Chris Evan

Mar 17, 2014 4:40 PM
Oh....one more thing....when they said I couldn't write on the Kourt document, I asked if the Kourt thought I was some kind of a slave...then I said then why is the Kourt enforcing its will on me?


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Mar 17, 2014 4:40 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Scott Duncan

Mar 17, 2014 4:41 PM
Imposing, not enforcing. :P


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Mar 17, 2014 4:41 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Eamonn O Brien

Mar 17, 2014 4:44 PM
Is there any possibility they called the name again after recess?


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Mar 17, 2014 4:44 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Anibal Jose Baez

Mar 17, 2014 4:44 PM
Who cares? :/


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Mar 17, 2014 4:44 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Chris Evan

Mar 17, 2014 4:45 PM
Yup....I am sure they wanted to proceed to a trial. I don't see why and how the matter has not been settled really!


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Mar 17, 2014 4:45 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Pete Daoust

Mar 17, 2014 5:01 PM
I asked if the Kourt thought I was some kind of a slave: WHAT WAS THEIR ANSWER TO THAT ? :)


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Mar 17, 2014 5:01 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Chris Evan

Mar 17, 2014 5:02 PM
none....then within...I would say 30 seconds, he called for a recess


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Mar 17, 2014 5:02 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Pete Daoust

Mar 17, 2014 5:03 PM
:( so we don't know ? :(


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Mar 17, 2014 5:03 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Chris Evan

Mar 17, 2014 5:03 PM
We do not!


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Mar 17, 2014 5:03 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Pete Daoust

Mar 17, 2014 5:03 PM
You should had FORCED them to answer that one :D


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Mar 17, 2014 5:03 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Pete Daoust

Mar 17, 2014 5:04 PM
*have


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Mar 17, 2014 5:04 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Scott Duncan

Mar 17, 2014 5:04 PM
Don't worry Chris Evan! I still think you're some kind of slave, even if the court's position is a bit ambiguous. :D


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Mar 17, 2014 5:04 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Pete Daoust

Mar 17, 2014 5:04 PM
:D


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Mar 17, 2014 5:04 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Chris Evan

Mar 17, 2014 5:04 PM
uh-oh!!!


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Mar 17, 2014 5:04 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Scott Duncan

Mar 17, 2014 5:05 PM
:D


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Mar 17, 2014 5:05 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Anibal Jose Baez

Mar 17, 2014 5:06 PM
Ha! It hurts all the way to the Caribbean!


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Mar 17, 2014 5:06 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Pete Daoust

Mar 17, 2014 5:08 PM
But these CHARGES seems to be DIS-CHARGED now !! ...no ? :D


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Mar 17, 2014 5:08 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Chris Evan

Mar 17, 2014 5:09 PM
I think they are UNLESS there is a defect in the Instrument.


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Mar 17, 2014 5:09 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Pete Daoust

Mar 17, 2014 5:21 PM
So now, what about sending them an INVOICE, for your time, I mean, you had to go there and everything.......ya know ? :/ Dear Kourt, Thank you for given me the opportunity to administrate charges on the person, I happen to have in my pocket. It was a great pleasure for "me" to do so. here is an invoice for my time, in regards to this commercial affairs. With Love. BY:____________________________ Sole Authorized Admin for CHRIS EVAN Peace :P


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Mar 17, 2014 5:21 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Chris Evan

Mar 17, 2014 5:22 PM
I sent the DA a $35,000 invoice in the other case already


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Mar 17, 2014 5:22 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Pete Daoust

Mar 17, 2014 5:22 PM
When ?


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Mar 17, 2014 5:22 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Chris Evan

Mar 17, 2014 5:23 PM
2 months ago....as soon as I got them into default via Ceit's procedure


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Mar 17, 2014 5:23 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Pete Daoust

Mar 17, 2014 5:23 PM
Have you followed up with a STATEMENT, and a NOTICE, and a FINAL NOTICE, and a DEFAULT NOTICE, and a LIEN ? :/


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Mar 17, 2014 5:23 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Chris Evan

Mar 17, 2014 5:24 PM
Not yet!


