The Tender For Law

Volume 5

Feb 13, 2014 7:37 PM

August le Blanc

Ok, Scott says Pete is the only one to get things right. I have been thinking, to figure out why. I accept it, but I do not comprehend it. My best thinking brings me to: Mining and the use of Crypto currency. I had the good fortune of having some Private conversations, with Scott, when at one time, we were friends here. As a result of those conversations I took some actions thru my buddy = duly authorized trustee corp. Those actions got me a response ( I am thinking it is a different prong in the agenda of which I am not privy to, nor is it my business). As a result of those actions taken, it was my thinking that why not discharge the whole fucking debt; created by, the creation of this thing a few days after my Birth dated aug 24/19##. So, I went about it, through a buddy. I did not want to be a slave to any one or any thing. I know I am not. Here is where I am at: I received this response:

Requ�tes RG - RG Enquire RequetesRG.RGEnquire@tpsgc-pwgsc.gc.ca Jan 30

to 1732964 Good day,

Your correspondence was reviewed, and it has been concluded that the matter you raised does not fall within the Receiver General for Canada's mandate. Although all payments to and from the Government of Canada are made in the name of the Receiver General, enquiries regarding payments should be made directly to the department responsible for the particular product and/or service: http://canada.ca/en/ .

Please note that the Receiver General will take no further action on this matter.

Sincerely,

Receveur g�n�ral du Canada / Receiver General for Canada

t�l�copieur/ facsimile 819-956-1664

ncr.rgenquire@tpsgc.gc.ca <mailto:ncr.rgenquire@tpsgc.gc.ca> ncr.rgenquire@pwgsc.gc.ca <mailto:ncr.rgenquire@pwgsc.gc.ca>

Travaux publics et Services gouvernementaux Canada 11A2 - Portage III Gatineau, Qu�bec K1A 0S5

Public Works and Government Services Canada 11A2 - Portage III Gatineau, Quebec K1A 0S5

As part of my ongoing education, I and saw the following video, that shows, the deductive reasoning approach, to deciphering the meaning of their clubhouse interpretations of things. Scott said it was important to figure out why. I listen and act based on that. This is why it is important to have a buddy do things under title�. I have tried to block Lana Dukakis from this, but am unable to, FACEBOOK WILL NOT LET ME, as I do not think she it has earned the right to this�. The rest of here have put the effort in to be here. I have shared my journey up until this point and will continue to do so. I think I would be remiss in not sharing this knowledge, with most of you. So this is my shovel: Put that in your pipe and smoke it. :-)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iRMGzfuuHyQ

Read Comments

August le Blanc

The effectiveness of doing things thru a buddy you trust. How it is a valid and real thing in their eyes. How to collect and or offset on a real big debt. How this is the ultimate in offsetting the BIG BILL THE GOVERNMENT CREATED AND USED ME FOR COLLATERAL, HOW TO TAKE THAT COLLATERAL AND USE IT TO BENEFIT ALL OTHERS AROUND YOU.

Pete Daoust

but WHY you call this a "buddy", it's NOT a fucking buddy, it's a CORPORATION......this is where it gets frustrating, reading your post Bobis, why in the world don't you use the RIGHT word to express what you want to express......WHY IN THE FUCK YOU WRITE IN CRYPTIC shit :(

August le Blanc

Oh for fuck sakes, I use the proper terminology and you cannot get it. I try to keep it simple and you do not get it. I am being as clear as I know how. I have explained this over and over� How do I make it clear for you? I use = signs to define the terms� How can I be clearer? FUCK FUCK FUCK

Pete Daoust

Ok, people.......here is what Bobis is trying to say....

Register a corporation. Lien the person you happen to have in your pocket, using that corp. to do it. Establish a trust. Let the corporation take care of ALL business shit regarding the PERSON. Direct ALL bills sent to the person where its surety is, Bank of Canada. And do not hesitate to BILL those who are trying to make you waist your time. And live your life.....

:D

August le Blanc

You lien all property and the marriage certificate is part of that, you explain things to your wife� It becomes a holding in the trust by doing it thru the duly authorized trustee corporation = your buddy Buddys I thought would help you understand it is some one you trust� I d not know what else to do :-(

Tommy Atherton

In one of scotts posts he says it too is a bill of lading, it too has a "cusip number" I guessed at that term, but it has a red number on it. To me the difference is there is two beneficiaries to the instrument. They must have a "buddy" lien it.

Pete Daoust

Notice of Correction for Fraud:

�Hey, there was no disclosure in this agreement � I didn�t realize the state was taking legal title to this trust. I�m firing you as trustee and you (the state of/gov) as beneficiary.

Here�s the new trustee and beneficiary.

Thanks for nothing.� Grantor.

Pete Daoust

Marriages are PRIVATE TRUSTS with a GOVERNMENT LIEN on the parties. That is why PRENUPTUAL AGREEMENTS are so EASY to kill. POST NUPTIAL agreements are ROCK solid. I have NEVER seen a challenged POST NUPTIAL AGREEMENT succeed. Not even once. If you make an amendment to the marriage, the GOVERNMENT has no say. It's TRUST business now.

~Scott Duncan

Pete Daoust

Now think about this marriage transaction. The marriage INCLUDES "Scott" AND "Tara", not "Scott" OR "Tara". This means marriage makes you effectively ONE PERSON UNDER THE LAW. Since the marriage actually consists of THREE ENTITIES, "Scott" AND "Tara", which by its nature EXCLUDES the GOVERNMENT, still remains an "ORGANIZATION". A marriage ORGANIZES these "entities" into their respective roles. If "Scott" AND "Tara" remain "Scott AND Tara", the GOVERNMENT HAS NO STANDING. However, if Tara sought a divorce, the MARRIED PERSON is no longer "Scott AND Tara", and the GOVERNMENT gets to intervene.

Pete Daoust

Well if you are CURRENTLY married, you are CURRENTLY fucked. It's a bill of lading that secures your PERSONS in the same way Rogueupport has secured Tara and My "PERSONS". You need the government's PERMISSION to disolve the "bill of lading". We only require the SHAREHOLDER'S permission...and they're WAY nicer than the government. If both parties lien their names, then wouldn't that take the surety out of the equation? That's "WILFUL DAMAGE to a SECURITY INSTRUMENT". The Marriage came first. IT has the claim, not you. Liening your name just makes you "next in line".

Tommy Atherton

lien the marriage certificate. the 2 parties that give the marriage certificate value in 100% cooperation, 100% agree that the private trust's trustee(s) of xxxinc would be acting in their best interest to lien the marriage certificate. (red number)

Tommy Atherton

So cara and i, too, are agreeable on the lien. Once in place, a certified copy of the contract will become a "new original", we will void the signatures on it and send it back registered. Joey Spirit, i believe leaving the marriage certificate un-liened is akin to leaving the Person un-liened.

Pete Daoust

Amendment

The modification of materials by the addition of supplemental information; the deletion of unnecessary, undesirable, or outdated information; or the correction of errors existing in the text.

In practice, a change in the pleadings�statements of the allegations of the parties in a lawsuit�may be achieved if the parties agree to the amendment or if the court in which the proceeding is pending grants a motion for the amendment made by one party. A judgment may be altered by an amendment if a motion to do so is made within a certain time after its entry and granted by the court. The amendment of pleadings and judgments is regulated by state codes of Civil Procedure and the rules of federal civil procedure.

A constitution or a statute may be changed by an amendment.

A will, trust, corporate charter, and other legal documents are also subject to amendment.