OK!.. I'll start the ball rolling...I would tell the court that if they wish to force me to identify as the LEGAL NAME and preform as such,I conditionally accept their offer on The courts acceptance of my charge of a fee of $50,000.00 as per my fee schedule for any violation of my rights and a further $10,000.00 per hour performance fee with a minimum billing of 3 hours,with complete immunity from prosecution of all statutes and acts! BAMMM! They owe me $80,000.00 right at the get go!

:D

force me to identify as the LEGAL NAME: Why would they do that ?? for any violation of my rights: What rights has been violated ??

Why not SIMPLY ask them, and keep it on ASKING them.......WHY ARE YOU IGNORING THE DOCUMENTS I HAVE FILED IN THIS COURT You giving me ALL THE GOOD REASONS TO BELIEVE that I am in a ILLEGAL place right now mister....WHY IGNORING MY DOCUMENTS...??? WHY WHY WHY WHY WHY ?????????????

The court can only deal with the LEGAL NAME in their jurisdiction,It's all they can see or hear! Corporations can only interact with other corporations and this is forced compliance under threats of arrest,charges and incarceration! So for this temporary violation of my right to contract or not to contract they get stuck with my bill!

I have reserved ALL RIGHTS, you CAN'T ignore my document MISTER.....WHY ARE YOU DOING IT ??? WHY ARE YOU IGNORING THE DOCUMENTS I HAVE FILED IN THIS COURT I am NOT that person, I had that person before you took it.......SO WHY ARE YOU IGNORING THE DOCUMENTS I HAVE FILED IN THIS COURT I RESERVE ALL RIGHTS... :D

The arresting officer got one of these when he grabbed me!

*sigh* :(

I will keep asking them to answer my questions provided to the court file till they drag me out kicking and screaming!

And what will be those question ? by priority please :)

"I can not understand the nature and cause of these proceedings unless and untill the questions of my NOTICE OF MISTAKE have been answered!

And what will be those questions ? :(

http://freemanireland.ning.com/forum/topics/notice-of-mistake

My first Question is to the Crown as to what evidence they have to establish jurisdiction and authority!

Ok, so the heck Notice of Mistake ? :D

Who is the one with Surety in this matter...there has been a fuckin mistake cuz it seems like you all think it's me and it aint SORRY!

Will you ask for forgiveness ?? .....about the fact that YOU might have lead them to believe that YOU were surety in this matter....

I reserve all rights...everyone,s rights! and insist on having the court answer the questions of the NOM...If I have lead the court to believe...(we all know beliefe is evil!...that I am the one with surety then that would be a mistake and please forgive me!

and insist on having the court....I would WISH, instead of INSIST...

At this point the Crown will most likely try to interupt and i ask him if I gave him leave to speak? no...sit down and shut up till I'm finnished with this supernumerary!

LOL.....I wish you good luck buddy !!! :D

Notice of Mistake I WISH to have answers FORGIVE me if I have made a mistake regarding surety three key elements, there is nothing else to talk about in there..... If it goes OVER this, you need them to POINT where is the surety in that room, for a 150k security cost....

I wont loose my cool and stick to the plan!

If you TRESPASS that, you'll go deeper into the fuck up :D

I know!

Graet !! :)

I'll do my best to make you all proud!lol

And they will do everything to make you trespass :P

my eyes are wide open to that tactic and i can keep my cool and my wits about me!

It's the TRUTH, not a tactic :P

If you go in there trying tactic, it will end up in a tic tac toc game.....with one looser, YOU :D

The lawyer that the court said they were appointing has yet to contact me...I'll most likely be introduced to him the day of trial! thats gonna be fun!

If I would be you, I would read Notice of Mistake 3 times a day, at least, for it to become "me" ....

Tell him to fuck off.......do not let him talk, you have no business with him....

I can recite it by memory already Pete!

