Scott Duncan

Jan 01, 2014 2:26 AM
As the year draws to a close and we begin our FUCKING MASSIVE BANNING, I direct you to this well written article by someone BESIDES my crew.

Unique Facebook User ID: 927379467328526
Last Updated: Jan 01, 2014 2:26 AM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None


Anibal Jose Baez

Jan 01, 2014 2:38 AM
It is my wish to thank you, Admiral Scott, for all the VALUABLE information shared here, and for your VALUABLE time in doing so. Even if I am not the object of your intent, to ME you have shared information I could had only ever dream to know. As a result, I am a happier man, and my family is ripping the befefits of this, as well. I can, without a doubt, say I am a better man thanks to you, Admiral. I have zero value, but you may call upon me if ever in need. I feel much gratitude for your actions. I wish you, Tara, and your crew, the best ALWAYS. Mackximus...


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02035927166068E+016
Last Updated: Jan 01, 2014 2:38 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Scott Duncan

Jan 01, 2014 3:05 AM
The flagship's CAPTAIN wishes to speak. You'd better listen.


Unique Facebook User ID: 927379467328526
Last Updated: Jan 01, 2014 3:05 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Jan 01, 2014 5:55 AM


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Jan 01, 2014 5:55 AM
Type of Post: photo
Place of Post: None


Scott Duncan

Jan 01, 2014 6:16 AM
What was "LEGALLY" stolen from you, the general public. NOT ONE SINGLE PUBLISHED WORK ENTERED THE PUBLIC DOMAIN. Let that sink in. The culprits? THE RIAA/MPAA and their legal manipulations on copyright law. ...and they have NOTHING to do with PUBLISHING!

Unique Facebook User ID: 927379467328526
Last Updated: Jan 01, 2014 6:16 AM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None


Scott Duncan

Jan 01, 2014 6:21 AM
BOOK BANNING? What the fuck is WRONG with you dumb Americans!

Unique Facebook User ID: 927379467328526
Last Updated: Jan 01, 2014 6:21 AM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None




Scott Duncan

Jan 01, 2014 7:39 AM
WARNING: https://www.facebook.com/rick.carne is distributing EXE files claiming they are "Info on trusts". LISTEN VERY CAREFULLY; THERE IS NO LEGITIMATE REASON TO SEND EXE FILES BY EMAIL. Let me say that again: THERE IS NO LEGITIMATE REASON TO SEND EXE FILES BY EMAIL. Network Operations at NX2000 are investigating WHAT THESE THINGS DO. Details follow.


Unique Facebook User ID: 927379467328526
Last Updated: Jan 01, 2014 7:39 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Scott Duncan

Jan 01, 2014 8:28 AM


Unique Facebook User ID: 927379467328526
Last Updated: Jan 01, 2014 8:28 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None




Pete Daoust

Jan 01, 2014 6:26 PM
I have to put this here.....this, to me, can be one heck of a "dot connector" Unless, as Tara Duncan pointed out, you want to COMPLICATE things. This is the most SOLID stuff I have read today "If I have given you or anyone else the impression that you own me, that would be a mistake, please forgive me." -Gail Marie


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: Jan 01, 2014 6:26 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None




Scott Duncan

Jan 01, 2014 11:43 PM
FROM http://thetenderforlaw.com (No it's not done yet, but I can feed articles in the meantime): What is the difference between LEGAL and LAWFUL? To answer this question one must first answer the question, �What is LAW?� Social conditioning and the public discourse of lawyers is intentionally designed to stop you from asking this question. Here in reality there have been many attempts to define it. Law is just a weasel-word catch-phrase. The works of Lord Lloyd of Hampstead, most notably �Introduction to Jurisprudence�, poses the question whether it's possible, or desirable to define LAW. By 1972, when these works were written, there was no accepted definition. There are, however, �proposed� definitions. One definition is that �LAW� is a system of rules and guidelines which are enforced through social institutions to govern behaviour. Queen's Counsel, Glenville Williams, said the meaning of the word law depends on the context in which the word is used. For example, early Customary law and Municipal law are contexts where the word �LAW� have conflicting and irreconcilable meanings. A devout Muslim will consider the Q'uran and the Hadiths LAW; however a quick examination of these �LAWS� will show that they're incompatible with anything resembling a civilized society. In the end a conclusion is that LAW is anything that's written down and upheld by the adherents of that writing. It is the first MAXIM of LAW;�If it is written, it is Law.� It simply boils down to how many people are willing to enforce it. Some �LAWS� are considered universal. Don't harm others. Don't steal from others; and don't deceive others. Left at that point, the concept of LAW would be pretty simple, as these are things that most of us do as a matter of course. If you are taking the time to read this article, I think it's a safe assumption that you aren't doing it between bouts of robbery and murder. Human beings, by their very nature (with some notable exceptions), are inherently altruistic, and have empathy; thus making the whole not killing people, not robbing people and not defrauding people, the de facto state of the average Homo sapien. These universal laws are essentially all Homo sapiens need to interact with each other. If you're not killing somebody, and you're not robbing somebody, and you're not deceiving somebody, it is safe to presume that whatever you do is, in fact, LAWFUL. So what does LEGAL mean? In Western society LEGAL means Acts and Statutes enacted by Parliament/Congress with the FORCE OF LAW, and with the consent of the governed. I created THE TENDER FOR LAW to educate the general public as to what money is; and the reason this is so important is that money is what indicates your consent to be governed by LEGAL Acts and Statutes. If you are unfortunate enough to know a banker or a lawyer, great entertainment can be had by asking the question, �What does this note is LEGAL Tender mean?�, and watching them trying to sputter out an answer. Lawyers will give long, convoluted explanations with bullshit piled on top of bullshit. When they are finished with their deliberately wrong answer, point to the words and ask, �Which word says all that? Is it the words, �this note�? No? What about the words, LEGAL Tender? What does that mean?� That is why this group is called THE TENDER FOR LAW. THIS NOTE IS LEGAL TENDER = THIS NOTE IS A TENDER FOR LAW. If you partake in any financial transaction, LEGALLY the only consideration is who must pay. LEGAL = Accounting and Surety Surety simply means �responsible party�. None of this is ever taught to you in school, and as the Money as Debt series has taught you, neither is monetary theory. This is done with a very insidious intent. To understand what this insidious intent is, I must explain how I managed to avoid it. To do this I must snap back to a childhood vignette. Many readers will know the familiar feeling of having contempt for your parents. Allow me to give you a few more. My father (John Wayne Duncan), was in his mid-twenties and living in Belleville, Ontario. He had moved there from London, Ontario, to take a job with Canadian National Railways. We lived at 67 Village Drive, and my phone number was 962-0377. I remember these salient details because they were hammered into my head, in case I was found wandering around, which I tended to do. My grandmother (Olga Jean Duncan), thought I was the greatest thing that had ever blessed the earth; and whenever she was around my whims were catered to, in excess. From that time forward, she was never shy about stating that �I was the favourite!� From a child's perspective, comparatively, my parents seemed to actually resent my existence. At that point in life, I had adopted several axioms which hold true to this day. If you are under 20 years old, like it or not, you are a child. If you're fortunate enough to be this age, let me give you these axioms, and I guarantee your life will be of higher quality. Notice I call them axioms, and not laws (although since I'm writing them down here, for this article, technically they are); 1. EVERY ADULT IS LYING TO YOU � There are no exceptions to this rule. Most lie because they don't want to admit they are ignorant of the questions you're asking them. Many lie because they don't want you to know certain things. But in the end, they are all lying to you. A lie of omission is still a lie. It's intent is to deceive. I think I covered that earlier in this article � see unlawful. 2. IF YOU POINT OUT TO THESE ADULTS THAT THEY ARE, IN FACT, LYING TO YOU, THEY WILL INTENTIONALLY SEEK TO HARM YOU � There are no exceptions to this rule. Nobody's feelings are more hurt than when their lies are exposed. You may think this sounds hostile, but that's simply because you can't tell the difference between what's true, and what feels good. Back to the childhood vignette... One day my father vetoed a purchase that my grandmother had made, saying, �He needs to know the value of money.� Unfortunately for all parties involved, I was at the stage in my intellectual evolution where I had reached the conclusion that the only way to successfully navigate the world of liars, which I appeared to have been born into, was to lie to them. I mastered the art of deception at a very early age; and as long as you focus on the fact that the deception is there to misdirect, you can still see the world very clearly. For one of the other advantages I had at that point, was that I knew that knowledge is power. The trick is not to let anyone know you're learning it. When my grandmother agreed with my father's position, I was shocked and hurt, until I remembered, �They're all lying to me�. My only question is, �Why are they all lying to me�? It was shortly after that point that I learned I wasn't criminally accountable for my actions. Wait...what were those words? CRIMINALLY ACCOUNTABLE. What the hell does CRIME have to do with ACCOUNTING? I had just spotted a trinity. Money, crime, accounting. Whenever I spotted interactive trinities I studied each part, knowing they were connected to the other two parts. I dedicated the next two years, with the limited resources that I had, to the study of these things. I knew NEVER to reveal that I was actually thinking, because I saw what happened to kids that were discovered doing that. That's when I discovered what money actually was. At that time I was attending Parkdale Public School. In those early days (Late 70's), �Truancy� was considered an offence; but it turns out that nobody in a public library cares about truancy. The librarians at the Belleville Public Library, seeing me reference but never checking out books, constantly checking references, looking up definitions of words, and reading law, simply saw me as a smart, ambitious young man who's �really going to go places when he grows up". The lesson I hadn't learned at that time was NEVER LET THEM TAKE YOU SERIOUSLY. Here's my example. Since my father was a Civil Engineer, designing a �dream house� and building it across town, was a matter of simplicity. That house had been constructed, and we were living there. By that point I was a little terror, because somehow this man had convinced my grandmother that �learning the value of money� was important. When I stated that it had no value, and was in fact debt, I found myself in a permanently hostile environment. By that time my brother and sister had been born, because my father was figuring out that he'd married a worthless bimbo, and said worthless bimbo loved babies, but couldn't stand children. When it looked like my father was going to call it quits, she invariably got �knocked-up�. My sister was an exact clone of her mother; and I didn't know it at a time, but my brother would grow up to be one of the bravest men I had ever known. Sadly, I got all the brains. Many things were denied me, because I dared declare that "money has no value". All I ever heard about was how they didn't have any money. But I knew money was worthless, and it bound you to a whole bunch of rules that nobody in their right mind would want. I continued ignoring school and studying what was interesting to me; nobody had caught on to the library scam yet. Nobody knew where I went during the day when I was �truant�, and since I was a child who didn't know counter-surveillance techniques, I was unaware that my mother had commissioned a neighbour's kid to follow me. The little droplets of knowledge that I had, ended when the police showed up and terrorized the librarians. I was brought home, the police commented on what a smart kid I was, and in the preparation for some form of corporal punishment that my mother had thought up, I pointed out that injuring me is a crime, but if I injured her, it was not. I told her I would never forgive her for what she had taken away, and that if she ever denied me any knowledge ever again, I would kill her... ...and then I went back to playing dumb. For the first time in my life, everyone thought my mother was lying. To this day, it is my fondest childhood memory. Nobody would accept that I could put these concepts together. I got my first erection when I saw fear in her eyes. I was flooded with a flurry of emotion. Nobody believed her. Everything she was saying was true, and nobody believed her. They believed ME. I was just a dumb rebellious child, not someone who'd figured out things, far too soon for their liking. From the perspective of an adult it's pretty easy to play �dumb kid� as the adults in question, had forgotten what it's like to be a child, and had certainly forgotten how much their parents underestimated them. Nobody believed her. Why didn't anyone believe her? She was an adult. That's when I realized I didn't need a library, I had a laboratory. Be offensive, deceptive, and stupid � because that's what they expected; which means they were always looking in the wrong direction. I studied that trinity. I studied law, I studied crime, and I studied money, because I was �not criminally accountable for my actions.� As I was going down this path to enlightenment, there was a disproportionate air of concern from my grandmother. I wouldn't find out until I was thirteen exactly what that was. At the time it was just, if you keep doing what you're doing, apparently you're going to miss out on something. Something very important. But when pressed on the issue, every party would lie about it. By that point I could spot liars from a mile away. Sometimes I couldn't spot what the lie was, I could simply spot that when they said something that they knew wasn't true, they couldn't hide it from me. I learned more from people's lies than I ever did from honesty. I resented my parents for this. Why would they bring me into this world, filled with deception and lies, where everyone thinks wrong, and values the wrong things? I knew the value of money. It had none. And I also found that it had conditions � see THIS NOTE IS LEGAL TENDER. Those of you seeking liberty must learn law and accounting, because if you don't you will believe a million lies. We've often heard the phrase, �No one is above the law"! In reality, there are lots of people above the law. A Justice, for example, in Canada, has absolutely no criminal liability for their actions; yet you are told we are all equal under the law. And you'll be told that it's necessary, etc., in order to distract you from the actual mechanics. If someone is �above the law�, then there is no law. It's fraud. A man/woman in a black dress and a red sash doesn't have magical super-powers that puts him/her �above the law� or above you; and these people possess no mental powers that you don't; yet everyone blindly accepts their �authority�. Thank your early childhood programming, and ESPECIALLY religion. It is your early programming that makes you "believe" people are "above" you. Legally, "authority" simply refers to the author of a document. You'll find many of these contrary definitions throughout legal jurisprudence. These are hidden-in-plain-sight lies that everyone BELIVES. So if you're a young man, or woman reading this, and you want the answer to all the questions you may have about life, start with a foundation of ALL BELIEF IS EVIL. If you BELIEVE something, it means you've stopped investigating, or questioning it. It means any research or thought you had once intended to put into it � has ended. Belief is the end of thought. Those that believe, know this. I can guarantee, despite the fact that you, the reader, are just one of seven billion people on this planet, you have at least once in your life heard the phrase, �You think too much�. Take a moment and try and recall who told you that; and then you can tell me why all belief is evil. For those digging up records, the dream house my father built was at 84 Edgehill Road, Belleville, Ontario. I used to attend Harry J. Clarke Public School, and regularly robbed Moira Secondary School for items and materials needed for my actual education, not the public fool system. Those doing serious digging, will see me as �Scott Duncan�, in yearbooks and records, etc. Because I love giving away the ending of the story at the beginning, I will tell you right now that John Scott Duncan was my legal name, but it was also a TITLE, and therefore could not be used whilst I was a child in commerce. This "TITLE" is not something everyone gets, and it must be CLAIMED, and the claimant must be "worthy". There is a reason you are referred to as MASTER as opposed to MISTER when you are a child. We'll cover that, and a bunch of shit attached to that, in a future article. It turned out for ME, that my name, itself, had a different standing legally. All this knowledge I had as a child. Now you are getting it; and you didn't even have to work for it. Let's snap back to the present again. At this writing, the year is 2014 of what is generally known as the Common Era. It used to mean Anno Domini, which apparently referred to a rape-baby that had a bad weekend for your �sins� (He didn't "die", according to the evil fairy tale. He "came back to life"). Let me take a second and do my regular bout of Christian-bashing and point out that if you're Christian your ideology is based on what is allegedly the word of a man who declared �Thou shalt not commit adultery�, and then went on to knock-up some other guy's wife in her sleep; which has the added bonus of being rape. If you're a Christian, you won't understand why I think you're just an evil piece-of-shit. All belief is evil. Christian belief is particularly bad. Say what you want about Muslims, but their beliefs are based on the teachings of someone that actually existed. ...but I digress... All belief is evil. I've simply mastered the art of showing you why. The founders of the United States actually formed their Republic to escape the �money as debt� system. They failed. At this writing there is over a trillion dollar Trade Deficit, and this once-free Republic that was the bastion of invention, innovation and productivity is now just a nation of debt, and the enforcement thereof. Virtually half the employed Americans today directly or indirectly work for the government, doing nothing but creating and enforcing policy. Canada is not far behind. Look at where the United States was twenty years ago, and that's where Canada is now. I seem to have entered a period of my life where those in my past, who said I was crazy, are now coming back and saying, �You were right�! Verily I say to those that knew me in the past, who are now coming out of the woodwork seeking answers from me; stop now, because "I'm sorry" isn't good enough any more. I already spent the time trying to teach you; TIME I WILL NOT GET BACK, and you couldn't be bothered to listen. If you make the attempt, I WILL harm you. Consider that PROPER NOTICE and govern yourselves accordingly. You're lucky you are even getting this. Be grateful. (Because I don't get that time back, you will PAY me first. Not with fiat currency, but in labour. HARD labour. A navy doesn't maintain itself, and there is a LOT of nasty/dangerous shit to do on a boat, that is just perfect for someone who dared waste my precious time!) Because as I said before, I don't possess any mental powers you don't; and if you couldn't be bothered to listen the first time, then you have already chosen your side. In the end, war is coming, and it will be a war between �thinkers� and �believers�, not good and evil. To quote Ben Stiller in Zero Effect, "There aren't any good guys. You realize that don't you? I mean you realize there aren't evil guys, and innocent guys. It's just, it's just...it's just a bunch of guys." Thinking and believing are mutually exclusive. They shall forever be in conflict. All that is �legal� relies on belief. Legal has nothing to do with right and wrong. It always has to do with money. REMEMBER THE REQUIRED VIEWING https://youtu.be/3P7izAUe3ZM


Unique Facebook User ID: 927379467328526
Last Updated: Jan 01, 2014 11:43 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Steve Lemieux

Jan 02, 2014 3:02 AM
Along with the REQUIRED viewing of MONEY AS DEBT 3 Here is a GREAT accompanying document I would suggest as REQUIRED READING:


Unique Facebook User ID: 458370044339963
Last Updated: Jan 02, 2014 3:02 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Steve Lemieux

Jan 02, 2014 3:32 AM
Here's another document worth reading. Here's a quote: "This is the plain fact of the matter. We have had no "Government" since the institution of the private Federal Reserve and its private collection agency, the IRS." THE DISPATCH OF MERCHANTS


Unique Facebook User ID: 458370044339963
Last Updated: Jan 02, 2014 3:32 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Steve Lemieux

Jan 02, 2014 4:14 AM
Here's an interesting read on the "Depository Trust Company"


Unique Facebook User ID: 458370044339963
Last Updated: Jan 02, 2014 4:14 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Harold Austerman

Jan 02, 2014 4:51 PM
SEE: BIRTH OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE! OR ORGANIC ACT OF 1871!


Unique Facebook User ID: 739373829449191
Last Updated: Jan 02, 2014 4:51 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

Jan 02, 2014 6:01 PM

Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: Jan 02, 2014 6:01 PM
http://www.youtube.com/v/IB85AjebnnY?version=3&autohide=1&autoplay=1
Type of Post: video
Place of Post: None




Jan 02, 2014 10:02 PM
all went well...still have to go back on the 9th to set the trial date.It started out in front of a JP who didn't want anything to do with me rebutting the capacity of the name so he put me over to court room 3 to speak to a judge...The judge was a sweetheart and accepted all my files and the Crown said the court appointed lawyer was un available to set a date for trial so...looks like the Crown is looking for ways to stall things! lol!


