The Tender For Law

Volume 5

Feb 12, 2014 2:45 PM

Pete Daoust

So now, there is a BANK somewhere on this planet, that have dug 1 million dogecoin.

Me, I use PIERRE DAOUST, the slave, to work for SFC Inc.

I want PIERRE DAOUST to get paid in DOGECOIN. 500,000.00 Dogecoin per week.

SFC inc, will exchange some CAD for some DOGECOIN from that bank.

SFC Inc, will give these dogecoin to PIERRE DAOUST, as wages.

PIERRE DAOUST will give ALL these dogecoin to Pete, because PIERRE DAOUST is Pete's slave :D

And that BANK, will keep supplying SFC inc with dogecoin every week, to PAY PIERRE DAOUST with.

PIERRE DAOUST won't ever touch these notes are legal tender anymore....

Is that makes sense ? Scott Duncan

500k dogecoin will travel from point-A, to point-B, to POINT-C, and back to poin-A, and then to point-B, and C, and back to A.......HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!! :D

Read Comments

August le Blanc

Then use the notes, money of exchange to pay down the interest? Created from the debt that was borrowed against the LEGAL Person, by admining it with money of exchange from corporate accounts? The death of a thousand cuts?

August le Blanc

I am referring to one of the first conversations I had with The Admiral, I am missing something, i do not know what it is, I am trying to figure it out. By drawing on the memories of what was communicated. It is important to grasp this fully for me. It was not just about establishing a currency but it was also about offsetting debt and a collapse of the current banking system� I am looking for clarity. I am asking my way out of confusion. I am thinking. I do not want to miss something vital. I am paying attention. :-/

August le Blanc

I am doing my best to ask a relevant question. And maybe, I am adding to many points, however still thinking, I am missing something vital� These were points discussed at an earlier time, that I did not quite grasp fully. I want to comprehend to understand. You know how you refer to the person in your back pocket? That is basically what I was was doing with the WE and ONE, I know it confuses people, that was not the intention it was to understand the use of titles and trusts� So maybe it is like surety� I have to comprehend what it is before I can use it as a tool�

August le Blanc

Yes� I know�. I do too much thinking, coming from a place where everything I knew was wrong� I am doing my best to fix that programming. Simplicity eludes me at times. One Lien is in, served and accepted, sitting back and waiting, as well, but in the meantime, I think and study.

August le Blanc

I plan to exchange what is dug� By using a private exchange that transcends borders. The surety is held in trust by some one else= corporate person� This whole process is not needed, unless I want to extract value from a thing that was attached to me at birth. 4days after. To offset huge debt created at that time and since� This is what the shovel is doing.

August le Blanc

See I stop using the we and or one or the person in my back pocket in language for simplicity and ease of comprehension, of course it is all administrated by the duly authorized yada yada, in in my case. :-P

Cara Small

I always thought that we have the right to dictate what we want in exchange for our labour. The corporation was the bank that is used to exchange the legal tender into whatever we want. Can the corp not simply exchange legal tender into credit at any place of purchase for you and you just go in and pick up your shit?

David Johansen

i am? how? dont you want to be able to trade them directly instead of converting them into other currency? like to buy a motorcycle, or boat, lumber, gold coins, milk, cheeze, bacon, ect... exchange for sitter time, plumber work, auto mechanic...

Cara Small

I would think the corp would just create credit at wherever you want shit from. You don't have to exchange anything for anything. The corp is doing it for you. Does that make sense, and does that stop one's affiliation with legal tender?

Pete Daoust

And WHERE DO YOU THINK I AM DOING GROCERIES ? ....Who is the OWNER of that grocery store.....what if he ACCEPT these fucking dogecoin ????

WHO CAN PROVE THE OPPOSITE... ???

Who has JURISDICTION over Pete to QUESTION these things ?? :/

Lana Dukakis

Hi Pete, What is going on? I don�t know Robert Cormier personally but I do know OF him. I do know someone who does know him personally though - my sister�s ex boyfriend (Kyle Gingrich) lives next door to him and his son. :)

Pete Daoust

Amendment

The modification of materials by the addition of supplemental information; the deletion of unnecessary, undesirable, or outdated information; or the correction of errors existing in the text.

In practice, a change in the pleadings�statements of the allegations of the parties in a lawsuit�may be achieved if the parties agree to the amendment or if the court in which the proceeding is pending grants a motion for the amendment made by one party. A judgment may be altered by an amendment if a motion to do so is made within a certain time after its entry and granted by the court. The amendment of pleadings and judgments is regulated by state codes of Civil Procedure and the rules of federal civil procedure.