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Mar 17, 2014 5:24 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Chris Evan

Mar 17, 2014 5:24 PM
Charges are still accruing at the rate of $1000 per day that the NAME is used


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Mar 17, 2014 5:24 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Chris Evan

Mar 17, 2014 5:24 PM
They need another invoice still!


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Mar 17, 2014 5:24 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Chris Evan

Mar 17, 2014 5:24 PM
That was just from when the CLAIM was made


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Mar 17, 2014 5:24 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Pete Daoust

Mar 17, 2014 5:24 PM
Oh fuck, you got some administration shit in your hands :(


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Mar 17, 2014 5:24 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Chris Evan

Mar 17, 2014 5:25 PM
Sure do!


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Mar 17, 2014 5:25 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


David Vilaca

Mar 17, 2014 5:25 PM
a 1000 per day for servitude to forms of your adversary, none of which is your fault


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Mar 17, 2014 5:25 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Pete Daoust

Mar 17, 2014 5:30 PM
Anyway, I like the fact that one of my facebook friend is not a looser :)


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Mar 17, 2014 5:30 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Pete Daoust

Mar 17, 2014 5:34 PM
I suggest, next time, make sure they answer that SLAVE question by a YES or a NO. :D


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Mar 17, 2014 5:34 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Scott Duncan

Mar 17, 2014 8:51 PM
Just remember guys, you aren't Ceit Butler! She was trained by Lou Manotti. She has access to ME 24/7, and she is no slouch in a courtroom on her own. The Ceit method requires a COMPLETE understanding of what you are doing, and it does NOT forgive error.


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Mar 17, 2014 8:51 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Pete Daoust

Mar 17, 2014 8:57 PM
You mean Ceit, the presumed MAMMOTH organization, or a queen of some sort ? :D


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Mar 17, 2014 8:57 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Anibal Jose Baez

Mar 17, 2014 9:02 PM
:O If used as a noun, slouch means an unimpressive incompetent person.


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Mar 17, 2014 9:02 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Pete Daoust

Mar 17, 2014 9:04 PM
:D ....it's like "nice" .....she is NOT "nice" in court


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Mar 17, 2014 9:04 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Howard Posehn

Mar 17, 2014 9:18 PM
What would have happened if you would have objected to his call for a recess? Force him to deal with the issue right now. Or would he just ignore you and run.


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Mar 17, 2014 9:18 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Anibal Jose Baez

Mar 17, 2014 9:19 PM
Let the "Speculation-fest" begin! :D


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Mar 17, 2014 9:19 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Scott Duncan

Mar 17, 2014 9:35 PM
They run. They always run. Ask Lou Manotti.


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Mar 17, 2014 9:35 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


David Vilaca

Mar 17, 2014 9:47 PM
let's say I have a BILL and it has been dishonored. I've sent proper notice, opportunity to cure and final notice of default. I then affirm an affidavit of obligation take my mail receipts and notices and create and register a notice of security interest. Lets say the security is $50.000.000.00, Where would I register this. Service Ontario says liens can only be registered for personal property that has been used as collateral to obtain a loan or that is being repaired or stored. If I want to lien The Chiefs of Police or say the Privy Council of Canada, and Justice Department, is that possible or do we go after the individual who endorsed false claims?


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Mar 17, 2014 9:47 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Scott Duncan

Mar 17, 2014 10:20 PM
If they owe, you can lien. The end. Service Ontario can't say otherwise.