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Jan 02, 2014 10:02 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Steve Lemieux

Jan 02, 2014 11:52 PM
I just got an email from Glenn with many links to check out. Here it is. Subject: I'VE TAKEN THE TIME TO PUT ALL THESE LINKS TOGETHER FROM KAREN HUDES WORLD BANK WHISTLEBLOWER------ PLEASE FORWARD TO EVERYONE-- IT'S TIME TO WAKE THE WORLD UP http://www.europarl.europa.eu/document/activities/cont/201105/20110518ATT19540/20110518ATT19540EN.pdf THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT COMMITTEE ON BUDGETARY CONTROL MAY 25, 2011 HEARING ON WHISTLEBLOWING EVIDENCE OF KAREN HUDES1 WORLD BANK WHISTLEBLOWER http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fDieoG1kdXs&feature=youtu.be 12:05 Minute video TALKS ABOUT THE WIZARD OF OZ > Aug 2013 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gHVgRgYdCsQ 23:35 minute video Sept 2013 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=58ayjFKRQ2A 34:37 minute video Oct 2013 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=av6bpIzvDvg 30:47 minute video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ucXqMLulhas 47:25 minute video https://s3.amazonaws.com/khudes/Karen-Hudes+(2).jpg https://s3.amazonaws.com/khudes/fdod37.pdf LAW OFFICE OF KAREN HUDES WORLD BANK WHISTLE BLOWER http://kahudes.net/contact-us/ CONTACT US https://www.facebook.com/login.php?next=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.facebook.com%2Fhashtag%2Fkarenhudes facebook Past disclosures are at: https://s3.amazonaws.com/khudes/nation+of+change.docx Karen's story Whistle Blower from the World Bank http://www.scribd.com/doc/106226872/Retired-Judge-Spills-the-Beans Retired Judge Spills the Beans http://www.gemworld.com/usa--original13thamend.htm The Original Thirteenth Amendment Ratified March 12, 1819 https://s3.amazonaws.com/khudes/Two_Constitutions_in_US.pdf Two Constitutions in the United States. 1st was illegally suspended in favor of a Vatican �Crown� corporation in 1871 https://s3.amazonaws.com/khudes/two+constitutions.pdf what is really important start on page 5 https://s3.amazonaws.com/khudes/embennell2.docx https://s3.amazonaws.com/khudes/fjudicialconferencetraxler.docx http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/1107/1107.5728v2.pdf http://articlev.org/oxwall/ow_userfiles/plugins/groupfiles/Letter%20to%20Clerk The network of global corporate control http://articlev.org/oxwall/ow_userfiles/plugins/groupfiles/Letter%20to%20Clerk%281%29.pdf http://articlev.org/oxwall/ow_userfiles/plugins/groupfiles/Letter%20to%20Clerk%281%29.pdf http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CREC-2013-10-24/pdf/CREC-2013-10-24.pdf http://articlev.org/map/ http://articlev.org/oxwall/ow_userfiles/plugins/groupfiles/clerk-reply.pdf http://my.firedoglake.com/danielmarks/2013/04/30/congress-needs-to-comply-with-state-demands-for-article-v-constitutional-convention/ https://s3.amazonaws.com/khudes/CREC-2013-10-24-pt1-PgH6775-6+(1).pdf https://s3.amazonaws.com/khudes/congressionalrecord-pp64-highlighted+(1).pdf http://www.conventionofstates.com/ http://blog.ucadia.com/2012/08/uofu-episode-92-america-sea-of-souls.html Ucadia http://anationbeguiled.com/?p=1277 http://www.scribd.com/doc/157112633/Social-Justice-Doctrine-the-New-World-Order-and-Operation-Heavy-Freedom http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-11-696 Federal Reserve System: http://www.nga.org/cms/CoG Council of Governors https://s3.amazonaws.com/khudes/A+Grandfather%27s+Encouragement.pdf Perspective Preview https://s3.amazonaws.com/khudes/5.Rebuilding+Global+Banking+System.pdf First of all, how did the current global banking system come to be? http://www.larsschall.com/2013/05/08/governance-issues-at-the-world-bank-a-security-risk-to-the-world-order/ https://s3.amazonaws.com/khudes/usdollar1.pdf https://s3.amazonaws.com/khudes/1.Perspective+Summary.pdf A GRANDFATHER�S ENCOURAGEMENT To Our Next Generation https://s3.amazonaws.com/khudes/2.Perspective.pdf https://s3.amazonaws.com/khudes/3.Perspective+Afterword.pdf http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201213/cmselect/cmintdev/writev/402/contents.htm International Development Committee - Written Evidence http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201213/cmselect/cmpubadm/writev/publicpolicy/m03.htm Public engagement in policy-making http://www.parliament.uk/documents/commons-committees/public-administration/Complaints%20Consolidated%2024%20July.pdf Written Evidence https://s3.amazonaws.com/khudes/4.Rebuilding+America%27s+Inner+Compass.pdf The Overhaul of American Education From the Ground Up https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pound_sterling#Currency_of_the_United_Kingdom

Unique Facebook User ID: 458370044339963
Last Updated: Jan 02, 2014 11:52 PM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None




Harold Austerman

Jan 03, 2014 4:45 PM
TRUDAT!!!!!


Unique Facebook User ID: 739373829449191
Last Updated: Jan 03, 2014 4:45 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Scott Duncan

Jan 04, 2014 2:58 AM
Bump.


Unique Facebook User ID: 927379467328526
Last Updated: Jan 04, 2014 2:58 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Scott Duncan

Jan 04, 2014 5:25 AM
Incoming!


Unique Facebook User ID: 927379467328526
Last Updated: Jan 04, 2014 5:25 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

Jan 05, 2014 12:12 AM
OOpppsssss... !!!!! :-o Pierre Ponzi schemes are not limited to con artists. The entire financial system operates like a Ponzi scheme - and after decades of fun and games we're reaching its inevitable limits. Note: The short intro to his excellent interview is just plain dumb. Stick with it. It'll be worth it. Video:

Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: Jan 05, 2014 12:12 AM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None


Sue Rakestraw

Jan 05, 2014 2:30 AM
For Scott Duncan's review: I am not endorsing buying anything from this site. Just an interesting video on Bitcoin.

Unique Facebook User ID: 265142030332998
Last Updated: Jan 05, 2014 2:30 AM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

Jan 05, 2014 4:27 PM
Scott Duncan dropped this in my group filled with stain shits yesterday :-o I pay by credit ALL THE TIME. My bank ENDORSES MY credit. I actually have VALUE that others WANT. :)


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: Jan 05, 2014 4:27 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Colin Stephen Tonks

Jan 06, 2014 12:52 AM
If the McDonalds' Corporation were to install Speed Limit signs (in their Drive throughs) at say 2 KM/hr - and had installed speed cameras that caught you doing 5 KMs/hr, could they send you a FINE for say $400.00 and expect you to pay it? What if they 'did a deal' with SPER (here in Qld's), in a money making exercise whereby they sold that 'perceived' debt onto them (for say, 30c in the dollar), could you lose your car for not paying SPER's demand? Isn't that what is happening - and what Queensland Motorway Pty Ltd (a private company) have done with their privately owned roads and Toll ways?


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.01523951670811E+016
Last Updated: Jan 06, 2014 12:52 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Daniel J Wentz

Jan 06, 2014 2:08 AM


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02021762657264E+016
Last Updated: Jan 06, 2014 2:08 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


David Johansen

Jan 06, 2014 2:55 AM
WHY? Why do people think wrong and value the wrong things?


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.020477456099E+016
Last Updated: Jan 06, 2014 2:55 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Norah Holloway

Jan 06, 2014 3:56 AM
I get it. I really get it. I can't stand trying to talk to brick walls, glazed over eyes, minds that can't even grasp the simplest term... or ideas. This year, I am studying like my life depends on it. Which, I really know now that it does depend on it. Tomorrow, I'm treating this group, like school... up at 9am... study for hours. No more messing around. Scott, I don't know how you do it. Thank you, for drilling into our heads that we really do value the wrong things.


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.01536860029343E+016
Last Updated: Jan 06, 2014 3:56 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Libby Patterson

Jan 06, 2014 4:26 AM
I am looking for the link for Black's Law Dictionary 9th edition please, thank you (a safe one to download)


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.01523369043703E+016
Last Updated: Jan 06, 2014 4:26 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Cara Small

Jan 06, 2014 4:41 AM
When forming a trust and putting real property in said trust, is it required for said real property to have not been used in gaining access to credit?


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02066034553543E+016
Last Updated: Jan 06, 2014 4:41 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Scott Duncan

Jan 06, 2014 5:57 AM
Someone just messaged me using Nigger Technology. The only reason I am aware of it, is because I get an alarm. JUST USE THE FUCKING PHONE!

Unique Facebook User ID: 927379467328526
Last Updated: Jan 06, 2014 5:57 AM
https://www.youtube.com/embed/rTzO-_Yl4d0?autoplay=1
Type of Post: video
Place of Post: None


August le Blanc

Jan 06, 2014 7:22 AM
We learn from our Mistakes. What exactly was the presumption that we presumed earlier? Do you recall it? What would be considered a Leader? We do not want this thing and We do not want to get in the way. We have followed guidance and arrived at the ability to be a autonomous. I have questions but they all start from� What are we missing? We have determined a value, we have determined it privately by an appraisal of assets and an inventory of skill's: That is the equation of the value of lien: On the titles generated at birth and the private business there of. Which is quite a large Sum when the subject of this lien becomes known: It is private for now. We have concluded an administrative process and are literally ready to enforce the lien. However, The Admiral Has said selling it to a bank might be a good thing or using it to generate credit by putting it up as collateral to a bank, which we have created as per proper notice and process, to care for this slave, this creation of others. We would sincerely like to do the right thing. Since it is the highest form of Law. Ours is a provincial jurisdiction, being a duly authorized trustee corporation does not trust law transcend that? We created credit as a result of proper notice and process which is directly attributed to the Admiral. We also have established an internal currency of Bobcoin. To engage in private matters. We wish to exchange these credits on behalf of our private client by opening an account with Aquilae Trust or something like that. We do not want to miss the point. Would this be a course that would benefit anyone here? Sincerely and Kindest regards. The Directors of Bob Uncle Ltd.


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.01530787868601E+016
Last Updated: Jan 06, 2014 7:22 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Beverly Berta Braakschmack

Jan 06, 2014 7:42 AM
So whaddup with Dean here? He's going to send letters to the UN and Queen Elizabeth over this? Would that really do anything? Basically if Dean uses fiat money, he's under the terms and conditions that go with it, regardless of anything else, correct?

Unique Facebook User ID: 1.0151988293247E+016
Last Updated: Jan 06, 2014 7:42 AM
http://www.youtube.com/v/aN-vPBzPI8k?version=3&list=UUxqjiqHIenA7st14duL19Sg&autoplay=1
Type of Post: video
Place of Post: None


Scott Duncan

Jan 06, 2014 8:11 AM
I give you, the honoured members of The Tender For Law, our new mascot: Wehrmacht Pony!


Unique Facebook User ID: 927379467328526
Last Updated: Jan 06, 2014 8:11 AM
Type of Post: photo
Place of Post: {u'location': {u'latitude': Decimal('48.8567'), u'city': u'Paris', u'longitude': Decimal('2.3508'), u'country': u'France'} u'id': u'110774245616525', u'name': u'Paris, France'}


Harold Austerman

Jan 06, 2014 4:36 PM
Taa Daa!!


Unique Facebook User ID: 739373829449191
Last Updated: Jan 06, 2014 4:36 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Libby Patterson

Jan 07, 2014 3:03 AM
I am in jury duty selection process today and tomorrow. I am shocked that circumstantial evidence is acceptable here legally.


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.01523369043703E+016
Last Updated: Jan 07, 2014 3:03 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


August le Blanc

Jan 07, 2014 3:56 AM
Anyone want to discuss how to form a trust? To maximize value and not be caught in the trap of "this note is legal tender". To avoid all joinder and live. Hmmmm?


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.01530787868601E+016
Last Updated: Jan 07, 2014 3:56 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


James Eugene Vari

Jan 07, 2014 1:55 PM
update how to beat the tax man and it work


Unique Facebook User ID: 857731637607687
Last Updated: Jan 07, 2014 1:55 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Scott Duncan

Jan 07, 2014 2:25 PM

Unique Facebook User ID: 927379467328526
Last Updated: Jan 07, 2014 2:25 PM
https://www.youtube.com/embed/vtQ7LNeC8Cs?autoplay=1
Type of Post: video
Place of Post: None


Norah Holloway

Jan 07, 2014 3:53 PM
Looks like National-Kick-A-Cop-In-The-Face-Day seems to have taken off!! \\

Unique Facebook User ID: 1.01536860029343E+016
Last Updated: Jan 07, 2014 3:53 PM
https://www.youtube.com/embed/rltylKujfyY?autoplay=1
Type of Post: video
Place of Post: None


Harold Austerman

Jan 07, 2014 4:51 PM
http://www.freedomsphoenix.com/News/148158-2014-01-06-police-break-13-year-olds-nose-for-refusing-to-confess.htm MAGIC SUIT/SMALL PENIS SYNDROME ALERT!!!


Unique Facebook User ID: 739373829449191
Last Updated: Jan 07, 2014 4:51 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


August le Blanc

Jan 07, 2014 6:28 PM
Think About this� We are worth nothing. We All Value Wrong and Think wrong� This forum is put together by Scott, who knows that. Value what is here. Treat those who would detract from this forum as the enemy.


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.01530787868601E+016
Last Updated: Jan 07, 2014 6:28 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Steve Lemieux

Jan 07, 2014 11:22 PM
Something you MIGHT wish to study if you're interested in doing Accepted for Value:


Unique Facebook User ID: 458370044339963
Last Updated: Jan 07, 2014 11:22 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Norah Holloway

Jan 08, 2014 5:54 AM
This just popped up in Toronto.


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.01536860029343E+016
Last Updated: Jan 08, 2014 5:54 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Jo Xappie

Jan 08, 2014 1:55 PM
chicka boom badda bing rapper's cryptocurrency!!!

Unique Facebook User ID: 1620495888164360
Last Updated: Jan 08, 2014 1:55 PM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None


Harold Austerman

Jan 08, 2014 4:26 PM
http://www.lewrockwell.com/lrc-blog/for-police-murder-is-a-time-saving-device/ THEY ACTUALY WALK AMONGST US!!!-SCARY!


Unique Facebook User ID: 739373829449191
Last Updated: Jan 08, 2014 4:26 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Mike Carparelli

Jan 08, 2014 9:56 PM
Small small world.......look who went to school with my wife in 83. The Admiral himself!


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.01520427836159E+016
Last Updated: Jan 08, 2014 9:56 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

Jan 09, 2014 3:49 AM
Me and my friend Denis, we are about to destroy a LAWYER :D We have her lying on the RECORD :D Muhahahahahaha!!!!! She's been trying to get PRIVATE informations from Denis, using LIES, and Denis has it on AUDIO..... Fun Time :D .....fucking LIERS :P Any suggestions .....


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: Jan 09, 2014 3:49 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Steve Lemieux

Jan 09, 2014 5:10 AM
It would seem THEY do know of such a thing as "SET OFF"... "5. (1) Where a depositor has applied for a payment under this Act and..." "...(b) a right of set-off could be asserted by the depositor or the liquidator in respect of the deposit and the obligation,..." This document COULD be interesting to certain folks.


Unique Facebook User ID: 458370044339963
Last Updated: Jan 09, 2014 5:10 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Harold Austerman

Jan 09, 2014 4:52 PM
http://www.freedomsphoenix.com/News/148310-2014-01-09-article-one-more-reason-the-banking-system-is-a-criminal.htm


Unique Facebook User ID: 739373829449191
Last Updated: Jan 09, 2014 4:52 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Beverly Berta Braakschmack

Jan 09, 2014 6:24 PM
I have a weird question. If say you wanted to pay off a line of credit or something. Rather than sending your payment to the bank that holds the account, would you send your payment to the Bank of Canada instead? The reason for this question is that if chartered banks fractionalize deposits, then sending payment into the Bank of Canada would deter this from happening? Scott?


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.0151988293247E+016
Last Updated: Jan 09, 2014 6:24 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

Jan 10, 2014 3:05 AM
Oh shit :D

Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: Jan 10, 2014 3:05 AM
http://video.dailymail.co.uk/video/1418450360/2013/12/1418450360_2954056678001_lilyrob.mp4
Type of Post: video
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

Jan 10, 2014 10:19 PM
My first Crypto-Currency Shovel :P (I have three like this :D


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: Jan 10, 2014 10:19 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Sino General

Jan 11, 2014 12:32 AM
An Interview with Gail about her Successful discharge with her Line of Credit with a 20 dollar check, along with Norah who join us on this call. Enjoy and pass on.

Unique Facebook User ID: 1.015497754093E+016
Last Updated: Jan 11, 2014 12:32 AM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None


Sino General

Jan 11, 2014 7:42 AM
Awesome banter in court with the judges, 10mins and 40secs is classic !!! pass around and share, this is oral contracting, Micah Yuwalasugo Green

Unique Facebook User ID: 1.015497754093E+016
Last Updated: Jan 11, 2014 7:42 AM
http://www.youtube.com/v/bgbQYMHQG5E?autohide=1&version=3&autoplay=1
Type of Post: video
Place of Post: None


Sino General

Jan 11, 2014 10:47 PM
Judge admits on the record that CRA and the Federal Tax Court are NOT part of the government of Canada = foreign private for profit corporation, AND... CRA has the unreturned 1013 form providing authority to represent... Bill was there on behalf of his federal corp owned by his trust... as the rules are set up... and they kept pushing for PAULINE to appear... that has nothing to do with it. see attached http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/agency


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.015497754093E+016
Last Updated: Jan 11, 2014 10:47 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Mike Carparelli

Jan 12, 2014 12:46 AM
Been watching since last night. Scott has mentioned this series a few times:)

Unique Facebook User ID: 1.01520427836159E+016
Last Updated: Jan 12, 2014 12:46 AM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None


Norah Holloway

Jan 12, 2014 1:43 AM
Hello All. A local group here in Victoria, BC has the opportunity to interview the NEW Chief of Police. I was wondering if anyone could help out... by coming up with some hard hitting questions. You know the grilling kind... the one's that will make him sweat...


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.01536860029343E+016
Last Updated: Jan 12, 2014 1:43 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


David Johansen

Jan 12, 2014 6:17 AM
this post has been removed... NOOO!!! ok what happened, what did i miss this time? why are their 384 members w/24 new, when last i looked it was down to 364 or something... i see Scott is still here. who has a back up of the thread: https://www.facebook.com/groups/tenderforlaw/607523365950266/


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.020477456099E+016
Last Updated: Jan 12, 2014 6:17 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Beverly Berta Braakschmack

Jan 13, 2014 12:57 AM


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.0151988293247E+016
Last Updated: Jan 13, 2014 12:57 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Steve Lemieux

Jan 13, 2014 1:32 AM
Someone sent this to me, for your consideration: "UNIDROIT is the organization that owns all of the rights to the UCC, and they have a website. The United States pays UNIDROIT $250,000/year for the use of their private law. UNIDROIT is about 100 yards from the Holy See, in Rome. Furthermore the UCC is all Roman Law."

Unique Facebook User ID: 458370044339963
Last Updated: Jan 13, 2014 1:32 AM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None


Chris Evan

Jan 13, 2014 5:02 PM
Question...If the NAME is on a Deed to property and the NAME is held in TRUST, yet still listed on the Deed, wouldn't the idiots still think its ME? Would it be prudent, and/or possible, to transfer the Deed to the Corporation instead of keeping it in the NAME?


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02024820688268E+016
Last Updated: Jan 13, 2014 5:02 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None




J.P. Alexander

Jan 15, 2014 3:11 AM
My CHILD SUPPORT THREAD: per/Pierre Short version I was at home cop knocks. I answer he has a warrant/reciept for me. I asked if he had a signed complaint by an injured party. He says No and asks that i come with him. I was so stupid i did. At the jail i reserved all rights they were angry with confusion. Bond out. Court date. I arrived, my turn. I had the NOTICE OF MISTAKE with me. Along with a bunch of freedumbbb documents i didn't know what they meant, I was desperate so I said fuck it. The judge asks me to say my NAME but i didn't I spoke of SURETY for a minute or so and let myself be interrupted. I interrupt back. I asked the Judge who the injured party was she says the the PROSECUTOR was REPRESENTING a state corp. called family human services or something. I asked for dismissal for LACK of signed complaint. She got angry. Then i pointed out that the PROSECUTOR the judge and the injured party all represented the STATE and that it was an obvious CONFLICT OF INTEREST. She got even more angry. She threatened me with jail bla bla bla. At one point i had to make a decision NOTICE OF MISTAKE or freeeduumbbb document that called them traitors and oath violaters and a bunch of dumb shit. So not knowing what to do I pulled out the NOTICE because it seemed alot safer, and said " uh I NEED to give this to YOU." She ACCEPTED the NOTICE and started reading. She made it probably to the question section before she realized what she was actually reading. As soon as she did REAL-IZE what i gave her she literally threw it at the clerk spouting off about not knowing what a NOTICE OF MISTAKE is.. The CLERK filed it. The judges demeanor changed and she dismissed for LACK OF PROPER NOTICE. Because at some point i yelled i had not been NOTICED of any CHARGES. She made a point to say " The only reason I'm dismissing this is for lack of proper notice" but i knew she was full of stain shit! :-) My point is i actually gave the judge NOTICE. I don't advise it and certified mail is probably better but she READ it. She couldn't say she had not READ IT or ACT like she hadn't because it was handed to her with me there. She couldn't ACT like she didn't understand my questions because the NOTICE states the FACTS in the beginning. BAM!!!! DISCLOSURE: This is not legal advise. I dont advocate going to court. I was scared and STUPID!!!


Unique Facebook User ID: 780666251957463
Last Updated: Jan 15, 2014 3:11 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None




Mark Otf Kerruish

Jan 15, 2014 4:05 AM
Does anyone have a link to or have an example for a Notice of Mistake? Thanks


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.01523073774052E+016
Last Updated: Jan 15, 2014 4:05 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

Jan 15, 2014 12:07 PM
But with all these crypto currencies available, Man and Women will soon realize that Money of Exchange can be ANY THING....... Funny times ahead, really funny times ahead... :D


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: Jan 15, 2014 12:07 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None




Janick Paquette

Jan 15, 2014 5:46 PM
Define AQUILAE... 1) Aquileia is a city in central Italy. 2) a constellation named "eagle", for Aquilae, lying in the Milky Way close to Cygnus and situated on the celestial equator. The brightest star is Altair _________________ Scott words: "When I need a task performed for AQUILAE I REQUEST." Ok, so let me ask again, define AQUILAE... :/


Unique Facebook User ID: 802541149837689
Last Updated: Jan 15, 2014 5:46 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Lana Dukakis

Jan 16, 2014 9:47 PM
My Father died last year. He left his estate to me and my sister and made me the executor of his last will and testament. He left his money, a number of items of furniture, and the bulk of his estate. Example�half the house, half a vacation property in Florida, half the value of cars, half of the bank accounts and investments etc. After my dad�s death, my stepmother, and my step brother and sister immediately cut off communication with me. They hired a lawyer and all communication has been through their lawyer. I have not received anything from my Dad�s estate as per his will. They have sold the house, emptied all the bank accounts and liquidated all of his (their co-owned) assets. Essentially, their lawyer says that his will is worthless and be entirely ignored due to �rights of survivorship� which says that the surviving spouse gets all the deceased spouses assets. After almost a year of trying to get them to recognise the will and provide me with bank statements etc so I can settle the estate, they will not even respond to my letters, phone calls etc. Legally, I am responsible to settle the estate as per his final wishes. Also, I am obligated to do his final taxes (including estate taxes etc). I can�t do this because I cannot obtain any of the info that I need. I want to charge them criminally, but I�m not sure what acts and statutes, criminal code sections I should reference when I inform a JP and submit an application to charge her criminally. I�m desperate at this point and I don�t know what sections of statutes etc to cite. Any and all help is greatly appreciated. Thanks!


