The Tender For Law

Volume 9

Feb 04, 2015 1:55 AM

David-Paul Sip

Here's an accounting article I think that Capitaine Pete will like :D

Croatia forgives debt of 60,000 poor citizens | Toronto Star

thestar.com

'People should pay their bills, but if they find themselves in deep trouble, this measure can help,' says Croatian PM

Read Comments

Scott Duncan

It's a completed transaction. The VALUE is YOU acknowledging the debt, and accepting JOINDER. That WILL be used against you later. The way I always win is by asking "What evidence does this court have, that I have ANY surety in this matter"?

If I accept "forgiveness" of a "debt", I accept the terms and conditions attached to it...

...IT'S A TENDER FOR LAW

Scott Duncan

If I accept "forgiveness" of a PUBLIC "debt", then the NEXT time I ask "What evidence does this court have, that I have ANY surety in this matter?", the court will have a LEGAL AND LAWFUL RESPONSE. They will have PROOF!

Eamonn O Brien

That signature and thus joinder would only be for that JOHN SCOTT DUNCAN's debt forgiveness matter yes? If a separate matter arose a week later that would be a completely different PERSON and thus there would be no evidence or proof of surety?

Scott Duncan

But JOHN SCOTT DUNCAN is a TITLE, not a name, (Or Corporation as the free-dumbers say). TITLES ARE CAPITALIZED. Your ALL CAPS NAME is a TITLE where JOINDER IS ATTACHED.

Since you are the ONLY MAN AUTHORIZED to use that title, it is REASONABLE to PRESUME you are SURETY for that title.

The "new person" every time, refers to the ORGANIZATION, not the TITLE. YOU ARE SURETY BY DEFAULT.

Scott Duncan

They are, until you accept JOINDER.

Why do the "rules" change in your head when you think of this stuff?

A NEWSPAPER BOY IS ON THE CORNER SHOUTING "EXTRA EXTRA" - Who has surety for that transaction, BEFORE you "pay" for the newspaper?

Eamonn O Brien

My understanding was they gave me a person to use. They're surety until I agree to be. Any new contact with a corporation is a new person that corporation created an account for.

I didn't have a differentiation between the all caps PERSON and the person on the speeding ticket... I know they're not the same person but thought they all referred back to the NAME... I'm confusing myself now...