INDIAN = PROPERTY OF THE BRITISH EAST INDIA TRADING COMPANY

THE CROWN

NONE OF YOUR BUSINESS. No really.

Oh fuck, we are playing now, fuck off with that section 91.24 :-P

WOW! That was EASY! :D

when you say THE CROWN you mean British monarchy?

That was fun.. Let's do another! :D

No... I mean THE CROWN.

HAHAHA!!! :D

ok

If i meant BRITISH MONARCHY, I would have included the words BRITISH and MONARCHY in my definition. See how that works?

I do.... thank you for bearing my ignorance as I try to remove it from my life

Now, come out of the library of your ass, and look in the REAL WORLD where I said THE CROWN.

I have ideas about THE CROWN. Likely they are pulled out of my or someone elses ass. I vaguely recall you mentioning once: the crown only has one client. Government.

I know nothing else

So go look. WHAT IS "THE CROWN"?

...good luck :D

Wiki pedia has some info this is where critical thinking comes into play.

It appears THE CROWN is made up of a bunch of strangers who have colluded to give themselves authority over all kinds of things

They sure did Mikey! They sure did! *scratchy 1950's music*

Ok. So the strangers who make up the CROWN think I am an indian. They even have evidence of me acting in this capacity. Yes i have collected my 5 bucks on treaty day. Will a resignation disolve this? Or is that a whole a different level of joinder. ?

No, they think you are a CROWN ORGANIZATION. They have since 1933.

In 1982 they decided you were AGENT of a CROWN ORGANIZATION.

INDIA,INDIAN,INDIES are REGISTERED TRADE MARKS of the BRITISH EAST INDIA TRADING COMPANY. It has NOTHING to do with the country of India... which remains property of the British East India Trading Company.

Being an AGENT of the CROWN in Quebec, is very discutable :-D

A what?

an AGENT of a CROWN ORGANIZATION....sorry...

very what?

lol make your own thread and leave shit stains in it. Scott was helping me with mine.

Craig Blacksmith13 hrs � Edited � Ho mitakuyapi. Something to ponder if ur interested. We were in court yesterday challenging Canadian jurisdiction. Comments have been made that in today's world we will never be given a fair trial because we carry around drivers licenses, status cards, pay bills, use Canadian money etc etc. Here's our position on this as Dakota Oyate. Yes we are in "their" court. Yes we carry around drivers licence, status cards etc. Our take on this is that the government gave them themselves authority over the indian July 1, 1867 when the constitution was passed. Included in their law was section 91 which is a unilateral (passing laws on their own) granting of federal authority. Currency, banking, taxation, marriage, divorce, postal service etc. These are all standard government authorities. What isn't standard is #24 on the list: Indians and lands reserved for indians. Keep in mind "Canada" at the time was on the east coast and along the north shores of the Great Lakes. It wasn't "Canada" as it is today. Our Dakota Oyate refused to surrender "sign treaty" so a refugee theory was established and other tribes signed away the western prairie provinces. Today, we have completely blown their fabricated history and exposed it as lies. In addition to this is the indian act which was passed into law in 1876. The indian act makes the "indian" in section 91.24 a legal permanent ward of the government. This why it states in the indian act that our lands are to be held in trust for our use and benefit with the federal government as trustee. (great white father) So as legal wards we are not bound by their laws outside of the indian act. We are not capable of administering ourselves so everything done, drivers licenses, registration, passports etc are all within this indian act for our benefit. Now as Dakota Oyate, we will not negotiate as "indians" today as was the case back in the 1860's. We have documented history of our alliance with the British and we see "Canada" as a creation of the British government not as a nation. The British are only sovereign on their lands. We are sovereign here. We will not enter into a treaty with a corporate entity which is what the British North America Act (Canada) is. We are in their court because it was the only way we could legally challenge jurisdiction. As the constitutional lawyer for canada states "no court has countenanced such an argument". If no court countenanced it, how can there be legal precedent. Canada cannot have it both ways. Either "indians" are wards (children, mentally incompetent, animals) with no legal responsibilities or "indians" are human beings that are being subjected to war crimes by stripping us of our humanity. Canada is not a sovereign nation. We are. Like � � Share 42 people like this. 11 shares Traci Braaten 12 hrs � Like Nic Leech Best wishes for this case.12 hrs � Like � 1 Nic Leech I would suggest a case based on being forced to use these forms of identification because to do anything else would once - and still could - be cited as revolutionary activities....with all the potential consequences. Under current geo-political circumstances, it could be considered as terrorism to refuse. - Ultimate hypocrisy. ...See More11 hrs � Like Larry Douglas Great work, craig. keep us informed.6 hrs � Like � 1 Write a comment... Crystal Marie34 mins � Omg so just got up from a nap safe to say I'll b up all night Like � � Share Darren Sinclair Welcome to my world28 mins � Like Crystal Marie Aww muffin insomnia is my world 26 mins � Like Darren Sinclair Muffin insomniac22 mins � Like

Even admitting to joinder...... does it remove the claim he is making ??

Is it totally freedumb.? IS this a facepalm ?

INDIA, INDIAN, INDIES (West Indies, Etc.), ARE ALL REGISTERED TRADEMARK OF THE BRITISH EAST INDIA TRADING COMPANY. Now read it again. This is an AGENT ;)

He's good too! He probably has Gerbils, like that Nazi Newsreel guy!

Issue is Agency.

Yes, same as these CRA agents, they are NOT surety for any shit they may make.....

I am not even sure they use their LEGAL name, as agent.... :D

Fuck fuck fuck..... i posted the agency article told the guy to read it i am now fucking blocked from page. Why ? Why cant we help these fuckong morons

The truth frightens so fucking much. Head in sand fuck off.. .. dammit

But no these fucks would rather go to court and participate in a circle jerk. Instead of helping to create a new fucking world bah

:-o ....relax buddy :D

Lol thx pete. Its just so obvious once scott holds your hand and shows you. But it takes a willingness to listen.

And i realize i barely get it if at all

Well, if ever CRA calls, ask the agent his/her name and drivers licence number, and his address.......and ask him/her his SIN number..... :D See what he/she tells you, and do the EXACT same thing when someone ask you these same question :D

Then, you'll be an AGENT :D

CRA has not called in months. Even the letter correspondance has dried up.

Perhaps it was something you said? :D

All i ever asked was if i had the right to the security of the person as stated in the uk canada act 1982 and how to exercise that right.

LOL... :D

They are still looking for the right answer to give you....

It WAS something you said! :D

Ha! :D