Unique Facebook User ID: 1597301487185764
Last Updated: Jan 16, 2014 9:47 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


August le Blanc

Jan 17, 2014 5:54 PM
Key information to help see profiles for who they really are. We are watching the watchers now�

Unique Facebook User ID: 1.01530787868601E+016
Last Updated: Jan 17, 2014 5:54 PM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None


Tommy Atherton

Jan 19, 2014 6:12 PM
just renewed the person's "whom is in my pocket" drivers licence as it is quite likely my car will be stolen, or my teeth knocked down my throat if don't carry one. Paid (correction Bought the debt) by cheque, in the memo wrote: terms: not for hire, how binding is this little exchange? Gail?, Tommy A open for slaughter in the TTFL forum, im scared of the Admiral BTW ha ha.


Unique Facebook User ID: 1584308875165822
Last Updated: Jan 19, 2014 6:12 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Jan 19, 2014 8:42 PM
"Private money" they're trying to figure out how to tax it. It is not legal tender, therefore no joinder ... who would knowingly consent to paying a tax.


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Jan 19, 2014 8:42 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Norah Holloway

Jan 20, 2014 12:20 AM
Well, first things first. I have been watching the Money as Debt Series on YouTube. I actually found the entire series in one go, on my 3rd viewing. I have been taking notes. It doesn't seem logical that we all go back to the gold standard. THAT IS CLEAR. I do have some questions. I have been reading back in the group as far as I can go. Which happens to be only as far as January 8, 2013. Members of the group have been mentioning certain threads, and I am unable to view them, I think they are further back. 1. Scott's "Proper Notice" thread 2. "How Evil-Children's-Aid Society" thread by Scott 3. "Notice of Mistake" thread 4. "Just In Case" thread 5. "How to lien you court case and the warrant properly" thread These are all threads, I cannot view� I was wondering if someone could please tag me in them. Or does anyone have a copy of these threads mentioned above?


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.01536860029343E+016
Last Updated: Jan 20, 2014 12:20 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

Jan 20, 2014 3:15 AM
So, the best thing to do is to make sure the person I happen to have in my pocket, never see a "This Note is Legal Tender" ? :D Any thoughts ?? :D


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: Jan 20, 2014 3:15 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

Jan 20, 2014 7:11 PM
Two new members.... Ian Dunphy Vito Jose Dono THE TENDER FOR LAW is an examination of what you need to know to fight Judicial corruption, by examining the stuff you are LIED TO about. SPOILERS: IT'S ALWAYS ABOUT ACCOUNTING AND SURETY. You are BOUND by ACTS, STATUTES, and CODES when you use MONEY. On that money are the words THIS NOTE IS LEGAL TENDER: THIS NOTE - The note the words (NOTICE) is written on. IS LEGAL - CODES, ACTS, AND STATUTES with the force of law. TENDER - tender verb ten�dered ten�der�ing Definition of TENDER transitive verb 1: to make a tender of 2: to present for acceptance : offer "tendered my resignation" intransitive verb : to make a bid or tender Origin of TENDER Middle English tendren, from Anglo-French tendre offer First Known Use: 15th century THIS NOTE IS LEGAL TENDER=THIS NOTE IS A TENDER FOR LAW This forum is where you can ask all your questions, and we don't have to keep typing the same answers over and over. To that end, I am telling you to WATCH THIS FIRST: http://youtu.be/3P7izAUe3ZM NOT watching this, and then posting a question and/or making idiotic statements which reveal you HAVEN'T watched this, means you are DELIBERATELY ignoring these instructions, and you will be banned. Post your question, we will do our best to answer. OFF TOPIC POSTS WILL BE PURGED. We want people to be able to use this as a central reference and a place to go for help, where people will take the time to do so. Post any questions on LAW, MONEY, CONTRACTS, and JURISDICTIONS and how they are connected. Keep it civil, even if Scott doesn't. (It's Scott after all. Seriously, it's better than paying him) Remember that Scott chooses his words carefully. LEARN WHAT THOSE WORDS MEAN.

Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: Jan 20, 2014 7:11 PM
https://www.youtube.com/embed/3P7izAUe3ZM?autoplay=1
Type of Post: video
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

Jan 20, 2014 11:16 PM
HAHAHA!!!.....fucks the puppy's picture in on a BOBSLEIGH :D HAHAHAHA!!!!....Jamaica in Bobsleigh ?? :/

Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: Jan 20, 2014 11:16 PM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

Jan 21, 2014 4:28 AM
Scott on SURETY- thread....(digged by Derek Moran) THE TENDER FOR LAW � SURETY FOR IDIOTS (c) 2013 ROGUESUPPORT INC. under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License. It's been a while since I've posted an article, and I've solidified the "For Idiots" concept. One of the most painful things about being on FaceBook is having to endure the fact that people with chronic Dunning�Kruger effect still think that their ignorance has the same standing as my knowledge; and they will happily state many unkind things regarding my character when I challenge their "pulled-out-of-their-ass" mythology. Some don't even go that far, and will simply lie about what I said, and claim I don't post evidence. I don't have to post "evidence". I'm not trying to PROVE anything to you. That said, this is not a debate centre either. You assume ALL LIABILITY when you ask to join this group. This, by default, means you have "SURETY", because SURETY equals LIABILITY. I don't need to provide "proof" of this; as my banning you from the group should be compelling enough to show the difference between who's in charge, and who's liable. Before we get to the actual issue of SURETY, and why you must avoid it, we must take a quick journey back in time to learn where the legalese that enjoins you came from. Those of you who endured the content-free 1.2 decades of the Public Fool System, will remember certain things, not the least of which is Shakespeare. The plays of Shakespeare are sold to you as "Olde English". In fact, it was sold as "Olde English" when these were first-run plays. There is a problem with this, though. Nobody ever spoke in the manner that Shakespeare wrote, and they most certainly never used the words. Shakespeare produced most of his major works between 1589 and 1613, all of which were sold as "Olde English". Popular periodicals of the time show that you were often considered "learned and of good taste" if you could speak in this "Olde English". So let's go read some really, really Olde English. Let's pick a really old English document, completely at random. We'll pick...The MAGNA CARTA. A quick read of the MAGNA CARTA will swiftly reveal two things. The first is that that it's pretty readable, not backward and convoluted like a Shakespeare play. There may be a few archaic words you may need to look up (to ascertain their meanings), but it's still pretty readable, and there are no words that Shakespeare used. There's also no letter "U". This is a very important fact to remember, because *spoiler alert*, when courts or legal documents refer to "YOU", they are in fact, granting you SURETY in the matter. If you look at a WARRANT, or a ticket from a Policy Enforcement Officer, it will have a name and it will then refer to that name as "YOU" from then on. For example, "JOHN Q PUBLIC, YOU have been charged with (insert bullshit offence here)". YOU=SURETY If you're ever in a courtroom and do not wish to have the "benefit of SURETY", you have but to object to being addressed as "YOU". There are many ways to do this. Dean Clifford might say, in response to being addressed as "YOU", "If I have led the court to believe that I am SURETY in this matter, then that would be a MISTAKE. Please forgive me." (FUN FACT: A court MUST ALWAYS grant forgiveness when asked and/or requested) Others, like myself, are a lot more succinct. For example, I might respond, "FUCK YOU! You're a YOU, I'm a ME! By what AUTHORITY do YOU address ME as a "YOU"?", because I can get away with it. The reason I can get away with it is that I UNDERSTAND the UCC as opposed to ONE PEOPLE'S PUBLIC FRAUD which spreads mythology and bullshit about the UCC. Now there may be a certain "pretend radio" talk-show host (who speaks in a manner that would suggest he is hosting a show with a dick in his mouth), who would demand "proof of this", ignoring the fact that the UCC is, in fact, the proof. Section 1, Subsection 308, of the UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE covers RESERVATION OF RIGHTS. This is a well-known fact, and this is how you use it. On entering the court, you aggressively make the first motion, that being, the RESERVATION OF YOUR RIGHTS. But since you're the only one in the courtroom with ACTUAL STANDING, you can be a total dick about it. You don't RESERVE YOUR RIGHTS, you RESERVE ALL RIGHTS! Not just yours, EVERYONE's. You remove everyone else's rights and give them to yourself. WHY? Because "Fuck off that's WHY!" You're the only one with STANDING. If you HOLD the power, WIELD it...don't be such a pussy! If you're entitled to ALL RIGHTS, CLAIM THEM. This is how you do it. When the "justice" starts speaking, interrupt them. Say, "Point of order!" They will immediately be silent. At that point, state "I believe I am the only party with standing, so barring objection from the court, I wish to RESERVE ALL RIGHTS now, and henceforth. Are there any objections from the court?" As the court has no standing to respond, simply speak to the record as such, "Let the record show that I have reserved all rights, and the court has not objected." At this point if they say anything to you, you simply say, "Objection. The record shows that I have reserved all rights, and I have not granted you leave to speak. Why are you speaking?" Do the same when opposing counsel attempts to speak. You will then be posed the question, "How do you wish to proceed in this matter?" for that is the one question a slave has the right to ask. What is their master's wish? You'll recall in other articles and comments, the levels of the caste system and how they give instructions. NOBILITY (KINGS AND QUEENS) EXPRESS THEIR "WISHES". ADMIRALTY ISSUES INSTRUCTIONS BY REQUESTING, ADDRESSING THEIR SUBORDINATES AS "MR". GENERALS GIVE ORDERS. Now even the talk-show host who sounds like he's got a dick in his mouth, won't "demand proof" of the fact that if you have all the rights, and everybody else has none, you are CLEARLY the KING. So you are going to have to learn to give instruction by expressing your wishes. This is why they are asking how you "wish to proceed". Courts grant and test your SOVEREIGNTY all the time. You simply have to listen to the words they are using. At this time you may respond, "I wish to prove to some ass-wipe who sounds like he's got a dick in his mouth, the things I know, so I wish to go to trial PRO SE. But I wouldn't recommend this...I would simply wish the case to be dismissed. If they say anything else besides "I agree, case dismissed", you exercise your AUTHORITY by questioning. MASTERS QUESTION, SLAVES ANSWER. For instance if a "justice" said anything except "I agree. Case dismissed," you question why they are even speaking. "I'm sure you'll recall Mr. (insert justice's name here) that at the beginning of these proceedings I explicitly reserved all rights, including yours. Have I not made my wishes clear?" Always remember to respond in the form of a question. A question serves the dual-purpose of establishing your authority, and negating the possibility of UNDERSTANDING; because if you UNDERSTAND, you accept SURETY. As stated before, the most powerful of these questions is, "Who are you?" UNDERSTANDING cannot be presumed until that question is answered. Above all, questioning deflects SURETY. Quite possibly one of the most useful documents I have ever published is my NOTICE OF MISTAKE for Dean. This is a useful, powerful document that also instantly removes SURETY. I framed it in such a way that you can replace the name "Dean Clifford" with your name, and you can make a pad of these things. Have lots of copies to hand out to friends and opposing counsel. Hell the court clerk loves these things too...make sure the court clerk has one as well. Just make sure you UNDERSTAND what the document says. Read it carefully and understand what the words mean, because you will be challenged. And remember, the NOTICE by its very nature, presents several questions. Do not permit the proceedings to move forward without these questions being answered! Because so many people ask for it, transcribed here is the copy of THE ROGUESUPPORT NOTICE OF MISTAKE. ***Begin NOTICE OF MISTAKE NOTICE OF MISTAKE In the matter of SURETY for the LEGAL NAME, I believe that there has been a MISTAKE as the SOLE BENEFICIARY has been INCORRECTLY IDENTIFIED as the accused. If I, AND/OR PERSONS AND/OR FRIENDS OF THE COURT AND/OR SUCH OTHER PARTIES ACTING IN MY INTERESTS, have led the COURT to believe by responding to �You� and or �DEAN CLIFFORD� and/or SUCH OTHER IDENTIFICATION THIS COURT HAS ADDRESSED ME AS, that I am the PARTY WITH SURETY in this matter, then that would be a MISTAKE and please forgive me. As I have no knowledge of who �You� and or �DEAN CLIFFORD� and/or SUCH OTHER IDENTIFICATION THIS COURT HAS ADDRESSED ME AS, I RESPECTFULLY ASK; by WHAT AUTHORITY is the COURT ADDRESSING me as such? As the SURETY BOND (BIRTH CERTIFICATE) has been deposited into the COURT, WHAT EVIDENCE does the COURT have that I, as the SOLE BENEFICIARY of the TRUST have any SURETY in this matter? As the GOVERNMENT is the SOLE SIGNATORY PARTY on the SURETY BOND (BIRTH CERTIFICATE), with SOLE AND FULL SURETY as TRUSTEE for the LEGAL NAME, WHAT EVIDENCE does the COURT have that I am a TRUSTEE for the LEGAL NAME. WHAT EVIDENCE does the COURT have that I am a TRUSTEE and have ANY SURETY with respect to the LEGAL NAME? WHAT EVIDENCE does the COURT have that I am an OFFICER, an AGENT, a TRUSTEE or an EMPLOYEE of the CROWN? WHAT EVIDENCE does the COURT have of any WARRANT OF AGENCY for the principal? WHAT EVIDENCE does the COURT have that there has been any meeting of the minds, any PROPER NOTICE given, any considerable CONSIDERATION offered, or that I have ANY INTENT to CONTRACT in this matter? As such, I am returning your OFFER, DECLINED, for immediate DISCHARGE and CLOSURE. AUTHORISED BY: ***End NOTICE OF MISTAKE If you truly UNDERSTAND what this document says and/or does, this is one of the most powerful documents you can wield in court. If you have the Dunning�Kruger effect you will likely go to jail. Used properly the NOTICE OF MISTAKE will ALWAYS remove any real or implied SURETY the court believes you may have. You will notice the court always refers to "belief". When I say belief is evil, it is not just a disparaging remark against adults with "imaginary friends" (which they totally deserve), it is yet another example of why this statement is profoundly true. All belief is evil. You are taught from childhood to "respect belief", and are constantly reinforced with the really dumb freedom that it is your "right to believe what you want". If I had the authority and/or power to remove just one right from humanity, and no more, the right to "believe" would be the one that I would eradicate. In all my years of studying, and being part of the Nobility, the curtailing of this one "RIGHT" would exponentially increase quality of life for all humanity. I calculate it would take two generations for it to "stick". Belief is the end of questioning. Belief is intellectual bankruptcy, and is the exact opposite of knowledge. You will never question if you "believe". Let's leap back to the 1500's to Shakespeare. This is where the concept of addressing somebody as "YOU" indicated the assignment of SURETY. No writings before this contained any such logistic mechanisms. Don't "believe me"...go look for yourself. Go look at the MAGNA CARTA yourself; and ask yourself why there's no "YOU" before Shakespeare. And ask yourself why the MAGNA CARTA, in all its current published forms, no longer has, "To do right by Alexander". There may be three readers amongst you who understand what I just said there, and all of them are Scottish I guarantee you. In any courtroom proceeding in the western world, SURETY IS PRESUMED, and it must be deflected from you. As a "justice" is not a PERSON under the law, the only PARTY that can ACCEPT SURETY is the PARTY making the CLAIM. There may be certain readers who talk like they have a dick stuck in their mouth, who will demand proof of this...and so I direct you to the Rules of Civil Procedure (wherever you are) to look up SECURITY FOR COSTS. Let's zoom back to the present (so we can get as far away from belief as possible) where the word "YOU" is part of the English language, as are the titles, "Mr.", "Miss", and "Mrs.". All of these titles and means of addressing you, are in fact, assigning and/or presuming SURETY...yes, on YOU. The easiest mnemonic exercise you can do to make deflecting these titles second nature is to replace the titles "Mr.", "Miss", or "Mrs." with the word, "bitch", in your head; and to respond as if they had addressed you as "bitch", because being addressed as "Mr.", "Miss", or "Mrs." is doing exactly that. As for the word "YOU", think of that as a tennis ball which must be served back. Assert your AUTHORITY by questioning whenever they address you as "YOU"; "Are YOU addressing ME?" If they're stupid enough to say yes, or even to imply the affirmative, be like that guy who talks like he has a dick in his mouth and demand proof; "By what authority do YOU address me as a PARTY OF SURETY?"...or something along those lines. Your only objective is to serve the "YOU" back to them. So that's today's word, "SURETY". It's something you don't want, and I've just shown you how to give it back. I'd like to thank my involuntary guests, Dean Clifford, and the guy that talks like he's got a dick in his mouth. Since I was so liberal with their identities, I certainly have no problem putting in a free plug for a "pretend radio" show. So here's a link to Dean Clifford talking about family court rules or something...hosted by a guy who sounds like he's got a dick in his mouth. And before Pierre thinks I've "soft-balled this one in there" for him, I'm now going to presumptively say, "Yes Pierre, I'm pretty sure it's Dean's dick he's sucking".


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: Jan 21, 2014 4:28 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

Jan 21, 2014 5:11 AM
Hey gang, I don't want to break the party here, I know you are busy establishing trust, trying to figure out the driver's license thing, digging for definitions, digging for sexy club house rules, and so on. But I just want to let you know that there are 80 different crypto-currencies out there, waiting for you to get dug :D And these currencies has NO TENDER FOR LAW attached to them :D Just saying....!!!!! ( I suggest DOGECOIN) tips from Pierre. :D


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: Jan 21, 2014 5:11 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Derek Moran

Jan 21, 2014 6:41 AM

Unique Facebook User ID: 1.01539996628005E+016
Last Updated: Jan 21, 2014 6:41 AM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None


Shawn Cornell Folkes

Jan 21, 2014 4:30 PM
Oooh! They just called like 20 cops on me in court becuse I refused to identify myself by their NAME! THANKS Dean Otf Kory... I am raising hell in court today! They even sent a goon out...who TOUCHED ME...after her came out to threaten me for causing a disturbance...meanwhile as soon as I said " I am here and will be properly presenting myself today by..." and got cut off. I gave the crown back his disclosure with a copy of my notices...the jp refused to accept them...no worries shits in the mail...on recess now


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02041354931625E+016
Last Updated: Jan 21, 2014 4:30 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Mathew Wolfe

Jan 21, 2014 4:36 PM
I think a lot of people are grasping the concept of what's going on in court, but many (myself for sure) are still lacking in the knowledge of how to file a claim and win. This is when we bring them into our jurisdiction an hold them accountable right? So let's talk about that. Until they are forced to pay they won't stop harassing us. Step by step, can someone walk us through this process?


Unique Facebook User ID: 865677426782970
Last Updated: Jan 21, 2014 4:36 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Steve Lemieux

Jan 21, 2014 6:31 PM
Liens on court actions? I've been pondering the inner workings of our so called justice systems and how they rake in revenue. It occurred to me that when an order is issued by a MASTER/JUSTICE, the original blue ink signature copy of the order is never given to the "winning" party, whether plaintiff or defendant. I suspected these are valuable SIGNED negotiable instruments THEY cash in on. What happens in the actual action matters little, as all they are after are those signed judgements. Who knows what is really going on there, but I'd sure like know. With that said, is it possible to get THEM to cough up the signed ORIGINAL order? What is it true value? Is it a security someone could use to setoff accounts with? I doubt you cash it in at your local bank.. It's easy to get lost in the possibilities. So let's say a particular entity has a security agreement for large sums of "money" owing from a certain legal person and has gone ahead and gave the world public notice of that security interest VIA a lien registered. Could the interest holder not lien ANY court action involving the respective legal person whether that person was plaintiff or defendant in said action? Would the lien holder not have a CLAIM to ALL funds generated from the commercial energy behind the legal person? Who could claim a paramount interest to the secured creditor? What proof would they have? None, I would suspect... So a civil or criminal action gets a lien slammed against it - What happens? Does it affect the outcome of the action? For who? Why? ;) Thoughts? Scott - care to comment?


Unique Facebook User ID: 458370044339963
Last Updated: Jan 21, 2014 6:31 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None




Scott Duncan

Jan 24, 2014 2:59 PM
Pay attention. If you follow this and GRASP it, you will see what is coming. If you see what is coming, you can exploit it. Get yourself some power you can abuse. :D It suits my agenda to give anti-government mindsets, a bit of power. So pay attention. ..I just wish all of you weren't so fucking stupid/programmed.