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Mar 17, 2014 10:20 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Pete Daoust

Mar 17, 2014 10:23 PM
Is $50.000.000.00, is in fact, 50 millions ? :/


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Mar 17, 2014 10:23 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


David Vilaca

Mar 17, 2014 10:27 PM
Thank You Scott Duncan, Yes Pete Daoust my lien will be in the 50 millions, how else do you get the bonding pulled and hold the individual accountable. anything less leave the MUNICIPALITY on the hook and thats more debt for them but more surety from the stupid


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Mar 17, 2014 10:27 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Chris Evan

Mar 18, 2014 12:25 AM
I see your point Aladdin Sane. I feel the matter was properly Administrated therefore I didn't care.


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Mar 18, 2014 12:25 AM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


David Johansen

Mar 20, 2014 9:02 AM
no its 50. you mean 50,000,000.00


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Mar 20, 2014 9:02 AM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


David Johansen

Mar 20, 2014 9:03 AM
heads are gonna roll!


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Mar 20, 2014 9:03 AM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Howard Posehn

Mar 20, 2014 7:12 PM
At least you didn't have to go to these depths. This is sad. It was like reading an obituary: https://secure.avaaz.org/en/petition/The_Canadian_Government_Free_Dean_Clifford_he_is_in_solitary_confinement_since_his_arrest/?pv=0


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Mar 20, 2014 7:12 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Howard Posehn

Mar 20, 2014 7:14 PM
By the way, "GO SIGNERS, GO!"


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Mar 20, 2014 7:14 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Ceit Butler

Mar 21, 2014 1:22 AM
Yeah, a PETITION! Boy, that'll show 'em. I bet they're quakin' in their boots over there in Manitoba now...


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Mar 21, 2014 1:22 AM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Lou Manotti

Mar 21, 2014 1:32 AM
when you PETITION,MOTION, ASK- you are BEGGING. So get on your KNEES when YOU do that kind of shit!


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Mar 21, 2014 1:32 AM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Pete Daoust

Mar 21, 2014 1:35 AM
Who want to petition in here ? :-\


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Mar 21, 2014 1:35 AM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Pete Daoust

Mar 21, 2014 1:35 AM
*wants :-D


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Mar 21, 2014 1:35 AM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Pete Daoust

Mar 21, 2014 1:46 AM
Ho, sorry, I just saw Aladdin Sane's post.... :-D


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Mar 21, 2014 1:46 AM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Chris Evan

Mar 24, 2014 6:46 PM
It seems that the Kourt has issued an Arrest Warrant (although I have not been notified by the Kourt. The Registry of Motor Vehicles sent a Notice stating that)


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Mar 24, 2014 6:46 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


David Johansen

Mar 24, 2014 6:50 PM
did they include a # with the paperwork? lien it! photograph the letter and post it.


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Mar 24, 2014 6:50 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Chris Evan

Mar 24, 2014 6:55 PM


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Mar 24, 2014 6:55 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Chris Evan

Mar 24, 2014 6:56 PM
This tells me that they are hiding something and plan on railroading me if I go to the other Kourt on Apr 2. I think something needs to be filed ASAP in that matter. Thoughts on this?


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Mar 24, 2014 6:56 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Chris Evan

Mar 24, 2014 7:04 PM
a person I trust already liened that Docket Number.


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Mar 24, 2014 7:04 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


David Johansen

Mar 24, 2014 7:10 PM
is that warrant # the one you appeared for last monday? it is dated 2013 and apparently on a 'form' letter because it says your lic. could be suspended. yes it is a double jeopardy threat using the old warrant over again which should have expired 30 days after it was issued or sooner because they brought you in on it, but it is still good for 30 days. knowing you can't post a bail without signing an agreement, you should plan that they will attempt to hold you, so get your ducks in order. they probably shredded the documents you wrote on once they figured out what you did.


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Mar 24, 2014 7:10 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Chris Evan

Mar 24, 2014 7:11 PM
That is the DOCKET NUMBER of that case


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Mar 24, 2014 7:11 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


David Johansen

Mar 24, 2014 7:15 PM
i thought last monday you were in ipswitch, which was the warrant issued for not showing up in salem on the first issue, but you do have a date (?) april 2 for salem. OH! what you did in ipswitch last monday must have worked and they cant bring it back up (?) maybe its closed. and this is a threat of warrant to show up in salem on the original first charge.


