Scott Duncan Because you, with INTENT struggle to MISS THE POINT. THIS COPY is for educational purposes. Replace "***redacted shit here***" with the PARTY/SUBJECT/VESSEL. Scott Duncan Derek Moran - NOTICES NOTIFY! That's what makes it a NOTICE. It's not for ASKING. The purpose is NOT to have a chat, or ask questions. It's a NOTICE. Scott Duncan Nope. Did you recently read a "No Parking" sign and the sign "followed up" with you? Scott Duncan Why would you need anything else? Beverly Berta Braakschmack In court, if you stated that you did not receive proper notice, you are indicating full disclosure, correct? Scott Duncan PROPER NOTICE IS disclosure. Before the sign "keep off the grass" was put there, no INTENT was disclosed. Scott Duncan The law is about INTENT

case-law that explains "INCLUDES" > http://www.canlii.org/en/on/onca/doc/2005/2005canlii21094/2005canlii21094.html?searchUrlHash=AAAAAQAXIGRlZmluaXRpb24gb2YgaW5jbHVkZXMAAAAAAQ

Beverly Berta Braakschmack So Scott, does a NOTICE point towards something? Or it just makes it "lawful"? As in NOTICE OF INTENT, NOTICE OF RIGHT, etc? Scott Duncan It transfers KNOWLEDGE. When you give notice, the reading party HAS KNOWLEDGE OF whatever the notice says. It is considered a FACT IN LAW beyond that point (If it is written, it is law).

Scott Duncan So lien the item for DOUBLE its face value and notify them. ...then send them a bill for the balance Scott Duncan ...yes, but I KNOW the guys who built PPSA.CA. I am loyal to those who build for my benefit. I trust their work.

Derek Moran LIGHTBULB just went off! > (PROPER NOTICE because a BILL is a TENDER FOR LAW). As in- how can any CORPORATION deny you the ability to discharge your debt by way of the bill-payment-remittance THEY, sent YOU, in the first place?!? February 28 Derek Moran ... a BILL is a TENDER FOR LAW).......did THEY, not TENDER it to me?? February 28 Derek Moran Barrons Law, BILL: a PROPOSITION or statement reduced to writing. In commercial law, an "account for goods sold, services rendered and work done."

"As I have already noted, a promissory note, by definition, involves an unconditional promise to pay a sum certain in money, but it is not itself money...there is no liquidation of the debt until it is DISCHARGED..." http://www.canlii.org/en/ca/scc/doc/1977/1977canlii36/1977canlii36.html

Scott Duncan OMG I have SO much to type. Work your way up the ranks. You aren't Nobility. Do not use "will". Your "will" is not a factor. You aren't qualified. *RIGHT ANSWER SMACK-DOWN* "Should YOU or YOUR OFFICE attempt joinder, such attempt SHALL be CONSIDERED an attempt at FRAUD". ...and that's how you do it. * Struts away smugly * (Fuck I have a lot of typing to do...) Scott Duncan 1.1 version: "Should YOU or YOUR OFFICE attempt joinder, such attempt SHALL be CONSIDERED an attempt to DEFRAUD". Scott Duncan Look up every word.

Jason Henry Did you catch where I used the term: Exchange? Welcome to commerce. Scott Duncan NON NEGOTIABLE. Think about those words.

Derek Moran I 'Notice' (pun intended) you spell Authorize with an 's,' Scott (as in, Authorise)..why is this? Scott Duncan the suffix ise and ize are interchangeable. One is the "American" form. Z and S USED to be the same letter in the Hindu-Arabic writing that ENGLISH is based on. ...Now you know. And Knowing is half the battle!

Bobis Youruncle Public notice = Bill of exchange= a tender to contract, in regards to post above in the thread a ways back.... you post the notice and if someone unauthorized does something and engages in what the notice says .. you have cause for action. (SCOTT clicked LIKE)

Derek Moran 'Wise-man' once told me: "The purpose of making something Public RECORD, is for the PROOF of an EVENT, in CONVEYING a FACT-in-LAW" and/or that a FACT-in-LAW has indeed been CONVEYED <------ SCOTT

Derek Moran Adam- as i recall, Scott said to leave out any names lest they presume SURETY. "Has a NO PARKING SIGN, or, KEEP OFF THE GRASS NOTICE ever told you who it was from??," i recall him writing. In fact i deliberately NOT use his first-name, and DO use MY first-name.

Derek Moran Interesting definition for COUNSEL in The Dictionary of Canadian Law: "An adviser, whether or NOT he is a lawyer..." And EVERYONE has the RIGHT-to-COUNSEL, right?

Mackximus Minimus Joseph Davia, if it was me signing a legal document, I try to avoid it at all times, unless is completely to "MY" benefit. If signing a contract, I use<<Authorized BY: (seal/signature here) "All Rights Reserved" "Non-Assumpsit.">> If I should be forced to sign anything (by inmates, and gardas punching my legs, in some crazy initiation, perhaps? lol), or forced to sign a traffic ticket (and/or ANY contracts in which I don't want to act as surety) I JUST SIGN VOID. In what respects to the "cv" you mentioned, perhaps you are referring to V.C., short for Vi Coactus. <<Vi coactus is a Latin term, abbreviated as V.C., and means: 'under constraint'. It is used to indicate an agreement made under duress. An example of its usage is that of the Dutch 17th century statesman Cornelius de Witt, who was forced to sign the act for restoration of Stadholderate. After all the entreaties by his wife, though he signed the contract but only before adding V.C. to his signature. [1] In the early chapters of his historically-set novel The Black Tulip, Alexandre Dumas describes the episode in detail, along with the role and meaning of the two letters V.C.>> If one DOES NOT know WHY is using all these when signing, it's completely useless then. Hope this helps! Scott Duncan Maximiliano P�rez, you have to be one of thr most attentive readers here. Of all the people on here, you are the one I NEVER have to worry about missing my points. You covered that well.

oh yah, if you can not back up what you claim, they will say you have no evidence to support such a claim. maybe this sepperates [fact finding] 'evidence' from 'proof'. like if i claimed to have built the motorcycle, but can not tell a juror how i did it, the motorcycle might only be proof that it does infact exist and can not 'evidence' my claim that i knew how to do it proving by fact that my claim of 'it is mine i built it, he who makes a thing owns a thing'... 'sufficient of facts finding' that an average joe could easily and commonly understand to determin the claim is truth in full and not deception/fraud. yes, a pot induced post. :)

...and not acurate.