laws do not cover, we will tell you and try to refer you to the appropriate agency that can help you.


Unique Facebook User ID: 431342553693049
Last Updated: May 29, 2014 10:46 PM
Type of Post: photo
Place of Post: None


Isaiah Whitney

May 30, 2014 2:04 AM
Another stupid freedumb fuck who thinks he knows better than Scott. Shawn Warren "sovereign-king" is a moron. Today's court strategy IN THE MUNICIPAL COURT OF BEAVERTON IN THE COUNTY OF WASHINGTONNOTICE OF SPECIAL APPEARANCE AND WRITTEN PLEA OF NON ASSUMPSIT.NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that the defendant John-Smith: Doe, in propria persona (my own proper self); hereby, files this Notice of Special Appearance to inform the parties that all appearances made by the defendant will not be made voluntary, because the defendant appears only under threat, duress, and coercion out of fear of being fined or incarcerated.The defendant does not waive his personal appearance before this court for arraignment. In fact, the defendant enters a written plea of �Non- Assumpsit,� due to the fact that he cannot plea until there is a verified criminal complaint signed by a flesh and blood victim, in order for the defendant to know and understand the nature of the criminal charges against him. The defendant does not consent and does not contract with the county, state, or this court; and the defendant objects to any and all hearings filed by this court, county, or the state.CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEI hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing Notice of Refusal has been furnished by US Mail to: The Clerk of The District Court, 120 E. Chesapeake Avenue, Towson, MD 21286, on this ___day of ___________ 2013. NOTICE OF MISTAKE TAKE NOTICE THAT: In the matter of SURETY for the LEGAL NAME, I believe that there has been a MISTAKE, as the SOLE BENEFICIARY OF A PUBLIC DOCUMENT has been INCORRECTLY IDENTIFIED as an "accused" and/or a "suspect".FORGIVE ME: If I, AND/OR PERSONS AND/OR FRIENDS OF THE COURT AND/OR SUCH OTHER PARTIES ACTING IN MY INTERESTS, have led A COURT and/or STATUTORY BODY and/or A GOVERNMENT SERVICE and/or AGENTS and/or OFFICERS of such bodies, to believe, by responding to �You�, and/or �SHWAN PHILLIP WARREN�, and/or SUCH OTHER IDENTIFICATION, such bodies HAVE ADDRESSED ME AS, that I am the PARTY WITH SURETY in this matter, then that would be a MISTAKE, and please forgive me.If I, AND/OR PERSONS AND/OR FRIENDS OF THE COURT AND/OR SUCH OTHER PARTIES ACTING IN MY INTERESTS, have led A COURT and/or STATUTORY BODY and/or A GOVERNMENT SERVICE and/or AGENTS and/or OFFICERS of such bodies, to believe, by responding to �You�, and/or �SHAWN PHILLIP WARREN�, and/or SUCH OTHER IDENTIFICATION, such bodies HAVE ADDRESSED ME AS, that I am, in ANY CAPACITY, a Pro Se litigant and/or a LEGAL PERSON in this matter, then that would be a MISTAKE, as I DO NOT CONSENT and WAIVE THE BENEFIT to such titles ), and please forgive me.THEREFORE: As I have no knowledge of who �You� and or �SHAWN PHILLPIP WARREN� and/or SUCH OTHER IDENTIFICATION ANY COURT and/or STATUTORY BODY and/or GOVERNMENT SERVICE and/or AGENTS and/or OFFICERS of such bodies [HEREAFTER "YOU"], HAS ADDRESSED ME AS, I RESPECTFULLY ASK; by WHAT AUTHORITY ARE "YOU" ADDRESSING me as such?As the SURETY BOND (BIRTH CERTIFICATE) has been deposited into the COURT, WHAT EVIDENCE does the COURT have that I, as a MAN who is not lawfully entitled to the BENEFITS of a BIRTH CERTIFICATE , have any SURETY in this matter?As GOVERNMENT is the SOLE SIGNATORY PARTY on the SURETY BOND (BIRTH CERTIFICATE), with SOLE AND FULL SURETY as TRUSTEE for the LEGAL NAME, WHAT EVIDENCE do YOU have that I am a TRUSTEE for the LEGAL NAME. WHAT EVIDENCE do YOU have that I am a TRUSTEE and have ANY SURETY with respect to ANY NAME?WHAT EVIDENCE do YOU have, that I am an OFFICER, an AGENT, a TRUSTEE and/or an EMPLOYEE of the UNITED STATES ? WHAT EVIDENCE do "YOU" have of any WARRANT OF AGENCY for the principal?WHAT EVIDENCE do "YOU" have that there has been any meeting of the minds, any PROPER NOTICE given, any considerable CONSIDERATION offered, or that I have ANY INTENT to CONTRACT in this matter?As such, I am returning your OFFER, DECLINED, for immediate DISCHARGE and CLOSURE.[ AUTHORISED BY: [ AQUILAE Trust Seal] [ ]Notary Seal:My commission expires Allocution: Oral declaration of rightsand non-consent at sentencing1. The document below is to be read orally to the court following conviction of a (whatever) and just prior to �sentencing�. The particular allocution below is the work and experience of one man during a �traffic� trial with a �charge� of �no valid registration (plates)�. There are two parts to the allocution: (a) declamation of rights and errors in the trial, etc, along with producing affidavits, information and mitigating facts, and (b) declamation of non-consent to any fines, taxes, prison, etc. Allocution has its origins in the common law. (See Corpus Juris Secundum, Criminal Law, �1573-1576). One must be totally alert to ask for the opportunity to �say something prior to sentencing� before the judge starts his sentencing � interrupt if necessary, but do it. Request a separate sentencing hearing of at least two weeks hence. Give yourself time to write the allocution. 2. Do not give this information in writing to the court or to opposing attorney before-hand as it is only valid when orally presented to the court by the live sentient man/woman and you do not want to forewarn the enemy. The legal fiction is civilly dead and cannot speak. 3. The court needs your consent to impose any sentencing or �punishment� or fines or restrictions of any kind, etc. In almost 100% of the cases the sentient man/woman becomes the surety (or stand in) for the legal fiction �defendant� and takes on the burden of the sentencing pronouncements. It is the legal fiction which is indicted, tried, and convicted. It is the sentient man/woman who takes on the sentence. The court needs the permission (consent) of the sentient man to impose a sentence and gets it through presumption, silence, acquiescence, or outright consent to apply to the �surety�. It is the sentient man/woman who now serves the sentence. The style of the case through conviction for the �defendant� is in all capital letters. The style of the sentenced party is upper and lower case. 4. When finished with the oral allocution, one must turn around and walk out of the court and its jurisdiction immediately. DO NOT HEAR the judge or the prosecutor or anyone else, even if they are screaming at you to �STOP�, or �Come back here!� If one does, then jurisdiction is given back to the court, i.e. you have contracted back in. 5. Allocution, Part One: During the trial you were denied exculpatory evidence such as the court not answering motions, notices, affidavits, allowing witnesses, etc. Keep a list of such omissions, errors, and due process denial during the trial, especially constitutional guarantees. 6. Allocution. Part Two: Read the following statement (i.e. create your own written statement to reflect your specific situation and trial activities). There is no time limit on its reading. Do not give in to interruptions. FOR THE RECORD YOUR HONOR: I am a Man, living upon the land and speaking as only a Man can. I was created in the image of Yashua under the authority of the redeemer, Jesus Christ with all of My senses intact. I am canceling the conviction and all appearances on My part and now cancel any and all contracts, entered into by Me, knowingly or unknowingly by any methods including but not limited to verbal, by assent. consent, presumption, assumption, deception, threat, duress, coercion, fraud, fiction, fantasy or illusions, or any other method, including words of art, magic, and sophistry, casuistry or out right lying, or by specious acts of fallacious, deceptive, delusive, misleading, apparent, illusive, illusory, ostensible, practice of law.(a) This proceeding has failed to produce evidence of an injured party.(b) This proceeding has failed to produce an affidavit of verified complaint, or the existence of a complaining party.(c) This proceeding has failed to produce an injured party onto the witness stand for testimony.(d) This proceeding has failed to produce and to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.(e) This proceeding has failed to produce an honorable ruling, therefore the court could rule only by an undisclosed presumption of an assumed intention, and this may be deemed the practice of witchcraft by a Satanic Cabal.(f) This proceeding � and this court � has now lost all jurisdiction by it�s denial of due process. I have not violated Yashua�s law. I have not caused an injury to another living man. This would be a violation of the Royal law of love your neighbor as yourself, or man�s interpretation �Do unto others as you would have them do unto you�. I have not committed a crime, and there is nothing on which to convict Me, thus the conviction is null and void. And, any Bonds affiliated or associated with this case, whether they were issued with the citation in the form of a bid bond, or as an appearance bond, or as a performance bond which have been written as a result of this procedure � and any other bonds written in any way, shape or form whatsoever � I hereby now cancel, terminate, discharge, dismiss, deactivate, eradicate, nullify, quash, rescind, repeal, revoke, abrogate, abolish, and expunge � and I forbid the commercial use of My name and likeness for profit, as all Bonds created, whether on the record or not, are void ab initio as only I, a Man can cause. I do not accept any offer to, nor do I give consent to, nor will I go to jail, go to prison, pay or discharge any fines, fees, court costs, nor taxes of any kind. I do not accept nor consent to have My rights blocked or impeded in any way. shape, or form. I do not accept any offer, nor consent to have My body or possessions seized or confiscated or used by anyone or their agent for their own use, or for the benefit of another. I do not accept any offer nor do I consent to probation, parole, pre- or post-trial release, or any other form of supervision imposed for this matter or in association with this matter which may be attempted to be linked with or in causation with this matter, or placed twice in jeopardy for the same pretended crime. I, this man, [ full name ], reserve all My natural God-given unalienable birth rights, waiving none, ever � as all is conditional upon My receipt of your written statement of claims and proof of claim to the contrary under your bond of office and penalties of perjury. My public business here is completed, perfected, discharged, accomplished, dismissed, concluded, terminated and, as Jesus Christ our Lord and Savior stated: FINISHED! 7. Immediately turn around and walk out of the court room. DO NOT ACKNOWLEDGE THE JUDGE OR THE OPPOSING ATTORNEY UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES. If the judge asks for a copy of your allocution, do NOT respond. It is on the record and he can get it there. If the bailiff stands in your path on the way out, ask him to arrest the judge for treason (abrogated his oath of office) and move on. Do not hesitate. 8. According to Michael Stone, this procedure is authorized under FRCP Rule 60, 1946 Amendment, Note to Subdivision (b). �Since the rules have been in force, decisions have been rendered that the use of bills of review, coram nobis. or audita querela, to obtain relief from final judgments is still proper, and that various remedies of this kind still exist although they are not mentioned in the rules and the practice is not prescribed in the rules. It is obvious that the rules should be complete in this respect and define the practice with respect to any existing rights or remedies to obtain relief from final judgments.� et seq.


Unique Facebook User ID: 791890220830179
Last Updated: May 30, 2014 2:04 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

May 30, 2014 2:24 AM
Would Grahame Johnson be the one to send CLAIMS in regards to consumable stuff PIERRE DAOUST happened to have RECEIPTS for ? ....he seems to be the BANKING guy there ! :/ Funds Management and Banking Grahame Johnson, Chief Eric Wolfe2, Deputy Chief Louise Hyland, Director Philippe Muller, Director Th�r�se Couture, Director Scott Hendry, Research Director


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: May 30, 2014 2:24 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Scott Duncan

May 30, 2014 5:30 AM
RESURRECTED "UPDATE" :D


Unique Facebook User ID: 927379467328526
Last Updated: May 30, 2014 5:30 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Lee Edgely

May 30, 2014 1:26 PM
So the legal name that i happen to have is in need of a new driving licence. It's going to cost me �55 for the pleasure of receiving this licence. The cash has to be paid at the window before they print the licence. This has to be one of those times that the licence gets signed as: sole authorised administrator, by qualifying, maybe Vi Coactus or ...before signing? What can you do about the photo that they want to be on the licence?


