The Tender For Law

Volume 5

Mar 11, 2014 2:00 AM

Tommy Atherton

Does this sound familiar?

Colonel Edward Mandell-House:

�[Very] soon, every American will be required to register their biological property in a National system designed to keep track of the people and that will operate under the ancient system of pledging. By such methodology, we can compel people to submit to our agenda, which will affect our security as a chargeback for our fiat paper currency. Every American will be forced to register or suffer not being able to work and earn a living.

They will be our chattel, and we will hold the security interest over them forever, by operation of the law merchant under the scheme of secured transactions. Americans, by unknowingly or unwittingly delivering the bills of lading to us will be rendered bankrupt and insolvent, forever to remain economic slaves through taxation, secured by their pledges.

They will be stripped of their rights and given a commercial value designed to make us a profit and they will be non the wiser, for not one man in a million could ever figure our plans and, if by accident one or two would figure it out, we have in our arsenal plausible deniability.

After all, this is the only logical way to fund government, by floating liens and debt to the registrants in the form of benefits and privileges. This will inevitably reap to us huge profits beyond our wildest expectations and leave every American a contributor to this fraud which we will call �Social Insurance.� Without realizing it, every American will insure us for any loss we may incur and in this manner; every American will unknowingly be our servant, however begrudgingly.

The people will become helpless and without any hope for their redemption and, we will employ the high office of the President of our dummy corporation to foment this plot against America.�

- Letter from Rothschild Agent Colonel Edward Mandell House to Woodrow Wilson (President) [1913-1921] found in Wilson�s personal diary/logs

Read Comments

T?lis B?auns

A. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_M._House B. http://books.google.ca/books?id=4vWiIvlpyfoC&pg=PA59&dq=%22every+American+will+be+required+to+register+their+biological+property%22&hl=en&sa=X&ei=9OYfU6_zNYWErQHhroHYCA&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=%22every%20American%20will%20be%20required%20to%20register%20their%20biological%20property%22&f=false C. http://books.google.ca/books?id=XIMTAgAAQBAJ&pg=PA88&dq=%22every+American+will+be+required+to+register+their+biological+property%22&hl=en&sa=X&ei=9OYfU6_zNYWErQHhroHYCA&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=%22every%20American%20will%20be%20required%20to%20register%20their%20biological%20property%22&f=false D. www.andrew.cmu.edu/user/sc24/History/fpprimary.html

T?lis B?auns

Jo Xappie, E.M-H. he's just a copypast agent- the idea comes from the Solomon brothers in New Zealand see. the teachings of John Solomon who created the legal fiction that a corporation could be called a person, [around 1895] and they are now greater than Solomon's wealth and these death things are destroying the Creation and mankind.

Scott Duncan

OK, ENOUGH!

FUCK!

Stop focusing on crap YOU had nothing to do with.

Here in REALITY you've been taught that stupid pieces of paper have magic powers you can "reclaim".

Seriously. Fuck off with that shit. No more.

Scott Duncan

Lou Manotti s by far the biggest success in detaching yourself from public documents, and currently holds the record for MOST times a Justice has fled a courtroom. :D

He never focused on "statement of live birth" or ANY OTHER crap. He simply asks, BY WHAT AUTHORITY DO YOU ATTACH A NAME DERIVED FROM A PUBLIC DOCUMENT, TO ME?

You did not MAKE the birth record. The record and derived documents, are not yours either.

Scott Duncan

Easy.

Reserve all rights. Then demand proof that they are legally/lawfully allowed to attach a name derived from ANY document, to YOU. Simple really.

Think about it. Can they attach "John Smith" to you? No? Then why can they attach ANYTHING to you?

Scott Duncan

SO, to summarize:Demand proof that they are legally/lawfully allowed to attach a name derived from ANY document, to YOU. Simple really.

Think about it. Can they attach "John Smith" to you? No? Then why can they attach ANYTHING to you?

Pete Daoust

So just do this 41 times....

BY WHAT AUTHORITY DO YOU ATTACH A NAME DERIVED FROM A PUBLIC DOCUMENT, TO ME?

ARE YOU PRESUMING I AM ONE OF YOUR SLAVE ?

And we will remit you the award, you'll be breaking Lou Manotti's record :D

Anibal Jose Baez

Chris Evan, DON'T LISTEN TO ANYONE, except for this guy. He already GAVE YOU THE FUCKING ANSWER!

<<Scott Duncan: SO, to summarize:Demand proof that they are legally/lawfully allowed to attach a name derived from ANY document, to YOU. Simple really.

Think about it. Can they attach "John Smith" to you? No? Then why can they attach ANYTHING to you?>>

What is so difficult about it? There is no other SOURCE other than Admiral Scott.. Who are you going to listen to? It should be pretty clear by now. :/

Anibal Jose Baez

If you don't follow Scott's advise, you could end-up saying something like this:

"Big daddy. I conditionally accept, your offer to rape me, upon proof that a safe, yet sensitive condom will be used to perform the rapping. If this has made you "pissy", please forgive me."

Remember rule #1! :D

David Johansen

"BY WHAT AUTHORITY DO YOU ATTACH A NAME DERIVED FROM A PUBLIC DOCUMENT, TO ME?"

you are all forgetting chris has allready shown up several times, that act alone is presumed to be a claim to the name called.

am i right?

David Johansen

or somone has to beat it into them.

but still, i do not understand the nature and the cause...

one who does not understand is not present. NEVER under any circumstances PURPORT TO UNDERSTAND. do you need a lawyer? NO THANK YOU, they will just lie. why don't YOU try explaining it to ME while were all here.

CONTEMPT! is that civil or criminal contempt? because we both know the word contempt doesnt exist, you just made it up. oh, what dictionary is that, the U.S. legal code?

you are being beligerant. why thank you, yes, yes i am, and I WISH YOU to dismiss this without prejudice, thank you.