The Tender For Law

Volume 4

Dec 14, 2013 11:09 PM

Pete Daoust

OK, I have a special request !! :D

If anyone could bring back Scott in here, that would be great....

I miss the guy !!! :(

Maybe it's a fucking French thing again......

Thanks Pierre.

Read Comments

Howard Posehn

5:50-mark: "Flaunting and exposing this regime is a duty and makes me feel proud and honestly, I apology for my low class of speech, but I fuck you all, the so-called do-gooders, both left or right wingers or from the center who are today licking the boots of our corrupted powers and who will be pleased to ridicule me. I fuck you all....." Memories. I miss Scott too, as well as Tara and Ceit.

Maddog Wonfeyeve

That plan has been imminent for at least a year now Chris Evan; and, IMO, was imminent in late 2008 when the market first faced the reality of an out of control fiat currency running unchained and rampant through the cities and towns of our society. Been "prepping" for the fallout ever since; as to remain in a city or town heavily populated by mentally oblivious zombies who cannot feed themselves without a grocery store, electricity, and a microwave, is a self imposed death sentence... just sayin, ;)

Maddog Wonfeyeve

I should have been more clear; as when I said "Society" I meant the one going on around those of us who are currently stuck here looking for a way out. As it was our misguided parents who consented on our behalf...

Robert Cormier

Derek Moran and Chris Evan...perhaps more than TWO...... The following is a list of (10) Domain Names On the web hosting Server with the IP Address of 208.88.197.38 and share this server with HUMANMACHINES.ORG. Click here for Additional Information on this Web Hosting Server. This Database item has been updated on Monday August 26 2013 4:08 PM CDD.COM CIRCUITMISTRESS.COM CITIZENSDOMAIN.NET CODIFIEDFEUDALISM.COM DOINEEDABLOWJOB.COM NIKNORT.COM ROGUESUPPORT.COM ROSALYND.COM THETENDERFORLAW.COM WEBTHISWEEK.COM

Pete Daoust

:P ....I keep my stuff :P

Sibername.com

Your Order has been received These are the details for your order from Sibername Internet and Software Technologies Inc. To contact us, please send an e-mail to sibername@sibername.com or call

Order ID: 228562 Order Date: Dec 19, 2013 2:52 PM

Order Details Code Description Price 233831 fucksthepuppy.com - Domain Name Registration 1 year 12.95 HST GST/HST 86659 9418 RT001 0.65

Total, CAD 13.60

Robert Cormier

Andrew Do you know if the following statement regarding Scott is valid? "He...has worked often with the Metro Toronto Police." I came across this statement while doing some research and thought WTF. It has my head spinning. :(

Daniel J Wentz

You don't have to. Enjoy the "peace" while it lasts.

Scott is currently studying OpenCV to make projectile weapons that don't miss. I saw the initial concept and ran a test with the equipment I have.

It works.

Even though it's meant to be rigidly affixed, I attached a servo to a paintball gun and simply waved it around in front of me, after selecting my target (My XO). He got splatted in the back of the head despite his quick reflexes.

If this were affixed to a shotgun he'd be dead.

They really should have left him alone, and kept their promises.

Scott is constructing some terrifying technology.

Government workers all have RFID tags on their access passes. Scott has built an Arduino RFID detonator. If an RFID in the detonator's payload comes within the "kill-zone" it goes off. It sends a beacon 3 meters and can read the cards that pass it within that range.

Let that sink in.

As is his way, he's going to have those who are deploying these weapons show the world how to build these things. That helps "pad the suspect list".

I guess they shouldn't have forced him out of his home at gunpoint. I understand that the sight of them throwing tara down sealed the deal.

I'm willing to bet all of his targets die withing 8 hours of his initial strike.

When Scott is loud and vocal, listen.

When Scott is quiet, run.

I speak from experience. I've seen it before. ;)

David Johansen

Scott is constructing some terrifying technology. When Scott is loud and vocal, listen.

When Scott is quiet, run.

well atleast THAT tells us Scott is simply to preoccupied to deal with wiping up the shitstains. that is atleast some positive information.

first i heard they were forced to vacate a property.

Daniel J Wentz

No MISTER Lawrence. You are not worthy of "Sir".

1: You were there for that year to witness and protect. You've none neither. You just leached off a lifelong friend of mine. You held open the door so police could violate Scott and Tara, and then respond with "Nuttin I could doo". You then threw fealty aside when told to muzzle a Nazi with an imaginary friend. You chose some stranger's "free speech" over the Admiral's request.