Unique Facebook User ID: 927379467328526
Last Updated: Jan 24, 2014 2:59 PM
https://www.youtube.com/embed/q5FDvzj8YX4?autoplay=1
Type of Post: video
Place of Post: None


Steve Lemieux

Jan 25, 2014 1:42 AM
Court - Who is Trustee? I�ve been to court more than I care to admit, back when I thought it was a good idea to �show them� what I knew. The results? How about jail time, a foreclosure (it took them 3 years to get it) and hundreds of thousands of dollars spent on ATTORNey fees. When the money would run out, I�d fire the useless cunt attorneys and take the actions over myself (another useless cunt � I know�). I�ve had some small victories yes, but when the time came to �get actual remedy� nope. They�d crush me like a grape. I was SURETY and their LEDGER needed my blood to be squared up. I remember making hour long statements in court � for what? It got to the point where I pretty much knew everyone at the Edmonton court house. File this, motion that, application for this � stand there ARGUING my points. Why did I most always LOOSE? Because when you MAKE STATEMENTS and/or ANSWER QUESTIONS/BE DEPOSED you are in DISHONOR and the justice will most ALWAYS side with his bar brothers (who also argue). There are ways to make the justices honest and neutral, but I have yet to achieve this in open court. I have the balls to assert it, but the opportunity has not come up. I�ve managed to stay the fuck out of there � THEY DON�T CARE and I NO LONGER CARE EITHER. Next time I�m dragged into court in shackles, I will BE the notice of mistake, no need to FILE anything. That�s a promise and PUBLIC NOTICE, you can count on it. Should I go to fail, their will be repercussions. The trust holding LEGAL title to my juristic person will come forward and hold those public servants accountable. Isn't that�s what their bonds are for? "THEY DONT FUCKING CARE". Let's look at that for a moment. That is indeed a FACT. Why don't they care? Humm... Is SURETY still presumed to be the fellow/TRUSTEE standing in THEIR courtroom? Isn�t it a FACT that only TRUSTEEs go to jail? Was a statement(s) made or a question answered which leads THEM to attach surety AND/OR jurisdiction to the fellow? Better think twice about that one� It is one thing to FILE the notice of mistake; it is another thing to ENFORCE the intent behind the notice of mistake. How bad do you NOT wish to be surety? Statements = Dishonor Being deposed = loss of Sovereignty = THEY get jurisdiction = you ARE the trustee Since when do grantors and beneficiaries of TRUSTS obey commands? Is court NOT a constructive trust and is the legal person NOT a government created trust of which YOU are the beneficiary? What would happen is THEY ALLOWED the fellow standing in the courtroom to NOT be surety? Who gets the bill? Is it the ATTORNey? And you THINK they are going to allow that to happen so easily? I could go on and on, but at the end of the day, do you know who you are and do you know what YOUR RIGHTS ARE? Legal persons HAVE NO RIGHTS, THAT�s WHY THEY DON�T GIVE A FUCK. So what are you gonna do? Yell, scream and moan like a little bitch? Cower before your enemy? Get yanked out the courtroom in total dishonor like the angry slave you appear to be? Or are you gonna educate yourself and calmly ask questions designed to publicly EXPOSE what�s really going on in there? SURETY AND ACCOUNTING. Who are you gonna be and what are you gonna do? Anyway, that�s my 2 cents, take it or leave it. I certainly don't believe any of the above, it is all merely fiction jumbled in the pea sized abnormality in my head (at the moment). Tomorrow, I'll make up some new bullshit for you to chew on... PEACE


Unique Facebook User ID: 458370044339963
Last Updated: Jan 25, 2014 1:42 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Scott Duncan

Jan 25, 2014 4:51 AM
Off topic: I am still stuck on the whole abortion issue; On one hand, it kills babies, and I can TOTALLY get behind that... ...but it gives women a CHOICE, and they (women) aren't very good at that. You see my dilemma.


Unique Facebook User ID: 927379467328526
Last Updated: Jan 25, 2014 4:51 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Scott Duncan

Jan 25, 2014 12:09 PM


Unique Facebook User ID: 927379467328526
Last Updated: Jan 25, 2014 12:09 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Mathew Wolfe

Jan 25, 2014 1:37 PM
Ok, at the risk of more arrogant, smart ass responses, I've got a few questions. The only way to lean is to ask right... So here we go. If I'm the AGENT for the principle or the sole authorized administrator; then all bills or charges are not for me, they are for the principle right? Or the AGENCY however you want to say it. If I'm acting as their agent then how do I send the agency the bill or charges? Secondly) if I'm the administrator of something I did not create, then that authority was granted to me correct? Someone have the analogy of a fed note, but that was GIVEN to me as well to administer for a designed purpose. Therefore, I only have the authority to administer as the creator of the (person) grants. Where can I find the terms or conditions? Lastly) how do I use this knowledge in court? I want results. I want to win. All of this theory is nice but if I can't back it up by real world application, then it's shit. Thanks for all the help, let the condescending arrogant comments roll! Lol


Unique Facebook User ID: 865677426782970
Last Updated: Jan 25, 2014 1:37 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Mathew Wolfe

Jan 25, 2014 1:45 PM
Oh and I almost forgot, if I'm acting as their agent, as the administrator, then wouldn't their corporate polices also apply to me? These are my questions. They may seem silly but y'all have far more knowledge in this area than I do. I've been trying to wrap my head around this coon law stuff for a while and everything I've seen from this group defies what I've learned! Lol which may be why my interest has been peaked! Thanks again do the help.


Unique Facebook User ID: 865677426782970
Last Updated: Jan 25, 2014 1:45 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

Jan 25, 2014 5:36 PM
The Civil Code of Quebec is so fucking clear as "ME", being the Sole Aurhorized Administrator for PIERRE DAOUST, it's unreal !!!! Seriously, you should ALL move in Quebec..... :D There is ALSO a charter, here in Quebec, that thing is crazy......it says CLEARLY that I, as the Sole Authorized Administrator of the PERSON, have the right to its SURETY, they use the word SURET� in French..... Unbelievable :-o :D


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: Jan 25, 2014 5:36 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None




Headen Barbershop

Jan 26, 2014 3:41 PM
Thanks for the add. Knowledge is needed for progress


Unique Facebook User ID: 652146064855538
Last Updated: Jan 26, 2014 3:41 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

Jan 27, 2014 4:07 AM
Hey, this is Captain Pete, with an ORDER, yes a fucking Order�. :D Here is the order: Everyone, who want to stay in this group, will COMPLY to this order, without ASKING questions, if you don�t comply to this order in 120 hours, you will be REALEASE from this group. 1). Download a DOGECOIN wallet. (that could take up to 8 hours for the sync part.) 2). Get at least 10,000 Dogecoin in this wallet by ANY means (ebay is the easiest). 3). Send me a wallet address where I can send you a specific amount of Dogecoin, so I can verify if you have done what you�ll say you did. (I don�t TRUST anyone of you :D ) If some of you think I am an ARROGANT fuck, you think wrong, I am only a �SURVIVING CONTRIBUTORS� who wants to contribute on SAVING YOUR LIFE. If you follow this order, in a near future, you'll want to kiss my feet :D (or not, no big deal :/ ) If Admiral Scott can�t ACCOUNT for this order, for ANY reasons, I will RELEASE all of you from this ORDER, on the spot, NO QUESTIONS ASKED, and will delete this thread..... Good Luck Captain Pete :D


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: Jan 27, 2014 4:07 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


David Vilaca

Jan 27, 2014 9:40 AM

Unique Facebook User ID: 431342553693049
Last Updated: Jan 27, 2014 9:40 AM
https://www.youtube.com/embed/6YHiuZeWyrE?autoplay=1
Type of Post: video
Place of Post: None


Icbeonne Senama

Jan 28, 2014 1:20 AM


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.0152435377608E+016
Last Updated: Jan 28, 2014 1:20 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Scott Duncan

Jan 28, 2014 11:35 PM
...and now a word from our sponsor.


Unique Facebook User ID: 927379467328526
Last Updated: Jan 28, 2014 11:35 PM
Type of Post: photo
Place of Post: None


Icbeonne Senama

Jan 29, 2014 1:53 AM
Hmmm..

Unique Facebook User ID: 1.0152435377608E+016
Last Updated: Jan 29, 2014 1:53 AM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None


Scott Duncan

Jan 29, 2014 2:45 AM
A few words on the subject of fraud... Wikipedia defines fraud as "a deception deliberately practiced in order to secure unfair or unlawful gain". With that in mind, I remind you, the collective reader, that I am in fact smarter, better educated and more knowledgeable than you. This is not arrogance nor it it ego, it is simply fact. This gives me a tremendous advantage over all of you. I could defraud the lot of you and you wouldn't even notice. Hell, some of you would probably even thank me. This little framework I've drawn out for you here is the primary reason that people fear those who are smarter than they are. Successful fraud artists tend to be masters of the human condition, not masters of knowlege and intellect. They know THAT their frauds work, but they don't know why. I, on the other hand, know that frauds work; and I know why they work. A fraud artist does not. Below you will see an article by the James Randi Educational Foundation showing examples of deception with no personal gain. The people who do these sorts of things are the ones that are predisposed to commit frauds against others. The same guy that puts up the giant squid washing up on the beach in California, has an identical mindset to those committing the sub-prime mortgage frauds. These people exploit the very programming I am fighting. My familiar ancestors are responsible for all of this, but they're dead now so they can't really be called to account. You are quite literally programmed from beyond the grave. When I was thirteen I laid my claim to the Trust that caused all of this. I am not one of them, and I am not one of you; but I certainly don't stand alone. My own personal feelings and this Trust to which I have dedicated a lifetime's work, are constantly at odds. It would be so easy for me to turn on all of you and take everything. So I guess the question is, "Why don't I?" I have a long list of failures, from light-weights like Derek Moran (circle-jerking to clubhouse rules), to Robert Menard choosing fraud over trust to...the strange pattern that seems to indicate that anyone named "Andrew" is functionally useless, to the people who are actually doing everything in their power to sabotage my initiatives. As I've stated before there is no "secret" knowledge around here. I'll never charge anybody money for the time I use to impart this knowledge. And quite frankly, I'm in a better position than anybody because I know how everything works. Unlike all the gurus out there charging money, I actually know the answers, and am doing something about it. It would be so much easier for me to exploit the knowledge I have for my own personal gain. So again, "Why don't I?" The answer is simple - Aquilae, a trust for which I am the keeper. People TRUST me. This is something I ponder all the time. A trust cannot have debt; and from a bookkeeping perspective the TRUSTEES owe me substantially more than I owe them. I often wonder to myself why it is that I find the idea of betraying their trust so horrifying. Those that know me know that I have rather "binary" emotions. I'm either angry, or I'm not angry. I am happy, or I am not happy. There is no middle ground. I know from a personal standpoint that I could kill a justice in the most horrifying way and feel nothing. So why don't I? It's not as though side-stepping government workers would be a big challenge. To a lesser extent all of you TRUST me, but that's only because I provide you with actual answers. I'm sure there are more than a few of you out there that are thinking, "What's the catch"? I have even explained that. All of you are part of a larger mechanism, and I've made no secret of the fact that I intend to collapse the banking system and start a war. I also intend to eliminate all the participants in the most spectacularly horrifying ways. And I intend to do it legally and lawfully - without breaching the TRUST. I mean harm to all fraud artists, be it in the government or the private sector. I'm coming for all of you; and as you can see I've not been quiet about it. The Law Society destroyed a lifetime's work, and interrupted my life plan, and I intend to return the favour. One of the possible scenarios is that I could end up in charge...of everything (note: if that happens I shall issue a degree that all legal matters are to be handled by realestate agents). But...I hope that doesn't happen, because there will be public executions in Nathan Phillips Square. Let's examine the tactical situation. I'm the Admiral. Everybody sees me. I am the "public face", and I tend to raise more questions than I answer simply by telling the truth. Several thousand posts ago I mentioned the sure-fire way to rob a jewelry store without getting caught: set off a nuke on the other side of town and nobody will give a shit about the jeweler. I am that nuke! I am who the "Powers that Be" are focused on, which means they're focused on the wrong thing. How does this relate to TRUST? Think of all those that have "boots on the ground". The people that intend to rob the jeweler store are dependent on the nuke to make their plans feasible. They TRUST the nuke to the point where they can rely on it. And all of this is happening in plain sight, and all that can be connected to it is some crazy guy on the internet in a secret Facebook group. If a "law enforcement official" questions any of you about "Admiral Scott" be sure to tell them...tell them everything. Because anyone who asks that question is attempting to sabotage my initiative, but they're government workers, so of course they're focused on the wrong thing. Just like the rest of you. It's not your fault, you were programmed that way. You are programmed to believe in "imaginary sky daddies" (that we invented). You are programmed to believe that people in costumes have magic powers, and you're programmed to believe that there are some magical words that you can say that will get the government off your back. You go looking for answers from the Dean Cliffords and Robert Menards of the world and end up spending a lot of time, effort and money, on half-truths, non-answers and the ever-present hope of them revealing their "secrets". I don't have any secret knowledge, at least nothing that pertains to you. In THE TENDER FOR LAW and THE ANSWER TO EVERYTHING, you have limited access to all of my knowledge, but only if you ask the right questions. Government workers are asking these questions right now. I'm not one of these fucking FREE-DUMBERS. Contracts are LAW. They are a TRUST. If one of the parties in that contract, or TRUSTEES, breached that contract, it is my right to detach myself from said contract as it is in fact VOID. If I'm told I own something, then I fucking own it. There's no such thing as conditional ownership unless you agree. I pay all my taxes. I pay all my bills. But the system is broken, and there's nothing I can do about that. Except prove it. For the past five years I have documented absolutely everything. I can substantiate every single one of my claims to the point where it is irrefutable. I know that the only way any of these people will ever be called to account is if they're beaten to death on the street, and that is my eventual goal. It won't come from anything that I have published, or will publish...that will just be the spark that ignites the fuse. All of this will happen simply by telling the truth. This comes at high personal cost, and every day I ponder slitting a lawyer's throat, or torturing them for days inside a shipping container; but that would breach the TRUST which I have sworn to uphold. This makes me better than every government worker that has ever existed. This is what the nobility should be. The nobility is called "privileged" and has higher standing because the people are supposed to TRUST them. I also know that I'm a semi-evolved chimp that made it this far, just like you, so I must remain forever vigilant. Nobody stomps on a burning bag of shit anymore. Frauds need to be as complex as the one that deceived you in the first place. The cornerstone of this mechanism is to get ignorant third-parties to endorse the fraud. This is very effective if MOST of what they are saying is true. The masters of this, like Robert Menard, lie through omission. I can say with the utmost certainty that none of you knew what THIS NOTE IS LEGAL TENDER meant before you came here. None of this is hidden. You all think wrong, and value the wrong things. It's not your fault, you were programmed that way. You are blind people who swear you can see. Stop assisting the fraud. Stop spreading fraud. Anyone who claims to have "secret knowledge" is a fraud. Right now you guys are practicing on DOGE coin. If this were a math class you'd be learning to add right now; and I need to get you up to the level where you can do advanced calculus. Those who are actually paying attention and listening to me will notice that I always give away the answer at the beginning. At a higher level fractal that's the same as the Great American novel. I tell you what you're going to read, then I let you know you're reading it, then I tell you what you just read. I choose the authoring style of the dumbest population on the planet - Americans. It doesn't matter if you live in Canada; you just have a watered-down version of the American system. When you do things from the rather humiliating perspective of dumb programmed chimp, who is finally being told the truth, you will find this much easier and actually fun to do. Ask Pete, because unlike the rest of you who think I'm "egotistical" and "arrogant", people like Pete see reality. I'm sure Pete will confirm this. When you realize you're a dumb programmed chimp, you will also realize you don't want to be a dumb programmed chimp. Every time I hear accusations of "crazy", "arrogant", and/or "egotistical", all my brain receives is "I want to be a dumb programmed chimp", and "I'm proud to be a dumb programmed chimp, and so are all the other readers". Indirectly these people mean you harm. You're just too dumb and programmed to see it. The tingly sensation people feel in the group is me eliminating people who mean you harm, because you're not aware enough to do anything about it yourself. I should point out that this is not an invitation to have a bunch of "guru videos" thrown at me with the question, "What do you think of this?" Above all, what I think is really none of your fucking business. Focus on what I'm telling you, and stop spreading fraud.

Unique Facebook User ID: 927379467328526
Last Updated: Jan 29, 2014 2:45 AM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None






Icbeonne Senama

Jan 29, 2014 11:42 AM
Ohh yeah. Max keiser coins. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=438150.0


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.0152435377608E+016
Last Updated: Jan 29, 2014 11:42 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Barry Andrews

Jan 29, 2014 3:47 PM
k... remedy for getting ur "property back" it works..... got a call this morning @ 9:10 am, my property is ready for me to collect. watch the vid... i, b andrews 60 queens st 17th jan 2014 Restoration of my property... i require the imidiate restoration of property (computer camara ect, stolen on the 26th sept 2013). Unless my property is restored by midday 20th jan 2014, i am going to charge the unlawful holder $1 for every second for each item, that the property is held in naked possession. b andrews.

Unique Facebook User ID: 733395393361264
Last Updated: Jan 29, 2014 3:47 PM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None


Scott Duncan

Jan 30, 2014 1:43 AM
Hey everyone! Derek Moran has started a "trash Scott Duncan" thread! :D


Unique Facebook User ID: 927379467328526
Last Updated: Jan 30, 2014 1:43 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Scott Duncan

Jan 30, 2014 2:02 PM
I had cause to PERSONALLY block Derek Moran. This means I can't see any of his posts. Strangely this has the unintended side-effect of actually IMPROVING THE CONTENT OF THE GROUPS I FREQUENT. I'm not kidding. I didn't know HOW MUCH circle-jerking he's done. Try blocking him yourself, and you will see what I mean. :D


Unique Facebook User ID: 927379467328526
Last Updated: Jan 30, 2014 2:02 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Scott Duncan

Jan 31, 2014 2:11 AM


Unique Facebook User ID: 927379467328526
Last Updated: Jan 31, 2014 2:11 AM
Type of Post: photo
Place of Post: None


Lee Edgely

Jan 31, 2014 11:43 AM
Hi folks, so what should I do with this, NoM first? Pete Daoust Scott Duncan Maximus Legis Gail Marie


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.01529407782786E+016
Last Updated: Jan 31, 2014 11:43 AM
Type of Post: photo
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

Feb 01, 2014 3:27 PM
Ellen Markey, I just ACCEPT your request to be part of this group, of course your profile picture helped :D I need you to get a dogecoin wallet and 10,000 dogecoin in it, in the next 48 hours, if of course, you want to stay in this group. Brad Tullar, you invited Ellen in the group, please help her... :P Thanks Captain Pete :D


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: Feb 01, 2014 3:27 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Colin Stephen Tonks

Feb 01, 2014 9:29 PM
https://fbcdn-sphotos-e-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash3/t1/1622270_756473391030308_1811288023_n.png


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.01523951670811E+016
Last Updated: Feb 01, 2014 9:29 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Scott Duncan

Feb 02, 2014 9:44 PM


Unique Facebook User ID: 927379467328526
Last Updated: Feb 02, 2014 9:44 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

Feb 02, 2014 10:55 PM
I really think, the logical next step would be to elaborate a bit on What this thing means to you. You have a crypto-currency wallet as we speak, with 10,000 units of that specific currency in it, which happen to be Dogecoin. There is 80+ crypto-currencies available for use today, there will be more tomorrow� :D WHY DOGECOIN ? ( I have picked Dogecoin for a specific reason :D ) And what does that REALLY mean to you ? Let me know in less than 100 words please, Thanks Captain Pete. :D


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: Feb 02, 2014 10:55 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Scott Duncan

Feb 02, 2014 10:56 PM
THE TENDER FOR LAW is an examination of what you need to know to fight Judicial corruption, by examining the stuff you are LIED TO about. SPOILERS: IT'S ALWAYS ABOUT ACCOUNTING AND SURETY. You are BOUND by ACTS, STATUTES, and CODES when you use MONEY. On that money are the words THIS NOTE IS LEGAL TENDER: THIS NOTE - The note the words (NOTICE) is written on. IS LEGAL - CODES, ACTS, AND STATUTES with the force of law. TENDER - tender verb ten�dered ten�der�ing Definition of TENDER transitive verb 1: to make a tender of 2: to present for acceptance : offer "tendered my resignation" intransitive verb : to make a bid or tender Origin of TENDER Middle English tendren, from Anglo-French tendre offer First Known Use: 15th century THIS NOTE IS LEGAL TENDER=THIS NOTE IS A TENDER FOR LAW This forum is where you can ask all your questions, and we don't have to keep typing the same answers over and over. To that end, I am telling you to WATCH THIS FIRST: http://youtu.be/3P7izAUe3ZM NOT watching this, and then posting a question and/or making idiotic statements which reveal you HAVEN'T watched this, means you are DELIBERATELY ignoring these instructions, and you will be banned. Post your question, we will do our best to answer. OFF TOPIC POSTS WILL BE PURGED. We want people to be able to use this as a central reference and a place to go for help, where people will take the time to do so. Post any questions on LAW, MONEY, CONTRACTS, and JURISDICTIONS and how they are connected. Keep it civil, even if Scott doesn't. (It's Scott after all. Seriously, it's better than paying him) Remember that Scott chooses his words carefully. LEARN WHAT THOSE WORDS MEAN. And when your examination of these things is done, you will see that we also have a REAL SOLUTION to the problem. YOU CAN'T BUY that shit ANYWHERE! :D ...no really. You can't. It's copyrighted. TL;DR - IT'S ALWAYS ABOUT ACCOUNTING AND SURETY. THIS NOTE IS LEGAL TENDER = OFFERING AN UNCONDITIONAL "BENEFIT" OF ACTS, STATUTES AND CODES.