A constitution or a statute may be changed by an amendment.

A will, trust, corporate charter, and other legal documents are also subject to amendment.

August le Blanc

All Capital letter names have a security agreement in place already, something I discovered when they printed off 50 pages of Le Blanc's to search thru, when I went in live, and did a lien search prior to implementing lien. That is the original security created , 10 days after my berth. The lien we do on the All Capital letters name has supreme claim. It cuts to the front of the line. It is the supra protest of the situation. SUPREME Judgement = Lien.

Tommy Atherton

So if one could figure out how to administrate a MARITIME lien, such as being in a MARITIME jurisdiction (Delaware) then he who hold that lien hold the trump card. Whereas in CANADA or 1 of the PROVINCES one could only administrate a (blank) lien. Is someone willing to fill in the blank for me?

August le Blanc

Note to self: *sigh* -Establish a Delaware corporation, at earliest convenience. The following is A metaphor for the confusion of being duped, most of my life. All points duly noted, perhaps at some point. i may even add some value, to the team... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x5Xp9hvTvPk

Tommy Atherton

back to this marriage issue if i may: It is a private trust, perhaps very much like the private trust which is mainly discussed here where the person is liened by a corp. or "buddy" as Bobis Youruncle calls it. The difference here is that "Her Majesty" is the trustee rather than a corp.(of ones own creation) such as Quebec XXXXXXXXX. That is why "Her Majesty" has liened the persons in who comprise the Private Trust (marriage). (same shit different trustee) Now, let me put on my "fucktard" hat: to "amend" the "marriage" is the remedy. Removing the current trustee (Her Majesty) from their duty and creating a new ( Delaware corp.) to be entrusted with the duty of being trustee for the Private trust, for the "marriage" to be held in, would amend the marriage and thus nullify the current trustees lien claim on the persons, one would then lien the "marriage certificate" with the new corp. (perhaps from Delaware) get in line for the lien on the Persons as well, and one, whos person is "married", could be somewhat back out of COMMERCIAL vulnerability. One would think that removing an "un-trustable" trustee would be possible? or am i being a retard again?

Tommy Atherton

Well, I return to the model we are familiar with, substitute Her Majesty with Quebecxxxx, you/and or your parents were the Grantor of the Person, as you are the grantor of the "marriage" you are the beneficiary of the Person, as are you beneficiary of the marriage, the only difference is the Trustee is a party that is not trust-worthy. I believe cara and I were the Grantors, as well as the beneficiaries. I think it is good to be the beneficiaries of the marriage and with the settlor/grantor, if united, have the power to remove the trustee by virtue of it being in the best interest of the beneficiaries.? Just switch Trustees and the model works in our favor again.

Tommy Atherton

It actually demonstrates how we are the "sole authorized administrator" of the PERSON. We administrated a trust with our signatures for the PERSONS to be joined. So as we administrated the trust for our PERSONS, not having provided an alternate TRUSTEE, they were happy to be the DEFAULT trustee.

Cara Small

When moms would talk to me about abduction I would joke about my older daughter "Who would take her? She looks at strangers as if she would bite their nose off." Lots of adults have had issues with my older daughter because of that. I love her for it.

Cara Small

The government is definitely trustee and surety for the certificate. They are the only signatory on the certificate. I am not sure that they are beneficiary tho. If they are, it would be a mistake that needs fixing. Perhaps that is what happened when the contract was signed. We "neglected" to name the beneficiaries and they acted AS trustee naming themselves as beneficiary. Is that what you are suggesting?

Tommy Atherton

So if we were the beneficiaries of the PERSONS, prior to MARRIAGE, and through MARRIAGE ("the lawful union of two PERSONS") the PERSONS were unionized, would we still not be beneficiaries, but now unionized. Only now , from an accounting perspective, one secures the other. They, the trustees, are still the party with surety. They benefit only if there is conflict between the parties, then the trustees have a duty to act in the best interest in the two parties DIVORCING (a separation of PERSONS), making sure the split of the PERSONS is to the benefit of both parties. Lots of Administration. If "Her Majesty" were the Beneficiary, then why are you running around being the Sole Authorized Administrator for the PERSON, as you are administrating ideally for the beneficiary. I believe we are the Settlors of the Private Trust, as we give all value, still, to the unionized PERSONS.

Pete Daoust

Ok, here is my take on this...... A private TRUST has been formed.

Cara granted CARA into it, and Tommy ganted TOMMY into it

The government have LIENED this new person CARA "AND" TOMMY.

So the government IS the beneficiary of that TRUST.