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.01529407782786E+016
Last Updated: May 30, 2014 1:26 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Steve Lemieux

May 30, 2014 4:43 PM
As I've state several times, CREDITORS should ONLY ask questions when dealing with PUBLIC agents. NEVER answer their questions and NEVER make statements. If they ask a question - YOU ask a question right BACK AT THEM. This has the effect of deflecting surety, which JUSTICES are masters of [some of them, anyway]. Here is a list of questions I came up with ANYONE dealing with ANY public policy agent/enforcer should consider asking depending on the situation at hand: [feel free to add questions you come up with as comments in this tread] 1. If I request for you to write things down and take note, are you obliged to do so? 2. Can you please take detailed notes of our discussion here today? 3. If at sometime in the future, I request full and whole disclosure in some type of legal action, will those notes be in your file? 4. Do you have identification? 5. Are you obliged to answer my questions? 6. Are you obliged to answer all my questions and leave personal emotions out of it? 7. Are you obliged to answer my questions truthfully? 8. Are you a nice person? 9. Are you having a nice day? 10. Did you have a nice breakfast this morning? 11. Can you please refer to me as Beneficiary? 12. Are you a member of the government? 13. Are you under the false presumption I am somehow associated with the government in some way, shape or form? 14. Are you under the false assumption that I am acting in commerce today? 15. Did you swear an oath? 16. Did you swear more than 1 oath? 17. Did you swear an oath of office? 18. What was the context of your oath(s)? 19. Do you remember your oath? 20. Can I hear the oath or oaths you've sworn? 21. As one of the people, I'm I not entitled to hear the oath you have sworn? 22. Is it ok if I hold you to your sworn oath of office here today? 23. Is your oath current? Does it expire? How long is the oath you took valid for? 24. Are you obliged to protect the people? 25. Is it your understanding that I am one of the people? 26. Do you oaths contradict one another? 27. Are you obliged to not do harm? 28. Are you obliged to protect the people? 29. Are you obliged to be honest with the people you interact with? 30. Do you understand the meaning of the oath(s) your swore? 31. Do your actions at this moment coincide with your oath or oaths? 32. Are you aware of the limitations of your authority? 33. Do you have an employee business card and employee ID number? 34. In what capacity are you operating today? 35. What jurisdiction are you operating in? 36. What are the limitations of your job? 37. Are you responsible for your actions and interactions? 38. Are you an honest man/woman? 39. Have you ever been appointed trustee or surety for someone? 40. Are you allowed to refuse such fiduciary appointment? 41. If I appointed you trustee & surety of this legal trust [point at the driver's license] for the day, would you accept? 42. As a public servant, are you obligated to accept trustee and surety appointment from a member of the public such as myself? 43. Are you aware all identification documents such as all driver's licenses are property of the government? 44. Are you under the false assumption that I am under the government�s jurisdiction because I carry government property [point at the driver license]? 45. Are you upset at this moment or are you happy? 46. If I told you that I do NOT consent to your jurisdiction and that it does not apply to me, would you get angry and hold it against me? 47. If I told you I do not consent to your contracts, would you hold it against me? 48. I'm I obliged to follow your commands? 49. Do you presume to have authority over me? 50. I'm I your slave? 51. What laws specifically permit you to have authority and control over me? 52. Are you aware that statutes only apply to members and franchises of the government? 53. Are you insured and bonded? 54. What are the limitations of your bond and/or insurance? 55. Are there certain actions you can do which are not covered by your bond or insurance? 56. Are you certain you are operating within your mandate here today? 57. Who is your supervisor or commander? 58. How can I contact that person? 59. What is the address of your office? 60. Is it right in Edmonton? 61. Do you believe that I am a peaceful man/woman? 62. Have you ever witnessed me committing a crime against my fellow man? 63. Are you under any false presumption or assumption that I have committed a crime? 64. Do you have a cause of action or claim against me? 65. Have I wronged you in any way, shape or form? 66. Have you ever had a complaint filed against you? 67. What was the nature of the complaint? 68. If I wished to file a complaint against you, what steps would you recommend I take? 69. Ok, thank you officer, how can I be of assistance here today? Some other questions: 70. Can you tell me the definition of "income" respective the income tax act and all that? 71. Is the income tax act positive law? Are you sure? Can you please explain how it is you think the income tax act is positive law? 72. Do you know what makes a law positive VS what makes a law negative? Is that a fact or your opinion? 73. Is that not a Trustee's robe/uniform you're wearing and should I not be under the presumption and assumption that you are indeed my trustee? 74. Are you attempting to intimidate me here today? 75. If I told you I was feeling intimidated by your actions, what would you do about it? 76. Is intimidation part of your mandate? 77. Do you believe in contracts being forced on people through intimidation and coercion? 78. Is that criminal or civil contempt Mr justice? 79. What is the nature of the contempt? 80. Is it a crime to be in contempt? 81. Can you please explain contempt? 82. What is the context of the contempt? 83. Can you please identify what law is broken as a result of contempt? 84. Does anyone here have a claim against me which would support criminal contempt? 85. Does anyone here have a contract breach involving me that I might not be aware of which would support civil contempt? 86. As contempt been manufactured here today? 87. Is this court using contempt here today as a tool to try and control verbal assertions that might be challenging public policy? Is that not a method of censorship? 88. Is there something of a fraudulent nature being protected here today through censorship? 89. What fraud I'm I not aware of that might be going on here today? 90. If I wanted to file a complaint against you Mr justice, what forms and process would you recommend I use? 91. Does a specific judicial form NOT exist which I can use to effectively file a complaint against you My justice? 92. Does a sworn affidavit support this charge? 93. Is there a need for this charge to be supported by a sworn affidavit? 94. May I inspect the original charging instrument? 95. Do I not have a right to inspect the original charging instrument? 96. Is this a valid cause of action? How so? 97. Is that a FACT or just YOUR opinion? 98. What constitutes a valid cause of action? 99. Who is the damaged party? what is the nature of the injury? May I see the supporting affidavit to that claim? 100. Is this an alleged claim or a verified and bone fide claim? 101. If I were to deny this claim is valid, would you be obliged to prove and validate the claim? 102. Do you need my consent to proceed with this action? 103. Do you need my consent to this judgement? 104. If I plead guilty to the facts on condition that no jail time is served and payment can be issued via a private negotiable instrument, would that be acceptable to you? 105. If I reserved all rights, why are you speaking? 106. Isn�t it up to me as to how this should proceed? 107. I'm I not the only person here with standing? 108. I'm I not entitled to redemption for so many dollars as an insured party in this matter? It took me, maybe an hour to come up with these. I found it a interesting exercise. Think of it as stay-out-of-jurisdiction training. How many can you come up with? ;) Steeve


Unique Facebook User ID: 458370044339963
Last Updated: May 30, 2014 4:43 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Steve Lemieux

May 30, 2014 5:12 PM
Trusts. I've read a lot of bullshit regarding trusts lately so I thought I'd share something that might be considered mandatory reading. Steeve


Unique Facebook User ID: 458370044339963
Last Updated: May 30, 2014 5:12 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Gary Ellis

May 30, 2014 10:10 PM
Thanks for the add, Pete


Unique Facebook User ID: 621762871251534
Last Updated: May 30, 2014 10:10 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Janick Paquette

May 30, 2014 10:23 PM
This is a NOTICE for cops that will probably come to my door because we did not register our dog for a dog tag. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED/WITHOUT PREJUDICE NOTICE Please take Notice that, I do not answer any questions coming from a Police Officer and I do not open the door to Police Officers. I am a woman and my name is of Private Matter. I am offering you today the Identification of the person I have, named JANICK MARTINE PAQUETTE with the Inscription number 119xxxxxxx, Social Security Number 26X XXX XXX and residing at (PO BOX Address here). As the Sole Autorised Administrator of this person, I am offering you this Document. If you have any documents to leave, please do so on the outdoor table. Use the rock so they don't fly away. Regards! The Sole Authorised Administrator for the person JANICK MARTINE PAQUETTE N�Inscription 119XXXXXXX/SSN 26X XXX XXX.


Unique Facebook User ID: 802541149837689
Last Updated: May 30, 2014 10:23 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Zachary Milton Sloan

May 30, 2014 11:12 PM
evidence of a trust or estate


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.01523318035827E+016
Last Updated: May 30, 2014 11:12 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Steve Lemieux

May 30, 2014 11:12 PM
Does anyone know how to decrypt gibberish? I got this message a while back and to this day I can't make out half of it. And I quote "Gday mate. I was reading your comments in the tender for play skewl & ye didn't mention the buck - o - five man ? I'm NOT in gaol & I've SIGNED AS SURETY.....BUT I WILL NEVER EVER GO TO GAOL AGAIN ALL BECAUSE THE BUCK - O - FIVE IS DEADLIER THAN ALL THE REST OF THEM MUPPETS PUT TOGETHER......& GETTING DEADLIER...JUST DONT ASK SCOTT DUNCAN COS HE DONT KNOW IT OR UNDERSTAND IT FULLY.....NONE IN THAT GROUP FULLY UNDERSTAND THE INTRICATE DETAILS THAT ARE DEADLIER THAN NoM Etc..... Me= Not in Gaol. Santos Bonacci= NOT IN GAOL.....all because of a Buck - 0 - FUCK. ....Scott Duncan is an incredible teacher & I hive his knowledge immense value as I do many others too.....but Scott, don't know the buck - o - five....I taught them all in t4lg but *Sigh*.....carry on with play skewl" Bonus points if you figure out who this sad lonely person is... :)


Unique Facebook User ID: 458370044339963
Last Updated: May 30, 2014 11:12 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Ceit Butler

May 31, 2014 1:35 AM
Pssst...all the fun shit's currently happening over here: https://www.facebook.com/roguesupport.scott/posts/959676584098814?


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.0153923542315E+016
Last Updated: May 31, 2014 1:35 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Chris Evan

May 31, 2014 9:03 PM
CHRIS was issued a Citation as OWNER of a VEHICLE which is actually OWNED and REGISTERED by a corporation. So....I am not sure how I would like to proceed.... A.) I could refuse the Citation as CHRIS is not a PARTY to the transaction. (But, they may just issue it to the PARTY and that PARTY doesn't have the same benefits CHRIS does) B.) I could (as Sole Authorized Administrator) accept the Citation for the party with SURETY and let them know who that is. C.) I could send a CHECK from the ACCOUNT of the corporation. D.) I could ignore it and hope they forget about it. How do YOU think I should proceed? :-D :-D


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02024820688268E+016
Last Updated: May 31, 2014 9:03 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Jason Lerato

Jun 01, 2014 8:11 PM
Lmao


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.01527421669471E+016
Last Updated: Jun 01, 2014 8:11 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None




Steven P. Nuxoll

Jun 01, 2014 11:42 PM
I know I'm not yet qualified to ask yet, but any specific writings or notes I should absorb in any particular order to build my base of knowledge in hopes that one day I might just be able to hold a just snow ball's chance in hell of actually carrying my weight in a conversation with y'all someday? I'm beginning to break free from my delusions but I'm not quite there yet and once I can fully comprehend it, I will re-read over and over and memorize and conceptualize until I can actually explain the concepts to others. Also, I seriously believe Scott Duncan missed his calling as a comedic writer for somebody with Dennis Miller stylized epic rants! :-D


Unique Facebook User ID: 678817518849901
Last Updated: Jun 01, 2014 11:42 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None




Scott Duncan

Jun 02, 2014 6:38 AM

Unique Facebook User ID: 927379467328526
Last Updated: Jun 02, 2014 6:38 AM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None


Beverly Berta Braakschmack

Jun 02, 2014 9:30 AM
Ok well I am putting it out here. The BIBLE is a book of commerce, from what I now understand. It is put forth to most as a reflection of what it really is. Those who follow the bible really have absolutely NO FUCKING IDEA what it means unless some �minister� tells them what it means. Because who could really read that thing and have a clue what any of that shit means other than it is a FICTION book. But when some guy tells you �this is what it means� and �this is how you should live TO BE HAPPY�... everyone goes with that. Yet that same �guy� diddled your son you find out later... but let�s ignore that... ... Yes, the only way to be happy is to listen to that guy. Here�s an example of what someone I care about who has been brought up very religiously sent me after sending them my �NOT MINE� booklet: "Romans 13:6-8 6 This is also why you pay taxes, for the authorities are God�s servants (so now figure out who is �god�, huh?), who give their full time to governing. 7 Give to everyone what you owe them: If you owe taxes, pay taxes; if revenue, then revenue; if respect, then respect; if honor, then honor." So �god� must be a bank then, correct? Oh, but that �minister� forgot to tell you HOW TO PAY. RESPECT=Accept. FOR HONOUR=Accept for Honor, or Supra Protest. It is described in the �Bills of Exchange�. Who�d have thunk? And here, I acronym: FFS! It is easy to see once you ACCEPT THE TRUTH OF IT ALL. and more... "Romans 13: 5,6 5 Therefore, it is necessary to submit to the authorities, not only because of possible punishment but also as a matter of conscience." Yes! They created this shitty MONEY OF DEBT... and you are going to either figure out how it works, with another delusion of shitty public school system (which would be impossible), or by yourself (otherwise known as basically impossible)... and your left with... oh right. Warehouse... for your benefit? Here�s the rest of that response: �Does this make any sense? Rules are meant to be followed? Yes? - It creates harmony and respect each other. Please work on paying your utility billings - I would not want them to put a lien on your property that you live in and have paid into for so long. -Also everyone is out there earning a living, paying taxes, paying bills - are you thinking our govt will pay our way? just because we are its property? It is merely a way of tracking our existence and making sure we "pay our own way for the privilege of living here." The bigger question is - Would we get that opportunity else where in this world? On another note though - I always admired your strength of always giving 100% of yourself when it came to learning something or figuring out how to do something - Always training yourself how to do things that are crazy difficult for most but you dive in and research or keep pushing yourself to find out how to make it work (web designing, renovating and earning your interior design certification, just to name a few) With that in mind - I think your disappointment in our govt run country should be taken with a different approach - Politics!! LOL better to understand from this inside!!� ...wow So, does anyone see how this �bible�, by way of its �teachers/ministers� has misconstrued what is going on? On that note, can we not "bounce" bible thumpers so quickly and maybe show them their delusion? Like the last fella so recently bounced. :(


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.0151988293247E+016
Last Updated: Jun 02, 2014 9:30 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Michael Atkins

Jun 02, 2014 8:35 PM
So I'm still operating as a wage slave.... I have 2 children 3 yrs and 3 months... Both are registered ... this is all unfortunate..... I'm still not confident enough to administrate my public debts..... I'm in a union and have tried several times to stop the accountants from taking taxes off my money of account deposits..... I'm first nations so I play the treaty card lots how can I correct this to stop having taxes taken off ..... or am I way to early to try something like this


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.0152158474006E+016
Last Updated: Jun 02, 2014 8:35 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

Jun 03, 2014 11:51 AM
https://www.facebook.com/OfficialDogecoin/photos/a.765825930112351.1073741828.738700972824847/830256313669312/?type=1&theater

Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: Jun 03, 2014 11:51 AM
Type of Post: photo
Place of Post: None




Anibal Jose Baez

Jun 03, 2014 2:49 PM
Fuck your beliefs! :D

Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02035927166068E+016
Last Updated: Jun 03, 2014 2:49 PM
http://www.youtube.com/v/2qMybWCRcDc?version=3&autohide=1&autoplay=1
Type of Post: video
Place of Post: None


Jun 03, 2014 8:29 PM
I'd like to start a thread about Ex parte judgements. The court is an area that I'm really not that familiar with. Has anyone been through it that could share their experience?


