August le Blanc
So the free dumb thing is a trap... Claiming something created by them in their courts leads to them claiming what is theirs, the Name created at the time of the charge and the person it is derived from to which surety is attached, the rope guys were acting for the accountants. Through consent after a conviction. So by inference there was consent previously given in some way, shape or form for them to have the authority to grab him stemming from charges that surety was attached by consent? So someone is lying and it is not the rope cops, cause they are doing a duty as set out in a contract. Stayed charges were converted and guilt was established in absentia? Or upon release he was given certain conditions ( parole)... but this rope thing is based on a conviction? Convicted of what? Serving time for what? What are the specific lies? ah... it is none of my business, so the lesson.... Buyer beware after all.