And the government appointed the government as TRUSTEE of that trust.

That is HOW it goes in my French brain :-D

August le Blanc

You lien the ALL CAPS NAME� sin number and accounts Associated with = write everything in the general collateral place on the forms and or document. The financial statement of the lien, when you fill out the forms , they have this place on them for this informations. ALL property associated with it, all titles and holdings, the complete estate. That is what. Thing = everything associated with the ALL Capital letters NAME that the slave has. It is all part of the package by doing that one simple lien. The government is a trust, there is no person to stand for them. You as the vessel with one sole on board and holder of the certificate, as such you have first right to do anything with it as holders in due course. There is already a security agreement in place on everyone, some have bankruptcies , some have late child payment things on them, those who do not have those have the one that created the birth certificate. By doing this process, it kills a revenue stream = no money for them and credit for the trustee of the private trust. and keeps all property safe in private. It is effective, I have done it, I am doing it I think, I can see myself doing it some more. Game over- Government Fired.

August le Blanc

It will say : Security agreement or one of the other things stated in the above post. There will also be a registration number, IT DOESN'T MATTER ABOUT ANY OF THIS OR SECURITY AGREEMENTS FROM PREVIOUS AGREEMENTS, YOU GET TO GO FIRST, THE ONE YOU FILE WITH BE SUPREME, YOU ARE ADMINISTRATING IT. GAME OVER - GOVERNMENT FIRED.

August le Blanc

The why = I wanted to create a private safe place. The lien is a tool to do that, very effectively. The why is the freedom to live mY life without third party interlopers who think and believe it thier right to harm me. Putting things on In to a private safe place, is the only thing that makes sense to me. If I want the interlopers to see that they cannot profit from any interaction with private property being held in Trust. The why is it cuts of profit, NO profit = no interest in this vessel for commercial purposes. A LIEN IS THE *FUCK OFF BECAUSE THAT'S WHY*, PART. TO ALL UNAUTHORIZED THIRD PARTY INTERLOPERS. Make sense. Lein = stop sign to government = they are fired, that is fucking why. Psst�

August le Blanc

Use the word *believe* in a sentence one more time and I will put you on ignore forever. Serious. This is a simple tool used in commerce to claim it. To Take It. To cut them off from profiting and keeping yourself safe. That is the fucking why.

Pete Daoust

Well if you are CURRENTLY married, you are CURRENTLY fucked. It's a bill of lading that secures your PERSONS in the same way Rogueupport has secured Tara and My "PERSONS".

You need the government's PERMISSION to disolve the "bill of lading". We only require the SHAREHOLDER'S permission...and they're WAY nicer than the government.

If both parties lien their names, then wouldn't that take the surety out of the equation?

That's "WILFUL DAMAGE to a SECURITY INSTRUMENT". The Marriage came first. IT has the claim, not you. Liening your name just makes you "next in line".

August le Blanc

*�.That's "WILFUL DAMAGE to a SECURITY INSTRUMENT". The Marriage came first. IT has the claim, not you. Liening your name just makes you "next in line".*

Means that a duly authorized trustee must do it. It means, if you as the legal person = slave in pocket, do it, you are creating a conflict of interest. The legal person came first, the duly authorized trustee, Liens that via the ALL CAPITAL Letters, spelling of the name. The lien is the tool that puts you in front of the Governments claim on the marriage, The lien is the superior claim as title holders of the certificate created at the birth of the marriage. It isolates that marriage certificate in commerce, making it unlawful for the government to trespass. The Lien simply fixes this problem. Keeping ALL PROPERTY CREATED AND OR DERIVED FROM THE TITLES SAFELY HELD IN TRUST, AND ADMINISTERED BY SOME ONE ELSE, BECAUSE IT IS NOT MINE. IT IS SIMPLY A CATCH 22 FOR THE GOVERNMENT WHEN ALL DONE IN PRIVATE, BY SOME ONE WE HAVE TRUSTED. ONCE ALL THIS IS DONE, PROPER PUBLIC NOTICE PUTS YOU IN THE FRONT OF THE LINE, SO, A PPSA DOES AAAAALLLLLLL OF THIS. SIMPLE. IT TAKES THE CERTIFICATES VALUE AWAY, THEY STILL HOLD IT AS A TRUSTEE� COPY HOLDER ( LOOK IT UP).

August le Blanc

I have done this guys, When Scott told me about all of this, when I first arrived here, and yes I was invited after meeting up with them. The concept I got, the mechanics- I discovered by trail and error and thinking and doing, you are benefiting from those experiences based now, on the knowledge I learned here. A trust created is the highest form of law, they recognize this and treat it accordingly = Hands off all private property.