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Jun 03, 2014 8:29 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Rick Hiltz

Jun 04, 2014 1:56 PM


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.01523057623409E+016
Last Updated: Jun 04, 2014 1:56 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None




Mathew Wolfe

Jun 04, 2014 3:28 PM


Unique Facebook User ID: 865677426782970
Last Updated: Jun 04, 2014 3:28 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


David Sutherland

Jun 04, 2014 6:42 PM


Unique Facebook User ID: 568417336606172
Last Updated: Jun 04, 2014 6:42 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


David Sutherland

Jun 04, 2014 6:42 PM


Unique Facebook User ID: 568417336606172
Last Updated: Jun 04, 2014 6:42 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

Jun 04, 2014 7:35 PM
Per capita adj. Latin for "by head," meaning to be determined by the number of people. To find the per capita cost, the total number of persons are added up and the bill, tax or benefits are divided equally among those persons. Quebec debt "per capita" I am NOT a fucking "capita", I am NOT a fucking "PEOPLE", and I am NOT a fucking "PERSON" :D I am "ME", and I "have" a "capita" in my pocket :P


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: Jun 04, 2014 7:35 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Jason Lerato

Jun 04, 2014 8:25 PM
FREEDUMB . Thoughts on what went wrong with this chiropractor in court http://www.winnipegfreepress.com/local/chiropractor-gets-jail-time-for-tax-evasion-140683123.html?device=mobile


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.01527421669471E+016
Last Updated: Jun 04, 2014 8:25 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


JJ Alexander

Jun 04, 2014 10:58 PM
OK, so I'm in the state of California, U.S.A. I had a traffic ticket. I sent in an Affidavit + Notice of Mistake + Birth certificate (copy), as well as the original ticket and subsequent notices with a red diagonal line through them and "OFFER DECLINED FOR IMMEDIATE DISCHARGE AND CLOSURE". 6 days after the court date for the ticket they issued a "FAILURE TO APPEAR" notice and suspended my license, and increased the bail to $1094.00 (from one hundred something $ before..). So now what?


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.01527605964543E+016
Last Updated: Jun 04, 2014 10:58 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Mathew Wolfe

Jun 05, 2014 2:44 AM
Real question in another group. "Can anyone tell me how to regain "man jurisdiction" in a case that has already begun? How does one even begin to respond to that one?


Unique Facebook User ID: 865677426782970
Last Updated: Jun 05, 2014 2:44 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Javier Alfredo Villela

Jun 05, 2014 3:24 AM

Unique Facebook User ID: 1.01532138053406E+016
Last Updated: Jun 05, 2014 3:24 AM
https://www.youtube.com/embed/sN1iKfSfihw?autoplay=1
Type of Post: video
Place of Post: None


Raj Kosmack

Jun 05, 2014 4:08 AM
Greetings Spirits...who are the white rabbits in this group to follow?


Unique Facebook User ID: 386601191509026
Last Updated: Jun 05, 2014 4:08 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Todd Kozinka

Jun 05, 2014 3:55 PM
It's starting. FOLKS have had enough.

Unique Facebook User ID: 1.01524533090914E+016
Last Updated: Jun 05, 2014 3:55 PM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None


Anibal Jose Baez

Jun 05, 2014 3:58 PM
Ok. My younger brother had a car for about 2 years. As many others around here, my brother lost his employment, and had to return the car to the bank, because he could not afford the monthly payments anymore. The bank then went and sold the car, then sent him a letter saying he owes over 6,000 grand. A BILL was never sent. This is all in letters that nobody dares to sign. My brother sent a notice as administrator saying that he wanted to administrate any debt asap. He asked for a copy of any contract, and a BILL, and he would immediately administrate the debt. Also, he requested copies of 2 forms of ID of the alleged lawyer that was sending to communication, to prevent fraud. He gave 10 days. Unfortunately, he did not send the notice registered mail, but instead the USPS personnel convinced him to use certified mail. I did not find out about this until later. The bank answered within the 10 days, sending just a copy of the contract. No BILL, or copy of id's were included. Then he sent a second notice asking for a BILL, and for copy of id's. He gave 10 days. Once again he did not send the notice registered mail, but certified mail. I did not find out about this until later. The bank lawyer replied saying they did not recognized who was sending the communication, so they were going to disregard that notice. No BILL, or copy of id's were sent. At this point, my brother comes to me to let me know what he is doing. He sent a 3rd notice asking for a BILL, and giving some terms and condition. This time with an affirmation as sole authorized administrator, and once again asking for a BILL. This time it was sent registered mail. The same day he sent his 3rd and final PEREMPTORY NOTICE, also he received in his person's mailbox an invitation for the person to appear to a hearing. The bank had quickly placed a lawsuit, with no affidavit attached, using some debt collector weasel lawyer representing "the bank", saying over 6,000 were owed to the bank, and that my brother has not responded to the obligation. Admiral Scott, and Pete, I have a few ideas of what an administrator should do in such case, but I would like to discuss some law ideas, and hear out things we can do, if we are in a similar situation. Thanks!


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02035927166068E+016
Last Updated: Jun 05, 2014 3:58 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Todd Kozinka

Jun 05, 2014 4:54 PM
wow

Unique Facebook User ID: 1.01524533090914E+016
Last Updated: Jun 05, 2014 4:54 PM
http://www.youtube.com/v/tvlEqtPrC8g?autohide=1&version=3&autoplay=1
Type of Post: video
Place of Post: None


Colin Stephen Tonks

Jun 05, 2014 8:44 PM
Law dictionary of 1636.

Unique Facebook User ID: 1.01523951670811E+016
Last Updated: Jun 05, 2014 8:44 PM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None




Michael Atkins

Jun 06, 2014 8:41 PM
So I got a situation. ..... I have these outstanding parking tickets .... going on 5 years now .... my wife says we got a registered letter saying there is a Lien on my truck for 900 bucks..... I have 21 days to pay. ... please correct me I'm sure there will be errors but here is what I think I should do..... send a letter back via registered mail conditionally accepting there offer upon proof of claim.... I require the original contract that we have.... also I require 2 pieces of id..... give them 10 days.... offer to administrate for free this time but any further correspondence will cost x.x .... also I require a bill ... Should I perhaps draft a NOTICE of MISTAKE send that along too?


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.0152158474006E+016
Last Updated: Jun 06, 2014 8:41 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Chris Evan

Jun 07, 2014 3:39 PM
I just was at a REGISTER and got a RECEIPT. this seems important.


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02024820688268E+016
Last Updated: Jun 07, 2014 3:39 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Scott Duncan

Jun 07, 2014 4:01 PM


Unique Facebook User ID: 927379467328526
Last Updated: Jun 07, 2014 4:01 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Jun 07, 2014 6:59 PM
As many of you are aware the gas was cut off this week. Cold showers are not cool lol The trustee corp agent was forced to buy back the debt in order to have peace in my home and enjoy a hot shower. As mentioned in Pete Daoust "Invoice" thread, about receipts and the Bank of Canada. a credit card was used to buy back the debt (turns out enbridge doesn't accept visa lol) and they don't give receipts, they say it will show up on your next "invoice" (her words) even though the piece of paper I got clearly states it is a bill. The debt was bought back via a commercial bank and the bank teller stamped a receipt created by 8750432 CANADA INC in the amount of what was "paid". The trustee corporation then took that receipt, wrote 'consumer purchase' on it, had me sign the back with my SIN and date. Public notice was also sent and a second notice directing the bank of canada to remit (as per the Bills of Exchange act section V) to 8750432 CANADA INC the sum of $XXX. I also identified who was the drawee, drawer and beneficiary. Not sure that is the proper procedure, but I guess we'll see


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Jun 07, 2014 6:59 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

Jun 08, 2014 3:47 PM
Mon histoire, et surement la votre :D (HAHAHAHA!!!) Je suis n� le 19 f�vrier 1966, en tant qu��tre-humain, et je suis capable de le prouver. Un enregistrement d�une naissance vivante a �t� produite lors de MA naissance, et MA naissance a eu lieu le 19 f�vrier 1966. 16 jours plus tard, c�est-�-dire le 6 mars 1966, mon p�re a SIGN� un ACTE de naissance. Cet acte de naissance annonce clairement un �VENEMENT, comme un acte de vente lorsque vous vendez une maison, l��v�nement qui s.est produit le 6 mars 1966, est la naissance d�une personne. D�finition du mot � personne � : outil qu�un �tre humain peut se servire pour faire du commerce, tel que Coca-Cola, Wal-Mart, L�agence du Revenu du Qu�bec, la Ville de Montr�al��ils sont TOUS des � PERSONNES �. Hors, la personne qui a vu le jour, ce 6eme jours de mars 1966 a �t� nomm�e PIERRE DAOUST par son cr�ateur, son cr�ateur �tant le GOUVERNEMENT du QU�BEC. Maxime de LOI : Le cr�ateur d�une chose est le PROPRI�TAIRE d�une chose. Vous pouvez connaitre la date de naissance de la personne que vous avez en regardant la date de SIGNATURE sur l�acte de naissance de cette personne. En utilisant l�Enregistrement d�une naissance vivante, et l�acte de naissance SIGN�, le GOUVERNEMENT a RATIFI� cette nouvelle personne, ce 6eme jours de mars 1966. En ce faisant, le gouvernement a pu imm�diatement mettre en collateral versus la DETTE PUBLIQUE, cette nouvelle personne fraichement cr�e. C�est d�ailleurs tout ce que le gouvernement peut mettre en collat�ral. Ils ont ensuite cr�e une S�RET� pour cette personne, pas vraiment le choix puisqu�une dette viens d��tre attribu�e a cette personne, et cette SURET� r�side a la Banque du Canada, puisque c�est la Banque du Gouvernement (La seule). �tant donn� que l��tre-Humain que je suis, est le SEUL a pouvoir donner de la VALEUR a cette PERSONNE nomm�e PIERRE DAOUST ayant le num�ro d�inscription 1196604XXXXXX (je peux vous d�cortiquer ce num�ro d�inscription et vous montrer que chacun des 13 chiffres veut dire quelque chose), l��tat n�a d�autres choix que de me donner TOUT les droits concernant cette PERSONNE que j�ai, de la l�article no.1 de la charte des droits et libert�s du Qu�bec. Article 1. 1. Tout �tre humain a droit � la vie, ainsi qu'� la s�ret�, � l'int�grit� et � la libert� de SA personne. Donc, J�ai le droit a la vie de PIERRE DAOUST, la personne que j�ai. J�ai le droit a SA � SURET� � J�ai le droit a SON INT�GRIT� J�ai le droit a SA LIBERT� L�article no.1 de cette charte nous indique CLAIREMENT que nous AVONS cette personne, hors nous avons TOUS �t� flou� a CROIRE que nous SOMMES cette personne. Aujourd�hui, j�utilise la SURET� de la PERSONNE nomm�e PIERRE DAOUST ayant le no. d�inscription 1196604XXXXXX, pour � D�CHARGER � toutes dettes publiques envoy�es a la PERSONNE nomm�e PIERRE DAOUST ayant le no. d�inscription 1196604XXXXXX Donc, voici les dettes publiques en question : 1). IMPOT PROVINCIALE 2). IMPOT FEDERALE 3). HYDRO-QU�BEC 4). TAXES MUNICIPALES 5). TAXES SCOLAIRES 6). CONTRAVENTIONS 7). IMMATRICULATION 8). FRAIS PERMIS DE CONDUIRE ET NUL N�Y PEUT RIEN, CAR C�EST LA LOI, SI ON ME REFUSE LE DROIT A LA � SURET� � DE MA PERSONNE, ON ME D�CLARE PAR LE FAIT M�ME, UN � ESCLAVE �. Le CERTIFICAT de naissance de cette personne, est tout simplement le � cautionnement �, en Anglais on dit � SURETY BOND � Ca fait 23 mois que je n�ai pas �t� la SURET� pour le bill que HYDRO-QUEBEC envoi a ma personne, je vous invite chez nous, pour que vous soyez T�MOIN que j�ai toujours l��lectricit�, et je vous MONTRE la facon D�ADMINISTRER ces dettes publique. Je n�ai pas �t� la SURET� pour $16,000.00 d�impot, j�ai les preuves aussi�.. J�AI TOUTES LES PREUVES��.je fais ce que je dis, je ne fais pas seulement le dire�. Une dette publique doit �tre RACHET�E avant d'etre PAY�E, et, �tant donn� que vous n'etes PAS un esclave, vous n'avez PAS l'obligation de les RACHETER ces fameuse dettes, vous pouvez les ADMINISTRER vers la SURET� de la personne que vous avez.... Ce n'est pas moi qui le dit, mais bien LA LOI..!! :D HAHAHAHAHA!!!!!! Dans toutes les D�CHARGES de dettes publiques que j�ai fais, je SUPPLIE le gouvernement de me dire que j�ai TORT, et que je vais PAYER si j�ai TORT�.. Mais non, ils deviennent TOUS silencieux comme des poissons :D Par : Pierre. Seul Administrateur Autoris� pour PIERRE DAOUST 1196604XXXXXX Je suis le SEUL ADMINISTRATEUR AUTORIS� pour la personne que j'ai, et NUL n'y peut rien :P Par : Pierre. Seul Administrateur Autoris� pour PIERRE DAOUST 1196604XXXXXX