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Mar 24, 2014 7:15 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Chris Evan

Mar 24, 2014 7:16 PM
No...no no...you have it backwards. The Ipswich Warrant was cleared when they arrested ME on this Salem thing. Last Monday was Salem


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Mar 24, 2014 7:16 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Chris Evan

Mar 24, 2014 7:16 PM
Back in October


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Mar 24, 2014 7:16 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


David Johansen

Mar 24, 2014 7:20 PM
oh then this is pre emptive from/because of your leaving court last monday. you neglected to reserve ALL rights and accept none of the benefits. you need a script to follow each and every time you 'appear'. they came back from recess and you failed to return, so they issued (will issue) a bench warrant to have you brought back in.


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Mar 24, 2014 7:20 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Pete Daoust

Mar 24, 2014 7:21 PM
It seems they are NOT very happy about one of their SLAVE'S behavior :D They are getting out the WHIP :P They still "believe" they are the MASTER of that PERSON, the presumption seems to be there, still.... mmmhhhh !!! :/


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Mar 24, 2014 7:21 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Chris Evan

Mar 24, 2014 7:21 PM
^^ Thats how I see it too


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Mar 24, 2014 7:21 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


David Johansen

Mar 24, 2014 7:23 PM
you need to bring the paperwork that specifically describes what it was that you did. they are claiming they have no idea what it was that you did, they will act as children "i dont know"... well you have to put it infront of them, then they can not say they dont know. you have to submit everything, they can claim they know nothing but what is in the file.


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Mar 24, 2014 7:23 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Pete Daoust

Mar 24, 2014 7:23 PM
Have you cleared out that "signature episode" with them ? .....I mean IN DETAILS ?


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Mar 24, 2014 7:23 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Chris Evan

Mar 24, 2014 7:23 PM
I did David Johansen....EVERYTHING was written down


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Mar 24, 2014 7:23 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Chris Evan

Mar 24, 2014 7:24 PM
On the Notice of Mistake.


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Mar 24, 2014 7:24 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


David Johansen

Mar 24, 2014 7:27 PM
not on the NoM. you have to provide them with the info and cite where that info came from so they can investigate its validity. ok then you go back in there and tell them you do not understand, according to ... you honorably discharged the debt instrument and case should be closed. you however never gave them the chance to ask you what is your wish/will in the matter.


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Mar 24, 2014 7:27 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


David Johansen

Mar 24, 2014 7:28 PM
the recess was a reset to try to trip you up. you should have not left and been better prepared to handle the return from that.


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Mar 24, 2014 7:28 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Chris Evan

Mar 24, 2014 7:28 PM
So then that is evidence that this matter isn't settled?


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Mar 24, 2014 7:28 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Pete Daoust

Mar 24, 2014 7:42 PM
It seems that there is still some PRESUMPTIONS floating in the air, somewhere :(


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Mar 24, 2014 7:42 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Pete Daoust

Mar 24, 2014 7:46 PM
I am getting the same shit here, in a more relax way, but they are extremely resistant as far as traffic tickets....


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Mar 24, 2014 7:46 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


David Johansen

Mar 24, 2014 8:12 PM
well, from what i am reading, that book from 1909 bills of exchange (thank you to the person who provided that), page 100 supra protest, says about collecting on a contract by somone deceased or incompetant such as a person of unsound mind (aren't we all?)... or also a fictitious person... so any BoE with a ficticious 'person' is in fact invalid, and is not that the whole basis of our claim in ALL of these matters? chris evan shulte is a ficticious person and the surety for ALL matters is the party who signed the document whom created the fiction.


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Mar 24, 2014 8:12 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


David Johansen

Mar 24, 2014 8:58 PM
the first warrant was the ipswitch case, this is the salem case mentioning a warrant. yah, i would say... you walked out, they cant do anything without you being there as everything HAS to be openly public which it was not because you left, so, yah, they will drag you back in inorder to conclude the matter, they have no other choice but to follow procedure.