Recite :P

For it to become me.....not recite the fucking thing :P

For it to be planted in my FUCKING HEART :D :D

"Do you have any oaths or obligations to uphold the laws of the State of Massachusetts or the United States under which these charges are being brought?" < thats what I say. :-) then they say "good, you are self representing" to which I reply with the definition of "representation" out of Blacks Law Dictionary and ask "Who is the 'another" I am standing in the place for?" They haven't liked this yet. :-)

I like that...I said..."I can not represent myself because I am myself.How can i represent what I already am?"

If you need to read the French version.....here it is :D AVIS DE FAUTE 1. PRENEZ AVIS QUE : Dans l�affaire d�une S�RET� pour le NOM L�GAL, je suis d�avis qu�il y a eu une FAUTE, car l�UNIQUE B�N�FICIAIRE D�UN DOCUMENT PUBLIC a �t� ERRON�MENT D�SIGN� � pr�venu � et/ou � suspect �. 2. PARDONNEZ-MOI : Si DES PERSONNES ET/OU DES AMIS DE LA COUR ET/OU TOUTE AUTRE PERSONNE AGISSANT DANS MON INT�R�T ET/OU MOI M�ME avons port� UN TRIBUNAL et/ou UN ORGANISME CR�� PAR UNE LOI et/ou UN SERVICE D��TAT et/ou DES MANDATAIRES et/ou DES REPR�SENTANTS de ces organismes � croire, en r�pondant � � Vous � et/ou � � JOHN DOE � et/ou � TOUT AUTRE TERME par lequel ces organismes M�ONT APPEL�, que je suis la PERSONNE D�TENANT LA S�RET� dans la pr�sente affaire, c�est une FAUTE que je vous demande de me pardonner. 3. Si DES PERSONNES ET/OU DES AMIS DE LA COUR ET/OU TOUTE AUTRE PERSONNE AGISSANT DANS MON INT�R�T ET/OU MOI M�ME avons port� UN TRIBUNAL et/ou UN ORGANISME CR�� PAR UNE LOI et/ou UN SERVICE D��TAT et/ou DES MANDATAIRES et/ou DES REPR�SENTANTS de ces organismes � croire, en r�pondant � � Vous � et/ou � � JOHN DOE � et/ou � TOUT AUTRE TERME par lequel ces organismes M�ONT APPEL�, que je suis, en QUELQUE QUALIT� QUE CE SOIT, personnellement partie � la pr�sente affaire et/ou UNE PERSONNE MORALE dans la pr�sente affaire, c�est une FAUTE, car JE NE CONSENS PAS AU B�N�FICE de ces titres et J�Y RENONCE (renonciation de la LOI SUR LE CHANGEMENT DE NOM (QUEBEC)). Veuillez me pardonner. 4. PAR CONS�QUENT : Comme je ne sais pas qui sont � Vous � et/ou � JOHN DOE � et/ou TOUT AUTRE TERME par lequel UN TRIBUNAL et/ou UN ORGANISME CR�� PAR UNE LOI et/ou UN SERVICE D��TAT et/ou DES MANDATAIRES et/ou DES REPR�SENTANTS de ces organismes [CI APR�S, � VOUS �] M�ONT APPEL�, JE DEMANDE RESPECTUEUSEMENT par QUELLE AUTORIT� � VOUS � ME D�SIGNEZ ainsi? 5. �tant donn� que le CAUTIONNEMENT (CERTIFICAT DE NAISSANCE) a �t� d�pos� aupr�s du TRIBUNAL,DE QUELLE PREUVE le TRIBUNAL dispose t il pour affirmer que, en tant qu�HOMME n�ayant pas droit au B�N�FICE d�un CERTIFICAT DE NAISSANCE , je d�tiens une S�RET� dans la pr�sente affaire? 6. �tant donn� que le GOUVERNEMENT est le SEUL SIGNATAIRE du CAUTIONNEMENT (CERTIFICAT DE NAISSANCE) et le SEUL B�N�FICIAIRE DE LA SURET� en tant que FIDUCIAIRE du NOM L�GAL, DE QUELLE PREUVE DISPOSEZ VOUS pour affirmer que je suis un FIDUCIAIRE du NOM L�GAL? DE QUELLE PREUVE DISPOSEZ VOUS pour affirmer que je suis FIDUCIAIRE et que je suis b�n�ficiaire de TOUTE S�RET� relativement � QUELQUE NOM QUE CE SOIT? 7. DE QUELLE PREUVE DISPOSEZ VOUS pour affirmer que je suis un REPR�SENTANT, un MANDATAIRE, un FIDUCIAIRE et/ou un EMPLOY� de l��TAT? DE QUELLE PREUVE DISPOSEZ VOUS pour affirmer qu�il existe un MANDAT consenti par le mandant? 8. DE QUELLE PREUVE DISPOSEZ VOUS pour affirmer qu�il y a eu accord des volont�s, qu�un AVIS EN BONNE ET DUE FORME a �t� donn�, qu�une CONTREPARTIE consid�rable a �t� offerte ou que j�ai L�INTENTION de CONVENIR de quoi que ce soit dans la pr�sente affaire? Je vous retourne votre OFFRE, que je REFUSE, pour D�CHARGE imm�diate et FERMETURE du dossier. [AUTORIS� PAR :