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: Jun 08, 2014 3:47 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None




Pete Daoust

Jun 09, 2014 4:07 PM
Private message received from David Grant. :D Hey, I found content in this group offensive. Please remove all content that may potentially be harmful. THE TENDER FOR LAW you guys are a bunch of french fucktards :-o


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: Jun 09, 2014 4:07 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

Jun 09, 2014 6:27 PM
We are fast approaching the stage of the ultimate inversion: the stage where the government is free to do anything it pleases, while the citizens may act only by permission; which is the stage of the darkest periods of human history, the stage of rule by brute force. I think this was written by Ayn Rand, in the 1920's .....and I think she was onto something :D


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: Jun 09, 2014 6:27 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Steve Lemieux

Jun 09, 2014 10:52 PM
Need a notary public? Can't find witnesses? Got an administrative process you need to do? Notary public - anytime - anywhere = https://www.notarycam.com/ Now go out there and fuck with some public officials. Lock them into a contract then lien the shit out of them. That's what they do to you.. Cheers! Steeve

Unique Facebook User ID: 458370044339963
Last Updated: Jun 09, 2014 10:52 PM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None


Beverly Berta Braakschmack

Jun 10, 2014 3:15 AM


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.0151988293247E+016
Last Updated: Jun 10, 2014 3:15 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None




Scott Duncan

Jun 10, 2014 12:50 PM
As I walk through the "Valley of Dunce" that is THE TENDER FOR LAW, I go through all your profiles. I don't want anybody to think that I'm actually interested in anything you have to say. I most certainly am not! I look for the profiles that mention "spirits", "God", "Jesus", and I look for words indicating a secondary level of stupidity, like "Strawman", etc. I do this to weed out the stealth-theists. Piece-of-shit Christians like to think they can hold onto their Jesus-myth, and also use what I teach. They can't, and the only thing they have to contribute is lies. This is why theists are banned on sight. But that's not what this post is for. No...this is to introduce a new TENDER FOR LAW feature. It will be "The Admiral inspects your profile". I shall select profiles at random and will point out the bullshit. The very first profile featured shall be that of Dean Kory. Mr. Kory is pseudo-famous for hanging out in the Fortress of Remand; and he has a page full of FREE-DUMB shit. Let's go take a look! :D https://www.facebook.com/dean.kory


Unique Facebook User ID: 927379467328526
Last Updated: Jun 10, 2014 12:50 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Lai Ping Lee

Jun 10, 2014 8:05 PM
lai ping lee's vision is to continue to stand in the front-line to confront the banking and the court system to re-establish COMMON LAW GRAND JURY back in to the justice system. This win in court will be setting a PRECEDENT case in Canada, transpiring millions of people to not be homeless, this can assist millions of people to overturn their foreclosure case and make it possible for millions of people to stop paying into the current fraudulent debt system. Another big vision is to file a Class Action lawsuit against the private corporation bankers and to take back OUR country's money printing Power. i believe with your support, we can CHANGE the fraudulent banking game ! Certainly, this Is possible if we demand it. Look at Iceland's country, where the people took back the power to print their own money in the year 2010. ~ ~ In gratitude to YOUR support for share this message ~~ ~~~

Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02019126848032E+016
Last Updated: Jun 10, 2014 8:05 PM
https://www.youtube.com/embed/VdyjLdHKdfQ?autoplay=1
Type of Post: video
Place of Post: None


Michael Rame

Jun 10, 2014 10:17 PM
I believe our only human right is a right to action and that action sustains our lives,defends our lives, procures our property, meaning we have the right to that which we produce so please explain to me where I have gone wrong according to your philosophy.


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02044678367571E+016
Last Updated: Jun 10, 2014 10:17 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Jun 11, 2014 1:02 AM
From the File "learning as I go along" There is a lawyer who allegedly is working on behalf of a bank to collect money from 2 persons, even though they received a zero balance statement from the bank. This lawyer has threatened garnishing wages, and a lien. He is now threatening a "Direction to enforce" instruction to the local sheriff. On numerous occasions this lawyer has been asked to provide proof of standing and a true bill. Nothing has been received to date. He has included in the letter a copy of the Direction to Enforce that he says he will send to the sheriff to sell the home etc. A corporation I trust has liened the property for the equity, he is about to be in default for non payment of his account with us. (not to mention racking up more charges with this letter ). My question(s) are; IF he does plan on this course of action, can he force the sale of a house for an unsecured line of credit? The fact that there is no sheriff file number on it, makes me think he is using intimidating and scare tactics. Will I receive notice from the sheriff IF he does go ahead with this (before they come knocking?) Is there anything else that needs to be considered?


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Jun 11, 2014 1:02 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Rick Hiltz

Jun 11, 2014 3:38 AM

Unique Facebook User ID: 1.01523057623409E+016
Last Updated: Jun 11, 2014 3:38 AM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None


Anibal Jose Baez

Jun 11, 2014 11:00 AM
So, the person that my wife happens to have, and that I happen to administrate, received from the IRS a "PROPOSAL for a change of tax and or credits on your tax return. This is not an audit. Your return may be examined in the future... This is not a bill, but you so need to respond within 30 days or we will the appropriate changes to your account." The funny/fucked-up part is that they give no reason to do this. The part of the communication were it says: "REASON (S) FOR THE CHANGE: " was left blank! Hahaha! :D So, the person she happens to have is entitled to a 3,000USD refund. They are PROPOSING to keep it, for no reason. As a responsible administrator, that is one PROPOSAL I must happily decline! :D It's time to administrate some bullshit! :D <<PROPOSAL. An offer for consideration or acceptance. 2. It is a general rule that a proposal offered to another for acceptance may be withdrawn at any time before it is accepted, provided that notice of the withdrawal be given to the party to whom it was made. A bid (q.v.) may be withdrawn at any time before acceptance; and a proposal by letter may be withdrawn at any time before, acceptance 1 Pick. 278; and, if accepted, it must be, in the very terms offered. 3 Wheat. 225. Vide Bid; Correspondence; Letter; Offer.>>


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02035927166068E+016
Last Updated: Jun 11, 2014 11:00 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Will Bed

Jun 11, 2014 5:31 PM
So a few weeks ago, the internet account for WB was victim of a fraud. almost 150gb of internet transfer per day for almost 2 weeks, so I picked up a unusually high debt in WB's mailbox... I called them and try to work something out, nothing possible on their end... Since this was the result of a fraud, I decided to administrate that private debt through the PERSON's SURETY... First I picked up a communication saying something along the lines of : "Here are the accepted methods of payment" (bank transfer was listed as one)... And "BTW this is from the Bank Of Canada's website : we do not offer banking services blabla..." I sent them a new communication, asking by what authority they could give advice in regards to Bank Of Canada's activities, and explaining every detail of the law and giving them ALL the information they needed to proceed, because clearly, by their first communication, they proved they were either incompetent, ignorant, or acted in bad faith... Got the bill for the next monthly period, paid the balance owed for the current period, but added something saying "for the outstanding balance for the month where the fraud occurred, THIS LADY has received everything you guys need to proceed and get paid... So talk to her my time is valuable and it's not my job to help you guys do yours"... Got a call this morning from the internet company : They REFUSE to collect the SURETY and get paid the total amount they claimed was owed by the PERSON ; instead they decided to just clear the extra debt off from the PERSON's account !!??? They just spit on 4 times their normal internet connection fees !!??? Would you fucking believe that ?


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.01541127535701E+016
Last Updated: Jun 11, 2014 5:31 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Beverly Berta Braakschmack

Jun 11, 2014 7:20 PM
It seems to me, if your Trustee Corporation that has seized the PERSON and deposited that security into a Trust, then this corporation would be entitled to all the value of the seized security. So if a Bill is presented, would you not accept these and send them to the Bank of Canada to receive the value of this Bill? Send a copy of the security and the financing statement for payment to the Trustee Corporation?


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.0151988293247E+016
Last Updated: Jun 11, 2014 7:20 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Jun 11, 2014 10:13 PM


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Jun 11, 2014 10:13 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Ross Bradley

Jun 12, 2014 2:59 AM
NOTHING of Interest here, Folks. Move on.... ;) < The impending trial of President Uhuru Kenyatta and the trial of Deputy President William Ruto, "whose cases were initiated proprio motu" by then-ICC Chief Prosecutor Luis Moreno-Ocampo in 2010, have only served to further sour relations between the two institutions. Some African leaders are now claiming that the "Rome Statute" violates their sovereignty and have issued accusations that rather than pursuing cases on the basis of universal demands, the ICC and the UNSC are doing so on the basis of political expediency. > With near on DOUBLE the population of AUSTRALIA, I wonder how many of the Kenyan people know of the "law" that their President and Deputy President are to now be held accountable by? I'm guessing it would be more than the number of people in AUSTRALIA there are - knowing of what is, the Law? How to get out of paying fines, rego, fees and tolls? LEARN of and USE, the Law? It's that simple, Folks! Google: http://tiny.cc/j4lbhx https://www.facebook.com/groups/211871612287035/


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.01523516389366E+016
Last Updated: Jun 12, 2014 2:59 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Scott Duncan

Jun 12, 2014 8:24 AM
************************************************************************************** NOTE: Menard `Tards keep asking to join, and haven't read the "ABOUT" section! If you ASK TO JOIN, you WILL BE BLOCKED. READ THE FUCKING "ABOUT" SECTION! You give up MORE THAN YOU KNOW, by ignoring this warning! ************************************************************************************** THE TENDER FOR LAW � "MUST READ" THREADS These are a list of articles by me, that are MUST READ. In the comments, please list any I have missed, that you think SHOULD be in here. All articles (c) 2014 ROGUESUPPORT INC. under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License. Help me out here, guys! Find urls to the best threads! *NOTE: Articles with FOR IDIOTS in the title do NOT mean they are simple. It means that I think you're all idiots, and the article is for you. FIRST: WATCH MONEY AS DEBT III! MONEY AS DEBT III - This covers what we are building, and why it is the ONLY REAL hope for TRUE change. YOU MUST WATCH THIS. DO NOT EVEN BOTHER POSTING UNTIL YOU WATCH THIS! This is NOT a point that is open to negotiation. DO NOT LIE ABOUT WATCHING IT, as you will be EASILY spotted and you will be ridiculed , berated, and banned. YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED! ALSO NOTE: CHRISTIANS ARE NOT WELCOME HERE! YOUR DELUSIONS ARE WHAT CAUSED ALL OF THIS IN THE FIRST PLACE. YOU HARM OTHERS WITH THOSE DELUSIONS. ADULTS WITH IMAGINARY FRIENDS ARE NOT ADULTS! THIS IS NOT A CHILDREN'S FORUM! http://youtu.be/3P7izAUe3ZM MUST READ ARTICLES: PROPER NOTICE FOR IDIOTS https://www.facebook.com/groups/tenderforlaw/permalink/482690341766903/ ONE PEOPLE'S PUBLIC FRAUD https://www.facebook.com/groups/tenderforlaw/permalink/484380801597857/ UCC FOR IDIOTS / OPPF Pt. II https://www.facebook.com/groups/tenderforlaw/permalink/484745448228059/ LEGALESE FOR IDIOTS https://www.facebook.com/groups/tenderforlaw/permalink/490962517606352/ SURETY FOR IDIOTS https://www.facebook.com/groups/tenderforlaw/permalink/490608044308466/ INSURANCE FOR THE INEPT https://www.facebook.com/groups/tenderforlaw/permalink/535384496497487/ PERSONS FOR IDIOTS https://www.facebook.com/notes/983715385028267/


