The Tender For Law

Volume 9

Mar 31, 2015 2:19 AM

David-Paul Sip

I remember this video and the infamous statement but look at this gem that Justice Paul Rouleau just wrote on behalf of the three judge appeal panel �The respondents violated Mr. Figueiras�s COMMON LAW RIGHT to travel UNIMPEDED on a PUBLIC HIGHWAY..." Can someone explain to me how does a right become a privilege as the Highway Traffic Act claims?

�This ain�t Canada right now�: G20 police violated Charter rights, court rules | Toronto Star

thestar.com

By targeting protesters for searches and not letting them proceed, York Police violated Charter rights in June 2010, the appeals court decides.

Read Comments

David-Paul Sip

Well the Highway Traffic Act claims the DRIVING is a "privilege" but then I recently found this wonderful 1950's ruling from the Alberta Queen's Bench andmonishing the Attorney General and affirming that a privilege cannot replace a right

David-Paul Sip

Why would the Justice write this? Look at these phrases..."common law", "right to travel", "public highway" :/ Many of us will recognize these components as the very language used by FREEDUMBERS and yet this is coming from a JUSTICE. WTF!

Tara Duncan

People "need" to lie when we can extrapolate forward that accounting will be involved. The "we hope" quote was the interesting part for me. We can always hope, but history says the results will be otherwise.