2: You boarded our FLAGSHIP at Scott's VETO of the objections of Tara and myself, as the little coward that tagged along with you was supposedly going to file criminal charges when comparing transcripts to the recordings made in court. The little coward ran away instead, making your "visit" nothing but offensive.

3: You and the "Martin Sutton" guy are part of WHY Scott and Tara left Facebook. Dean signing BAIL and lying about it was the last straw. You are all liars and cowards as far as I'm concerned.

I am not speaking for Scott and Tara, I am speaking from the current AQUILAE mandate.

You are a liar, mooch and a coward, but you are no friend of Scott & Tara. A stranger on the street has higher standing than you do, with them, and I know this for a fact.

If any the self-made mythology you are speaking of states that is in error, please feel free to correct the record. Until then you are no more worthy of being called "sir" than you are being called "Doctor".

Andrew D'Aragon

Where were you when all this was going down? Standing at the side of your lifelong friend? No of course not, you had more important things to do. Yes they opened their home for me, but I had a home and was asked to be there. The whole at my expense all my travel and other accommodations, they shared their food, and their spare bedroom, and I also helped out cleaning, did some repairs on the condo and driving them around, taking them on errands and the like. so don't preach to me you sanctimonious piece of shit.

I was only supposed to be there for a short while as Scott had offered to help with the development of a project I had. After a year and everything I did and tried to do for them you have no standing with your hearsay knowledge and belief that you take for fact. So shut your fucking trap.

I advise based on the facts presented to me, and my advice is freely given, under no obligation to be taken. But if one does not follow my advice and chooses their own path, my hands are clean, a real man takes responsibility for his decisions and actions in life and the consequences thereof, he doesn't seek help and council from others in order to put them in a position of blame. It would appear from what you are saying that Scott is this way, but I know better. if you could only see how much damage you are doing to Scott and the trusts reputation with your inane ramblings.

And what planet of the insane do you come from to even put forth the suggestion that any one man can stand to the assault of a full ETF squad in full body armor? WTF is your glitch? do you honestly believe anyone in the world reading this shit is swayed by that point? Am I supposed to cower in shame for not being superman?

Fuck off peanut gallery, you are nothing but a has been composer who through obtuse statements and commentary give the illusion of providing facts when in fact you are spouting shit and nothing of relevance.

Fuck you!

Scott Duncan

Oh my.

It seems there are some points to clarify here. DOCTOR WENTZ certainly expresses his position succinctly! First let me correct Andrew Lawrence, and then I shall correct Dan:

1: Composition is one of the MANY things DOCTOR Wentz does. You will never be qualified to do what Dan does, and he is in every measurable way BETTER than you. It is in fact YOU that are making "obtuse statements and commentary give the illusion of providing facts when in fact you are spouting shit and nothing of relevance."

DAN was executing his duties, as he has done without fault, for 3 decades.

Dan has in those 35 years, suffered and sacrificed more than you have a right to know, for me, and he continues to do so. (I suspect he's just numb)

2: None of the information is "second hand". He was watching that day. Cameras were running that day, remember?Once again, talking out of your ass.

3: The testimony he makes is accurate, regarding Tara and Dan having to be VETOED, as regards you being in our jurisdiction. I did this because Martin was supposedly going to peruse criminal charges, regarding the transcripts....and when he saw these forgeries he ran.

...and Tara loathes you. When you bragged about how much the cops "respected you", while some piece-of-shit cop attacked and abused her, you sealed your fate. (To quote Dan)

NOW YOU DARE PRESUME TO SPEAK ABOUT DAN? DIE YOU STUPID WORTHLESS WANNABE POSER "BIKER"!

WE'RE DONE WITH THE LOT OF YOU!

Any Questions?