Unique Facebook User ID: 927379467328526
Last Updated: Feb 02, 2014 10:56 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Scott Duncan

Feb 02, 2014 10:57 PM
THE TENDER FOR LAW - SITE PRE-LAUNCH PHASE! THE TENDER FOR LAW is an examination of what you need to know to fight Judicial corruption, by examining the stuff you are LIED TO about. SPOILERS: IT'S ALWAYS ABOUT ACCOUNTING AND SURETY. You are BOUND by ACTS, STATUTES, and CODES when you use MONEY. On that money are the words THIS NOTE IS LEGAL TENDER: THIS NOTE - The note the words (NOTICE) is written on. IS LEGAL - CODES, ACTS, AND STATUTES with the force of law. TENDER - tender verb ten�dered ten�der�ing Definition of TENDER transitive verb 1: to make a tender of 2: to present for acceptance : offer "tendered my resignation" intransitive verb : to make a bid or tender Origin of TENDER Middle English tendren, from Anglo-French tendre offer First Known Use: 15th century THIS NOTE IS LEGAL TENDER=THIS NOTE IS A TENDER FOR LAW This forum is where you can ask all your questions, and we don't have to keep typing the same answers over and over. To that end, I am telling you to WATCH THIS FIRST: http://youtu.be/3P7izAUe3ZM NOT watching this, and then posting a question and/or making idiotic statements which reveal you HAVEN'T watched this, means you are DELIBERATELY ignoring these instructions, and you will be banned. Post your question, we will do our best to answer. OFF TOPIC POSTS WILL BE PURGED. We want people to be able to use this as a central reference and a place to go for help, where people will take the time to do so. Post any questions on LAW, MONEY, CONTRACTS, and JURISDICTIONS and how they are connected. Keep it civil, even if Scott doesn't. (It's Scott after all. Seriously, it's better than paying him) Remember that Scott chooses his words carefully. LEARN WHAT THOSE WORDS MEAN. And when your examination of these things is done, you will see that we also have a REAL SOLUTION to the problem. YOU CAN'T BUY that shit ANYWHERE! :D ...no really. You can't. It's copyrighted. TL;DR - IT'S ALWAYS ABOUT ACCOUNTING AND SURETY. THIS NOTE IS LEGAL TENDER = OFFERING AN UNCONDITIONAL "BENEFIT" OF ACTS, STATUTES AND CODES.


Unique Facebook User ID: 927379467328526
Last Updated: Feb 02, 2014 10:57 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Dino Disenfranchised

Feb 03, 2014 9:11 PM
This just cant be dumbed down any further than this.

Unique Facebook User ID: 1.01523100619462E+016
Last Updated: Feb 03, 2014 9:11 PM
https://www.youtube.com/embed/-AiuLMalZ40?autoplay=1
Type of Post: video
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

Feb 04, 2014 11:09 AM
This is the ACTIVE crew of The Tender for Law :D If you do not see your NAME here, well, it means you are NOT an active member of this group, and you could be RELEASE from the group any time. :P Chris Evan Mathew Morrill Kent Barrett Gail Marie Beverly Berta Braakschmack Brad Tullar Will Bed Bobis Youruncle Icbeonne Senama Paquette Janick Libby Patterson Maximus Legis Eamonn O Brien Phillip Prater Theprisonersix Mackximus Minimus Jeremy FellOwed Pol O Se Aladdin Sane David Vilaca James Baal Shane Pennell Jesse Alexander Vito Jose Dono Laurent VH Tommy Atherton Cara Small Atherton Eli Weakley Joey Spirit Mimi Collins Stuart Stone Lacey Hatt Lana Dukakis Mike Carparelli David Gyurkovics LaNi Black Viviane Kinsella Citizen Skinny Mackximus Minimus Shin Goki Doug Lake Samantha B. Witching Wayne Brown Norah Holloway WeLove JessicaDawn AndOthers Brauns Orig Libau T?lis Joel Weakley Dave Iversen Chris Thornton KnownAs Colin Matt Antonacci Jo Xappie David Johanson.


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: Feb 04, 2014 11:09 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

Feb 04, 2014 8:58 PM
:D


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: Feb 04, 2014 8:58 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Janick Paquette

Feb 04, 2014 10:04 PM
Question: I've been listening to Money as Debt 1-2-3 for, I don't know how many time since I've joined this group now. And There is a part I do not understand. You know when the guy buys the car and the lady who sold the care gets a check? They explain "who gets what" out of this transaction. Well in their explanation, I don't understand how the real wold suffers from it. How come the money newly created depreciates the value of money? I don't understand it in english and in french! :/ Thanks!


Unique Facebook User ID: 802541149837689
Last Updated: Feb 04, 2014 10:04 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Icbeonne Senama

Feb 05, 2014 8:00 AM
Here is something for those of us who want to mine, but have OLD machines. I am currently mining DOGE on AZURE for FREE and getting about 80 khash/s... You will have to do some reading and possibly some THINKING (ouch!?) But it is good!

Unique Facebook User ID: 1.0152435377608E+016
Last Updated: Feb 05, 2014 8:00 AM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None




Pete Daoust

Feb 05, 2014 10:58 PM
This lady looks a bit BELLIGERENT to me !!! :D

Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: Feb 05, 2014 10:58 PM
https://www.youtube.com/embed/qpcfZzx8xY0?autoplay=1
Type of Post: video
Place of Post: None


Shane Pennell

Feb 05, 2014 11:25 PM


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.01528359500503E+016
Last Updated: Feb 05, 2014 11:25 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None




Colin Stephen Tonks

Feb 06, 2014 9:17 PM
�Those who are able to see beyond the shadows and lies of their culture will never be understood, let alone believed, by the masses.� -Plato (427�347 BC)


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.01523951670811E+016
Last Updated: Feb 06, 2014 9:17 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None




Dru Klotz

Feb 07, 2014 4:34 PM
I must express my jubilation regarding my being accepted, at this time, into The Tender For Law Facebook page. I have much to learn and will appreciate what I learn by spreading the information gained. On an extremely distant side note,at the risk of my being kicked out almost as soon as being allowed entry, has anyone ever seen the film Mr.Freedom? I do recommend it for a chuckle. I will take in as much as you all have provided after which I will start to participate in the conversation.


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.01523575736258E+016
Last Updated: Feb 07, 2014 4:34 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

Feb 07, 2014 5:40 PM
HAHAHAHA!!!!.... :D Madame Marois :D


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: Feb 07, 2014 5:40 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

Feb 07, 2014 10:48 PM
"decentralization of Law" :D ......

Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: Feb 07, 2014 10:48 PM
http://www.youtube.com/v/GykNHFNdFOg?autohide=1&version=3&autoplay=1
Type of Post: video
Place of Post: None


Howard Posehn

Feb 08, 2014 2:12 AM
Ethereum Come and ask anything to Vitalik, Anthony, Charles and Mihai on our Reddit AMA live right now - http://www.reddit.com/r/IAmA/comments/1xb5rj/hi_were_the_ethereum_founding_team_ask_us_anything/ - we'll start answering at 1800 EST and will end at 2100 EST

Unique Facebook User ID: 294473387379215
Last Updated: Feb 08, 2014 2:12 AM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

Feb 08, 2014 4:47 AM
Open your fucking ears !!!! :D

Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: Feb 08, 2014 4:47 AM
https://www.youtube.com/embed/vOkZvUoa0Rc?autoplay=1
Type of Post: video
Place of Post: None


Lee Edgely

Feb 08, 2014 6:13 PM
Pete Daoust Thanks again for the Coin. I have not asked you whether you want this coin back or will I forward this Coin on to others?


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.01529407782786E+016
Last Updated: Feb 08, 2014 6:13 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Lana Dukakis

Feb 09, 2014 6:40 AM
I've seen quite a number of articles like this one. Any comments tips or suggestions? Is there something I'm missing? Many have been charged with money laundering. It seems the police want to crack down on people who are ONLY EXCHANGING currency. How can they think that there is money laundering when they are just EXCHANGING? Do we need to worry? Do we need to exchange less than a certain amount to avoid this? The authorities seem to be fighting back. I guess they are scared that we will win.

Unique Facebook User ID: 1597301487185764
Last Updated: Feb 09, 2014 6:40 AM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None


Lana Dukakis

Feb 09, 2014 11:45 PM
The Council on Foreign Relations meeting about Bitcoin uploaded just 3 days ago on Feb. 6 2014. I found it all interesting. At 52:00 or so Gavin Anderson one of the bit coin team talks about (indirectly) bitcoin and how the government is treating it like legal tender. I think this video is great for newbies like me and brings us up to date on how the government looks at Bitcoin.

Unique Facebook User ID: 1597301487185764
Last Updated: Feb 09, 2014 11:45 PM
http://www.youtube.com/v/BgFUAhz7h2U?version=3&autohide=1&autoplay=1
Type of Post: video
Place of Post: None


Michael A Rivera

Feb 09, 2014 11:48 PM
Thank you Ceit Butler


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02055958814386E+016
Last Updated: Feb 09, 2014 11:48 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Laura Bird

Feb 10, 2014 12:19 AM
Hi guys, thanks for letting me join this group!! Does anyone know if there is a way to get rid of a requirement to pay issued by CRA? Or do you have to take them to Federal Court to have it removed? Thanks


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.01532716143359E+016
Last Updated: Feb 10, 2014 12:19 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Tommy Atherton

Feb 10, 2014 2:49 AM
Been reading all weekend "Files", thanks to Scott. Oh yeah and to Beverly, loved the visuals in "Not mine" this stuff is like a brain enema.


Unique Facebook User ID: 1584308875165822
Last Updated: Feb 10, 2014 2:49 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Scott Duncan

Feb 11, 2014 6:01 AM


Unique Facebook User ID: 927379467328526
Last Updated: Feb 11, 2014 6:01 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Eamonn O Brien

Feb 11, 2014 12:50 PM
I know the group has more important issues to be concerned with at the moment but I thought I'd share this... It's a presentment from a state department addressed to "The occupier"... To me that's the most blatant offer of surety I've ever seen :p I was thinking for a response... "There is no-one by the title "The occupier" at this address. Please review your records and forward any further correspondence accordingly" Thoughts? (The blanked out parts of the letter are in the Irish language)


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02035706386866E+016
Last Updated: Feb 11, 2014 12:50 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

Feb 11, 2014 4:56 PM
Setting up, a CURRENCY exchange thread !! Go..... :D


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: Feb 11, 2014 4:56 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Feb 11, 2014 7:46 PM
Can we have a thread where we can create a check list of sorts or clarification of what we need to do once the corp/trust is created and the lien placed on the name? Proper notice of the lien to the government... which government agencies require the notice? Send a notarized copy of the BC with the notice? Is the corporate seal equivalent to a notary signature? Find an accountant to access the receivers certificate? Open up a non interest bearing bank account? ...


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Feb 11, 2014 7:46 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None




Anibal Jose Baez

Feb 12, 2014 3:14 AM
Dean Clifford Court Transcripts http://youtu.be/aq-P8t6dzVA


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02035927166068E+016
Last Updated: Feb 12, 2014 3:14 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

Feb 12, 2014 2:45 PM
So now, there is a BANK somewhere on this planet, that have dug 1 million dogecoin. Me, I use PIERRE DAOUST, the slave, to work for SFC Inc. I want PIERRE DAOUST to get paid in DOGECOIN. 500,000.00 Dogecoin per week. SFC inc, will exchange some CAD for some DOGECOIN from that bank. SFC Inc, will give these dogecoin to PIERRE DAOUST, as wages. PIERRE DAOUST will give ALL these dogecoin to Pete, because PIERRE DAOUST is Pete's slave :D And that BANK, will keep supplying SFC inc with dogecoin every week, to PAY PIERRE DAOUST with. PIERRE DAOUST won't ever touch these notes are legal tender anymore.... Is that makes sense ? Scott Duncan 500k dogecoin will travel from point-A, to point-B, to POINT-C, and back to poin-A, and then to point-B, and C, and back to A.......HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!! :D


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: Feb 12, 2014 2:45 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Lana Dukakis

Feb 12, 2014 5:52 PM


Unique Facebook User ID: 1597301487185764
Last Updated: Feb 12, 2014 5:52 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Lana Dukakis

Feb 13, 2014 4:02 AM
TO: HYDRO 123 ABC Ave W, Ottawa, Ontario. K1A 0G9 JOHN DOE 1 � JOHN DOE 100 And BANK OF CANADA 234 Laurier Ave W, Ottawa, Ontario. K1A 0G9 JOHN DOE 1 � JOHN DOE 100 FROM: Vivian Dukakis in COMMON LAW JURISDICTION OUTSIDE OF CANADA SOLE AUTHORIZED ADMINISTRATOR for: LANA VIVIAN DUKAKIS (BIRTH CERTIFICATE NUMBER XX-XX- XXXXXX and SOCIAL INSURANCE # XXX-XXX-XXX, and, or, XXXXXXXXX) RE: COMPLETED BILL OF EXCHANGE and INSTRUCTIONS to DRAWEE to DISCHARGE PUBLIC DEBT created by______________ (hereinafter �BENEFICIARY�), against the DRAWEE - ELANA VIVIAN DUKAKIS, for which THE BANK OF CANADA is SURETY. February 12, 2014. I would like to thank you in advance for helping me administrate the debt of the PERSON ELANA VIVIAN DUKAKIS. As the SOLE AUTHORIZED ADMINISTRATOR for ELANA VIVIAN DUKAKIS, you are to NOTICE that I have administered the debt acting as the DRAWER; thereby completing the INCOHATE INSTRUMENT, and, or, REMITTANCE you recently sent to ELANA VIVIAN DUKAJIS (identified by the BENEFICIARY as account # XXXXXXXXX), dated January 30th, 2014. ATTACHED you will find a copy of the CHEQUE which I sent to THE BANK OF CANADA for immediate DISCHARGE as per THE BILL OF EXCHANGE ACT (1985). You are hereby instructed to NOTE FOR THE RECORD, and to maintain a record in your files, for future reference, that it is my wish to NOT BUY BACK ANY PUBLIC DEBT addressed to ELANA VIVIAN DUKAKIS. Should you fail to respond, via registered mail within 30 calendar days of the above date, through a NOTARY, and under FULL COMMERCIAL LIABILITY, I will UNDERSTAND that you ACKNOWLEGE this debt as DISCHARGED, and, or, that it no longer exists. BY:_______________________________ Sole Authorized Administrator for: ELANA VIVIAN DUKAKIS RESTRICTED SIGNATURE, RESTRICTED CAPACITY


Unique Facebook User ID: 1597301487185764
Last Updated: Feb 13, 2014 4:02 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Lana Dukakis

Feb 13, 2014 4:03 AM
Home work completed Pete! :) TO: BANK OF CANADA 234 Laurier Ave W, Ottawa, Ontario. K1A 0G9 JOHN DOE 1 � JOHN DOE 100 FROM: Vivian Dukakis in COMMON LAW JURISDICTION OUTSIDE OF CANADA SOLE AUTHORIZED ADMINISTRATOR for: ELANA VIVIAN DUKAKIS (BIRTH CERTIFICATE NUMBER XX-XX- XXXXXX and SOCIAL INSURANCE # XXX-XXX-XXX, and, or, XXXXXXXXX) RE: INSTRUCTIONS to DRAWEE to DISCHARGE PUBLIC DEBTS, and, or, PUBLIC ACCOUNTS for the PERSON ELANA VIVIAN DUKAKIS February 12, 2014 BE ADVISED: As the SOLE AUTORIZED ADMINISTRATOR for ELANA VIVIAN DUKAKIS, it has come to my attention that the PERSON ELANA VIVIAN DUKAKIS has been sent a REMITTANCE by______________________, (hereinafter �BENEFICIARY�), dated January 30th, 2014. As the DRAWEE identified in the above mentioned REMITTANCE, and SURETY for ELANA VIVIAN DUKAKIS (Birth Certificate REGISTRATION # XXXX and SOCIAL INSURANCE NUMBER XXX-XXX-XXX), you are INSTRUCTED to DISCHARGE this debt as per THE BILLS OF EXCHANG ACT (1985). You will find attached that I completed the INCOHATE INSTRUMENT which was sent to me by the BENEFICIARY, for you to DISCHARGE immediately. You will NOTE FOR THE RECORD that it is my wish to NOT BUY BACK ANY PUBLIC DEBT addressed to ELANA VIVIAN DUKAKIS. If I, or anyone else, have lead you to believe, that I am one of your "employees", and, or, "agents", and, or, "the queen" and, or, an �organization�, and, or, a "slave�, that would be a MISTAKE, please forgive me. Should you fail to respond, via registered mail within 30 calendar days of the above date, through a NOTARY, and under FULL COMMERCIAL LIABILITY, I will UNDERSTAND that you have discharged this debt and, or, that it no longer exists. BY:_______________________________ Sole Authorized Administrator for: ELANA VIVIAN DUKAKIS RESTRICTED SIGNATURE, RESTRICTED CAPACITY


Unique Facebook User ID: 1597301487185764
Last Updated: Feb 13, 2014 4:03 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


August le Blanc

Feb 13, 2014 7:37 PM
Ok, Scott says Pete is the only one to get things right. I have been thinking, to figure out why. I accept it, but I do not comprehend it. My best thinking brings me to: Mining and the use of Crypto currency. I had the good fortune of having some Private conversations, with Scott, when at one time, we were friends here. As a result of those conversations I took some actions thru my buddy = duly authorized trustee corp. Those actions got me a response ( I am thinking it is a different prong in the agenda of which I am not privy to, nor is it my business). As a result of those actions taken, it was my thinking that why not discharge the whole fucking debt; created by, the creation of this thing a few days after my Birth dated aug 24/19##. So, I went about it, through a buddy. I did not want to be a slave to any one or any thing. I know I am not. Here is where I am at: I received this response: Requ�tes RG - RG Enquire RequetesRG.RGEnquire@tpsgc-pwgsc.gc.ca Jan 30 to 1732964 Good day, Your correspondence was reviewed, and it has been concluded that the matter you raised does not fall within the Receiver General for Canada's mandate. Although all payments to and from the Government of Canada are made in the name of the Receiver General, enquiries regarding payments should be made directly to the department responsible for the particular product and/or service: http://canada.ca/en/ . Please note that the Receiver General will take no further action on this matter. Sincerely, Receveur g�n�ral du Canada / Receiver General for Canada t�l�copieur/ facsimile 819-956-1664 ncr.rgenquire@tpsgc.gc.ca <mailto:ncr.rgenquire@tpsgc.gc.ca> ncr.rgenquire@pwgsc.gc.ca <mailto:ncr.rgenquire@pwgsc.gc.ca> Travaux publics et Services gouvernementaux Canada 11A2 - Portage III Gatineau, Qu�bec K1A 0S5 Public Works and Government Services Canada 11A2 - Portage III Gatineau, Quebec K1A 0S5 As part of my ongoing education, I and saw the following video, that shows, the deductive reasoning approach, to deciphering the meaning of their clubhouse interpretations of things. Scott said it was important to figure out why. I listen and act based on that. This is why it is important to have a buddy do things under title�. I have tried to block Lana Dukakis from this, but am unable to, FACEBOOK WILL NOT LET ME, as I do not think she it has earned the right to this�. The rest of here have put the effort in to be here. I have shared my journey up until this point and will continue to do so. I think I would be remiss in not sharing this knowledge, with most of you. So this is my shovel: Put that in your pipe and smoke it. :-) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iRMGzfuuHyQ


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.01530787868601E+016
Last Updated: Feb 13, 2014 7:37 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

Feb 14, 2014 2:00 AM
Hey, Dogecoin future casillionaires :D http://www.cryptocoinsnews.com/2014/02/11/dogecoin-development-is-showing-real-potential-for-growth-dogewand/ Thanks to Icbeonne Senama..... ;)

Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: Feb 14, 2014 2:00 AM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None




Cara Small

Feb 14, 2014 8:20 PM
Maybe now would be a great time to discuss electronic signatures a little more? It seems to be coming up a lot in the discussion of smart contracts.


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02066034553543E+016
Last Updated: Feb 14, 2014 8:20 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


J.P. Alexander

Feb 14, 2014 10:59 PM
Shit just got REAL!!!


Unique Facebook User ID: 780666251957463
Last Updated: Feb 14, 2014 10:59 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Beverly Berta Braakschmack

Feb 15, 2014 6:05 AM
Scott, Happy Valentines Day!