Chris Evan, what they like or don't like is really irrelevant.....FOCUS on what you have to do......do not TRESPASS :D

Pete, its not easy, but I am doing my best. these are professional psychopaths!

It may makes you "feel good" when you figure out you've said something they don't like.......but not for long :D

You just have to STICK to it.....simple stuff, not easy but simple....

What is REPRESENT? To exhibit; to expose before the eyes. To represent a thing is to produce it publicly. Dig. 10, 4, 2, 3. To represent a person is to stand in his place ; to supply his place; to act as his sub- stitute. Plummer v. Brown, 04 Cal. 429, 1 Pac. 703; Solon v. Williamsburgh Sav. Bank, 35 Dun (N. Y.) 7. Law Dictionary: http://thelawdictionary.org/represent/#ixzz2mTOOMcf8

I think Blacks 9th says "to stand in the place of another", but thats from memory...

So, what to do ??? :D

Funny you ask....I am drafting a Notice on this subject! Well...its on my list of shit to do anyway. :-)

So in conclusion concerning the Notice of Mistake...File the paperwork! Stand behind it! Know it! live it!...and let the PAPER WORK!

ask them if they recognize one standing their ground? declaration of right to question the accusor (the court), are we not in the court? then are we not now able to remedy this confusion? is the court confused whether or not it has a validly standing complaint? because if IT doesnt know then it cant prove or bring forth evidence it should possess here and now. (sombody else might be able to shorten that into a question they cant interrupt). that questioning also embarasses the court infront of the public, it calls them out for committing a fraud. somthing a lawyer can not do, but we can.

Learning to simply stand/hold your claim "in honor" amidst much confusion, intimidation and trickery is the hardest part of the game as we often are our own worst enemies (govern yourself or be governed) but it is also the most exciting part of the game. The part were you really if your humble enough to learn from your mistakes - get to know yourself, your weakness and flaws. Those are the buttons that THEY consciously press. It is a process of maturity and a very rewarding at that, when you consider the cost against value ratio:-)

So once you've chosen your method and done your paperwork BE ready for some serious theater in which you will have the star role...and with any great actor, discipline in your craft is key.