Pete Daoust

Scott Duncan wrote this....

*�.That's "WILFUL DAMAGE to a SECURITY INSTRUMENT". The Marriage came first. IT has the claim, not you. Liening your name just makes you "next in line".*

And I am SURE he didn't meant liening your name with your nam... :/

August le Blanc

Pardon me that was a mistake Please forgive me, I am sorry. Yes Les pendens. Puts the corporation first. A private corporation has the authority to damage the security via the lien process. It has the authority vested in it by private charter, which is its license to operate privately. And it is recognized by their business model = legal.

Pete Daoust

To me, so far, the only LOGICAL thing to do, is to AMEND that marriage TRUST, by changing the TRUSTEE, and make 9111-1111 Quebec Inc as a trustee, and changing the BENEFICIARIES, and put our kids there....and us, me and Nadine.....

BUT I AM NOT FUCKING SURE at 100%..... :(

August le Blanc

The birth certificate is the same thing, a certificate created by another party. This would apply, mistakes are always correctable. It was a mistake to think any of this was mine in the first place, it was a mistake for my parents to sign me over to the government via birth certificate,The lien fixes all these mistakes. It is the most potent weapon.

August le Blanc

*To me, so far, the only LOGICAL thing to do, is to AMEND that marriage TRUST, by changing the TRUSTEE, and make 9111-1111 Quebec Inc as a trustee, and changing the BENEFICIARIES, and put our kids there....and us, me and Nadine.....

BUT I AM NOT FUCKING SURE at 100%�.. *

The lien does this. It is how to do it, it is the answer.

August le Blanc

Because you have to do it thru someone else *YOU* can't do it. It took me a long time to think thru layers of shit, layers of meaning in many forms, the is why english is so fucked and effective for this stuff, the same word can have different meanings, he does not lie to us. There is still meanings behind these things and Scott chooses his words very carefully� *YOU CANNOT DO IT* Corporation in trust has too� The lien rebuts all of it.

Pete Daoust

When Scott Duncan wrote this, I never ASSUMED that he said PIERRE DAOUST liening PIERRE DAOUST.....it is assumed that ....a corp. would do it

*�.That's "WILFUL DAMAGE to a SECURITY INSTRUMENT". The Marriage came first. IT has the claim, not you. Liening your name just makes you "next in line".*

August le Blanc

Spin away� I will talk to you later. The lien works on anything, if done properly, by the methods contained here. Who is going to rebut the lien? They can't = the government, no person to stand for it. All property is then safely held in a private jurisdiction - under corporate charter = private law and the ability to say * fuck off that's why*

August le Blanc

You = man, man = servant, servant = ass fucking. A corporate you under charter is a whole different man it is the servant of the trust, the enforcer by administration. In it's own private clubhouse. That repels all interlopers, not authorized by charter.

August le Blanc

From the Interpretations act: Powers vested in corporations

21. (1) Words establishing a corporation shall be construed (a) as vesting in the corporation power to sue and be sued, to contract and be contracted with by its corporate name, to have a common seal and to alter or change it at pleasure, to have perpetual succession, to acquire and hold personal property for the purposes for which the corporation is established and to alienate that property at pleasure; (b) in the case of a corporation having a name consisting of an English and a French form or a combined English and French form, as vesting in the corporation power to use either the English or the French form of its name or both forms and to show on its seal both the English and French forms of its name or have two seals, one showing the English and the other showing the French form of its name; (c) as vesting in a majority of the members of the corporation the power to bind the others by their acts; and (d) as exempting from personal liability for its debts, obligations or acts individual members of the corporation who do not contravene the provisions of the enactment establishing the corporation. Marginal note:Corporate name

(2) Where an enactment establishes a corporation and in each of the English and French versions of the enactment the name of the corporation is in the form only of the language of that version, the name of the corporation shall consist of the form of its name in each of the versions of the enactment.

August le Blanc

Remember the maxim of law - to include something is to exclude all others.