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.0151988293247E+016
Last Updated: Feb 15, 2014 6:05 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

Feb 16, 2014 12:05 AM
Truth be told. And don't wait for your mainstream media to wake you up... Corrupt governments are ALL OVER THE WORLD. AND ALL *western* countries INCLUDING OURS are controlled by the SAME banksters mafia who also control the Vatican and the Throne of England. IT'S THE SAME SYSTEM. They make laws that don't apply to them, to regulate and TAX YOU, to keep you ignorant while they bleed you dry 'cause THAT'S THEIR GOAL ! You weren't born to be a slave to this system. And that is EXACTLY what SOCIALISM creates. SLAVES ! Sadly, most of you can't even see beyond this government nanny. Your dignity's been destroyed. Your DEPENDENCE has turned you into a WILLFUL SLAVE. You have NO PURCHASING POWER LEFT. WAKE UP ! You have no criticism left. You have no dignity left. AND EVEN THOUGH the Ukrainian revolution MAY VERY WELL BE controlled propaganda, as the info is not clear who the good side really are, there's a clear message that should inspire each and every one of you. The truth is : Some people ONLY - think they - NEED/WANT SO MANY REGULATIONS because they're scared of being scared of what they don't know, and of what THIS VERY SYSTEM has created : a society full of bankrupt, oppressed, depressed, frustrated people who can barely get by and who are sick of it... I'm not talking about the poor who cant afford nothing. I'm not talking about the rich being overtaxed. I'm talking about the toll this society has over YOUR SPIRIT and YOUR MOTIVATION. Stress. Valuing the wrong things. Lack of respect for others AND for yourselves in the first place. I'm talking about this system which WILL ONLY EVER create MORE of that. Is THAT what you REALLY want ?? Do you think THAT is what you're REALLY WORTH ?? SERIOUSLY ?? A country is worth NOTHING without HUMANS x THEIR TIME x THEIR WILL TO ACHIEVE SOMETHING OUT OF IT. YOU ARE THE MONEY ! You are a HUMAN. Not some dumb fuck piece of slave to their game. Please. Start questioning EVERYTHING which is forced upon you. Please... ~Will Bed wrote this ... :)

Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: Feb 16, 2014 12:05 AM
https://www.youtube.com/embed/Hvds2AIiWLA?autoplay=1
Type of Post: video
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

Feb 16, 2014 12:14 AM
Prepare yourself for a ride, dear brothers and sisters.... :) The Stock Market is Behaving Just Like it Did Before 1929 Crash and this Chart is Just Part of the Story ....

Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: Feb 16, 2014 12:14 AM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None


Scott Duncan

Feb 16, 2014 8:40 AM
The best F.U.D. propaganda yet! :D Note to the stealth-theists: This is posted as a propaganda example. It demonstrates how ignorance can facilitate programming. Don't go running back to your "flock" saying crap like "Scott Duncan admits Bitcoin is a scam! Here's proof"... I'll just make you look dumber than you already do. Note: F.U.D. = Fear Uncertainty Doubt (Looking that up leads to an interesting read)

Unique Facebook User ID: 927379467328526
Last Updated: Feb 16, 2014 8:40 AM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None


Feb 16, 2014 8:08 PM


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Feb 16, 2014 8:08 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


John Quicktree Muellers

Feb 17, 2014 6:33 PM
so I am dealing with a lady at the labor board, I have requested her name, id and employee info, and interesting enough she can't remember her id number,,, I also requested for her to prove her claim in which I a private / sovereign citizen am bound by an act of legislation,,, she sent me a web address, she also claimed as a employer I have no rights and am bound the their regulations even after submitting my evidence my X employee is intention is to extort money from me, he has denied receiving 2 recall notices and was working right after he was temporary laid off. so plan of response 1 - make second request for proof of claim in which the charter applies to private and or sovereign citizens and or business's 2 - provide court case R vers Dell as evidence in which the "state" has no business being involved with private citizens 3 - include copy of bill of rights and charted with highlighted area's of "charter violations" 4 - include fee-schedules registered with attorney general of Canada, and Alberta 5 - include copy of claim to attorney general of alberta notifying him of both myself and company are private and I am the one who makes the rules and determines how I function in commerce 6 - submit my bill


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.01540829161201E+016
Last Updated: Feb 17, 2014 6:33 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

Feb 17, 2014 8:39 PM
I have sent a question to the Government of Quebec :/ Hi, after doing some researches, I have good reasons to BELIEVE that a LIEN has been perfected by the Government, on me and my wife's MARRIAGE CERTIFICATE, please tell me if it's TRUE or NOT. Their answer. What do you mean by LIEN ? Please, give us all the details that my help us give you an answer (in French, I used PRIVILLEGE L�GAL, because that's what a LIEN is in French) :-o .....I am shocked with this answer !!!! :-o


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: Feb 17, 2014 8:39 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

Feb 18, 2014 3:25 AM
Hey, Dogecoin OWNERS :-D http://www.businessinsider.com/dogecoin-rally-2014-2 http://www.businessinsider.com/dogecoin-rally-2014-2


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: Feb 18, 2014 3:25 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None




Lana Dukakis

Feb 19, 2014 5:25 PM
Scott I am thinking that I might want to create an affidavit which is supported by two people who have known me for quite a while stating that I am my taken name and not my given name because I want proof that I am not the given name or the name on the birth certificate. But I don�t want to waste my money if doing this won�t serve me very much. But that is where I get confused again. :( So here are my questions to help me to understand: 1. I am guessing that I always should do commercial stuff using the name on my BC. Is that correct? 2. If not, how do I get the banks to accept my affidavit of identity and or identification as they want government issued ID and my legal name. (I tried to use my taken name before a few times and was told that if I want to use my taken name that I have to legally change my name on my birth certificate) 3. Should I and can I claim ownership of all images of my body in the affidavit? Here I�m thinking of famous sports people who sue people who post their image without permission and win in the courts because somehow they have reserved all rights to their image or something to that effect. 4. If I create such an affidavit, what are the advantages and uses of it and for it? Any help and guidance here is very much appreciated. :)


Unique Facebook User ID: 1597301487185764
Last Updated: Feb 19, 2014 5:25 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

Feb 19, 2014 5:47 PM
Pet's Law Dictionary


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: Feb 19, 2014 5:47 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Sino General

Feb 19, 2014 6:00 PM
I'm sure u all saw this right-?

Unique Facebook User ID: 1.015497754093E+016
Last Updated: Feb 19, 2014 6:00 PM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None


Ceit Butler

Feb 19, 2014 10:40 PM

Unique Facebook User ID: 1.0153923542315E+016
Last Updated: Feb 19, 2014 10:40 PM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

Feb 19, 2014 10:47 PM
WE REALIZED THAT JAKE WAS NOT HAPPY, UNLESS HE WAS DOING SOMETHING HE LOVED.... :D (At 6:30 of this video) WOW!!!......what a DISCOVERY !!!!.....I am shocked :D (Sorry, not much to do with "This Note is Legal Tender, but it has EVERYTHING to do with it :D )

Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: Feb 19, 2014 10:47 PM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None


David Vilaca

Feb 20, 2014 9:59 AM

Unique Facebook User ID: 431342553693049
Last Updated: Feb 20, 2014 9:59 AM
https://www.youtube.com/embed/YceTblLkS8Y?autoplay=1
Type of Post: video
Place of Post: None


Lana Dukakis

Feb 20, 2014 4:46 PM
Saw this late last night/early this morning on the Ethereum website. Is NAMECOIN going to be the official coin for Ethereum? ethereum @ethereumproject: The first smart contract went live on our Testnet at 23:58 GMT on 19/02/14: Namecoin successfully implemented in 9 lines of code.


Unique Facebook User ID: 1597301487185764
Last Updated: Feb 20, 2014 4:46 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

Feb 20, 2014 10:46 PM

Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: Feb 20, 2014 10:46 PM
https://www.youtube.com/embed/AJ1yWihBNA4?autoplay=1
Type of Post: video
Place of Post: None




Anibal Jose Baez

Feb 21, 2014 4:46 PM
Great times @ the Tycho-Brahe with Admiral Scott, and part of the crew, back in late November of 2013!


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02035927166068E+016
Last Updated: Feb 21, 2014 4:46 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

Feb 22, 2014 3:45 AM
Hey Scott, I was on the highway 15, heading north, and at about exit 28, I sarted seeing a bunch of affidavit, notice, contract, weird creation of mine :-D , ALL THESE FLYING AROUND ON THE BLOCK CHAIN, and at about exit 31, I started feeling a strange POWER of some sort, can't really explain it.... Should I take a break, or keep THINKING more ?? :-\


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: Feb 22, 2014 3:45 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Eamonn O Brien

Feb 22, 2014 5:54 PM
In my 2 yrs of learning, I've never actually seen a deed for a property... Below is the deed to my mother's house... The town council are the freehold owners while a government issued person that my mother controlled at the time is the LEASEhold owner... I dealt with a probate officer yesterday and she said that the holding position can be changed from leasehold to freehold as the property has no mortgage... My question is, if a freehold was applied for, would it be registered in a new government issued person's id? My educated guess is yes... It's all commerce, and one needs a person to engage in it... If a freehold was to be obtained could it be registered with a taken name? Application : FREEHOLD Name and surname : FUCK YOU THAT'S WHY :P


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02035706386866E+016
Last Updated: Feb 22, 2014 5:54 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

Feb 22, 2014 11:59 PM
Welcome Isabelle Michaud, better get a fucking dogecoin wallet FAST.... :D I am Not in a good mood right now, I have a PFK attack, and can't get this idea out of my head..... :D


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: Feb 22, 2014 11:59 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Scott Duncan

Feb 23, 2014 11:01 PM

Unique Facebook User ID: 927379467328526
Last Updated: Feb 23, 2014 11:01 PM
https://www.youtube.com/embed/NZeOUI2zEbo?autoplay=1
Type of Post: video
Place of Post: None


Scott Duncan

Feb 24, 2014 4:42 PM
MtGox toasts off their twitter feed. Something is afoot...

Unique Facebook User ID: 927379467328526
Last Updated: Feb 24, 2014 4:42 PM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None


Sino General

Feb 24, 2014 5:38 PM
Here we go again, in this article, the following is said in their process, now tell me again how silence doesnt bind or create some kind of default or agreement ??? "If the owner doesn�t object before the deadline, the forfeit is complete."

Unique Facebook User ID: 1.015497754093E+016
Last Updated: Feb 24, 2014 5:38 PM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None




Scott Duncan

Feb 25, 2014 11:52 AM
Derek Moran still keeps getting messages here...

Unique Facebook User ID: 927379467328526
Last Updated: Feb 25, 2014 11:52 AM
Type of Post: photo
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

Feb 25, 2014 2:47 PM
Norah Holloway in ACTION !!! :)

Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: Feb 25, 2014 2:47 PM
https://www.youtube.com/embed/dKe_4xs0Nbw?autoplay=1
Type of Post: video
Place of Post: None


Chris Evan

Feb 25, 2014 7:21 PM
Thanks Scott....I have good reasons to believe this is based on a true story!!

Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02024820688268E+016
Last Updated: Feb 25, 2014 7:21 PM
https://www.youtube.com/embed/UpXYrn2qSXs?autoplay=1
Type of Post: video
Place of Post: None


Shane Pennell

Feb 26, 2014 1:12 PM
What they do with the "purity bricks" almost made me piss my pants! LMAO!!

Unique Facebook User ID: 1.01528359500503E+016
Last Updated: Feb 26, 2014 1:12 PM
https://www.youtube.com/embed/VABSoHYQr6k?autoplay=1
Type of Post: video
Place of Post: None




Beverly Berta Braakschmack

Feb 27, 2014 12:10 AM


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.0151988293247E+016
Last Updated: Feb 27, 2014 12:10 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None






Pete Daoust

Feb 27, 2014 9:14 PM
Here we go.....right from the INSIDE !! :D

Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: Feb 27, 2014 9:14 PM
https://www.youtube.com/embed/pvmFHwa_cbc?autoplay=1
Type of Post: video
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

Feb 27, 2014 9:22 PM
LISTEN TO THIS YOUNG MAN ... :) Roguesupport Nx, ChiefRock Sino General

Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: Feb 27, 2014 9:22 PM
https://www.youtube.com/embed/W7vvBWAZViE?autoplay=1
Type of Post: video
Place of Post: None






Anibal Jose Baez

Feb 28, 2014 3:57 AM
I have reasons to think "Lana Dukakis" is either a cop, or is LYING about his/her intentions here. Watch out. Just sayin'.


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02035927166068E+016
Last Updated: Feb 28, 2014 3:57 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Shane Pennell

Feb 28, 2014 11:46 AM
https://www.facebook.com/truthmovementresourcecenter/posts/574661792641629


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.01528359500503E+016
Last Updated: Feb 28, 2014 11:46 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

Feb 28, 2014 2:56 PM
Hey Norah Holloway...!!!! :D Do they CARE ?? :/

Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: Feb 28, 2014 2:56 PM
https://www.youtube.com/embed/M9RGWsJzvN0?autoplay=1
Type of Post: video
Place of Post: None




Ceit Butler

Feb 28, 2014 8:45 PM

Unique Facebook User ID: 1.0153923542315E+016
Last Updated: Feb 28, 2014 8:45 PM
Type of Post: photo
Place of Post: None


Steve McCall

Mar 01, 2014 3:52 AM
Hey all... Maybe slightly off topic shameless self promotion but because the subject is TOTALLY relevant to the group intention, here is my new tune Cry Baby. It's a free download and you are all free to distribute or copy in anyway. It'a about standing up to bullies and oppression and protecting all that is sacred.

Unique Facebook User ID: 1.01544244026856E+016
Last Updated: Mar 01, 2014 3:52 AM
https://www.reverbnation.com/widget_code/html_widget/artist_1221605?widget_id=55&pwc%5Bincluded_songs%5D=0&pwc%5Bsong_ids%5D=20207546
Type of Post: video
Place of Post: None


Libby Patterson

Mar 01, 2014 7:05 AM
<3

Unique Facebook User ID: 1.01523369043703E+016
Last Updated: Mar 01, 2014 7:05 AM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None


Libby Patterson

Mar 01, 2014 11:59 PM
<3

Unique Facebook User ID: 1.01523369043703E+016
Last Updated: Mar 01, 2014 11:59 PM
https://www.youtube.com/embed/hdAnyC45ZbU?autoplay=1
Type of Post: video
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

Mar 02, 2014 3:18 PM
Hey members, Adam Thomas has is dogecoin WALLET.......and he went through some crazy BRAIN smashing fapity fap fap fapping crazy shit to get that dogecoin wallet. To help him, I would like each members to send him 10 dogecoin in his wallet. The address is : D81AMracuTCMstVpn5Q9oZRUrgDCmdzHgr :D


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: Mar 02, 2014 3:18 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Mimi O'Meigh

Mar 02, 2014 7:58 PM
Would it be to one's benefit to privately CONTRACT into a sale of agreement to purchase a parcel of land? If one purchased this land with fiat currency by the person one has in her pocket, that land will be Government's INVENTORY. I am aware there are ways to make this piece of land UNTOUCHABLE, and have full control over it. I know this is through someone I TRUST, but that is all. If I have a contract to buy a thing but only get it part paid for and then run out of money, do I have a security interest in the thing that I could lien?


Unique Facebook User ID: 1467918376808807
Last Updated: Mar 02, 2014 7:58 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Norah Holloway

Mar 02, 2014 11:26 PM
Pete, I know where Dean is!

Unique Facebook User ID: 1.01536860029343E+016
Last Updated: Mar 02, 2014 11:26 PM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None


Adam Thomas

Mar 03, 2014 10:42 AM
aaahhhh....is that the bomb bo5 ???


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02033698492237E+016
Last Updated: Mar 03, 2014 10:42 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


David Vilaca

Mar 03, 2014 4:21 PM
A whistleblower from within Justice Department. One of Peter "Humanitarian Bombs" Mackay Justice Department weasels has cracked. Schmidt seems willing to pay a price to keep it that way. During an interview on CBC Radio�s As It Happens, the lawyer said that after a decade fighting within the system, he decided finally to bring the matter before the courts only after a recent trip to Egypt underscored �how fragile democracy is and how much it needs care and tending.� How vulnerable it is, for instance, to opaque, legally ambiguous legislative processes � or the stifling of dissent.

Unique Facebook User ID: 431342553693049
Last Updated: Mar 03, 2014 4:21 PM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None




Scott Duncan

Mar 04, 2014 7:32 AM
FROM THE PEARLS-BEFORE-SWINE DEPT:


Unique Facebook User ID: 927379467328526
Last Updated: Mar 04, 2014 7:32 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Sino General

Mar 04, 2014 9:05 AM
The Nanaimo Three - Political Prisoners in Canada The latest update on Dave Lange, Dave Smith and Andrew Simpson, looks like they cut some kind of deal, i guess they ran out of ideas or thoughts on the case and/or just got scared ? i dunno.... Postby Burnaby49 � Tue Mar 04, 2014 6:44 am So, on to my day in court. I was there at 9:30 prior to our heroes being escorted into the courtroom. When they came in Lange was in a red prison jumpsuit and Smith in the suit he was wearing when he was tossed into the pit Friday afternoon. Smith gave his magic incantation as he crossed through the remand doorway into the court then gave me a cheery wave before sitting down. The first thing Crown counsel did was inform the court that Lange wanted to talk to the duty counsel, essentially legal aid. However issues over that. If he'd had the sense to want duty counsel assistance last Friday there would have been no problem. An astute young lawyer was right there in our court ready and willing to take on the job. But today there were difficulties, it was List Day. That was a new term to me, turned out to be the processing of all the miscreants arrested over the weekend and now facing a judge on Monday morning. Duty counsel had to be there to help represent them. Since Lange was a "regular" prisoner being held during the term of a trial he was at the end of the line behind the List Day mob so our trial would have to wait for his services unless the judge ordered a priority in which case duty counsel would dump the List Day riff-raff and hurry on over. Judge asked the Crown what they wanted to do. Crown counsel said she had a non-controversial initial witness who could be put on while waiting for the duty counsel. The two Daves were good with it so we got at least one witness in before their capitulation. The Crown started by recapping events leading to arrest. Our heroes trying to enter the courts in November and December 2012 under the guise of being Peace Officers and their attempts to get a metal shop to make them a bunch of phony Peace Officer's badges. Then it was time for the witness, a woman from Victoria who was a supervisor in the Victoria court Sheriff service. (A note here - I copied her name down when she said it on the stand but wasn't sure if I got it right so I quizzed her in the lobby after testimony. However for some reason she refused to give it to a scruffy old stranger badgering her for personal information at a high security trial with a bunch of defendants known for harassing court officials. After thinking it over I realized she had a point, her name is irrelevant to the accurate recording of events so I'll leave it out). She was just proving some documents. All she did was hand over documents into evidence after identifying them as documents given to her by her staff after having received them from the defendants in November and December 2012. I think they were the fake Peace Officer certificates purportedly notarized by the Chief. Lange cross examined her first. Just asked her if she had personally seen him serving the documents on the Sheriffs. Not in November but in the December incident she was present and saw him pressing the documents on the Sheriffs. Then Smith's turn and he went Full Freeman right out the gate; Smith - Do you work for the province of British Columbia? Witness - Yes. Smith - Are you aware that the province of British Columbia is a bankrupt corporation? Witness - Huh? Don't understand what you are talking about. Smith - Are you aware that the Province of British Columbia is a bankrupt corporation owned by (I think he said) the American government or treasury? The witness was apparently confused as to what this had to do with some documents she'd entered into evidence. Judge told her to just answer yes or no to the question whether she worked for a corporation. So, no. I work for the province of British Columbia. Then Smith asked (I think, poor audio) if she had to follow corporate policies. Judge - answer yes, no, or I don't know. Smith - When you were made a sheriff did you take a statutory oath to the corporation of British Columbia? Witness - I took an oath for the province of British Columbia Smith - Are you sure? Witness - Yes. After this nonsense was done duty counsel still MIA. Crown counsel said that the next witness was an RCMP officer specializing in Freemen who would give factual evidence about events so it might be a good idea to have a lawyer for Lange if he planned to continue with counsel. So at 10:30 Court adjourned until they could round up duty counsel. At that point I assumed that Lange was bailing and wanted a lawyer to help negotiate a deal. Since his "Special appearance" bullshit on Friday, far from being a magic pass out of trouble, had resulted in the judge ordering a week in jail I thought that maybe Lange was reconsidering. Maybe his wife had talked some sense into him on the weekend. Just guesses on my part. I hung around in the lobby and chatted with the 77 year old commissionaire at the information desk about the trial and he asked who the judge was. I said I didn't know so he pulled out the list to look it up. This was when I found out why I couldn't locate the courtroom on Friday. While this was not an in camera hearing it was apparently a super-secret unlisted hearing not on the daily docket. Even the registrar didn't have it. I was just lucky I'd seen Smith wandering by. At noon we were told to come back at 2:00. Something was obviously up. Back at two but we just sat around in the courtroom until three with no defendants or judge. When duty counsel showed up and our two boys were brought in the duty counsel conferred with both of them so it looked like Smith was onboard for representation too. Turned out they had both cut a deal with the Crown during the break and were changing their pleas to guilty. Duty Counsel said he had reviewed it, seemed ok to him, and then he hurried off to be with his first love, List Day. Crown said that they had made identical plea bargain agreements and the terms were; 1 - All charges except impersonating Peace Officers dropped. They were to plead guilty to that. 2 - Each defendant to get 21 day jail term. Smith off on time already served. Lange 8 days short. 3 - Twelve Months unsupervised probation. Agreed terms of probation were; - No contact or communication with any other member of the Fabulous Fighting Five Freemen. - No contact or communication with the person who signed the Peace Officer's Oath as a claimed notary (hi Chief!) - Keep the peace (A loaded term!) and be of good behavior during term of probation - Not possess badges, cards, letters or certificates that might give them the appearance of being Peace Officers - not attend any court sessions except their own. If they were involved in any court sessions they were to identify themselves properly and conduct themselves in a manner acceptable to the courts. Crown counsel said they put this provision in because of Smith's Friday hissy-fit. Judge was willing to accept the agreement and asked both defendants if they agreed to these terms. Yes except for a slight quibble by both. They were fine with the no-contact with the Chief, Ream, Simpson and Valliant but wanted to be able to associate with each other. Apparently they worked together from time to time in the plumbing/heating business and wanted to continue. Crown agreed. Judge then asked Crown if a fine would be preferable to the eight days to be served by Lange. Crown didn't seem happy with idea but it didn't matter because when the judge offered Lange the choice of jail or a $1,500 fine he picked jail. Since Lange worked, or was trying to get work, judge allowed sentence to be served on weekends. Judge also waived Victim Surcharge fine. When all this done judge asked our defendants once again if the agreed to the deal. Yes. Did they have anything to say before final sentencing. No. When he read out the terms he phrased the no contact with the Chief as "no contact or communication, directly or indirectly, with the individual purportedly a 'notary' going under the names of Sino General and/or Chief Rock and/or Hajistahenhway." Judge had problems with the pronunciation of Hajistahenhway. Crown counsel of no help with that one. So we finally got down to business at three and everything concluded by four. As a result I was saved from viewing a parade of witnesses droning on for the rest of the week. Works for me. As always, I forgot to mention something. Probably a couple more of these to come yet. Crown Counsel gave a short song and dance at sentencing about why our felonious freemen should get the book thrown at them (21 times greater jail sentence than Simpson!). They brought up the fact that the "Fighting For Us All" Freeman Five (I'm being generous here on my interpretation of the Crown's position on their capabilities) seemed to be somewhat more or less organized and with the apparent ability to occasionally actually act in concert. A somewhat unique event in Canadian Freemanistan considering that most of them seem incapable of organizing a one-man pub crawl. I'll go out on a limb and say that I think if I gave Menard $50 he could handle at least that. One piece of evidence that the Crown gave as proof of their professional expertise in being able to act together as an organized team in pursuit of a common goal was the series of videos that Mowe linked to and now, sadly, deleted. You remember; the ones taken in happier, more optimistic times, when they showed the world graphic proof that they could all get into one vehicle together and drive to a location entirely different than the one the video started at. No wonder the Crown fears their latent capabilities!


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.015497754093E+016
Last Updated: Mar 04, 2014 9:05 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None




Pete Daoust

Mar 04, 2014 11:17 PM
Surety and Accounting ? :)

Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: Mar 04, 2014 11:17 PM
https://www.youtube.com/embed/M3YA6u4ttN0?autoplay=1
Type of Post: video
Place of Post: None


Tara Duncan

Mar 05, 2014 12:04 AM
FROM THE PEARLS-BEFORE-SWINE DEPT: I sometimes observe people's speculations regarding what creates joinder in legal matters. We hear comments and arguments citing the "live" birth certificate, the registered birth certificate, legal currency, social contracts, first names, last names, names in "Capitis Diminutio Maxima", and probably at some point the correlation of giving birth in the desert while viewing a sunning lizzard. There are individuals and teams pouring over historical documents, legal documents or simply looking for secret words or mystery themes in every day documents. None of these conversations relate to my point, though. In contract law (and how can this be about anything else where there is no injured party), there are two or more parties who enter into an agreement with knowledge and understanding. If written properly all parties are aware of the responsibilities and surety attached to the terms and conditions - including the penalties for non-performance. If "social contracts" exist would it not be reasonable for all participants to enter into the agreement with full clarity? If you need to go looking for the secret signals that have obligated you to terms and conditions, or if the parties "enforcing" your contractual obligations are unwilling or unable to illustrate the point at which you made an informed decision, are you obligated to perform to the contractual specifications? There are two possible scenarios that could play out in your quest for the mystery joinder. In one scenario you spend your entire life looking, and find nothing. On your deathbed you lament you have wasted your life and are no further ahead. In the other scenario: Let's say you one day find the secret, hidden, list of words or sentences, the "holy grail of joinder, if you will", at the bottom of a well, enclosed in plastic, and signed by someone you have never met on behalf of all humanity. Eureka! Then what do you do? Do you chant the secret words of non-joinder? Do you appeal to an amorphous cloud of bureaucratic haze? On hearing your revelations, do people and organizations immediately stop victimizing you or taking your stuff? What do you hope to gain by immersing yourself in what is colloquially referred to as "club-house" rules? If you can't answer that, perhaps you need to cut your losses and return to living a happy, productive life. Go watch War Games again and repeat after me, "The only winning move is not to play".


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02034833945604E+016
Last Updated: Mar 05, 2014 12:04 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Will Jefferson

Mar 05, 2014 5:13 AM
Hey everyboby, this is my first post since joining the group a few weeks ago, I just like to express my thanks to Scott Duncan Tara Duncan Pete Daoust and everyone else who are making this place what it is and I feel very lucky to be here learning from you guys. I have a Dogecoin wallet with 40k Doge in it (having trouble getting the wallet.dat to open on my laptop but ill get it). Last week I sent my incorporation papers off to Delaware and other than that im just trying to keep up and read everything I can, you guys are fucking hilarious btw. (; I see more and more everyday how I value(d)the wrong things and its my wish to ditch the programming that enslaves me and have an original thought before I die. A bit about me; Im 22yrs old, born in Toronto and raised in Quebec, still live in QC but often travel to TO with my dad where I work in the bullshit factory know as the film industry as a carpenter or labourer. I lived a pretty sheltered childhood, Ive always been shy and introverted but it wasn't until I entered the public fool system that I developed the feelings of alienation and social aversion that I have now. I think I lost interest in that racket in 1st grade when the teacher looked at me like an idiot for saying that plants needed air. Before stumbling on this place I was a regular on Deans forum, I first heard about him last February when he got arrested and immediately "dove in" thinking "This is It!", before that I was kinda lost and aimless so decided to learn computers and philosophy (didn't get too far), before that I was messed up on drugs and before that I was an underage stoner.


Unique Facebook User ID: 861229973892415
Last Updated: Mar 05, 2014 5:13 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

Mar 05, 2014 6:48 AM
I think I'll give power of attorney to 9111-1111 Quebec Inc, in regards to PIERRE DAOUST's affairs.......so administration that's seems to be filled with stupid, will be billable, in an easier manner ... Is that a good idea ? :D

Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: Mar 05, 2014 6:48 AM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None


Icbeonne Senama

Mar 06, 2014 10:00 AM
http://www.coindesk.com/serious-linux-flaw-leave-bitcoiners-vulnerable-eavesdropping/


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.0152435377608E+016
Last Updated: Mar 06, 2014 10:00 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

Mar 06, 2014 11:38 PM
Hey Scott Duncan, I was wondering if the person, I happen to have in my pocket, can be a SUPRA PROTEST ACCEPTOR for a bill that comes in, under the person's NAME, that my person is married to ? :) (It makes sense to me, but you know !!! ) :/ Thanks Pete.


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: Mar 06, 2014 11:38 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Scott Duncan

Mar 07, 2014 8:44 AM
Just to clear up ANY misconceptions. The "Secret" verified public denial. This is from "Satoshi" himself :D

Unique Facebook User ID: 927379467328526
Last Updated: Mar 07, 2014 8:44 AM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

Mar 07, 2014 3:26 PM
Helloss Tara Duncan I think I need your help, so I ask for it I have been meeting with a Man recently, a nice Man, and I felt EQUAL to him, even though he has a lot more ACADEMIC knowledge than me, he is what the system promote, well EDUCATED Man, all this education acquired from this system, he smells good, looked good�.blablabla�. In other words, he is filled with �feels good� stuff, and has lots of CERTIFICATE/DIPLOMA to prove it. Anyway, he was in a very dark place, when I met him, he was organizing his death, because no other options seems to be available to him, he think he owe a few hundred thousand dollars to QRA, because QRA said so, and he tried everything he could, using his academic knowledge, to get out of that situation, and failed. So, after listening and OBSERVING him, I felt this �MAN� was in deep shit, and I thought I might help him, in fact, my whole body was burning in flame, because I really think I can fix his shit in about 20 minutes, with my NON-academic knowledge. So I proceeded in telling him who I am, in a very smooth manner, and what I do with public debts, and after 30 to 45 minutes, this �MAN� seems to have lost this idea of putting a bullet in his head, and, I have to admit, it made me �feel good�. And on my way back home, I seriously questioned myself about this� Is this shit is fucking �REAL� ? I will NOT suppose in my mind that I just saved a MAN�s life, and will not give myself �credit� about it, but fuck, the �feeling� was PRICELESS !! :/ Tara, please help me here, IS THIS REALITY or BELIEFS ? How can I let a Man, shoot him self, for a freaking PUBLIC DEBT, if I "have" something, that MIGHT help ? :( But do I "have" something REAL, or is that thing is a BELIEF ? I don�t want to go out there and play little Jebus, I don�t want to �save the planet�, I don�t want to create �beliefs� in Man�s mind�.. But that �feeling� I had, after that meeting, was weird and unprecedent, for �me� Thanks Tara, and sorry for my accent :D Why I ask Tara Duncan ?, because FUCK OFF, that's why :P Pete.


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: Mar 07, 2014 3:26 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Scott Duncan

Mar 07, 2014 5:20 PM


Unique Facebook User ID: 927379467328526
Last Updated: Mar 07, 2014 5:20 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Chris Evan

Mar 08, 2014 8:18 PM
Some good stuff, some crap...

Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02024820688268E+016
Last Updated: Mar 08, 2014 8:18 PM
http://www.youtube.com/v/E07rxJ_bGTE?autohide=1&version=3&autoplay=1
Type of Post: video
Place of Post: None


Colin Stephen Tonks

Mar 09, 2014 8:58 AM
Human nature doesn't change and History allways repeats itself. We have deluded ourselves by living in a "fools paradise!!" Subject: : US Obituary - An Essential Read A scary Obituary ... and it is occurring as you read this: In 1887, Alexander Tyler, a Scottish history professor at the University of Edinburgh, had this to say about the fall of the Athenian Republic some 2,000 years prior: "A democracy is always temporary in nature; it simply cannot exist as a permanent form of government. A democracy will continue to exist up until the time that voters discover that they can vote themselves generous gifts from the public treasury. >From that moment on, the majority always votes for the candidates who promise the most benefits from the public treasury, with the result that every democracy will finally collapse over loose fiscal policy, (which is) always followed by a dictatorship." "The average age of the world's greatest civilizations from the beginning of history, has been about 200 years. During those 200 years, these nations always progressed through the following sequence: � From bondage to spiritual faith;� From spiritual faith to great courage;� From courage to liberty;� From liberty to abundance;� From abundance to complacency;� From complacency to apathy;� From apathy to dependence; � From dependence back into bondage." The Obituary follows: Born 1776, Died 2012 It doesn't hurt to read this several times. Professor Joseph Olson of Hamline University School of Law in St. Paul, Minnesota, points out some interesting facts concerning the last Presidential election: Number of States won by: Obama: 19 Romney: 29 Square miles of land won by: Obama: 580,000 Romney: 2,427,000 Population of counties won by: Obama: 127 million Romney: 143 million Murder rate per 100,000 residents in counties won by: Obama: 13.2 Romney: 2.1 Professor Olson adds: "In aggregate, the map of the territory Romney won was mostly the land owned by the taxpaying citizens of the country. Obama territory mostly encompassed those citizens living in low income tenements and living off various forms of government welfare..." Olson believes the United States is now somewhere between the "complacency and apathy" phase of Professor Tyler's definition of democracy, with some forty percent of the nation's population already having reached the "governmental dependency" phase. If Congress grants amnesty and citizenship to twenty million criminal invaders called illegals - and they vote - then we can say goodbye to the USA in fewer than five years. Foot Note: Whilst the numbers may be less the same applies to Australia but perhaps in 5-10 years. If you are in favour of this, then by all means, delete this message. If you are not, then pass this along to help everyone realize just how much is at stake, knowing that apathy is the greatest danger to our freedom.


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.01523951670811E+016
Last Updated: Mar 09, 2014 8:58 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

Mar 10, 2014 3:50 AM
Ok, I just shut down the Admin Group, if you have stupid question, post them here :D


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: Mar 10, 2014 3:50 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None




Anibal Jose Baez

Mar 10, 2014 10:17 PM


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02035927166068E+016
Last Updated: Mar 10, 2014 10:17 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Tommy Atherton

Mar 11, 2014 2:00 AM
Does this sound familiar? Colonel Edward Mandell-House: �[Very] soon, every American will be required to register their biological property in a National system designed to keep track of the people and that will operate under the ancient system of pledging. By such methodology, we can compel people to submit to our agenda, which will affect our security as a chargeback for our fiat paper currency. Every American will be forced to register or suffer not being able to work and earn a living. They will be our chattel, and we will hold the security interest over them forever, by operation of the law merchant under the scheme of secured transactions. Americans, by unknowingly or unwittingly delivering the bills of lading to us will be rendered bankrupt and insolvent, forever to remain economic slaves through taxation, secured by their pledges. They will be stripped of their rights and given a commercial value designed to make us a profit and they will be non the wiser, for not one man in a million could ever figure our plans and, if by accident one or two would figure it out, we have in our arsenal plausible deniability. After all, this is the only logical way to fund government, by floating liens and debt to the registrants in the form of benefits and privileges. This will inevitably reap to us huge profits beyond our wildest expectations and leave every American a contributor to this fraud which we will call �Social Insurance.� Without realizing it, every American will insure us for any loss we may incur and in this manner; every American will unknowingly be our servant, however begrudgingly. The people will become helpless and without any hope for their redemption and, we will employ the high office of the President of our dummy corporation to foment this plot against America.� - Letter from Rothschild Agent Colonel Edward Mandell House to Woodrow Wilson (President) [1913-1921] found in Wilson�s personal diary/logs


Unique Facebook User ID: 1584308875165822
Last Updated: Mar 11, 2014 2:00 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Jo Xappie

Mar 11, 2014 2:46 AM
How the Stimulus package works. (an oldy but goody) It's a slow day in the small town of Pumphandle and the streets are deserted. Times are tough, everybody is in debt, and everybody is living on credit. A tourist visiting the area drives through town, stops at the motel, and lays a $100.00 bill on the desk saying he wants to inspect the rooms upstairs to pick one for the night. As soon as he walks upstairs, the motel owner grabs the bill and runs next door to pay his debt to the butcher. The butcher takes the $100.00 and runs down the street to retire his debt to the pig farmer. The pig farmer takes the $100.00 and heads off to pay his bill to his supplier, the Co-op. The guy at the Co-op takes the $100.00 and runs to pay his debt to the local prostitute, who has also been facing hard times and has had to offer her "services" on credit. The hooker rushes to the hotel and pays off her room bill with the hotel owner. The hotel proprietor then places the $100 back on the counter so the traveler will not suspect anything At that moment the traveler comes down the stairs, states that the rooms are not satisfactory, picks up the $100 bill and leaves. No one produced anything. No one earned anything. However, the whole town now thinks that they are out of debt and there is a false atmosphere of optimism and glee. And that, my friends, is how a "government stimulus package" works!


Unique Facebook User ID: 1620495888164360
Last Updated: Mar 11, 2014 2:46 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None




Pete Daoust

Mar 11, 2014 10:21 PM
When it's for the PROTECTION of OUR "SECURITY" , they will do ANYTHING :D

Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: Mar 11, 2014 10:21 PM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None


Laurent Vah

Mar 13, 2014 11:41 AM
Petitions. Pleading to your rapists :D


Unique Facebook User ID: 275563289280277
Last Updated: Mar 13, 2014 11:41 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

Mar 13, 2014 5:45 PM
The �security� of JEAN ARNAUD and MICHEL ARNAUD has been compromised, due to a body injury received by Michel. This is EXACTLY what is written, on a DPJ (Direction de la Protection de la Jeunesse) judgement here in Quebec, DPJ here is the same as CPS in CANADA, but here in Quebec, we have our OWN, since Quebec is a FREE STATE :P Now, what "security" has been compromised ? :D A. The "SOCIAL SECURITY" B. The "SOCIAL INSURANCE" C. The well being of these 2 boys D. All of the above E. A and/or B F. I am full of shit :D


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: Mar 13, 2014 5:45 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Mar 16, 2014 3:32 AM
I wanted to throw an idea in here, and get some feedback. This relates to bills of exchange and lets use a gas bill in the example. GAIL received a bill of exchange from the gas company. A duly authorized trustee corporation is going to administer that debt for her. This BOE would be an asset for the corp. Because the gas company has such an issue in dealing with BOE, the corp will send a check to the gas company to cover the debt. Then the corp will submit the BOE to the Bank of Canada. What I'm not sure about is whether that is done through the mail directly to the B of C or if the corporation can deposit the BOE into their bank account and the bank will process the BOE through the Canadian Payments Act to the Bank of Canada? If this was to work, could the corp not be an exchange for others to deal with their B of E hassle free...creating a value for the corp, exchanging a BOE into money of account, reducing the debt, and creating new money? Does this make sense?


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Mar 16, 2014 3:32 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

Mar 17, 2014 2:18 AM
Hey, come on bunch of fucktards, it's TAX TIME !!! :D

Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: Mar 17, 2014 2:18 AM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None


Chris Evan

Mar 17, 2014 4:38 PM
Ok....I am out of there and here is what I did. I am not sure if it is entirely right, so please critique if your name is Scott. If your name is not Scott, fuck off!! :-P They called the NAME at role call. I stood up and said I am here on behalf of the Defendant. I asked for an original charging or accusatory instrument. The "Judge" said he will come back to that as it was the Prosecutors case. The Prosecutor said the cop was there to testify. I again asked for an original charging or accusatory instrument. He said I was given copies. I said I required to inspect and execute an original. A back and forth ensued a couple times. I finally got 2 document. One I had seen and had copies of (It was the Criminal Complaint), and the other I wasn't sure what it was. The second had something stapled onto the back so if I flipped it, it would have writing on both sides. Regardless, I flipped them both over and wrote ACCEPTED BY: <signature> and underneath that put the SSN account number of the Person. They flipped out and demanded I stop. I told them I am almost finished. When I finished, I handed them to the Bailiff. The Bailiff gave them to the Judge as I announced I have deposited the Surety Bond an Affidavit and a Notice into the Court. The Judge said the Kourt doesn't accept these. I said again FOR THE RECORD, I have accepted the charges on behalf of the Surety and deposited the Surety Bond into the Kourt. The Judge recessed and I went home. Now, I am not sure what they will do from here, but as far as I can see, this matter is settled.


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02024820688268E+016
Last Updated: Mar 17, 2014 4:38 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


T?lis B?auns

Mar 17, 2014 9:48 PM
/Wouldn't be surprised if this is a twisted surveillance tactic, but if you aren't scared, today's your last chance to provide input on Canada's prostitution laws: fucking perverts

Unique Facebook User ID: 1.01523955859954E+016
Last Updated: Mar 17, 2014 9:48 PM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None


David Vilaca

Mar 19, 2014 2:30 PM
Scott Duncan, if I may, who is a trusted Notary in Toronto accepting Crypto in exchange for services?


Unique Facebook User ID: 431342553693049
Last Updated: Mar 19, 2014 2:30 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Scott Duncan

Mar 20, 2014 5:20 PM
NOTICE OF MISTAKE: Derek Moran is SPREADING LIES REGARDING NOTICE OF MISTAKE! DO NOT USE ANYTHING DEREK MORAN POSTS! YOU DO NOT SIGN! YOU DO NOT PUT "NON ASSUMPSIT" (You fucking idiots don't even know what that means) YOU DO NOT ADD TO MY WORK YOU FUCKING IDIOTS!


Unique Facebook User ID: 927379467328526
Last Updated: Mar 20, 2014 5:20 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Anibal Jose Baez

Mar 21, 2014 4:54 PM
I understand now why Admiral Scott says the "free-dumb movement" is a looming threat. They are VERY DANGEROUS. The level of celebration of ignorance of these "free-dumbs" is harming the rest of us BIG TIME. I have a new found appreciation for Scott's patience. He is WITHOUT A DOUBT better than "Jesus". Fuck the FREE-DUMBS!


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02035927166068E+016
Last Updated: Mar 21, 2014 4:54 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Beverly Berta Braakschmack

Mar 22, 2014 7:05 AM
This was the first instance (I ever saw) of Notice of Mistake. There is NOTHING MORE THAN "Authorised by" Just to be clear.