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Mar 24, 2014 8:58 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


David Johansen

Mar 24, 2014 8:59 PM
thats why i said, get ALL your ducks in a row for this and go in there before they pick you up emptyhanded.


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Mar 24, 2014 8:59 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


David Johansen

Mar 24, 2014 9:01 PM
again, IMHO you need to get ALL this stuff taken care of first, get the suspension lifted, pay whatever you have to to get the license reinstated, then cancel the contract. otherwise it will allways be hanging over your head.


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Mar 24, 2014 9:01 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Pete Daoust

Mar 24, 2014 9:09 PM
Or call Scott Duncan, 416-XXX-XXXX, I don't remember the last 7 digits :P


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Mar 24, 2014 9:09 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


David Johansen

Mar 24, 2014 9:34 PM
yah, i second that. this is outside of our scope to handle without him.


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Mar 24, 2014 9:34 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Chris Evan

Mar 24, 2014 9:52 PM
Funny....I did that just before I read that Pete Daoust


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Mar 24, 2014 9:52 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Scott Duncan

Mar 24, 2014 9:53 PM
Yes.


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Mar 24, 2014 9:53 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Pete Daoust

Mar 24, 2014 9:56 PM
Good thing !!! :D


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Mar 24, 2014 9:56 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Pete Daoust

Mar 24, 2014 9:57 PM
And so, what did Scott said, Chris .... :D HAHAHAHAHA!!!!!


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Mar 24, 2014 9:57 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Pete Daoust

Mar 24, 2014 10:01 PM
Come on Chris, share the nuggets, it's because of ME if you called, I sent you some telepathic shit, with my spirit thing......come on !!! :D


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Mar 24, 2014 10:01 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Pete Daoust

Mar 24, 2014 10:01 PM
Peace Man... :D


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Mar 24, 2014 10:01 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Pete Daoust

Mar 24, 2014 10:05 PM
I have bought $3000.00 worth of CD's from this Eckhart Tolle guy, to achieve that kind of shit.....mmmmmmmooooouuuuuhhhaaaaaaaa !!!!.....that was the sound I have made with my mouth, to reach your spirit, and plant the IDEA of calling Scott Duncan.....


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Mar 24, 2014 10:05 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Chris Evan

Mar 24, 2014 10:07 PM
He told me exactly what we already know!!! Notify them through the corporation of a Lien and Fraud. When they come get me ask "By what authority do you attach a NAME derived from a Public Document to me?" 40 times is the record!


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Mar 24, 2014 10:07 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Pete Daoust

Mar 24, 2014 10:08 PM
:D


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Mar 24, 2014 10:08 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Pete Daoust

Mar 24, 2014 10:10 PM
That's ALL, no magical ink color and shit ? :(


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Mar 24, 2014 10:10 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Chris Evan

Mar 24, 2014 10:10 PM
YAH....RED VOID


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Mar 24, 2014 10:10 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Pete Daoust

Mar 24, 2014 10:12 PM
Please, share the NOTICE you will create.....please :D


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Mar 24, 2014 10:12 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Eamonn O Brien

Mar 24, 2014 10:15 PM
Do you have to send notice through the corp because the corp has already liened the person?


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Mar 24, 2014 10:15 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Chris Evan

Mar 24, 2014 10:16 PM
yes


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Mar 24, 2014 10:16 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Eamonn O Brien

Mar 24, 2014 10:17 PM
Ah right....


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Mar 24, 2014 10:17 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Chris Evan

Mar 24, 2014 10:23 PM
He said "Don't accept the charges...VOID"!


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Mar 24, 2014 10:23 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Chris Evan

Mar 24, 2014 10:23 PM
Which is the one thing I thought I did wrong actually.....


