The Tender For Law

Volume 5

Mar 26, 2014 3:49 AM

Cara Small

Received this today. Looked up "Bill of exchange" in "their" act and have good reason to believe this fits the definition. We also received a "statement". So we are thinking, flip this sucker over and administrate. Also thinking to send back statement with the accepted bill of exchange. Thoughts?

Read Comments

Pete Daoust

Maybe you could start by the begining, and give the opportunity to those who sent you this bill, to give you a hand on how to COMPLETE that bill, so there won't be any defect on the instrument....

Now. that is doing something in GOOD FAITH ;-)

Pete Daoust

I really think folks should retract the word PAYING of their vocabulary.......especially when they are not even sure they want to BUY something.

Before I can PAY for something, I need to have made the decision to BUY that something......Buying ALWAYS come before PAYING, I use to PAY for stuff that I didn't even knew I was buying....

A public debt needs to be bought back, before it gets PAID.

Tommy Atherton

Thanks Pete, I will ask if he (signatory party) could help us complete the Bill he sent. I agree about the use of the "paying" word, that is his words, I wrote them explaining that we are wishing to administrate a Bill for the account if we are provided with one. With your knowledge of what qualifies a Bill of Exchange, would you consider the posted document a Bill of Exchange? We received a "statement" along with the posted document, and his language clearly, again, is an offer for us to be surety. I will, again, correct our intent with a wish for us to receive instruction on how to properly complete the Bill.

Pete Daoust

I have to see that statement......he is TRAPPING you into this.....

If you NEVER said that: We are pleased to hear that you wish to settle your account by paying the outstanding balance in fuIl.

Then he is LYING to you....period.

Tommy Atherton

The document stated "we wish to have the account settled. We hereby demand you send us a BILL for the balance owing for the PERSONS' ACCOUNT. We promise to administrate all debts attached to any BILLS we receive from you." I will refrain from using the word "settled" in subsequent documents. To me, I did not state; however, that I would settle the account. But that is the content of the letter that the above post was generated from.

Pete Daoust

You need to communicate again with this liar, and tell him

Hey, we NEVER said we will buy back this public debt and pay for it, we are seeking for a BILL, so we can ADMINISTRATE that debt, as the SOLE AUTHORIZED ADMINISTRATOR for the person to whom you've sending the said debt.

We NEED a statement, and a remittance voucher to do this, and you are OBLIGED to send us this.

If you choose to NOT send us the appropriate tools to ADMINISTRATE that debt, we will consider that there is NO DEBT, and/or you are in bad faith, and/or you are lying to us, and/or you are hiding stuff from us, and/or you are incompetent.

:P

Anibal Jose Baez

And is someone offers the PERSON I happen to have in my pocket to buy PUBLIC DEBT, tell them it's illegal to "pay" for public debt, but if they send me a BILL, I'll will intermediately ADMINISTRATE the shit out of that by way of DISCHARGE via the PERSON'S SURETY. :D

Pete Daoust

Again Mackximus Minimus, if you DECIDE to buy BACK this debt (It was already bought), and pay with MONEY OF ACCOUNT, it's completely legal......other than that, you can offer cash (They can't take it) or CREDIT......and that CREDIT comes from "ME", via Bank of Canada :P

Pete Daoust

payment`of a debt with debt is ILLEGAL

YOU NEED TO transform CASH (Bank notes) into MONEY OF ACCOUNT to pay a debt......because MONEY OF ACCOUNT is nothing :(

THAT'S why they want PERSONS to have a fucking bank account, and that's WHY PIERRE DAOUST dosen't have a fucking BANK ACCOUNT :D

Pete Daoust

Close the bank accounts :P and find a way to roll without one, only CORPORATION should have bank accounts, these persons, we happen to have in our pockets, are fucking SLAVES.....when have you seen SLAVES having bank accounts ?

Eamonn O Brien

The thing that sticks in my mind was back when Suil Eile had the signed response from the courts affirming the receipt of his NoM. Scott said "You owed them so you paid them"... That still confuses me unfortunately...

Anibal Jose Baez

But WHY would my PERSON accept to become surety on some check, when I am already tendering payment, and someone else is the surety? They can't FORCE my PERSON to do that.

There is something there, I just can't put my finger to it.

Anibal Jose Baez

Well, its a response to Eamonn O Brien's comment, he said that if I walk in a bank to settle a loan with just cash, they will turn it into money of account, a check, that they will give back to ME, thinking I'm surety, because I need to SIGN it. When in the CASH, my PERSON is NOT surety for those bills. You get it now?

How can a bank force my PERSON to turn cash into money of account? I don't see guns there.