Lat night I read a thread in Administration of the Person where Scott really wasn't in favor of A4V. Why is this post here if Scott doesn't really support A4V? Just wondering???

I certainly am not answering for Scott, but will share my comprehension of what I've hear him saying. I'm in Canada, I'm not sure of the equivalent agents are in the US...what seems to be the issue is first public or private debt. If you owe the plumber money for work done on your home, that is private debt that we are responsible for...payment is contracted before the services are rendered. If the plumber is willing to accept a BoE (ie signed bill) then all is well in using it. Terms are contracted for private debt. For public debt, and I may be a bit off here but A4V I think is processed through the consolidated revenue fund, which is funded by taxes and tax payers. The issue with this is the tax payers are paying your public debt which then removes funds from the system that can benefit all people. The administration that Pete does, to my understanding, is with the intention that the Bank of Canada will create the funds to cover the public debt you are submitting. No 'hardship' is created for others as a result. I'm not positive I have the correct understanding and don't want to create any shit stains, I'm happy to be corrected :)

I believe were ALL considered Bankers because we deal/Handle FED Reserve Notes!

Accepted for Value is a setoff tactic, discharge is another thing.

:)

Consumer bills are for Agents of Government to write off dinners and champagne and cars and hotels and... and...

probably hookers and crack...

setoff by tax dollars, I might add...

:D http://www.thetenderforlaw.com/

Are YOU are a bank/banker? Is A4V not a TRUST? Who do you appoint as FIDUCIARY/TRUSTEE to pledge the ASSET (a4v) submitted? Can a CFO/CEO refuse appointment? What indentures do you wish to BIND him/her to? If you can't answer these questions - would it not be wise to keep DISCHARGING your statements with bank notes? ;)