Robert Cormier

**blinking furiously**

By way of TRUST, and my own DETERMINATIONS, I know the following to be true:

1. Scott Duncan is always right. 2. Scott is happy to share the fact that he has an exceptionally large penis and women who wish to view/get slapped in the face with said penis, get extra points, if they visit him in a �Naughty Schoolgirl� outfit. 3. The preverbal shit is about to hit the fan in a way that perhaps none of us can imagine. 4. Drones and an array of the neatest gadgets are being readied, and, or, are already standing by. 5. Ceit Butler makes the most amazing pancakes. 6. Tara Duncan is the coolest chick, and, she has arguably elevated this page into the realm of a compelling and fascinating novel, worthy of many accolades for generations to come. 7. If you want to �know� why, the answer just may be: �Fuck Off! That�s WHY!� 8. On Ghost/Baby/Zombie/Rapist day, some of us are certain to receive stupendous gift(s). 9. The �Second Coming of the Admiral� TM will take place in the not too distant future. (Please do not take offence Scott, I am aware that: enlisted men come, and officers �arrive�, but the phrase works so well in the context of this page.) 10. While ironically, he hates us all, a number of us have grown to love him for all that he has done for us!

Andrew D'Aragon

�Oh my.

It seems there are some points to clarify here. DOCTOR WENTZ certainly expresses his position succinctly! First let me correct Andrew Lawrence, and then I shall correct Dan:

1: Composition is one of the MANY thing DOCTOR Wentz does. You will never be qualified to do what Dan does, and he is in every measurable way BETTER than you. It is in fact YOU that are making "obtuse statements and commentary give the illusion of providing facts when in fact you are spouting shit and nothing of relevance."

DAN was executing his duties, as he has done without fault, for 3 decades.

Dan has in those 35 years, suffered and sacrificed more than you have a right to know, for me, and he continues to do so. (I suspect he's just numb)�

koodos and worship of your trustee. Ok, grading a fish on its ability to climb a tree, the fish will always fail.

�2: None of the information is "second hand". He was watching that day. Once again, talking out of your ass.� So sitting in the comfort of his home far from danger he saw the ETF in full body armor enter and still expected one man to do something against that? Is this your position also?

�3: The testimony he makes is accurate, regarding Tara and Dan having to be VETOED, as regards you being in our jurisdiction. I did this because Martin was supposedly going to peruse criminal charges, regarding the transcripts....and when he saw these forgeries he ran.

...and Tara loathes you. When you bragged about how much the cops "respected you", while some piece-of-shit cop attacked and abused her, you sealed your fate.�

Is it your claim that you did not have to explicitly invite me onto your boat before I would leave the dock? And that it was not Tara herself that asked why it was I was still standing out there? And Martin who replied �he is waiting for permission to come aboard?� Are you claiming this to be untrue?

�NOW YOU DARE PRESUME TO SPEAK ABOUT DAN? DIE YOU STUPID WORTHLESS WANNABE POSER "BIKER"!

WE'RE DONE WITH THE LOT OF YOU!

Any Questions?�

I am trying to find something of substance to respond to here but all you are doing is telling me how you feel. Am I responsible for your feelings? I must have missed the point!

Scott Duncan

I understand Dan has had huge success with my Alpha test weapons. I'll show everyone how to build them when they are in Beta.

I also understand that his XO is not too happy with how well it works, so that's a good sign.

Robert Cormier

Me too. :) :) The bastard! While we are all blinking, please, if you are so inclined, tell us the story of your identity theft. I raised a point earlier about a claim that you worked with the cops. I think the kiddies will sleep better hearing the story from you. Of course, I submit to your wishes in this and other regards. BTW Is there a guard of the battle bunny position? Winking at Norah :)

Scott Duncan

I also rigged GO NET so separate government agencies could swap information with Plausible Deniability, when I was in my mid 20's. I was paid well and I patted myself on the back for how clever I was. I didn't know, back then what it would be used for, and it is my ONLY life regret, and I will never forgive myself for what I did to everyone, because of it.

Robert Cormier

Trying to understand. So you identified Bernardo and they ignored it. I heard about sex/snuff tapes made for "judges" and their ilk and Bernardo being only a producer/service provider. Obviously, THAT STORY diapered real quick. I TRUST YOU to tell me the truth. :)

Gail Marie

Plausible Deniability The term most often refers to the capacity of senior officials in a formal or informal chain of command to deny knowledge of and/or responsibility for any damnable actions committed by the lower ranks because of a lack of evidence that can confirm their participation, even if they were personally involved or at least willfully ignorant of said actions. In the case that illegal or otherwise disreputable and unpopular activities become public, high-ranking officials may deny any awareness of such act in order to insulate themselves and shift blame on the agents who carried out the acts, confident that their doubters will be unable to prove otherwise.

Derek Moran

"Scott Duncan None of you are even qualified to understand what I've done to ALL of you. It's hubris to think you can grasp it. That's why it was so successful!"

..you turned all our computers into Bitcoin-miners, Scott?

Scott Duncan

In this case, Gail, there is no PERSON doing the crime (There is DEFINITELY an "Injured party". YOU). It's a process that allows you to "Tag" an account. Other "Ministries" will see the "Tag" and know they should look closer. That's all.

...and that's all they need.

August le Blanc

The only counter to the tag is to establish a trust, correct? That is why it is so important to kill our person in their eyes, To save our vessel with one soul on board. This is the only way out of that trap. No use of strangers titles given to us at berth. With a safer currency like the New Dodge coin, exchanged privately, A 100 billion cap?

Scott Duncan

Nobody believes that Tara is the "mean one" and I am the "nice one".

Why is that? It seems a little sexist to me.

Anyway, there is an incoming post from Tara which I'm sure will drive the whole "Scott's the nice one" thing home.

Ceit Butler

Ah the rhetoric of Andrew Fatone!

You seem to be under the misguided assumption that you have entered into a debate. You are not expected or invited to respond as your response would again be rehetoric.

The interesting thing about your ilk is that you rewrite history to suit your public persona. Your ad hominem attacks and profanity notwithstanding, you and I know who and what you really are. You know who you "claimed" to be, and the reality of what you ultimately have to offer.

You were given much more than you allege in this post, both financially, educationally and interpersonally.

The last time you visited, you were allowed onto the boat at the Admiral's request. You will not be allowed to return by the Captain's order.

Those few people who have been in our company have always been the recipients of anything and everything we have to offer. At times this has involved ridiculous opulence; at others a conversation and a cup of tea.

Scott's price for this consideration is your honesty, willingness to learn, and, perhaps, when called upon, a small favour. The favour is always trivial to you, but is everything to us. In this, as in your promise to set the record straight, you demonstrably failed.

There is nothing to debate here; nothing to refute. At the end of the day you and I know the truth. When you wake up tomorrow morning, your public bravado notwithstanding, you will still be only what you are.

(In case anyone is confused, this is not Ceit)

Gail Marie

Scott...I'm on the verge of creating a corp and its trust...some time ago there was some brief discussion about a receivers certificate, is this something I need to be aware of or request as part of the process?

Scott Duncan

The group has been around longer.

I was also "Licensed" by the Queen to do it. "Legally" I'm squeaky clean. All I CAN be is sorry.

No power can call me to account except the harshest one. The guy in the mirror.

August le Blanc

I have not walked in anyone else's shoes, I do know sorrow. So to me to be filled with sorrow for ones actions is a different thing then being sorry� I know I know� Shut up Boobies Or I'll ban you� I like boobies :-D

Derek Moran

Am i on the right track with this, Scott?

Holy shit- i just realized...the CROWN, has given us the "MONEY," in which to BUY-BACK our own ESTATE, with the "ESTATE-CONVEYANCE-DEED (Birth) Certificate" they gave us.....in essence, they've given us the ability, to be the UNDERWRITER for our OWN estate, and everything that goes along with it

Robert Cormier

I was thinking of being there with cameras whirring away on the 25th, when you "press start". I'll bring "champagne." and some food and work very hard in the galley with Ceit to get the meal "just right". The "documentary" is alive and well. It would be a shame to miss the big moment.

Robert Cormier

Deja vous with Pierre. lol Do you have a BELIEF? Tell us, and Scott, your beliefs Pierre. Since you have suggested you have some remaining. Please confess. PS...I'm 50 (did this due to a previous editorializing which I erased)

Scott Duncan

Ah. I see. We call this Derek Moran Syndrome.

We assumed by your writing that you were in your late 20's. That would be the time you stopped thinking, so you're stuck there.

If you don't grow up by 50, you don't have to. It's an ancient law I just made up :D

Robert Cormier

He asked my mother's sister to be interviewed because she was the 2nd smartest "person" to attend The University of Toronto in it's entire history. She was the kind of girl that would get 2x 100% and 1 99% and three 98%.

Daniel J Wentz

I also wish to point out that I have yet to hit my XO with this paintball gun. Stormtroopers in Star Wars have better aim.

I need to climb up to the camera and wipe it off. This whole "missing" thing is unacceptable.

Daniel J Wentz

Wait, I haven't spread any "second hand information" for a while!

BEGIN: Second-Hand Information -----------------------------------

Ah the rhetoric of Andrew Fatone!

You seem to be under the misguided assumption that you have entered into a debate. You are not expected or invited to respond as your response would again be rehetoric.

The interesting thing about your ilk is that you rewrite history to suit your public persona. Your ad hominem attacks and profanity notwithstanding, you and I know who and what you really are. You know who you "claimed" to be, and the reality of what you ultimately have to offer.

You were given much more than you allege in this post, both financially, educationally and interpersonally.

The last time you visited, you were allowed onto the boat at the Admiral's request. You will not be allowed to return by the Captain's order.

Those few people who have been in our company have always been the recipients of anything and everything we have to offer. At times this has involved ridiculous opulence; at others a conversation and a cup of tea.

Scott's price for this consideration is your honesty, willingness to learn, and, perhaps, when called upon, a small favour. The favour is always trivial to you, but is everything to us. In this, as in your promise to set the record straight, you demonstrably failed.

There is nothing to debate here; nothing to refute. At the end of the day you and I know the truth. When you wake up tomorrow morning, your public bravado notwithstanding, you will still be only what you are.

(In case anyone is confused, this is not Ceit)

END: Second-Hand Information -------------------------------------

Fatone :D

Daniel J Wentz

It's pretty obvious when you think about it :D

Lou Manotti totally had her back during the Dean Clifford Arrest. I could hear in the video, and concluded that it MUST be him, because everyone else sounded like a bunch of seagulls fighting over dead fish.

It may be a tad May/December but I think she's barking up the wrong tree. :D

You are "Fire" in your demeanor. He's "ICE". Ice may be more her speed.

T?lis B?auns

hmmm, let me check my memory banks http://www.e-laws.gov.on.ca/html/statutes/english/elaws_statutes_90w03_e.htm It's very convoluted language and it outlines how screwed we are by being a negotiable warehouse receipt.

Schedule II

Warehouse Receipts [defined as] are Receipts given by the owners of warehouses,-, etc.,acknowledging the possession of chattel property (SOB)

stored, or kept for the owners of suchchattel property. The ownership of the property may be changed on purchase , by theendorsement and delivery of the warehouse receipt. These receipts are used largely as collateral security . They are given to bankers

, and others along with their notes, as securityfor further advances of money...

Derek Moran

�bill of lading� includes all receipts for goods, wares and merchandise accompanied by an undertaking

(a) to move the goods, wares and merchandise from the place where they were received to some other place, by any means whatever, or

(b) to deliver to a place other than the place where the goods, wares and merchandise were received a like quantity of goods, wares and merchandise of the same or a similar grade or kind;

http://www.laws.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/B-1.01/page-169.html#h-80

Derek Moran

�warehouse receipt� includes

(a) any receipt given by any person for goods, wares and merchandise in the person�s actual, visible and continued possession as bailee thereof in good faith and not as the owner thereof,

(b) receipts given by any person who is the owner or keeper of a harbour, cove, pond, wharf, yard, warehouse, shed, storehouse or other place for the storage of goods, wares and merchandise, for goods, wares and merchandise delivered to the person as bailee, and actually in the place or in one or more of the places owned or kept by the person, whether or not that person is engaged in other business,

(c) receipts given by any person in charge of logs or timber in transit from timber limits or other lands to the place of destination of the logs or timber,

(d) Lake Shippers� Clearance Association receipts and transfer certificates, British Columbia Grain Shippers� Clearance Association receipts and transfer certificates, and all documents recognized by the Canada Grain Act as elevator receipts, and

(e) receipts given by any person for any hydrocarbons received by the person as bailee, whether the person�s obligation to restore requires delivery of the same hydrocarbons or may be satisfied by delivery of a like quantity of hydrocarbons of the same or a similar grade or kind.

http://www.laws.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/B-1.01/page-169.html#h-80

Derek Moran

�unperfected�, in relation to a security interest, means that the security interest has not been registered in a public register maintained under the law under which the security interest is created, or has not been perfected or published by any other means recognized by that law, where the registration or other means of perfection or publication would have made the security interest effective against third parties or would have determined priorities in rank in respect of rights in, on or in respect of the property that is subject to the security interest;

http://www.laws.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/B-1.01/page-169.html#h-80

Derek Moran

BAILEE: 1. a person to whom GOODS are ENTRUSTED for a specific purpose with NO INTENTION of TRANSFERRING the OWNERSHIP 2. a person who receives POSSESSION of a THING from another or CONSENTS to receive or HOLD possession of a THING for another, under an AGREEMENT with the OTHER person, that the person will keep and RETURN the thing or DELIVER the THING, OR that the person will ACT as DIRECTED with the SPECIFIC THING. The Dictionary of Canadian Law.

Derek Moran

SUBJECT: 1. Citizen = (Officer-on-land of a corporation, a COMMERCIAL TITLE under an ADMIRALTY) 2. the PERSON on whom a personal investigation is carried out OR is being carried out. 3. any matter, theme, incident or description, and includes a PERSON, OBJECT, PLACE, or EVENT. See NATURAL-BORN SUBJECT.

Derek Moran

just in case you disappear too, Lou...

Lou Manotti So you just figured out that if THEY take you into CUSTODY the PRESUMPTION is that YOU are a THING and/or PROPERTY of the CROWN. LOL!

Lou Manotti You are never jailed but rather WAREHOUSED. LOL!

Lou Manotti a THING can never be a MATE aboard THEIR SHIP, that is why THEY refer to you as an INMATE when you are warehoused aboard (the jail).

Lou Manotti THEY can only OFFER youthe PRIVILEDGE/BENEFIT of being recognized as being their PROPERTY/THING-so grow some balls and WAIVE it!!

Lou Manotti ANY court that fails to provide remedy due to a mistake is operating under FRAUD! therefore for and on the RECORD the ORDERS/ACTIONS/ENDORSEMENTS of the court are of NO FORCE/EFFECT.

Derek Moran

"If i have lead the court to BELIEVE in ANY way that i Seriously wanna just get hacked-up with a chainsaw as it's not like my brain will be LESS functional!- then that would be a MISTAKE, and i want the court to FORGIVE ME"

Derek Moran

CHOSE IN ACTION: 1. 'Chose In Action' is a known legal expression used to describe ALL PERSONAL RIGHTS OF PROPERTY which can ONLY be CLAIMED or ENFORCED by ACTION, and NOT by taking PHYSICAL possession. The term covers MULTIFARIOUS RIGHTS, many diverse in their ESSENTIAL nature, such as DEBTS :P, COMPANY SHARES, NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS, and RIGHTS OF ACTION founded on TORT or BREACH OF CONTRACT. 2. an INCORPOREAL RIGHT to something not in one's possession, and accordingly, it is not possible for the DEBTOR to have possession of it.

Derek Moran

It was a Tire Warehouse. MICHELIN, would send the Chester-truck (the CARRIER), with about a 1,000 RonCo- err, 'tires'...hand us a BILL OF LADING, and the MANIFEST i think it was once they got there, with all the CARGO they had on it with the exact number of UNITS, but, the CARRIER, would NOT get the BILL OF LADING back, until all of the CARGO/GOODS were "off-truck," and ACCOUNTED/DELIVERED for.....then we would SIGN the Bill of Lading, hand it back to the CARRIER (Chester), and he would hand it back to Michelin once he got back to their yard, and presumably then, THATS when they would get paid

Derek Moran

"Yeah....tell us how to use CREDIT to administrate these public debts sent to these INMATES "

NO COMMERCE EXPECTED AND/OR IMPLIED - CASH UP FRONT, PAY WITH YOUR CUNT, and im only fuckin' DISCHARGING DEBT by way of SET-OFF with the CREDIT im CLAIMING in regards to the BIRTH CERTIFICATE and/or SECURITY-of-the-PERSON/BENEFICIARY/CESTUI QUE TRUST related to ME that I have and/or any other way you guys JAMMED-ME-UP with this FUCKED-UP-SYSTEM you created for MY benefit and In Good Faith, OF COURSE!

Pete Daoust

What about a list of all lawyers in Ontario with their personal addresses ?

Oppsss....it must be past midnight :O

I have these funny ideas when it's past midnight :-\ ....that's why I always go to sleep at that time...

Derek Moran

GOOD QUESTION, Pierre. I suspect the SIGNED Bill of Lading, CONFIRMING that the GOODS/CARGO were in fact actually DELIVERED to our Tire Store, was PROOF (PROOF = SIGNATURE), that the CARRIER, had performed HIS obligation, barring any OBJECTIONS of course from us, thereby the CARRIER-driver RETURNING the Bill of Lading, to the SHIPPER/Michelin, would now constitute cause for Michelin to fulfill their OBLIGATION next which would be, to PAY THE CARRIER for performing HIS obligation

Derek Moran

While you were away Scott, Bobis mentioned that you had said to him at some point- "I gave you guys the answer right at the very beginning (paraphrasing)"

To which i replied- "Yeah, id bet it was this: NO COMMERCE EXPECTED AND/OR IMPLIED - CASH UP FRONT OR PAY WITH YOUR- well, you know the rest..."

Derek Moran

OH, okay- get this.....the CARRIER, before he backed-up to our loading-dock, always needed our warehouse-manager, to INSPECT the SEAL that was placed on the back-door of the truck, to verify that no one had tampered with the SEAL.....the purpose of having the untampered-SEAL witnessed, was what stopped any driver from potentially stopping-off at their buddies house on the way and dropping-off a few tires to him, before he ever got to us...it was like a ZIP-TIE, only made of thin-metal

Tom Davies

We get the odd trailer with a seal on it too....but not so often. Usually we inspect every skid of product before signing for it....a driver once wanted me to sign up front for a delivery. Sure enough....damaged product. Like my boss told me....never trust a truck driver...lol.

Derek Moran

All that talk about printing "NEW ORIGINAL" on a certified-copy of an ORDER from the court, but...you dont see the possible significance of doing that to your Long Form Statement of Live Birth Record cerified-copy?

Derek Moran

Holy shit- i just realized...the CROWN, has given us the "MONEY," in which to BUY-BACK our own ESTATE, with the "ESTATE-DEED (Birth) Certificate" they gave us.....in essence, they've given us the ability, to be the UNDERWRITER for our OWN estate, and everything that goes along with it

Derek Moran

ESTREAT: a copy or duplicate of some ORIGINAL WRITING or RECORD, especially of a fine or amercement IMPOSED BY A COURT, EXTRACTED from the RECORD, and CERTIFIED to one who is authorized and REQUIRED to COLLECT IT. also termed (in Scotts law) 'extract'. Black's 9th.

Derek Moran

Holy fuck- get this, it also says "ISSUED AT..." on the BC i have, right?

ISSUED: describes an originating process which a REGISTRAR dates, SIGNS, SEALS with the SEAL OF THE COURT, and to which a COURT FILE NUMBER is assigned.

Pete Daoust

R�gie de l' assurance maladie du Qu�bec , DARPA PO Box 6600 Quebec ( Quebec ) G1K 7T3

ALL RIGHTS RESERVED / NO PREJUDICES

Dear Mister / Madam .

I received your NOTICE OF RENEWAL for the Health Insurance Card .

I am the Sole Authorized Administrator for the person named PIERRE DAOUST having the registration number 119XXXXXXXXX . Insurance : DAOP XXXXXXXXX

According to the document that you sent to the person that I have, that is to say PIERRE DAOUST , it seems that the insured is the PERSON , so I would like to inform you that this person was created 16 days after my birth , that is to say XX Mar. 1966 .

I am born February X, 1966 , so I wonder if it is the birth date of the PERSON or mine that this document must show PUBLIC ?

I'm really sorry for the confusion that this may bring, but I want to ensure that there is no fraudulent information concerning these pieces of identities.

This discovery on my part is fairly recent , also I was educated to BE that person and not HAVE that person.

Today , after a thorough study, I know I 'm not that person, but I HAVE that person, only the FACT that this person was created 16 days after my birth, is undoubtedly proof irrevocable , how could I BE something that has been created 16 days following the day of my birth?

Anyway, I'm waiting for your answer about WHAT date of birth to used , mine or the person�s .

And , PLEASE , be ADVISED that the photo you need on this ID, will identify the face of the SOLE AUTHORIZED ADMINISTRATOR for PIERRE DAOUST , registration number of 119XXXXXXXXXX , and nothing else .

Yours sincerely

With Respect , Honor , Dignity and Integrity

BY: ________________________________________ Sole Authorized Administrator for PIERRE DAOUST Registration Number 119XXXXXXXXXX .

Pete Daoust

Now, the only thing that happened so far with this CREATION of mine is, they tried to call "ME", on my wife's cell... :-o

I have no idea where they've got that number from, and I suspect that they do not like the fact that I record ALL CALLS.....but I may paranoid again on this... :(

Anyway, they told my wife that they will send me something in writing :)