The Tender For Law

Volume 4

Dec 20, 2013 2:40 PM

Damon FlaxDubz Herrod

Hey guys, this is my first post on this page, none of you know me but I have read most of your information :) just got a quick question for anyone with a spare second. I've just received my first two letters from HM Revenue & Customs (UK tax office), the first thing I notice is that my name on both letters is in full capital letters, kind of made me laugh. The question is, do I return them to sender (no contract) or write them a letter in response asking for proof of why I am obliged to pay tax? (El Spaniardo style) Decisions decisions, this could be fun. Any info would be very much appreciated, thank you :)

Read Comments

Damon FlaxDubz Herrod

Is consideration one of these 4 points? They want me to pay them tax but what do they give me in return? Nothing. Does this make the contact invalid? Sorry I'm learning :) haha, thanks for your help man, will watch the video and do some reading

Damon FlaxDubz Herrod

Well to my knowledge they are trying to attach a debt to the legal PERSON (who I may happen to have in my pocket?), I am also aware that tax is statutory which is only a corporate regulation, not law, and as the administrator of the ''person in my pocket'' I do not wish to, nor do I have to enter into any form of contract with HMRC. I have the right and the power to decline any contract I am confronted with, and to be coerced into signing said contracts would make it an unlawful contract. I hope that I am on the right path haha

Pete Daoust

They are not trying, they are sending a debt to the person you happen to have in your pocket........so ask them to disclose to you, all methods available for you to administrate that debt, and tell them that you are the SOLE AUTHORIZED ADMINISTRATOR for the person you happen to have in your pocket.....

You have 2 choices,

1). BUY this debt and pay for it

2). Find where is the surety of that person, and discharge that debt via that surety.

Man O'man Man

Damon, I read your initial post carefully, thoroughly, repeatedly and quite literally. You have failed in communicating what the contents of the 2 letters from them contains. There is a rather large assumption being made between you "received 2 letters" and "have to pay." Perhaps sharing the wording would help.

Damon FlaxDubz Herrod

If i'm honest, I haven't even opened the letters, I am aware that I am very close to paying tax, as I have earned near enough the minimum amount required in my place of work before having to pay tax. I didn't open the letters as I thought it may be a good idea to just return them to sender without even bothering to read it, as the name on the letter is for the person in my pocket and as the sole authorized administrator I do not wish to contract with the corporation in any way, which includes reading their junk mail. But you're right, I am just jumping to conclusions, I suppose it's just a good time to get some information on the worst case scenario of me having to pay any forms of tax :) sorry if it was misleading in any way