Unique Facebook User ID: 927379467328526
Last Updated: Jun 12, 2014 8:24 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

Jun 12, 2014 3:17 PM
CLUSTERFUCK TO VICTORY :-o Posted by Admin on Jun 12, 2014 in News | Goodbye This last post is to notify everyone that I have decided to totally quit all work and projects for Dean and his website and other related projects and services we had agreed to do together. Much thought and consideration was given, and due to all the complications and trauma and drama, I feel it is the right thing to do for my own happiness and safety. There has been too many promises over this time working on various aspects but now my time has come to an end. I am absolutely and unequivocally certain I will not return and will not want anything to do with the site or with Dean. It has been way too stressful on my part and it is not possible for me to keep things afloat. I have become rather disgruntled and impatient with much and there has been much chaos due to coming on board to this. I only came on board in hope to learn about obtaining tax exemption status and fighting parking tickets, somehow the projects grow and the roles and duties grew and no one else was willing to help despite many offers but this always ended in conflicts. I�ve had my life threatened, another has threatened to smash my teeth in and a couple have tried to use blackmail and threats also. This is all merely because Dean makes many promises to people to do business with them to sell law courses which many fight over him. It has been absolutely nuts and now I want no part in all this or any of Dean�s buddies or brother either. It has been utterly traumatizing and humiliating. I have come to realise Dean protects moochers and scumbags but takes hard working people for granted. This has saddened me greatly due to how much energy and time I�ve spent on this. I am not saying he has nothing to offer because he does, I simply cannot work with him anymore and have had enough. As for the forum, media and document service I had built, this will no longer be available. It is best to cut the cord and part ways completely as I do not want to spend any more time helping Dean or be burdened with all this. This was a partnership with Dean in which he gave many promises which he could not keep. His situation currently has been a factor of course but even before much was all dumped on me. I was never in support of his land stewardship program either despite him never being able to produce a plan or show how it could benefit me and my situation. This sounds selfish but we all want security and safety. I do not have either in this situation with him. Dean has not tried to call me at all over 7 months and the messages I�ve gotten through his brother were one way and like a dictator. A PABX was setup and a variety of working numbers was provided but he never cared to get them approved. With the projects and other tasks and duties, my time was spread too thin and always having the media, updates to process and reporting, it was hard to get everything I wanted to done. As Dean�s situation deteriorated, this also effected new signups as numbers continued to dwindle. Many initially would sign up for $15 per month then quit in disappointment because they were expecting Dean�s involvement. Some may have just joined to watch the few videos that were provided but didn�t want to be a part of the community. Now in terms of figures as everyone always has money on the mind, many assumed there was up to 1200 or so members. Well as it turns out, at the start there was the option to register for an account without making a payment. It was determined that many of the accounts were fake due to automated bots originating from Russia which somehow managed to get past the CAPTURA code on the registration form. About 600 or more were fake which had no access anyway. Over time, about 300 either quit, stopped paying or had never paid and were given a free account. This left about 300 payment members only and some change. I cannot take on such burdens and expect to keep everyone happy and pay off Dean�s private property he bought. This is not my problem and want nothing to do with that either. About 3 months ago, due to so many people wanting to quit, complaining, and just fed up with all the issuing of empty promises, losing faith in the whole incarceration saga numbers continue to dwindle. Many of these members had actually signed up for beginner courses also and never got what they paid for. So at an attempt to keep them around until things improve, about 66% of these were cancelled but offered to pay a full year in advance instead. There was concerned that the wrong type of people would join also at an attempt to infiltrate and shit all over the community then leave as there was some shit stirrers and shills that did not join for the right reasons. It did not make sense to allow monthly subs were not working out. There was some new signups that paid yearly but not enough to sustain things at all. Now that the forum and any current and future services are no longer available for Dean, all subscriptions have been cancelled so those who joined need not worry about being charged for nothing. I utterly and totally wants nothing to do with Dean Clifford, his brother or any of their buddies ever again. It has turned out to be a complete disaster and so many burdens have been put on me and wishes I never came on board to do anything at all to begin with. The web server has been handed over to another which will get in touch with Dean when he gets out. Knowing all the dramas and shit that has gone down outside of Dean�s case and even before then, she wants nothing to do with this mob either and will not talk with them at all also. These people lack integrity and just like to blow smoke up peoples arses most of the time. As for the reporting, many lies were fed to him and inaccuracies. Much has come to light since then but it is too time consuming to cover every facet of detail. In regards to Dean�s case, his gun and pot charges actually have not been dropped at all. I was misled to believe it was just one gun that was a WWII relic heirloom piece, but in fact Dean has a full arsenal. This is something the team wanted nothing to do with and especially the web admin who originally wrote some of the news posts. He wants nothing to do with guns or drugs and was merely involved to learn about tax issues which he was promised on be shown on how to get all your tax back. This was complete nonsense and just hot air Dean promised which never was going to happen in the first place. The list of guns entail (Errors & Omissions Expected): British 303 rifle, an sks rifle, 2 shot guns( Remington 870) .25 automatic pistol. .32 auto� The .25 is also a prohibited weapon (not restricted � Prohibited). Pretty scary weapon cache there and sounds like something out of a movie. In regards to the drug charges, the original news post was misleading and BS was fed there also, the grow op was actually for commercial purposes and not for a sick friend as originally told. Each to their own but being involved in such a thing attracts certain types of people which I want nothing to do with and that is why many cleared off and those who were helping prior to the arrest left and quit within a week or 2. I want nothing to do with such endeavors. Much has been obscured and kept secret. Some final words, anyone expecting to make a living out of freedom will have a rude awakening, it is a timeless story and with economies trending downwards and national debts exploding, it�s a given many more commanders and factions will be popping up to make a quick buck. A direct message to Dean: I sympathise with your suffering but this is your choice you made and no one else�s. I do not believe everything is a conspiracy though. You have woken so many people up and ignited interest from all over the world, so hats off to you. I just have to say, this is your war I do not care to fight in and I no longer care if you have the golden ticket. Hopefully you can get out soon and start over. I�m sure you will not be in short supply of people to help you hit the reset button. Goodbye for Good and forever. Admin.


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: Jun 12, 2014 3:17 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Eamonn O Brien

Jun 12, 2014 4:44 PM
Just a quick one... Debt collection agencies... Am I right in saying that if a company with which one had a contract sold a debt onto a collection agency then one is no longer in debt to anyone? The principle company have stated they have nothing to do with it anymore...


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02035706386866E+016
Last Updated: Jun 12, 2014 4:44 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None




Pete Daoust

Jun 13, 2014 12:16 AM
Great find by Chris Evan....

Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: Jun 13, 2014 12:16 AM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None


Jeffery Dale Tolliver

Jun 13, 2014 2:11 AM
Like us on our Facebook page......

Unique Facebook User ID: 1405762973043777
Last Updated: Jun 13, 2014 2:11 AM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None


Janick Paquette

Jun 13, 2014 2:45 AM
My person has a bank account with my boyfriend's person. When they froze my bank accounts last year, they emptied the small balance of 600$ that was in one of them and froze the rest of them. Even the one that is shared with another person. There was a balance of � 750$ in that shared bank account that they are leaving there except for the administration fees that are deducted every month. So my boyfriend tried telling them that it was his money not JANICK's (he's still learning!) So the Bank Director said that if the money wasn't JANICK's she just had to write to REVENUE QU�BEC to let them now and to ask to release the money to the other partie. So this is what I wrote: Vendredi le 25 avril 2014 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED/WITHOUT PREJUDICE AGENCE DU REVENU DU QU�BEC a/s M�lissa Corriveau 4, place-Laval, bureau 500 Secteur L462P1 Laval, QC H7N 5Y3 N� N.E.Q. : 226xxxxxxx N� de r�f�rence: 101xxxxx REGISTERED MAIL: RN 001 175 XXX CA NOTICE OF CLAIM Bonjour Mme Corriveau. The accounts under the name JANICK PAQUETTE, who is the person I administrate with the SIN 26x xxx xxx �...., have been frozen. The funds from (account number) at BMO in Mont-Tremblant, is a joint account under the names (both person's names) The funds in that account belongd to the person (other person's name) and the funds are not accessible since that time. I am advising you to unfreeze the total amount of this account so it can be available to the person (other parties name). Please act accordingly ! Regards ! Authorised by: The Sole Authorised Administrator for the person JANICK PAQUETTE 26x xxx xxx / �.. address of the person here. ------------------------------- I never got a response and the account is still frozen! So what's an Administrator to do? :/


Unique Facebook User ID: 802541149837689
Last Updated: Jun 13, 2014 2:45 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Ross Bradley

Jun 13, 2014 3:40 AM
OMG!! Mackximus Minimus... A "win" over Origin Energy? To 'quote' myself.... < People. - There is one important paragraph in my original contact (as posted above - and to Origin Energy), that says: "I reminded him of the Papal decree and briefly explained the "Law" that is effective from September 1st, 2013. I also reminded him that the "I'm just doing my job" (or, the Nuremburg 'defense'), would also, now apply to him." Members should "learn" what this all means. Learn all of it and be confident in knowing it. Is my tip! > https://www.facebook.com/groups/211871612287035/419971751477019/?comment_id=426643684143159&notif_t=like


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.01523516389366E+016
Last Updated: Jun 13, 2014 3:40 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

Jun 13, 2014 11:56 PM
ALERT, ALERT.....just got out !!! A new PROPER NOTICE just got invented......it's called NOTICE of ADMINISTRATION Just saying :-o


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: Jun 13, 2014 11:56 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None




Scott Duncan

Jun 14, 2014 5:28 AM
COME ON CHRISTIANS! A MILLION DOLLARS IS WAITING! No? What about a NEW AGE "Spiritual" KOOK? Any of YOU want a million bucks? :D COME ON YOU FUCKING DELUSIONAL MORONS! YOU DON'T EVEN HAVE TO PROVE IT! JUST ONE BIT OF ACTUAL EVIDENCE! JUST ONE, and a million dollars is YOURS!

Unique Facebook User ID: 927379467328526
Last Updated: Jun 14, 2014 5:28 AM
Type of Post: photo
Place of Post: None


Scott Duncan

Jun 14, 2014 5:24 PM
Text 'Tard� This one's important, so pay attention! It's primarily directed at THE TENDER FOR LAW members [ https://www.facebook.com/groups/tenderforlaw/ ], but it applies globally. Text 'Tard: It's one of those things that you, the typical Reader/Free-Dumber, do because... OK, I have no fucking clue why you do it. I'm talking about the idiotic way you people write. If you're trying to communicate to ME, and you want ACTUAL knowledge from me (which I happily provide, at no cost to you whatsoever), then perhaps you might do me the favour of at least trying to write at my level. I have raised this issue on many occasions, and am invariably dismissed as a "Grammar Nazi". This is simply untrue. When you type like an autistic 12-year-old it is a personal attack on me. You are in a forum that deals with LAW. I select the words I use VERY carefully. If you are able to write a LEGAL document, you certainly don't write it in Text 'Tard�. This means you will do more for people who wish to harm you, and those around you, than you will for the man who's ACTUALLY GIVING YOU KNOWLEDGE! You are communicating with ME. Everyone else in this group is an audience. Every time you write in Text 'Tard� you are saying on the PUBLIC RECORD, that you care more about strangers in black dresses, in a clubhouse in which you are not a member, than you do about myself, or anyone else in this group! I get NO BENEFIT by running this forum. NONE! It costs me my precious time to be here. Those of you who have been paying attention lately will notice that I instantly ban anyone who tries to justify their use of Text 'Tard�. You'll write in proper English for a pretend "Justice", but you won't for a real Admiral? Very well... If you won't do so out of basic human decency, you will do it by force. This is a policy I've already implemented over the past week or so; I'm just making it official. WRITE IN COMPLETE SENTENCES! USE THE PROPER WORDS, IN THE PROPER ORDER! The autistic 12-year-old demograph is not really my target audience and I shall pander to it no more. I hate you all. Die. Have a nice day! https://youtu.be/24CQJvzmWHI


Unique Facebook User ID: 927379467328526
Last Updated: Jun 14, 2014 5:24 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Jamie Barnes

Jun 15, 2014 12:52 PM
i need to start rounding up some non conformists for my court on weds. if your passionate about non conforming then come to snaresbrook crown on weds and witness the shitness of the judiciary. if your a fan of law then come on down to the public gallery there and admire the way justice is administered in this amazing country of ours. ill post time and court room on my status night before as soon as i find out


Unique Facebook User ID: 1471362516337950
Last Updated: Jun 15, 2014 12:52 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Anibal Jose Baez

Jun 15, 2014 1:22 PM
Josie Wales believes in some kind of "god." What a fucking turn off. :/ I really liked that woman. And now I cannot look at her the same way. I mean, I will do her any day, but it is a real turn off. I blame Scott Duncan!


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02035927166068E+016
Last Updated: Jun 15, 2014 1:22 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Scott Duncan

Jun 15, 2014 6:28 PM
In case you were wondering about the injection of LEGALESE into the English Language... ...it's all about Shakespeare and "Olde English".

Unique Facebook User ID: 927379467328526
Last Updated: Jun 15, 2014 6:28 PM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None


Declan � Reilly

Jun 15, 2014 9:54 PM
On the back of the US dollar bill it states IN GOD WE TRUST. Would accepting this legal tender also be creating an implied trust with the bearer of this 'notice of contract' becoming a trustee acting for the benefit of the creator (GOD) of this currency?


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.01521124199147E+016
Last Updated: Jun 15, 2014 9:54 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Anibal Jose Baez

Jun 16, 2014 6:29 PM
OK, here I share something that took me MANY, MANY, MANY freaking hours to put together. I did it for ME, to be able to study, and have a record of my activities at The Tender for Law. It's ALL the surviving posts made to the group, and the comments, from January of 2013, to June 13th, 2014, 10:00am, to be precise. It's called "The Tender For Law Anthology" with 9 pdf volumes filed with all the gold nuggets, and wisdom from Admiral Scott. It's even organized by dates. Here is a link to the box.com share file. It's 9 files, all together no more than 2G, so prepare that external hard-drive, Dropbox, or better have some space in your machine. This is free! (Duh!) For whoever wants to start thanking me, please thank Scott Duncan, the only, and real source of knowledge, and truth here. So save your thank you's for Admiral Scott, and if you really mean it, pay with your cunt (I'm flexible with the needy), or donate to any of the following addresses: Dogecoin: DT1a6omL6cJXA6dhntEGGesuwDbemmvxnv Bitcoin: 14mceAzpZqCVkpsRLoeFMKQdqG28EoUReY Hope this helps everyone that wants to study, and for the newbies to be able to see the evolution of this group!

Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02035927166068E+016
Last Updated: Jun 16, 2014 6:29 PM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None


Scott Duncan

Jun 16, 2014 6:41 PM
OK, who's WRONG here? GO!

Unique Facebook User ID: 927379467328526
Last Updated: Jun 16, 2014 6:41 PM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None


Mathew Wolfe

Jun 17, 2014 12:43 AM
OK so I sent the notice of mistake and never went to court. As suspected they issued a warrant. So what now? Chris Evan Jesse Alexander


Unique Facebook User ID: 865677426782970
Last Updated: Jun 17, 2014 12:43 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

Jun 17, 2014 3:25 PM
Ok, Yusef EL, WHAT DO YOU WANT FROM THIS GROUP EXACTLY ? It's been a few times you are trying to post some UNAVAILABLE attachment in here, WHAT DO YOU WANT ?


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: Jun 17, 2014 3:25 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None




Todd Black

Jun 18, 2014 3:07 PM
Please no flogging and/or disbarring because of where these came from. I thought someone might be able to use these. http://blacks.worldfreemansociety.org/top.htm https://bouvier.worldfreemansociety.org

Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02010969526245E+016
Last Updated: Jun 18, 2014 3:07 PM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None


Jun 18, 2014 3:45 PM
There is a trustee corporation with some completed bills of exchange and receipts that need to be taken care of to ensure the accounts balance. I've been focusing on figuring out the process for the trustee corp to follow in sending them to the bank of canada. So far this is what I've suggested to the trustee corp; 1. send public notice and copy of birth certificate to the bank of canada and minister of finance 2. confirm that the minister of finance fiduciary/trustee 3. send the completed bill of exchange or receipt to the bank of canada and a copy to the minister of finance. (in cases where there is more then one, sent an itemized statement with bills receipts attached?) It seems to me that we want to create an account of sorts so that weekly/monthly whatever we choose, the process will be simple once all is set up. Anyone have any suggestions or insights on what else we need to consider?


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Jun 18, 2014 3:45 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

Jun 18, 2014 9:05 PM
ANY LAWYERS IN THIS GROUP ?, and/or GOVERNMENT agent ? This is YOUR thread, come on, let it rip :D


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: Jun 18, 2014 9:05 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Scott Duncan

Jun 19, 2014 5:00 AM
Per Cara Small's request...


Unique Facebook User ID: 927379467328526
Last Updated: Jun 19, 2014 5:00 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

Jun 19, 2014 1:32 PM
Are you READY ? :D I see no other options :( Maybe I am wrong, but.... :D


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: Jun 19, 2014 1:32 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Jun 19, 2014 2:43 PM
For the dogecoin fans http://freedoge.co.in/?op=home


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Jun 19, 2014 2:43 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Will Bed

Jun 19, 2014 5:05 PM
OK folks, Because we all wanna understand the Maritime lingo and get a clue what Chris Evan's talking about, let's play BATTLESHIP shall we ;) SO LET'S START "The PROPER MARITIME thread" ! I tried to figure it all out, asked Chris for a few hints, and figured out we�d all learn more by letting this write itself in good ol� TT4L fashion ! So we need a board, we need ships, and we need players ! The SEA of COMMERCE will be our board, the PERSONS will be our VESSELS and we need MEN and WOMEN willing to play ! Let's play !


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.01541127535701E+016
Last Updated: Jun 19, 2014 5:05 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Jun 19, 2014 6:53 PM
A trustee corporation contacted the Bank of Canada asking for the process to be deal with a completed bill of exchange it is holding. This was their response; Dear Sir/Madam, Your request falls outside the purview of the Bank of Canada. The Bank of Canada, as a central bank, is not a commercial financial institution, and therefore does not hold or accept deposits, bonds, securities or any other funds on behalf of general public, nor does it provide banking or financial services to individuals. The mandate of the Bank of Canada is to conduct monetary policy so as to promote the economic and financial welfare of Canada. We pursue this objective by keeping inflation low, stable, and predictable. As part of our mandate, we also supply quality bank notes that are readily accepted and secure against counterfeiting; and promote the safety and efficiency of Canada's financial system. Best regards, Public Information Office Service de l'information publique Communications Bank of Canada/Banque du Canada 234 Laurier Avenue West/ 234, avenue Laurier Ouest Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0G9 info@bankofcanada.ca T: 1 800 303-1282 F: 613 782-7713


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Jun 19, 2014 6:53 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None




Scott Duncan

Jun 20, 2014 1:37 AM
INCOMING!


Unique Facebook User ID: 927379467328526
Last Updated: Jun 20, 2014 1:37 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Scott Duncan

Jun 20, 2014 10:35 AM
For my "followers" (It still really creeps me out that I actually HAVE "followers") and members of THE TENDER FOR LAW: DISCUSS.

Unique Facebook User ID: 927379467328526
Last Updated: Jun 20, 2014 10:35 AM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None


Tigana Stuart

Jun 20, 2014 12:17 PM
http://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/06/19/rcmp-whistle-blower-exposes-bad-policing-in-moncton-shooter-fiasco/


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02024851301022E+016
Last Updated: Jun 20, 2014 12:17 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Dino Disenfranchised

Jun 23, 2014 2:39 AM
My nephew of age 12 sent me this and I thought the group would like it. Enjoy! :)

Unique Facebook User ID: 1.01523100619462E+016
Last Updated: Jun 23, 2014 2:39 AM
https://www.youtube.com/embed/qahB7mYhLxs?autoplay=1
Type of Post: video
Place of Post: None


Scott Duncan

Jun 23, 2014 5:51 AM


Unique Facebook User ID: 927379467328526
Last Updated: Jun 23, 2014 5:51 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None




Pete Daoust

Jun 23, 2014 8:02 PM
For future parents, don't EVER sign for the person' creation, the same fucking date you deliver...that is STUPID Wait until THREATS comes in :D And then, SIGN, and add to the file, I signed this because I have been threatened to do it :D HAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!.....your kids will LOVE it, later on :D (Fuck I wish I could go back in time :( )


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: Jun 23, 2014 8:02 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Tara Duncan

Jun 24, 2014 2:33 AM


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02034833945604E+016
Last Updated: Jun 24, 2014 2:33 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Scott Duncan

Jun 24, 2014 6:53 AM
BITCOIN INFOGRAPHIC that scares the crap out of those who have known me since 2009 (Or longer). It's like I'm psychic, or something! It's almost as if I'M ALWAYS RIGHT!

Unique Facebook User ID: 927379467328526
Last Updated: Jun 24, 2014 6:53 AM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None


Scott Duncan

Jun 24, 2014 10:43 AM
HEY EVERYONE! THE GRAND POOBAH OF FREE-DUMB SPEWS BULLSHIT! Notice how the lying weasel always leaves his "escape route" of saying "I believe" and attempts to give it the same weight as fact. TENDER - tender verb ten�dered ten�der�ing Definition of TENDER transitive verb 1: to make a tender of 2: to present for acceptance : offer "tendered my resignation" intransitive verb : to make a bid or tender Origin of TENDER Middle English tendren, from Anglo-French tendre offer First Known Use: 15th century THIS NOTE IS LEGAL TENDER=THIS NOTE IS A TENDER FOR LAW LEGAL TENDER is NOT MONEY, NOR is it CURRENCY. It is ATTACHED to money/currency. Adults with imaginary friends lie and use "belief" as an excuse when they are caught out. I state no belief. I state fact. And why is that sack of shit so worried about what I say ANYWAY? OH THAT'S RIGHT! HE KNOWS WHAT'S COMING! :D Notice the weasel "believes" and calls it"proof". And Free-dumber Christians are there in the YouTube comments! They just follow behind lapping up his bullshit. Convoluted bullshit, lying through ommission that LEGAL TENDER is ATTACHED to money/currency, and instead says it IS money. He leaves out the "all debts public and private" was attached to NON FEDERAL BANK NOTES and BANK NOTES BACKED BY GOLD/SILVER because the fucking LAW was different! LIES LIES LIES All relying on your ignorance. Fuck! Christians are simultaneously disgusting and stupid.

Unique Facebook User ID: 927379467328526
Last Updated: Jun 24, 2014 10:43 AM
https://www.youtube.com/embed/KoSYpwaMMoM?autoplay=1
Type of Post: video
Place of Post: None


Isaiah Whitney

Jun 25, 2014 7:00 AM
OK, so I know once I show these folks at work that this is no joke and we can take some power back they'll jump. This friend of mine is trusting me to help. We're going to ADMINISTRATE this PUBLIC DEBT and get a whole factory of men/women sticking it to the SURETY. This was part of a response to a letter that was sent using the Forrest Gump approach as recommended by Captain Pete Daoust which I'll add shortly.


Unique Facebook User ID: 791890220830179
Last Updated: Jun 25, 2014 7:00 AM
Type of Post: photo
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

Jun 25, 2014 12:42 PM
From Alexandra Dominique Schulte... Alexandra Dominique Schulte Hi pete. Im alex. Chris Evans sister. I need help. My brother is in a cage. Im doing everything i can for him to get out without attaching surety. I need help learning how to lien a court file with the birth certificate bond. If you will. Scott Duncan, I don't want to fuck up anything here, I am NOT in the USA and have no EXPERIENCE what's so ever with this... I know what I would do, if that shit would happen to me here, in Quebec.....


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: Jun 25, 2014 12:42 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Paul O'Shea

Jun 25, 2014 9:44 PM
More lifesaving tips from Robert Mertard !!

Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02057274595802E+016
Last Updated: Jun 25, 2014 9:44 PM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None


Paul O'Shea

Jun 25, 2014 10:07 PM

Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02057274595802E+016
Last Updated: Jun 25, 2014 10:07 PM
Type of Post: photo
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

Jun 26, 2014 1:35 AM
From the �YOU ONLY NEED MONEY WHEN YOU ARE SPENDING IT� deptartment. "YOU ONLY NEED MONEY WHEN YOU ARE SPENDING IT! The rest of the time MONEY is DEBT and OBLIGATION. HOARDING IT IS STUPID! Everybody think about that. I'm saying it for a reason. Get the concept in your head, and cement it there. You'll know why later." -Scott Duncan. Well, guess what, I�ve been thinking about this, and I have to admit, the first time I have red this I said to my self��what the fuck he is talking about ?? :/ And then a few months later, my thoughts were: What the fuck he is talking about ? :( You see where I am going with this, so I have made a little exercise, I went to the store to buy some shit, with NO (what I thought was) MONEY in my pocket, and fuck, I was stuck, no money appeared :( So I kept thinking about it, and then, one day, I said to myself, what if I bring some CREDIT with me ? :D Now, money can easily be CREDIT, so I right away thought INSTANT credit, because he said: YOU ONLY NEED MONEY WHEN YOU ARE SPENDING IT!....so fuck, it have to be an INSTANT thing, :/ like a magic lamp or something ! So anyway, I showed up to the store again, and brought a piece of plastic with me, that can make appear out of nowhere some INSTANT credit, it says VISA CIBC �credit� card on it. And it worked !!!!....INSTANTLY, I could CREATE some credit/money to SPEND it :D Now, from where/who this fucking credit comes from ?.... I am thinking that it comes from �ME�, with the help of some fucktards :/ , by using the LEGAL person, I happen to have in my pocket (slave), I could create CREDIT, and that person (slave) has now a debt, and since it�s MY slave, I got to make it pay, make it works, make it sweat, to BALANCE some books somewhere��. The good news is, it�s NOT my slave, I just happen to HAVE it, because its owner delivered it to me, so I can USE it, and its OWNER is SURETY for it, and the OWNER gave me the right to the person�s surety, well, that�s what is written :/ So I am at a point where I KNOW I can use that surety to balance VISA CIBC�s books��I can�t see WHY I couldn�t do it, that�s what a slave is suppose to do anyway, work for its MASTER, and make him eat. I got to be the MASTER, unless someone says otherwise ? :/ , I know where is surety, so I am thinking of explaining all this to Bank of Canada, and instruct them to balance VISA CIBC�s books. I guess all these RECEIPTS will be helpful, they seems to be the VALUE of these CREDITS�.for example, one of these receipts says $312.48 on it, it dosen�t say -$312.48, or minus $312.48, but $312.48 :/ , so that must be the VALUE itself ? I am NOT sure about the mechanics on DOING this with Bank of Canada, should I just ACCEPT these receipts and write the account number on them and photo copy them and send the ORIGINAL to bank of Canada ? Should I itemized them one by one on a account statement, with a bottom portion called REMITTANCE, and create a Completed Bill of Exchange ? I am NOT sure about this�..so here�s the thread :D Oh, and this $312.48 was all food :) no fucking luxury shit, strictly food and soap :D ...."consumer's shit" But again, if this is TRUE, no one would really have to WORK ? :-o The legal definition of the word WORK is preatty straight forward, check it out !!! :) That could cause some crazy shit out there !!!!! That seems to good to be true :( oh well !!!


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: Jun 26, 2014 1:35 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Lee Edgely

Jun 26, 2014 12:11 PM
Scott Duncan, Gail Marie, and anyone else. On a previous post I was asking for help about the local property tax here in Ireland. The Revenue wanted me to register my details, so I would become surety for the house tax. I did not give JOINDER. This is the link to the previous post https://www.facebook.com/groups/tenderforlaw/permalink/618967074805895 It was not a BILL that they sent to the LEGAL NAME, not a NOTICE, it was a letter demanding money. Scott Duncan's advice was that I give NOTICE that my time is billable for responding, should they not return an acceptable answer to my questions. I took Gail Marie�s advice and asked them for a Bill. I also took Eli Weakley�s advice and asked them for proof of their claim. Firstly, I sent a letter to Michael Gladney the Collector General in the Local Property Tax (LPT), he never replied, I then sent an affirmation, he never replied, then a Notice of Fault, he never replied, I then defaulted him. The week after I defaulted him he sent the LEGAL NAME a Notice (three days ago) with an account Statement Balance of 0.00 for the LPT. It also states that the declaration for this period is outstanding. It seems that he has taken it from Pay As You Earn (PAYE/Empe) to zero the account on the LPT. I was self employed until 2009 and I am a stay at home dad since 2009, there was no credits on their system for a tax refund. I rang the local county Revenue dept. in Louth and the woman on the phone said that a Homecarers allowance of �800 was added to the account recently and the LPT was deducted from that. She was unable to confirm how the Homecarers Allowance appeared on that PAYE account and then stated that she is unwilling to says any more about the situation. Finally, the questions I would like an answer to if you can help: 1. Is that fraud on Michael Gladney�s part if he did create that Homecarers Allowance without my application for the Allowance? 2. Is it fraud on his behalf for deducting from the Homecarers Allowance in to the LPT? 3. If it is fraud, would I be liable if I did not report it to the Garda (Police)? 4. I informed the local Revenue dept. of this situation, is it up to them to sort out the internal mess if the Garda needs to be involved? 5. Is it none of my business as it is an internal matter and should I forget about it and go have some craic with another department?


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.01529407782786E+016
Last Updated: Jun 26, 2014 12:11 PM
Type of Post: photo
Place of Post: None


Jun 26, 2014 8:52 PM


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Jun 26, 2014 8:52 PM
Type of Post: photo
Place of Post: None


Scott Duncan

Jun 26, 2014 11:12 PM


Unique Facebook User ID: 927379467328526
Last Updated: Jun 26, 2014 11:12 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Scott Duncan

Jun 27, 2014 2:32 AM
Javier Alfredo Villela submitted the following, VERBATIM. Since I don't want this post Lammi-fied (because there is GOING to be ridicule), I am posting this as Copypasta. ****begin copypasta***** STATE OF IN THE DISTRICT COURT FOR COUNTY STATE OF Nevada V. YOU Case No. ___________________ LETTER ROGATORY FOR RELIEF Under the Hague Convention Title 18 �1781 I, John Doe, Executor for the JOHN DOE cestui que trust, to notice the Court of my Letter Rogatory to the YOUR COUNTY DISTRICT COURT, and demand my name be cleared of this alleged criminal case for the reasons set forth below: 1) I, John Doe, have learned that this alleged Court that has scheduled a case/cause/claim against me is not really a court as per the Constitution of the United States, but rather a tribunal operated as a private corporation. 2) I have learned of the fraud that goes on behind the scenes of these alleged criminal case , which are really civil claims in equity, and the steps taken to securitize these civil claims, without giving full disclosure to the people. I am hereby letting the court know that I am opting out of any contract and do not allow any documents regarding me or my cestui que trust to be securitized and sold to any investors etc. 3) The fraudulent process is as follows: All cases are civil, though often fraudulently called criminal. The courts are operating under trust law, assuming the Defendant is a decedent. After finding the alleged Defendant guilty, the court clerks sell the judgments to the Federal Courts. Since the Defendant is a decedent, the court officials consider themselves as a beneficiary. 4) When a judge asks if a person understands, he/she is asking if the person is liable for the bond. I am not responsible for the bond of this/these cases, but I will appoint the Judge as Trustee/Fiduciary and be the beneficiary of all proceeds. 5) The judgments are stamped with something to the effect of Pay To The Order Of__on the back and taken to the federal discount window. The judgment now becomes a note. 6) The notes are then pooled together and then become securities, which are yet pooled together and sold as bonds. 7) Said bonds are liens against me. 8) The United States Attorney�s Office has a put code number, NAICS (North American Identification Security Classification. Said NAICS number enables the United States Attorney�s Office to trade globally all securities. 9) All US federal courts are registered with the DOD (Department of Defense), where they are registered with CCR (Contractor�s Central Registration), under the DOD, which another department called DLIS (Defense Logistics Information Service), which issues a cage code, which means a commercial and government entity, which everything corresponds with their bank account. 10) Said United States Attorney�s Office and Courts have a Dunn�s number (Dunn & Bradstreet). 11) Everything filed into court is securitized without the knowledge or consent of the people or of all parties. 12) All criminal cases not heard in an Article 3 court (District Court of the United States) are really civil, however, the courts again commit fraud by labeling the case as criminal. All cases which are plead out or have a guilty conviction label the civil defendant (through unlawful conversion) as felons, when they are not. This is fraud upon the people at large, and certainly fraud upon the alleged Defendants. 13) The Bank Account is at Federal Reserve Bank of New York, in New York City. The Depository Agreement is signed by the Clerk of Court. 14) All securities are then deposited with the DTC in New York. 15) An Escrow Agent is used as a go-between - between the Clerk�s Office and the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. 16) The securities end up being listed through the Seventh Circuit (Chicago, IL), then sent to the DTCC, the clearinghouse whom lists the securities for trading. 17) All of the lawyers involved are acting a private debt collectors according to the FDCPA (Title 15�1692). The BAR Association exempts them from having to be registered as such; however, they operate through call warrants, which are like a put, or a call. Doing margin calls is where they convert a case through (similar to a Writ of Execution) use the case number to buy equity securities. 18) Everything filed into court is securitized and turned into negotiable instruments, and then turning them into securities. These items are sold commercial items, calling them distress debts (Unifund). The items are then pooled together in what is now called a hedge fund, where they are sold globally. 19) Anytime when there is risk management involved, it is for the securities. This is an underwriting company. When the hedge funds are going into the global market, they go through LuerHermes, a bond holder and underwriting company and subdivision of Alliance SE, of Munich ,Germany (Pimco Bonds). 20) After 9 months, all paper is converted to a securities status. This is defined in Title 15�77(a)(b)(1) and an now considered to be an investment contract. The paper is endorsed to become a security, and the trust is then collapsed. 21) The courts have an account with the IMF (International Monetary Fund) under Interpol. The Judges involved and the US Attorneys involved do not have an accessible Oath of Office , because they cover up the fact that the oath of office is between them and the IMF. 22) The US Judges and US Attorneys are actually employees of the IMF and have expatriated out of the United States. They are now unregistered foreign agents under Title 22, which states all foreign agents must be registered. 23) The court judgments are deposited with the IMF. Since this case obviously involves me, I have a drawing right to all proceeds. See UCC �3-305 and �3-306. The court judgments are monopolized according to Title 16, which is a violation of anti-trust laws, and also unfair trade practices. 24) Indictments are True Bills, meaning they are negotiable instruments. The District Attorney failed to give me a 1099 OID showing me as the recipient of the funds, which is a fraud upon me. In my case, I have not been indicted, but still request a 1099 OID, unless the court wishes to close this account. 25) The unlawful funds, through fraud and deception, are deposited in the Federal Reserve Bank of New York and they have not paid the tax on this income. According to the IRC, this is a �7201 of Title 26 violation (willful failure to file with the intent to evade the tax). 26) A copy of the Depository Resolution Agreement was not made available to me from the Clerk of Court. The Clerk of Court makes deposits into the Federal Reserve Bank of New York via electronic funds transfers (EFT�s). 27) The Clerk has a PMIA (Private Money Investment Account) is, which also has a government code. According to Clerks Praxis, the Clerk of the US District Court is the Registrar in Admiralty. 28) According to the IRS �6209 Decoding Manual and the ADP (Automated Data Processing Manual), all 1099�s are Class 5 gift and estate taxes. I am asking for a 1099 OID in this case, as I am not willing to gift you the proceeds. I am hereby asking for the proceeds in their entirety, including interest. 29) I have never pledged my rights or my body to any gifting program, including any court or court process. 30) I am not a charitable organization. I demand all funds from the cases (current and past cases) be sent to me within 30 days or I will file complaints to the IRS and SEC explaining the fraud and theft committed upon me, and issue a 1099 OID. 31) I demand my name and my cestui que trust name, John Doe/John S. Doe/John Smart Doe/ JOHNDOE/JOHN S. DOE/JOHN SMART DOE be removed from any and all government databases indicating bad credit, commercial liens and/or the titles of criminal, felon and/or convicted felon be removed immediately and permanently nunc pro tunc. 32) I hereby request a copy of the Depository Resolution Agreement from the Clerk of Court. And a W-9 from the Judge and the US Attorney involved, if you wish to proceed with this case. 33) I hereby notice the Court that I am the executor of the cestui que trust of JOHN DOE/JOHNSMART DOE. According to Title 26 �303 & �7701, companies, corporations, and associations and trusts are all decedents. This means my all capital letter name is a legal estate. My all capital letter name falls into this class. I direct all of the affairs and financial affairs of JOHNDOE/ JOHN S. DOE /JOHN SMART DOE. 34) I demand this case/account be closed and no further steps taken to securitize it. 35) I hereby ask the Court to notify local agents and agencies to put me on a do not disturb list so we do not have to go through this again. 36) I am confident that the Court and its officers want to follow the law, and perhaps were unaware of the processes of civil and criminal cases. 37) I expect no further harassment from rogue unregistered foreign agents. LETTER ROGATORY FOR RELIEF presented this the ____ day of ________, 2014. (_____Signature________________________) Authorized Representative : John Smart Doe Mail checks and correspondence to: PO Box Las vegas, Nevada 12345 *****end copypasta**** ****BEGIN WITTY INSIGHTFUL CRITIQUE*****


Unique Facebook User ID: 927379467328526
Last Updated: Jun 27, 2014 2:32 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Steve McCall

Jun 27, 2014 3:41 AM
If I may, I'd like to vet an arising scenario here that I am unsure about how to respond. I'd much rather be torn apart and spit out here than in court. The matter involves a trustee in Bankruptcy... BDO who has sent me an "offer" to settle what they deem "an undervalue transaction" when I transferred the title of my family home back to myself as sole title 6months before my wife claimed bankruptcy. Not my choice or descision for her to do that, but thats what she went with. My initial verbal response to the trustee was that except for a brief period of 1.5 years. When my wife was added she was added for the consideration of one dollar as was the case when title was returned to me, the same consideration. They are "offering" to allow me to pay them 14,000.00 as an out of court settlement based on what they say her consideration should have been. We are, still married. She has signed an affidavit stating she has no matrimonial interest in the property. I drafted a letter. My first thought was to respond aggressively declining their offer to contract and including my fee schedule for any further administration of contact or actions they decide to take and that any action would be acceptance of my fee schedule. In my draft I included that I would charge fees to individuals acting on behalf of the corporation as well as the corp and that I would collect and lien them. I am as you may know, threatening things I have no real clue how to carry out with any degree of certainty. I like what Pete was talking about " I would be happy to pay but I don't want to buy, and you have to buy before you can pay"! I don't wanna buy. They don't deserve any more of the little we have left. Im not sure how to best administrate this best. I would just like them to go away and leave me alone as I don't have 14,000 cents at the moment. My second thought was to accept the offer to pay through the SURETY for my PERSON or third, accept the offer and send a chq for a nominally lesser amount like 100.00 to settle the account? If you have been patient enough to read this far and do actually have a clue, Id appreciate the feedback, or the ridicule!


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.01544244026856E+016
Last Updated: Jun 27, 2014 3:41 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Ceit Butler

Jun 27, 2014 3:04 PM
Bruno Hiller: Rob Menard has most of us blocked, so the attachment in your post is "unavailable". You will have to copypasta if you want to share. :p


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.0153923542315E+016
Last Updated: Jun 27, 2014 3:04 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Tracy Sutton

Jun 27, 2014 5:08 PM
Here is a link i found while researching some information http://www.legislation.gov.uk/aep/Cha2/18-19/11/contents Just putting this out there...take a look Still researching more

Unique Facebook User ID: 1.01557138792151E+016
Last Updated: Jun 27, 2014 5:08 PM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

Jun 28, 2014 1:57 AM
Hey, Troll for Truth.....show up if you are a MAN..!!! Come on, name caller, SHOW UP.....


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: Jun 28, 2014 1:57 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Ron Halabi

Jun 29, 2014 12:06 AM
Hello All, I have been a silent member for a very short time as I work through the files/threads Scott written, and clear my head of all the misinformation I have come across in that past. I hope to be able to participate soon. Cheers


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.01519710320558E+016
Last Updated: Jun 29, 2014 12:06 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


J.P. Alexander

Jun 29, 2014 12:22 AM


Unique Facebook User ID: 780666251957463
Last Updated: Jun 29, 2014 12:22 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Ceit Butler

Jun 29, 2014 1:12 AM

Ceit

FOR THE LOVE OF TELEVISION... I'd like to say a few words regarding a disturbing trend. I first noticed this not long after Dean Clifford's arrest, with instances recurring at an alarming rate. The recent Robert Menard video-fiasco, and the ensuing comment skirmish on YouTube, was the latest example of this. I am referring to the apologist Free-Dumb attitude of �It's not HIS fault that things didn't work out for you, YOU made the choice to give him money so the blame lies with you�. You will find this argument mirrored by practically ALL of the Dean Clifford crowd, as well as repeated by most any other Free-Dumb Guru's staunch defenders. Let's translate this into some examples that everyone can understand! If you walked into Best Buy (for non-Canadians, insert your country's equivalent here!), and purchased the new 85� Samsung HD Smart television (A steal on Amazon, at only $39,997.99! http://www.amazon.com/Samsung-UN85S9-85-Inch-Ultra-120Hz/dp/B00CMEN95U ), when you arrived home and set it up, you would expect it to work. If said television did NOT work, would you sit there and think to yourself �Well golly, there goes go forty some-odd grand! But it's my own fault for trusting that Best Buy (or local equivalent) wouldn't sell me a defective product in the first place.�? Hell no! You would cart that puppy straight back in and demand a refund or replacement! You would expect that the source from which you purchased this thing, would not only KNOW that the product works, but would GUARANTEE it just in case some unforeseen, manufacturer's defect happened to rear its ugly head! Still not clear? Let's try another example. If you contracted with someone to have your house painted/lawn cut/pool cleaned/home renovated/etc and paid them in advance, would you blame yourself if they didn't carry out the task for which they had been paid? HELL no! You would insist on either your money back, or the completion of the SERVICE FOR WHICH YOU PAID. So, the question is, why do you people expect higher standards from your television and/or other material purchases or personal services, than you do for your freedom? Because really, that's what is at stake in these legal matters. A simple search on Google will turn up countless examples of �Freeman failures�. There are even enough of them that RationalWiki has a direct link ( http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Freeman_on_the_land )! The consequences of these failures are usually exorbitant fines, and/or jail time. A little more serious than a scummy pool, and unruly yard. :p If someone is selling a service, you should expect to get what you paid for. You SHOULD expect accuracy! If I advertised myself as being a contractor, and told you that I think I have this whole building-thing figured out... Would you pay me to build your dream home? Hell, would you pay me to build your DOG'S dream home?! HELL NO! If I was a Math teachers and taught children that 2 + 2 = 5, would it be your kids fault when they flunk out at the end of the year? HELL FUCKING NO! It would be MINE, for teaching them INACCURATELY. So why, WHY are you so eager and willing to lower your standards of expectation when it's your LIFE on the line? I CAN'T be the only one that finds this insane (aside from present company currently in this room), that would just be too depressing for words. Dean Clifford, Robert Menard, Santos Bonacci, Karl Lentz, to name a few... NONE of them have ANY business selling a service that they CANNOT GUARANTEE. This SHOULD be COMMON FUCKING SENSE!!!!! They are profiting off of people's ignorance and desperation, and gambling with your freedom and your lives in return. Investigating on your own, accessing FREE information and formulating your own plan of attack; a resulting failure then WOULD be your fault because YOU made each and every one of those choices YOURSELF. If, on the other hand, you have PAID someone for their services, the ONUS is on them to come through with what they have promised. To provide ACCURATE information! This should not be complicated, I should NOT have to point this out. Wake up, people. Pull your heads out of your asses and start USING that brain! This is the main difference between The Tender For Law, and basically every other group that is teaching law. Scott Duncan DOESN'T charge money, and he encourages CRITICAL THOUGHT. If any of the rest of you lot was capable of employing such a thing, we WOULDN'T need to be having this conversation right now, critical thinking easily reveals these logic gaps. Okay, I'm finished ranting now. Those of you who have not already reinserted your heads into your rectums, may proceed to do so now. I'm really not expecting any less...


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.0153923542315E+016
Last Updated: Jun 29, 2014 1:12 AM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None


Colin Stephen Tonks

Jun 29, 2014 1:13 AM
Steve Confronts Lawyer On The LEGAL NAME Fraud "NAME: The master key to the entire system's/CROWN CORPORATION'S game. The NAME is the lynch pin to the entire legal/control construct. Without a LEGAL NAME, which is your consent by agreeing to be said NAME, the system vampires cannot literally feed on your life blood/creation source energy that is typically shown in the physical materials we collect. It is only the CONSENT to be/use/have a LEGAL NAME/Mark of the Beast that is required for your absolute spiritual contract/deal with the devil motif to be in FULL FORCE AND EFFECT with you as a SLAVE and them as MASTER. For PROOF of this, look and see how much of your life/existence involves a LEGAL NAME and you will see the measure of control the system has over you."

Unique Facebook User ID: 1.01523951670811E+016
Last Updated: Jun 29, 2014 1:13 AM
https://www.youtube.com/embed/EVyLfFiJjcU?autoplay=1
Type of Post: video
Place of Post: None


Colin Stephen Tonks

Jun 29, 2014 4:36 AM
We depend on words. We place enormous faith in words, that they mean and sound as intended, in order to live in this world. We �trust� words using words like �trust� (from 12th Century Latin trausti = "an approved agreement, deed, oath or alliance as a subject of the church") Its claimed origins from Old Norse deliberately misleading. Is this what you mean when you use, write and speak the word �trust�? Have you consented to an oath or alliance as a subject of the Roman Cult enthroned at Vatican Hill? Maybe you have, maybe you have not. But most people would never have heard of this original and primary meaning, the true intended meaning of the constructed word. Why is the first meaning of a word important anyway? We are taught that words are pegs upon which ideas are attached, mere tools to convey meaning, not really having any �great and mystical power�. Yet this deliberate confused teaching is in direct contradiction to the very nature of words and their vocal pronunciation throughout history. Words are power, special words have special power. The ancient belief in words having "magical" power So thought the Egyptians, the Sumerians, the Phoenicians, the Greeks, the Romans and all ancient civilizations that created new forms of writing, attached meaning to the arrangement of symbols including meaningful sound. From the very beginning of civilization itself, words themselves were magical, and to know the true meaning of a word and its origins was to hold in your grasp real power. The origins of words and power It is one thing to forget the precedence of history that the true meaning of a word is power, it is another thing entirely to forget that all language, all language created by men and women has a single point of origin, an architect. As it happens, there are specific points and individuals in history that excelled in the creation of new words and meanings with then long periods of use, or eventual decline. Why are the true original meaning of so many words hidden? So how come the original meaning of �trust� is hidden? How come the original meaning of so many words we take for granted --for example understand meaning �To stand under the authority of the Church (Roman Cult)� are also deliberately hidden? The answer is simple, �they� do not want you to know the true nature and meaning of the words you use every day without ever questioning what you are actually saying under �their� system from �person�, to �claim�, to �deposit� to even the word �law� itself. The catch-22 of modern law and meaning of key words A classic of why this system of deliberate hidding meaning is in place is in regards to the practical operation of local, national and international law. Many a bright person who has studied law soon identify key words that have important power within the legal system--REGINA meaning "The Crown" is one such example. But unless an individual can demonstrate to the Court an understanding and precedence of the legal terms being used, the knowledge of key legal terms and ancient legal phrases are of little use. But when an individual is capable of demonstrating a real understanding of words within a Court, then it is possible to shift the power almost immediately to your favour to some degree. The intention of this lexica The intention therefore of this lexica is to provide an insight into some of the important legal words of power and control used by modern governments pledging alliance to the present legal system of the Holy See, the �common law� that threads its web throughout almost every single nation on Earth. By understanding the original meaning and intention of these words, it is hoped you will better understand the implications of many of the documents and actions you take for granted on a daily basis. A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y

Unique Facebook User ID: 1.01523951670811E+016
Last Updated: Jun 29, 2014 4:36 AM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None


Mike Lamb

Jun 29, 2014 4:24 PM
I have not researched this thoroughly, but it looks like another "distraction" to me. https://www.facebook.com/TrueDiplomaticImmunity

Unique Facebook User ID: 1.01528877463908E+016
Last Updated: Jun 29, 2014 4:24 PM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None


Scott Duncan

Jun 29, 2014 10:45 PM
The desperation is almost palpable! It's as if we'd actually put EFFORT into it. What will he do when we ACTUALLY FOCUS on him?


Unique Facebook User ID: 927379467328526
Last Updated: Jun 29, 2014 10:45 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Jamie Barnes

Jun 30, 2014 7:02 AM
this is the new re edited uploaded version after the 1st the bbc banned. plz share....

Unique Facebook User ID: 1471362516337950
Last Updated: Jun 30, 2014 7:02 AM
http://www.youtube.com/v/TiLeg1yvLQY?version=3&autohide=1&autoplay=1
Type of Post: video
Place of Post: None


Janick Paquette

Jun 30, 2014 7:54 PM
Hi guys! Got 2 tickets this weekend. 1- Seat belt 2- didn't have the insurance papers with me. The Police officer gave me 2 seperate tickets. My question is: If he made 2 seperate tickets to charge the person with 2 violations, do I need to deal with them (tickets) seperately or is it of no significant if I put both ticket numbers on the letter (I am sending with the Bills of Exchange) and send them in the same registered mail enveloppe? :D


Unique Facebook User ID: 802541149837689
Last Updated: Jun 30, 2014 7:54 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Scott Duncan

Jun 30, 2014 11:28 PM
ETHEREUM ON A BOAT! ...oh wait. Did that. :D Still though, worth watching. I wish you chowder-heads could see what Ethereum means for all of you. It will change EVERYTHING.

Unique Facebook User ID: 927379467328526
Last Updated: Jun 30, 2014 11:28 PM
https://player.vimeo.com/video/98654624?autoplay=1
Type of Post: video
Place of Post: None