Pete, and Blake, are sure right on point on this. Just like the Admiral ALWAYS said: "It's all about surety, and accounting." Do not let them proceed, if the questions before the court are not answered. Fuck them! They have ALL kinds of magic tricks to try to make US VOLUNTARILY accept their bullshit FRAUD. Nobody puts a gun to our heads (yet) and force us to say/do anything. It's us, via intimidation, about bullshit that only exists in our heads and not in REALITY, part of the program, "guilt", "fear" (man made shit that is not REAL)... BULLSHIT! We know we have the PROOF about who the surety is, and how/what settles the accounting! And that's ALL we have to be concerned about. If they kidnap us? Hell, I'll sure act like a kidnapped victim, and say it out loud for the record, and out side of that bank... I mean... "court". The only question I want to hear/answer from those pieces of shit is: "How do you wish to proceed?" Let's remember it's OUR lives we are talking about. And these pieces of shit, using programming, have stripped-off our BALLS, and tamed our instincts of SURVIVAL. We are trained to "feel bad" to talk for ourselves, be "afraid" to "defend" our lives, be "scared" to use "violence", or to even kill if we have something like... a stranger in a costume pointing a gun at our heads, in private property, no crime has been committed, and he is DYING to kill us for no reason. Oh, no wait... maybe we should act "peacefully, and "honorably", while getting KILLED! Ceit Butler shared a step-by-step procedure on how she dealt with a criminal matter. It's rock solid. https://www.facebook.com/groups/tenderforlaw/595084573860812/ And if you want to have some fun, Pete suggested somewhere something that makes complete sense. Before anything is agreed upon, and with much advance via telegram and/or registered mail, qualify our capacities, ask a TON of questions that need to be answered prior doing business, and give terms and conditions if they want to play. Call the fraud up front. Let them know we know what is happening. Why? Because FUCK OFF, that's why! We are the only party with standing. They are not a person, they are not a party. The "judge" is an unauthorized administrator, and we have a SECURED INTEREST on the matter. Now, the Admiral explained how to better navigate these muddy waters. When we create something, we control it, and we are in a MUCH BETTER position to attend any matters of commerce in the public, or in the private. We must take from THEM the ability to take OUR VALUE, and we must start using it for ourselves. That implies a whole new level of administration, I presume. :D

The magic words, or so I've been told: Point of order. There are questions before the court that MUST be answered before this matter can proceed. (The questions in the NoM). If these questions remain unanswered, I cannot understand the nature and cause of these proceedings.

whilst understanding, claim lack of understanding and refuse to be told anything except the answers to the questions presented which they technically can not answer.

Another classification of matters which will discharge a surety is as follows:** (1)Misrepresentation or concealment to induce his becoming surety.The contract is voidable from the beginning as between the surety and all parties privy to such misrepresentation or concealment; if a principal signed under duress, the holder guilty of the duress could not enforce the obligation against a surety.*

All rise, the supernumerary is in the court, first matter if business is Her Majesty vs. DAVID VILACA, I stand up in the gallery walk to the bar not crossing and without a word spoken, they ask if I am the person they seek and I respond with " I am the sole authorized administrator and and I will be speaking to the record, I reserve all rights in this court, I now convene a court of public record competant jurisdiction and accept both of your oaths of office, now before we begin there are some questions before the court that must be answered as I do not understand the nature and cause of these proceedings, the court clerk and prosecutor have had for some time my rebuttal (have in hand proof of service) to the fallacious belief that I am surety in this matter, for and on the record, if I, AND/OR PERSONS AND/OR FRIENDS OF THE COURT AND/OR SUCH OTHER PARTIES ACTING IN MY INTERESTS, have led A COURT and/or STATUTORY BODY and/or A GOVERNMENT SERVICE and/or AGENTS and/or OFFICERS of such bodies, to believe, by responding to �You�, and/or �DAVID VILACA�, and/or SUCH OTHER IDENTIFICATION, such bodies HAVE ADDRESSED ME AS, that I am the PARTY WITH SURETY in this matter, then that would be a MISTAKE, and please forgive me.

I will be interrupted at which point i call upon a point of order, cross the bar and state for the record I do so under duress, head straight for the clerk and serve proof of service INTO the RECORD and continue on point. State clearly I have the right to speak to the public record and I would like to continue without asserting my voice over everyone else's.

whom ever interupts your right to speak to the record ask them on who's behalf they are speaking and whether they are surety on the claims before the court.

If you have correctly established that you have reserved ALL rights..."POINT OF ORDER! DID I GIVE YOU LEAVE TO SPEAK?"

David V. gets it. give him a bronz star! david, have you been hiding in the woodwork? this is the first I have seen you post anything.