Derek Moran

Dec 21, 2013 4:33 PM
Scott Duncan Remember, if you don't assert YOUR rights, others will decide FOR you, what those rights are. ..you see the problem.


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Dec 21, 2013 4:33 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Derek Moran

Dec 21, 2013 4:37 PM
Scott Duncan OK, before I post my Dean Kory article, I need to get something out there. I think you have ALL missed something... EVERY GOVERNMENT CHARGE is a NEW PERSON with SURETY ATTACHED TO YOU! The "DEAN KORY" on your driver's licence, is NOT THE "DEAN KORY" ON THAT WARRANT! THAT"S A NEW "DEAN KORY" THAT WAS CREATED, AND THAT "YOU" RESPONDED TO! DO NONE OF YOU GET THAT????


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Dec 21, 2013 4:37 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Harold Austerman

Dec 21, 2013 4:39 PM
Sovereign A chief ruler with supreme power; one possessing sovereignty. (q. v.); 2. In the United States the sovereignty resides in the body of the people. Vide Rutherf. Inst. 282. --Bouvier's Law Revised 6th Edition, 1856 "[It is] the people, to whom all authority belongs." --Thomas Jefferson to Spencer Roane, 1821. "There is no such thing as a power of inherent Sovereignty in the government of the United States. In this country sovereignty resides in the People, and Congress can exercise no power which they have not, by their Constitution entrusted to it: all else is withheld." --Julliard v. Greenman, 110 U.S. S. 421 A piece of paper does not give people the right to walk the earth as one of God's creatures. People have that right without the Constitution, without the Amendments some people call the "Bill of Rights," and without a Birth Certificate. No Political or Royal figure can give one the right to be free or take that right away. The idea that one is "given" what one already has is an illusion created for the purposes of control, power, and manipulation. Such an idea exists only when people allow it to exist or are ignorant of their rights.


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Dec 21, 2013 4:39 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Harold Austerman

Dec 21, 2013 4:41 PM
seems like a coterie of old families got togather and said hey! we can make a fortune here, lets put on robes, jewels, horse Carriages, strut around, and make like big shots, and Tax em, Kill'em if they don't obey!!! History in a Nutshell!


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Dec 21, 2013 4:41 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Derek Moran

Dec 21, 2013 4:46 PM
Scott Duncan *sigh* If you are in court RESERVE ALL RIGHTS. State that you wish the "charges" dismissed, and keep QUESTIONING!


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Dec 21, 2013 4:46 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Derek Moran

Dec 21, 2013 4:47 PM
Scott Duncan Ask for everyone's credentials. That one drives them nuts!


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Dec 21, 2013 4:47 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Derek Moran

Dec 21, 2013 7:41 PM
Scott Duncan There's no "Criminal LAW". It doesn't exist. Those are CODES of conduct. Criminal CODE.


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Dec 21, 2013 7:41 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Derek Moran

Dec 21, 2013 7:43 PM
Scott Duncan You don't LOOK like "Her Majesty", and since there is only ONE of you, so you CAN'T be "an organization."


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Dec 21, 2013 7:43 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Pete Daoust

Dec 21, 2013 8:15 PM
OK, but in that case, if the criminal code of Canada applies to HER MAJESTY and an ORGANIZATION only, well, Article 337 of that same code only can be use by HER MAJESTY and an ORGANIZATION against a public servant ? NO ? :/ 337. Every one who, being or having been employed in the service of Her Majesty in right of Canada or a province, or in the service of a municipality, and entrusted by virtue of that employment with the receipt, custody, manage- ment or control of anything, refuses or fails to deliver it to a person who is authorized to de- mand it and does demand it is guilty of an in- dictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding fourteen years.


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Dec 21, 2013 8:15 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Pete Daoust

Dec 21, 2013 8:24 PM
Does that make sense ^^^^, Derek Moran ? :/


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Dec 21, 2013 8:24 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Derek Moran

Dec 21, 2013 8:40 PM
Dean Clifford You are not licensed to interpret statutes.


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Dec 21, 2013 8:40 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Pete Daoust

Dec 21, 2013 8:45 PM
Well, in that case, how in the fuck can I be BOUND by something I can not interpret ? :/ So here is the person, which seems to be the thing bounded buy those statutes I have no RIGHTS to interpret, do your stuff, I'll sit there, let me know when you are finished, and cut me a fucking check when it's all over !!!! :/ WHAT ELSE CAN I DO ANYWAY ???? :D


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Dec 21, 2013 8:45 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Pete Daoust

Dec 21, 2013 8:46 PM
You are not licensed to interpret statutes..!!!!!!!!!!! My fucking jesus christ crying out loud !!!! :D HAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Dec 21, 2013 8:46 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Harold Austerman

Dec 21, 2013 8:47 PM


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Dec 21, 2013 8:47 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post:


Harold Austerman

Dec 21, 2013 8:48 PM
Debt slaves!!^^


Unique Facebook User ID:
Last Updated: Dec 21, 2013 8:48 PM
Type of Post:
Place of Post: