The Tender For Law

Volume 4

Dec 13, 2013 11:05 AM

David Johansen

the proper question: seems a man was stopped at a fork in the road where there were two others. the man not knowing which way to go to get somewhere was told he could only ask ONE question. one of the 2 ALLWAYS lied, while the other ALLWAYS told the truth. Well sinse the man needed to go to see the king, he couldn't ask which one told what. (if you know the olsd story please elaborate) What was the question he had to ask?

ok, so 2 roads and 2 parties, is 4 answers, only one is correct. So the man asked one of the parties, what way would the OTHER say to go? (the correct question). the answer from either is ALLWAYS going to be the wrong way.

this is part of the think wrong series. discuss;

Read Comments

Phillip Prater

It is about asking the right questions but thinking wrong is the problem for me. I find it hard to shift gears to trap them into the answer I am looking for. I would normally expect to just ask and get a straight answer but for these persons it seems to always be cat and mouse.

Chris Evan

What is your opinion on this.....I am sending a "Notice of Default and Notice of Lien". I asked "by what authority do you have a POA to use the NAME that I am the Sole Authorized Administrator of", of course, to no response. So, I am filing a UCC-1 from the corp that lawfully claimed rights to the NAME.

Chris Evan

BILL them? I see it as someone opened an account using the NAME that a CORPORATION (now) is the Sole Authorized Administrator of....at the time that the account was opened, the CORP was not. Since no one will tell me HOW they got the authority to open it, this CORP wants to lien "all proceeds that come from that account", I haven't filed this yet

Phillip Prater

If you BILL them you can charge whatever that fee is if they continue to use it. I think I would give a courtesy notice to remind them(using the name DBA NAME) and if it is not withdrawn by 3 days you may be obliged to hold them personally and publicly responsible. This way you open it up kill their person as well. I may be wrong but this is what comes to my mind.

David Johansen

yah, i just sort of showed up, had to go grocer , staples, and tobacco shop. i hated going out but had to see the cardiologist. he said the heart looks perfect... i didnt have the heart to tell him i love BACON!

Phillip Prater

clarification?? ok, what do you need clarification to... the man at the crossroads asks what will the other say because if the correct answer is A the truther will say A the liar will say b but if you ask what the OTHER one will say, if he asks the liar he will say the truther will say b because he lies and if he asks the truther he will say b because the liar will not tell the truth and not say A.

David Johansen

i'm catchin up, at "nees" . i see what Fb code translates is 0174 �. 0169 �. thats ASCII code. it was/is part of pre windows (a grafic user interface, but also after writing machine language code which is only numerical. everything you see and/or do on a computer is translated from a numerical code either interacted as hexidecimal, decimal, binary, all things numbers translates interchangeably with any other number system language, but hard drives can only store data in binary (base 2) code in clusters bits/byte's (8 bits) etc, but RAM memory where a conputer does all its work is in hexidecimal (16) base 16.

binary, base 2 is 0 or 1, like a light switch its either on or off. hexidecimal is 0123456789ABCDEF, A=10, F=15 and if you want 22 you write that as F7. binary is simple and dumb, hex writes huge numbers in small spaces.

David Johansen

tell them thats fine if they like but as your only the beneficiary by constructive lien, anything they manage to get out of the legal person is rightfully yours. ! and you can go hang with pierre and wait for the check... LOL

David Johansen

speaking of lieen the 'vessel', David Johnson pointed this out. a mindblower when you apply shipping vessel to person vessel, a trich they hoped we wouldnt ever catch (pre 1933) United States v. Rodgers, supra, that the United States may define and punish offenses committed by its own citizens on its own vessels while within foreign waters where the local sovereign has not asserted its jurisdiction.

that sovereign in our case would be the state, and seeing as the state flag s presented subordinate in (district) courtrooms and for some reason they dont SPEAK UP!

David Johansen

@phillip, yes. if you ask the proper question you know whatever the answer is its wrong. its like multiplication, a negative times either (positive or negative) is a negative. so the other way is allways what your looking for. now apply that to court & justice

Chris Evan

I know what you are getting at, but it used to be that the State had a duty to protect our rights in return for us to protect the state...former definition of citizenship...hence making us an equal to the State. And that is what I am speaking of!

Chris Evan

My pleasure....I know what you are getting at, but it used to be that the State had a duty to protect our rights in return for us to protect the state...former definition of citizenship...hence making us an equal to the State. And that is what I am speaking of!

Operative statement "used to be". :-P