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.0151988293247E+016
Last Updated: Mar 22, 2014 7:05 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


David Vilaca

Mar 22, 2014 3:00 PM
Wish I could share the shitstorm I am administrating but it's a private matter and I can only tell a story. Long ago a sorta good guy existed, he developed a way to share his good fortune with the public at large and eventually was Knighted by The Queen. this great impresario created an empire by throwing Turkeys at people during CHRISTMAS and contracting the best and brightest talent around. So the sorta good guy who created an Empire and Knighted by Queen is dead and any Honor he obtained in this life died with him. Forward to a month ago when I found a piece of paper addressed to the person I just so happen to be SOLE signing authority for. This piece of paper authorized another person (BIG WIG) to be surety and/or confiscate WAGES negotiated in good faith (they used weasel words). BIG WIG and the ONION (Organized Labor crying a lot) have a contract of which I am the beneficiary. I as a private man have no agreement with any other person for wage confiscation. BIG WIG and the ONION (a trust which the person is a beneficiary of) are very powerful ENTITIES with INTERNATIONAL RECOGNITION. oh well :) I decided to to ask a few questions of the payroll department at BIG WIG and the werent very forthcoming with answers. In fact they made some very serious claims and allegations and barred my from my rights. I made it very clear that the matter at hand was a private matter and that they should forward any remittances in their possession to the address on file. I asked if they had endorsed any papers on my behalf and they said yes and if I failed to earn enough to satisfy the alleged debt in that tax year they would apply to renew the CONTRACT. OK, so now I'm mad like a meme and inform payroll that I am sole signing authority for the name and any interference in my private affairs and signing on my behalf is cause for a bill. Guess the payroll dept felt that I was going to kill people in their office be cause they took this very private matter to the ONION and made it public. I guess they misunderstood my intent to hold any individual and/or to personto account if they continue to interfere with my only right. BIG WIG sent my person and the ONION HQ a letter and a pile of POLICY about workplace harassment. This letter is defamatory and a serious infringement upon my one and only right. They have destroyed my credibility by publicly stating they are only following the law (just like the nazi's) and that I may confront some one physically in their office. They failed to send an affidavit that I in fact threatened anyone physically or that there is even any evidence of work place harassment in my history and or file. Well I too have a policy and I could careless what the ONION and BIG WIG think. I know I still think wrong but fuck it, there is a war coming and I have an oath to protect the members of the ONION, I'm sure they will choose self destruction (conditioned to the bounty of over 40 debt notes to the hour and the apathy it creates) rather than be like the men and women that started the ONION (they cry a lot) 130 years ago. The ONION is bankrupt and BIG WIG is flush with DOH, both will pay the price, one for breach of trust and the other for failing to abide by my policy. My will is to not harm anyone, my will is to see damages repaired. None of this is my fault.


Unique Facebook User ID: 431342553693049
Last Updated: Mar 22, 2014 3:00 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Chris Evan

Mar 23, 2014 11:23 PM
It seems like we are talking more about being a Creditor here now. Now is probably a good time to clear out FREEDUMB crap stuck in my (and/or our) brain. First, we know to send BoEs REGISTERED MAIL. That registered mail number is an internationally recognized number....ie, unique number. The letter that Pete Daoust and I have used that we are sending with the BoEs, could actually be a document of Title, correct? This Title, we would use to claim the creation of the funds, yes? That Title SHOULD be kept by us for a CLAIM....is all this correct? Second, a few members here have been discussing the TAX forms necessary to be a Creditor. It makes sense that one would have to tell the ACCOUNTANTS what the ACCOUNTS are doing. I think I have seen the Canadians discussing T5008 (?) and in the States, its 1099-OID (I think). Then I have seen others around discussing IRS form 707 and 709 (again...I think). Scott Duncan, is this correct? Third, if we are creating these funds and we are claiming to be the Creditor, someone needs to be the Debtor, yes? Is there any reason to use a W-9 form (for those who we create the funds for....Beneficiary of a BoE)? I think that is all in my brain for now......but this could be a good Creditor thread!!


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02024820688268E+016
Last Updated: Mar 23, 2014 11:23 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Colin Stephen Tonks

Mar 25, 2014 12:06 AM
Melbourne court rules random police checks 'not lawful'. "Magistrate Duncan Reynolds ruled "there is no common law power vested in police giving them the unfettered right to stop or detain a person and seek identification details." Magistrate's ruling is consistent with DPP v Hamilton, Supreme Court of Victoria 2011: Justice Kaye: "It is an ancient principle of the Common Law that a person not under arrest has no obligation to stop for police, or answer their questions. And there is no statute that removes that right."


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.01523951670811E+016
Last Updated: Mar 25, 2014 12:06 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

Mar 25, 2014 1:21 AM
Hey, do you see what I see ? :D


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: Mar 25, 2014 1:21 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Chris Evan

Mar 25, 2014 4:20 PM
Please critique...No FREEDUMB!!!


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02024820688268E+016
Last Updated: Mar 25, 2014 4:20 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Will Bed

Mar 25, 2014 7:58 PM
So I'm taking a shot at getting back, from a bank, the original promissory note I signed to create the principal of a loan for which I have honoured my part of the contract back in 2009... I just had the bank lady over the phone, she said there are always 2 originals, one was *she said* given to me (well if I ever got it, I obviously can't see - as a good programmed chimp - how I would have kept it until this day...) and the other they keep in a SAFE place. She was actually surprised their original was still IN THE VAULT when she went to look it up (it was contracted in 2007 and paid in full on May 5th 2009) and said after 5 years (that's in a few weeks from now) they send their original "TO A SPECIAL PLACE" and "The law says it must be destroyed" and "they cannot give it back to me"... She offered to leave a "certified" copy (guess that's worthless anyways - at least it proves they still got something there) for me at the front desk and I asked her to make sure they keep THEIR original past May 5th, just to make things easier if I ever wanted to claim it... Has anyone been there already ?


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.01541127535701E+016
Last Updated: Mar 25, 2014 7:58 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None




Colin Stephen Tonks

Mar 26, 2014 2:49 AM
Another useful document, although of Aussie focus:

Unique Facebook User ID: 1.01523951670811E+016
Last Updated: Mar 26, 2014 2:49 AM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None


Cara Small

Mar 26, 2014 3:49 AM
Received this today. Looked up "Bill of exchange" in "their" act and have good reason to believe this fits the definition. We also received a "statement". So we are thinking, flip this sucker over and administrate. Also thinking to send back statement with the accepted bill of exchange. Thoughts?


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02066034553543E+016
Last Updated: Mar 26, 2014 3:49 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Laurent Vah

Mar 26, 2014 6:48 PM
Wow, great article. This guy explains clearly what scott and Pete Daoust are trying to teach us. Too bad there are some "god" references in it. Not a lot just in the beginning of the article, but you can skip it like i did :p

Unique Facebook User ID: 275563289280277
Last Updated: Mar 26, 2014 6:48 PM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None


Eamonn O Brien

Mar 27, 2014 1:23 PM
This popped up on my news feed. The guy got a final notice regarding a parking fine. His reply and their reply are posted... I'm very surprised they responded the way they did... What yis think?


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02035706386866E+016
Last Updated: Mar 27, 2014 1:23 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Ceit Butler

Mar 27, 2014 2:05 PM
Hey Pete, need a new setup? :D

Unique Facebook User ID: 1.0153923542315E+016
Last Updated: Mar 27, 2014 2:05 PM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None


Steve Lemieux

Mar 27, 2014 11:57 PM
Some information to chew on [no, I didn't write it]: TOP THINGS THE COURTS DON'T WANT YOU TO KNOW Did you know that part of the fine you pay goes into the judges' pension fund? Did you know that many court documents are "signed" with a rubber-stamp? Did you know many attorneys have this rubber-stamp so they can fake the judge�s signature? Did you know the IRS maintains a criminal investigation file on every Federal judge? Did you know that the Post Office is not authorized to serve process? Did you know that they are not bonded for that, they are not paid for it? Did you know the postman cannot see into the envelope, so he cannot swear to the contents of what he delivered (and he usually doesn't see who received it)? Do you realize that "service by mail" is therefore illegal? Did you know that "receiving" mail is a voluntary act, and you have the right to refuse mail? Did you know that you can report crooked judges to the Court Administrator? Did you know you can report crooked judges to the Insurance Commissioner? Did you know that many of the judges haven't signed the correct oath of office as specified in the state Constitution? Did you know that in many of these judges' oaths, the words "and impartially" are gone? Did you know that if you do not have an attorney to represent you during sentencing, you cannot lawfully be sentenced? Did you know that you can ALWAYS remain silent because the State judge cannot grant you immunity from Federal prosecution? Did you know that the judges do not hold the full judicial power of the state? Did you know that they hold the military power? Are you aware that a mere signature is not defined by law as Evidence of Authenticity? See Rules of Evidence Rule 902. Did you know that if you have a complaint about an attorney, you will get much better results if you file your complaint with the Professional Liability Fund (the insurance arm of the Bar Association) as well as the Bar Association? Did you know that the PLF has a formal complaint procedure, and they actually pay out money? Did you know that the state Bar Association (run by the state Supreme Court) lets drug-addicted attorneys and judges continue to practice, and keeps them out of jail with a special program, the Attorney Assistance Program? Did you know that the original purpose of the Bar Associations was to weed out the most incompetent of the incompetent? TOP THINGS THE POLICE DON'T WANT YOU TO KNOW Did you know that if you sue for false arrest (or false imprisonment), the arrest is presumed to be false? Did you know that all you need to prove is that the arrest occurred, and then the burden is on the officer to prove that it wasn�t false? Did you know that for an imprisonment, all you need is to show that you were "restrained of your liberty by words and acts which you feared to disregard"? Did you know that a car stop counts as an arrest and an imprisonment? Did you know that if an officer says he has a warrant for your arrest, you can demand to see the warrant AND the supporting affidavit, and if he arrests you without producing them, it�s a false arrest? Did you know that the police routinely ignore and violate this law? Did you know that "sovereign immunity" only covers "discretionary" acts (where the officer has a choice about what to do) but does not cover "ministerial" acts such as executing an arrest warrant? Do you understand that an officer is personally liable for any misdeeds during a warrant arrest? Did you know that sovereign immunity does not cover an officer AT ALL if he breaks the law? Did you know that many court documents are "signed" with a rubber stamp? Did you know that many clerks and attorneys have these stamps with a judge�s signature? How do you know the warrant wasn�t stamped by a clerk or attorney? How can a rubber-stamp signature on a warrant POSSIBLY be legal? Did you know that you can ask an officer for his business card and ID, and if he doesn�t comply, he�s out of uniform? Did you know you have the right to resist a false arrest with as much force as necessary? Did you know that if an officer misbehaves, you can complain to Risk Management? Did you know that the Federal Pure Food, Drug and Cosmetics Act (that set up the FDA) makes it illegal for anyone but a licensed physician to operate a breathalyzer? Did you know that if an officer asks you a question, you have the right to ignore him and keep walking? TOP QUESTIONS TO ASK AN FBI AGENT Are you a "Special Agent" ? Are there any "General Agents" in the FBI? When you tell me you are a "Special Agent," are you telling me that you have only specific, limited authority, and that I am responsible for finding out what the limits to your authority are? Am I responsible for making sure you stay within the limits of your authority, even if you are unaware of what those limits are? Please show me documentation of your authority. Is it true that the authority of an FBI agent is the same as the authority of a Park Ranger? Did you swear an "Oath of Office" ? Please show me a copy of it. If you violate your Oath of Office, what are the consequences to you? How are those consequences enforced? Do I have to complain to your superiors, or sue you, or what? What is the name of your superior? What is your badge number? Are you authorized to use an alias? How can I serve process on you if I don't know your real name? When you took office, did you file a bond? Is there any liability insurance to cover damage that you cause while on duty? Please show me a copy of the insurance policy. Are you here on campus as an "invitee" or as a "licensee" ? How does that affect the liability of the Trustees if you are injured while here? How does that affect the liability of the Trustees if you cause damage? Which program are you here under: Applicant, Civil Rights, Counterterrorism, Financial Crime, Foreign Counterintelligence, Organized Crime/Drug, or Violent Crimes and Major Offenders? Is it true that if you arrest me, and I sue you for false arrest (also false imprisonment, assault, battery, and kidnapping), the only thing I need to prove is that an arrest occurred, and then the burden is on you to show that it wasn't false? Would I sue you in State or Federal court? Why? Is it true that "imprisonment" includes "restraining me of my liberty by words and acts which I fear to disregard" ? Is it true that you can conduct a warrantless arrest only if you witness a felony or a breach of the peace, the same as any citizen? Please show me documentation of any other powers of arrest. What is the Constitutional authority for the FBI to exist? Is it true that the "police power" means the power to protect the health, safety, morals, and welfare of the public? Is it true that the police powers are reserved to the States under the 10th Amendment? How can you call yourself "law enforcement" if you're not exercising the police power? Is it true that the only Federal crimes (under Article I of the Constitution) are counterfeiting, piracy and treason? If you're not exercising police powers, and you're not a standing army, then what are you? Is it true that Congress technically ceased to exist during the Civil War, by adjourning "sine die" ("without day")? Is this the reason that Congress has not used the Constitutionally mandated procedure for admitting any States to the Union since 1859? Is this the reason Senators and Representatives are not actually sworn in during "swearing-in" ceremonies? Is this the reason the President calls the Congress into session every two years? Why two years? Is it because the salaries of Congress fall under the two-year limit on military appropriations? Are there geographical limits to your authority? Please show me documentation of those limits. Are you authorized to operate in one of the 10 Federal "Regions" ? What is the Constitutional authority for the Nixon-era creation of those "Regions" ? How can the Federal government create "Regions" if it is forbidden to create States? Was it done through emergency or martial-law powers? Isn't "Region" a military word? Do you have any reason to believe that any of us are engaging in interstate commerce? Do you know that any mention of the �interstate commerce clause� in any court, by the Prosecution or the Plaintiff, brings the Constitution into evidence and I am free to use it OR object on the grounds that the Constitution has not been entered into evidence. Do you know Lon Horiuchi, who shot Vicki Weaver while she was holding a baby in her arms (in the infamous Ruby Ridge incident), all over a shotgun that was a quarter of an inch too short? Do you know the agent who shot 14-year-old Sammy Weaver in the back as he tried to run home? Did you have any part in the Waco massacre (in which the FBI used CS gas and its flammable propellant, in a surprise attack with no element of surprise)? Isn't CS gas illegal to use in war? Did you help destroy evidence from Waco? Is it true that the U.S. Marshals Service falsely claimed a possible drug problem with the Weavers at Ruby Ridge in order to get military reconnaissance flights over the cabin? (and the "hot spot" from the alleged drug lab turned out to be a doghouse?) And that the bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms invented a phony drug nexus at Waco in order to obtain massive assistance from the U.S. Army, the Texas National Guard, and the Alabama National Guard? Is it true that civilian agencies routinely obtain free military support by lying about drugs, and because there is no sanction for lying, obvious falsehoods are accepted by the military as a pretext for intervention? Is it true that the infamous FBI Hostage Rescue Team has spent considerable time in recent years holding hostages and has not even attempted to rescue a hostage for several years? Why are there 56 FBI SWAT teams and what's that got to do with investigation? Is it true that almost the entire Waco operation, not only 2/28 but the siege, had been improperly financed from money that law enforcement was supposed to use only in the war on drugs? Have you had any military training? Are you connected in any way to military intelligence? How come you're not covered by the Posse Comitatus Act of 1878, which was passed to outlaw the use of federal troops for civilian law enforcement and which made it a felony to willfully use "any part of the Army . . . to execute the laws" ? Is it true that during the 1930s J. Edgar Hoover, director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, falsely told the American people that an unprecedented wave of child kidnappings was in progress, and the FBI was rewarded with substantial attention and funding, and in the 1980s a very different FBI earned itself more funding by putting out phony claims about a wave of serial killers of children? Is it really a federal crime to transport artificial teeth into a state without the approval of a local licensed dentist, with penalty of up to one year in prison? Is this the sort of thing we pay the FBI to investigate? Is it true that the federal courts have virtually taken over such vital state functions as the operation of prisons and mental hospitals? And that by 1993, the federal courts operated 80 percent of all state prison systems in America? Is it true that federal judges determine virtually every detail of these prisons, including standards for food and clothing, grievance procedures, and cell space per convict? Is it true that these prisons are run by private corporations for profit? TOP THINGS THE BANKS DON'T WANT YOU TO KNOW Did you know that the FDIC doesn't really insure bank accounts? Did you know that when a bank goes under and is taken over by the FDIC, instead of paying the $100,000, the FDIC just pays its own people to come into the bank and divvy up what's left of the bank's assets? (This comes from a woman who once worked as a temp for the FDIC. Her job was to talk on the phone to the angry depositors and explain this to them.) Did you know that a bank cannot legally require a fingerprint as a condition of cashing a check? According to UCC 3-501(b)(2), they can only require you to: Exhibit the instrument (i.e. you show them the check) Give reasonable identification, and evidence of your authority if you are cashing the check on behalf of someone else Sign the check, and make a written receipt for partial payment, or the surrender of the check upon full payment (i.e. you let them keep the check) They write the brochures to say that they "ask" for a fingerprint (not "demand" as a condition of payment). Their excuse for the fingerprint is "reasonable identification." So if you can get them to agree that your picture ID is reasonable identification, they have NO LAWFUL EXCUSE for refusing to pay the check just because you don't give them a fingerprint! In this case they have "dishonored" the check and you can proceed exactly as you would if they blatantly, and for no reason, refused to pay. Contact us for ideas on how to use the fingerprint issue. Did you know that if you write �Without Recourse� below your endorsement or signature that the bank can not take any action against you for any reason! Did you know that banks do not loan their own assets, nor the assets of their depositors? Do you realize this means they do NOT loan money, but instead, there is an exchange of credit for credit, in which interest is charged on one side, but not the other? If the borrower walks away with cash (which has value in the form of "purchasing power"), but the bank didn't loan any of its assets, isn't it obvious that the "purchasing power" must have come from SOMEWHERE? Did you know that when a bank makes a "loan," the money supply (M1) expands -- in other words, the volume of currency in circulation increases? Did you know that the value of the Federal Reserve Note "dollar" depends on the size of the money supply via the law of "supply and demand" -- in other words, the more FRNs there are, the less they are worth? Do you understand that when the bank makes a loan, the value of the FRN "dollar bills" in everybody's pocket declines -- in other words, the bank is creating FRN dollars in competition with the FRN "dollars" in your pocket, and this reduces the value of the FRN "dollars" in your pocket? Do you realize this is the cause of inflation? Do you realize that this means the "value," or "purchasing power," loaned by the bank is essentially STOLEN from the public via the mechanism of inflation? Contact us for ideas on how to use the "Theft by Inflation" issue 1. Always Pursue Truth - unless something better comes along. 2. There is No Deception so great as-- Self-deception, see # 1.


Unique Facebook User ID: 458370044339963
Last Updated: Mar 27, 2014 11:57 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Ceit Butler

Mar 28, 2014 5:29 AM
"House Bill 2613 was an attempt to give grieving families the opportunity to obtain a �certificate of birth resulting in stillbirth� rather than a certificate of death" Gee, that's AWFULLY nice of them, registering stillbirths and miscarriages with BIRTH Certificates instead of Deaths..

Unique Facebook User ID: 1.0153923542315E+016
Last Updated: Mar 28, 2014 5:29 AM
Type of Post: photo
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

Mar 29, 2014 1:12 AM
THE MAJORITY IS ALWAYS WRONG is my MOST repeated. Those aren't just words. It's the truest thing you have EVER read. The key is there. -Scott Duncan


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: Mar 29, 2014 1:12 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None






Chris Evan

Mar 29, 2014 9:42 PM
Semi evolved chimps http://www.life-hack.co.uk/2014/03/the-experiment.html?m=1


Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02024820688268E+016
Last Updated: Mar 29, 2014 9:42 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Scott Duncan

Mar 29, 2014 10:52 PM


Unique Facebook User ID: 927379467328526
Last Updated: Mar 29, 2014 10:52 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Scott Duncan

Mar 29, 2014 11:23 PM

Unique Facebook User ID: 927379467328526
Last Updated: Mar 29, 2014 11:23 PM
Type of Post: photo
Place of Post: None


Steve Lemieux

Mar 30, 2014 3:30 AM
I got a good laugh reading this, thought I'd share. You might even learn a thing or two. Enjoy!


Unique Facebook User ID: 458370044339963
Last Updated: Mar 30, 2014 3:30 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

Mar 30, 2014 2:42 PM
BY LAW, if our POLITICIENS WOULD FOLLOW THE LAW, we would never have a NATIONAL DEBT. So HOW in the fuck can I "VOTE" for one of these CRIMINALS ?

Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: Mar 30, 2014 2:42 PM
https://www.youtube.com/embed/q7HMt5MgsDg?autoplay=1
Type of Post: video
Place of Post: None


Pete Daoust

Mar 30, 2014 11:09 PM
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/722803/000110465913080931/a13-23427_1ex99d5.htm Check page 27, and you<ll find out WHY Gentilly II was closed :P

Unique Facebook User ID: 1.02017712542701E+016
Last Updated: Mar 30, 2014 11:09 PM
Type of Post: link
Place of Post: None


Mar 30, 2014 11:54 PM
Question about lawyers.....my understanding is that they are NOT employees of the corporations they may work for....that they work more in terms of a special agreement type of situation. Is this correct? I've had one swear up and down that he is an employee, his employee status being no different to that of a customer service employee. So let's just say he was telling the truth, would the "employee" status mean that he would no longer be protected by limited liability?


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Mar 30, 2014 11:54 PM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None




Scott Duncan

Mar 31, 2014 5:31 AM
Isn't she cute :D She seems to have stumbled onto the Admiral and his motley crew of simu-drones. She has my attention, because she is surrounded by the most vile forms of idiocy. Yet here she is. In a most impudent way, she demanded the Admiral's attention, and now she's got her wish... ...she's smarter than she lets on, but is she strong enough to break from the stupid that surrounds her? It's better than a soap opera, and if you're not careful, you might learn something :D


Unique Facebook User ID: 927379467328526
Last Updated: Mar 31, 2014 5:31 AM
Type of Post: status
Place of Post: None