From the interpretations act: �person� � personne � �person�, or any word or expression descriptive of a person, includes a corporation;

Pete Daoust

Fuck Bobis Youruncle :(

*�.That's "WILFUL DAMAGE to a SECURITY INSTRUMENT". The Marriage came first. IT has the claim, not you. Liening your name just makes you "next in line".*

WE ALL KNOW THAT SCOTT WAS NOT SAYING "YOU" as a MAN or the PERSON......fuck, we ALL knew he meant the fucking corporation :(

August le Blanc

Nope, I didn't, that is not my take, I do not make assumptions about this stuff. When *YOU* is applied it has always meant an attachment to surety, the corporation takes this attachment via lien, it can legally damage the security. I can't because of the standing as trustee in their jurisdiction, a private trust is a private jurisdiction, that is recognized. It has the power to lien it, it says so in the private charter, it is law. it is legal. It is what they do, we reverse it and tell them to take a flying fucking leap. He said all of that to make us think about it� Is my reasoning in this. I have thought about the WHY, and as a result and taking these actions, this is where I am now. I DID NOT ASSUME and or PRESUME anything, I learned about it and then figured it out.

Cara Small

Pete. I think the question you are asking was part of a conversation Scott and I had. If I remember correctly, he was saying that putting a lien on THE NAME was "WILFUL DAMAGE to a SECURITY INSTRUMENT". The Marriage came first. IT has the claim, not you. Liening your name just makes you "next in line".

August le Blanc

I do be careful and am conscious of this. I respect him and do not want to cause any confusion. I do my best to answer the why of the situation. The programming and beliefs create the confusion, not the knowledge. My own thinking has been my best and worst asset in this process. My beliefs and thinking fucked me many times. A break through is coming when the confusion, seems to be hampering at times. All I can say is: Stay on target and it will come.

Tommy Atherton

lien search underway, I first searched the PERSON, I checked the PROVINCE of the PERSON'S "birth" although the PERSON has been commercially active (dumb shit to limit) In an other PROVINCE. Anyone know if I clicked correctly? $20.00 bucks a pop, do not wish to fuckup too much.

August le Blanc

You go to lien place or do it online. You say I would like to do a lien search on the NAME Please. They Say sure..here it is. Security Agreement will come up ( THIS IS THE Security agreement created by my birth, for me aug 24� I week after my actual birth It also confirms no other liens, Like child support and or bankruptcy) YOU ONLY NEED TO DO ONE IT WILL TELL YOU IF YOU ARE LIENED OR NOT. And you are already so you move on to file your lien via corporate person in trust. Then you are done that part lien is done� It would be good to put a value on the lien. That is up to you to find out or determined for yourself. As the govt has no standing and no person can dispute in Private place. It can be up to you how much, I picked a value that they attached to the thing they created. Value is accounted for by lien. YOU as accountant, determine that.

August le Blanc

Oh. Ok. I did mine, live in memorex, I received the results right away. They wold not accept my payment method at the time on line. Well I guess you have to wait till monday when some one is there to process it� Or check your inbox� I do not know about that. If you have confirmation of search, but no results. It looks like monday for you then. I really do not know. I am not their administrator� :-D

Tommy Atherton

I suspect it is due to the day of week as well. Thanks Bobis Youruncle I can communicate with clarity, but I cant seem to help being a Fecktard, it is normally due to ignorance leading to mistakes, please forgive me.

August le Blanc

Yes, the corporation is the only person that can have standing, in this matter. Do not forget you can amend the lien anytime. I made some mistakes and corrected them as I went, As understanding was achieved. It was not until recently that I completed all of this. The info I received was from the finical institutions depositors act. Which I cannot find my copy� Gail Marie may have one kicking about. The government has no standing to dispute any value attached. Everything learned here was applied, as the goal was for me is to offset all debt, created by the security instrument attached to the vessel, as the original security agreement which = the value of the one share we are issued as citizens and given the bond to hold as cargo. The lien is the receivers certificate of the bankruptcy of the legal person or the ALL CAPS NAME, that is being used without authorization once lien is in place. So the corporation becomes the receiver of this value. It is the equitable value of the one share� That was the value of the LIen our trustee filed. You can do a lien search on the person that was assigned to me thru this legal thing, if you had the required info and see on paper what the corporation, in which one share is owned by the sole shareholder, is now worth. It is a substantial sum. I am in the process of creating the credit to account for this sum. We at Bob uncle are Not quite there yet. Have some more process to do. I have spent a year on this as well as learning other things, crypto currency and such. I had to learn all of it to do this.

August le Blanc

See heres the thing� You could put any value on the lien and they cannot do anything about it, it is a private matter for one, two it is up to you to account for how you came to that value. Acting as Chief whatever. No one has any standing other than the corporation in private. So once you turn everything over to the trust for safe keeping. It is safe and valuable as well. You appease it for yourself ( corporate self), Then�. Bob is your Uncle. :-D

Tommy Atherton

My take on the value, is that if they, GOVERNMENT, put a value on it for a certain sum, one would want their trustees to put a sum of value beyond that value, as it would still be of interest for a party to get in line for a lien.