EXACTLY NOT what I teach you to do. NOTHING FROM THE GOVERNMENT IS:
1) Good.
2) IN YOUR INTEREST.
3) FREE.
EVER!
WHAT DOES IT TAKE TO SHOW YOU THIS? I THOUGHT YOU KNEW THAT!
I was thinking wrong. I viewed it as,
I have a contract resulting in �60,000 debt. By accepting joinder for that it will be written off... As I signed for it originally then no problem...
It's a completed transaction. The VALUE is YOU acknowledging the debt, and accepting JOINDER. That WILL be used against you later. The way I always win is by asking "What evidence does this court have, that I have ANY surety in this matter"?
If I accept "forgiveness" of a "debt", I accept the terms and conditions attached to it...
...IT'S A TENDER FOR LAW
If I accept "forgiveness" of a PUBLIC "debt", then the NEXT time I ask "What evidence does this court have, that I have ANY surety in this matter?", the court will have a LEGAL AND LAWFUL RESPONSE. They will have PROOF!
That signature and thus joinder would only be for that JOHN SCOTT DUNCAN's debt forgiveness matter yes? If a separate matter arose a week later that would be a completely different PERSON and thus there would be no evidence or proof of surety?
But JOHN SCOTT DUNCAN is a TITLE, not a name, (Or Corporation as the free-dumbers say). TITLES ARE CAPITALIZED. Your ALL CAPS NAME is a TITLE where JOINDER IS ATTACHED.
Since you are the ONLY MAN AUTHORIZED to use that title, it is REASONABLE to PRESUME you are SURETY for that title.
The "new person" every time, refers to the ORGANIZATION, not the TITLE. YOU ARE SURETY BY DEFAULT.
"The "new person" every time, refers to the ORGANIZATION, not the TITLE. YOU ARE SURETY BY DEFAULT."
When I said new person I meant the likes of a speeding ticket... Who is surety by default for that?
They are, until you accept JOINDER.
Why do the "rules" change in your head when you think of this stuff?
A NEWSPAPER BOY IS ON THE CORNER SHOUTING "EXTRA EXTRA" - Who has surety for that transaction, BEFORE you "pay" for the newspaper?
My understanding was they gave me a person to use. They're surety until I agree to be. Any new contact with a corporation is a new person that corporation created an account for.
I didn't have a differentiation between the all caps PERSON and the person on the speeding ticket... I know they're not the same person but thought they all referred back to the NAME... I'm confusing myself now...
THE TENDER FOR LAW! THE ONLY PLACE ON THE WHOLE INTERNET, THAT:
1) Tells the truth.
2) Makes you drink your own piss.
Hmmmm... I think we need the P.R. Dept. to spin this a bit. :/
Also: I fucking hate Derek Moran. Oh hey, we ALL do, but for me it's a SPECIAL hate.
I know it's not relevant to the thread, but the point is still valid.