The Tender For Law

Volume 4

Dec 21, 2013 4:30 PM

Derek Moran

Scott Duncan The court offers you the right to claim sovereignty IN THEIR JURISDICTION, WITH FULL SOVEREIGN STATUS all the time. There's a catch; you MUST wait for them to offer it.

YOU don't know what the word "belligerent" means, do you?

When a court says you are a "belligerent defendant" (That's a NOUN; for the retarded people who THOUGHT they knew what it meant), what are they saying?

Read Comments

Derek Moran

Scott Duncan OK, before I post my Dean Kory article, I need to get something out there. I think you have ALL missed something...

EVERY GOVERNMENT CHARGE is a NEW PERSON with SURETY ATTACHED TO YOU! The "DEAN KORY" on your driver's licence, is NOT THE "DEAN KORY" ON THAT WARRANT! THAT"S A NEW "DEAN KORY" THAT WAS CREATED, AND THAT "YOU" RESPONDED TO!

DO NONE OF YOU GET THAT????

Harold Austerman

Sovereign A chief ruler with supreme power; one possessing sovereignty. (q. v.); 2. In the United States the sovereignty resides in the body of the people. Vide Rutherf. Inst. 282. --Bouvier's Law Revised 6th Edition, 1856

"[It is] the people, to whom all authority belongs." --Thomas Jefferson to Spencer Roane, 1821.

"There is no such thing as a power of inherent Sovereignty in the government of the United States. In this country sovereignty resides in the People, and Congress can exercise no power which they have not, by their Constitution entrusted to it: all else is withheld." --Julliard v. Greenman, 110 U.S. S. 421

A piece of paper does not give people the right to walk the earth as one of God's creatures. People have that right without the Constitution, without the Amendments some people call the "Bill of Rights," and without a Birth Certificate.

No Political or Royal figure can give one the right to be free or take that right away. The idea that one is "given" what one already has is an illusion created for the purposes of control, power, and manipulation. Such an idea exists only when people allow it to exist or are ignorant of their rights.

Harold Austerman

seems like a coterie of old families got togather and said hey! we can make a fortune here, lets put on robes, jewels, horse Carriages, strut around, and make like big shots, and Tax em, Kill'em if they don't obey!!! History in a Nutshell!

Pete Daoust

OK, but in that case, if the criminal code of Canada applies to HER MAJESTY and an ORGANIZATION only, well, Article 337 of that same code only can be use by HER MAJESTY and an ORGANIZATION against a public servant ?

NO ? :/

337. Every one who, being or having been employed in the service of Her Majesty in right of Canada or a province, or in the service of a municipality, and entrusted by virtue of that employment with the receipt, custody, manage- ment or control of anything, refuses or fails to deliver it to a person who is authorized to de- mand it and does demand it is guilty of an in- dictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding fourteen years.

Pete Daoust

Well, in that case, how in the fuck can I be BOUND by something I can not interpret ? :/

So here is the person, which seems to be the thing bounded buy those statutes I have no RIGHTS to interpret, do your stuff, I'll sit there, let me know when you are finished, and cut me a fucking check when it's all over !!!! :/

WHAT ELSE CAN I DO ANYWAY ???? :D