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Mar 24, 2014 10:23 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Pete Daoust

Mar 24, 2014 10:28 PM
In other words, you've treated it as a DEBT, instead of a CHARGE ? :/


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Mar 24, 2014 10:28 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Pete Daoust

Mar 24, 2014 10:28 PM
Fuck... :(


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Mar 24, 2014 10:28 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Pete Daoust

Mar 24, 2014 10:30 PM
Charge To impose a burden, duty, obligation, or lien; to create a claim against property; to assess; to demand; to accuse; to instruct a jury on matters of law. To impose a tax, duty, or trust. To entrust with responsibilities and duties (e.g., care of another). In commercial transactions, to bill or invoice; to purchase on credit. In Criminal Law, to indict or formally accuse. An encumbrance, lien, or claim; a burden or load; an obligation or duty; a liability; an accusation. A person or thing committed to the care of another. The price of, or rate for, something.


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Mar 24, 2014 10:30 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Pete Daoust

Mar 24, 2014 10:30 PM
Debt A sum of money that is owed or due to be paid because of an express agreement; a specified sum of money that one person is obligated to pay and that another has the legal right to collect or receive. A fixed and certain obligation to pay money or some other valuable thing or things, either in the present or in the future. In a still more general sense, that which is due from one person to another, whether money, goods, or services. In a broad sense, any duty to respond to another in money, labor, or service; it may even mean a moral or honorary obligation, unenforceable by legal action. Also, sometimes an aggregate of separate debts, or the total sum of the existing claims against a person or company. Thus we speak of the "national debt," the "bonded debt" of a corporation, and so on.


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Mar 24, 2014 10:30 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Chris Evan

Mar 24, 2014 10:33 PM
Regardless, I am only the lawful holder in due course. yes? SOMEONE was charged and SOMEONE owes a debt.


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Mar 24, 2014 10:33 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Pete Daoust

Mar 24, 2014 10:35 PM
:-o


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Mar 24, 2014 10:35 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Pete Daoust

Mar 24, 2014 10:38 PM
I don't HOLD that shit ? :( I am not even sure I can HOLD anything :/ well.... :D


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Mar 24, 2014 10:38 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Chris Evan

Mar 24, 2014 10:55 PM
Pete Daoust....I will DEFINITELY share the notice before I send it. I am done with stupid shit....check that. I am leaving the stupid shit in the past. :-D Still working out the kinks in that


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Mar 24, 2014 10:55 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


T?lis B?auns

Mar 25, 2014 1:15 AM
How about on a sheet is: Page 1. Notice of Intent and Liability; and on the "private side" Page 2. a notarised sealed Notice of Intent and Liability. So that the adjudicator can't turn the file over without being noted privately. ?


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Mar 25, 2014 1:15 AM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Chris Evan

Mar 25, 2014 3:46 AM
Why would I do that?


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Mar 25, 2014 3:46 AM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


David Johansen

Mar 25, 2014 4:39 AM
brauns is thinking to much, but it wouldnt hurt none if on the back of every sheet of paper issued by the company to be in faded light grey, a copy print of the fee schedule. just like on the back of the town excize tax form/remittance.


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Mar 25, 2014 4:39 AM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Chris Evan

Mar 25, 2014 12:24 PM
Why would I do that?


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Mar 25, 2014 12:24 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Chris Evan

Mar 25, 2014 12:26 PM
See....I have given them the SURETY BOND. THEY feel its their right to enslave ME. I don't see why ANYTHING other than a NOTICE stating such and WHY they don't have that right is necessary. The rest is all FREEDUMB crap. I am not interested in conversing and negotiating and titting and tatting with these criminals. I only want to be left alone.


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Mar 25, 2014 12:26 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


David Johansen

Mar 26, 2014 6:29 AM
ok, i see/hear what your saying. just that all i meant was that the back of a piece of paper be marked, even with simply, 'turn over', like a watermarked picture.


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Mar 26, 2014 6:29 AM
Type of Post:
Place of Post: